• Search Search Please fill out this field.
  • Life Insurance
  • Definitions

What Is a Collateral Assignment of Life Insurance?

assignment in insurance example

Charlene Rhinehart is a CPA , CFE, chair of an Illinois CPA Society committee, and has a degree in accounting and finance from DePaul University.

assignment in insurance example

A collateral assignment of life insurance is a conditional assignment appointing a lender as an assignee of a policy. Essentially, the lender has a claim to some or all of the death benefit until the loan is repaid. The death benefit is used as collateral for a loan.

The advantage to using a collateral assignee over naming the lender as a beneficiary is that you can specify that the lender is only entitled to a certain amount, namely the amount of the outstanding loan. That would allow your beneficiaries still be entitled to any remaining death benefit.

Lenders commonly require that life insurance serve as collateral for a business loan to guarantee repayment if the borrower dies or defaults. They may even require you to get a life insurance policy to be approved for a business loan.

Key Takeaways

  • The borrower of a business loan using life insurance as collateral must be the policy owner, who may or may not be the insured.
  • The collateral assignment helps you avoid naming a lender as a beneficiary.
  • The collateral assignment may be against all or part of the policy's value.
  • If any amount of the death benefit remains after the lender is paid, it is distributed to beneficiaries.
  • Once the loan is fully repaid, the life insurance policy is no longer used as collateral.

How a Collateral Assignment of Life Insurance Works

Collateral assignments make sure the lender gets paid only what they are due. The borrower must be the owner of the policy, but they do not have to be the insured person. And the policy must remain current for the life of the loan, with the policy owner continuing to pay all premiums . You can use either term or whole life insurance policy as collateral, but the death benefit must meet the lender's terms.

A permanent life insurance policy with a cash value allows the lender access to the cash value to use as loan payment if the borrower defaults. Many lenders don't accept term life insurance policies as collateral because they do not accumulate cash value.

Alternately, the policy owner's access to the cash value is restricted to protect the collateral. If the loan is repaid before the borrower's death, the assignment is removed, and the lender is no longer the beneficiary of the death benefit.

Insurance companies must be notified of the collateral assignment of a policy. However, other than their obligation to meet the terms of the contract, they are not involved in the agreement.

Example of Collateral Assignment of Life Insurance

For example, say you have a business plan for a floral shop and need a $50,000 loan to get started. When you apply for the loan, the bank says you must have collateral in the form of a life insurance policy to back it up. You have a whole life insurance policy with a cash value of $65,000 and a death benefit of $300,000, which the bank accepts as collateral.

So, you then designate the bank as the policy's assignee until you repay the $50,000 loan. That way, the bank can ensure it will be repaid the funds it lent you, even if you died. In this case, because the cash value and death benefit is more than what you owe the lender, your beneficiaries would still inherit money.

Alternatives to Collateral Assignment of Life Insurance

Using a collateral assignment to secure a business loan can help you access the funds you need to start or grow your business. However, you would be at risk of losing your life insurance policy if you defaulted on the loan, meaning your beneficiaries may not receive the money you'd planned for them to inherit.

Consult with a financial advisor to discuss whether a collateral assignment or one of these alternatives may be most appropriate for your financial situation.

Life insurance loan (policy loan) : If you already have a life insurance policy with a cash value, you can likely borrow against it. Policy loans are not taxed and have less stringent requirements such as no credit or income checks. However, this option would not work if you do not already have a permanent life insurance policy because the cash value component takes time to build.

Surrendering your policy : You can also surrender your policy to access any cash value you've built up. However, your beneficiaries would no longer receive a death benefit.

Other loan types : Finally, you can apply for other loans, such as a personal loan, that do not require life insurance as collateral. You could use loans that rely on other types of collateral, such as a home equity loan that uses your home equity.

What Are the Benefits of Collateral Assignment of Life Insurance?

A collateral assignment of a life insurance policy may be required if you need a business loan. Lenders typically require life insurance as collateral for business loans because they guarantee repayment if the borrower dies. A policy with cash value can guarantee repayment if the borrower defaults.

What Kind of Life Insurance Can Be Used for Collateral?

You can typically use any type of life insurance policy as collateral for a business loan, depending on the lender's requirements. A permanent life insurance policy with a cash value allows the lender a source of funds to use if the borrower defaults. Some lenders may not accept term life insurance policies, which have no cash value. The lender will typically require the death benefit be a certain amount, depending on your loan size.

Is Collateral Assignment of Life Insurance Irrevocable?

A collateral assignment of life insurance is irrevocable. So, the policyholder may not use the cash value of a life insurance policy dedicated toward collateral for a loan until that loan has been repaid.

What is the Difference Between an Assignment and a Collateral Assignment?

With an absolute assignment , the entire ownership of the policy would be transferred to the assignee, or the lender. Then, the lender would be entitled to the full death benefit. With a collateral assignment, the lender is only entitled to the balance of the outstanding loan.

The Bottom Line

If you are applying for life insurance to secure your own business loan, remember you do not need to make the lender the beneficiary. Instead you can use a collateral assignment. Consult a financial advisor or insurance broker who can walk you through the process and explain its pros and cons as they apply to your situation.

Progressive. " Collateral Assignment of Life Insurance ."

Fidelity Life. " What Is a Collateral Assignment of a Life Insurance Policy? "

Kansas Legislative Research Department. " Collateral Assignment of Life Insurance Proceeds ."

assignment in insurance example

  • Terms of Service
  • Editorial Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Your Privacy Choices

Assignment in Insurance Policy | Meaning | Explanation | Types

Table of Contents

  • 1 What is Assignment in an Insurance Policy?
  • 2 Who can make an assignment?
  • 3 What happens to the ownership of the policy upon Assignment?
  • 4 Can assignment be changed or cancelled?
  • 5 What happens if the assignment dies?
  • 6 What is the procedure to make an assignment?
  • 7 Is it necessary to Inform the insurer about assignment?
  • 8 Can a policy be assigned to a minor person?
  • 9 Who pays premium when a policy is assigned?
  • 10.1 1. Conditional Assignment
  • 10.2 2. Absolute Assignment

What is Assignment in an Insurance Policy?

Assignment means a complete transfer of the ownership of the policy to some other person. Usually assignment is done for the purpose of raising a loan from a bank or a financial institution .

Assignment in Insurance Policy - Meaning, Explanation, Types

Assignment is governed by Section 38 of the Insurance Act 1938 in India. Assignment can also be done in favour of a close relative when the policyholder wishes to give a gift to that relative. Such an assignment is done for “natural love and affection”. An example, a policyholder may assign his policy to his sister who is handicapped.

Who can make an assignment?

A policyholder who has policy on his own life can assign the policy to another person. However, a person to whom a policy has been assigned can reassign the policy to the policyholder or assign it to any other person. A nominee cannot make an assignment of the policy. Similarly, an assignee cannot make a nomination on the policy which is assigned to him.

What happens to the ownership of the policy upon Assignment?

When a policyholder assign a policy, he loses all control on the policy. It is no longer his property. It is now the assignee’s property whether the policyholder is alive or dead, the assignee alone will get the policy money from the insurance company.

If the assignee dies, then his (assignee’s) legal heirs will be entitled to the policy money.

Can assignment be changed or cancelled?

An assignment cannot be changed or cancelled. The assignee can of course, reassign the policy to the policyholder who assigned it to him. He can also assign the policy to any other person because it is now his property. We can think of a bank reassigning the policy to the policyholder when their loan is repaid.

What happens if the assignment dies?

If the assignee dies, the assignment does not get cancelled. The legal heirs of the assignee become entitled to the policy money. Assignment is a legal transfer of all the interests the policyholder has in the policy to the assignee.

What is the procedure to make an assignment?

Assignment can be made only after issue of the policy bond. The policyholder can either write out the wording on the policy bond (endorsement) or write it on a separate paper and get it stamped. (Stamp value is the same, as the stamp required for the policy — Twenty paise per one thousand sum assured). When assignment is made by an endorsement on the policy bond, there is no need for stamp because the policy is already stamped.

Is it necessary to Inform the insurer about assignment?

Yes, it is necessary to give information about assignment to the insurance company. The insurer will register the assignment in its records and from then on recognize the assignee as the owner of the policy. If someone has made more than one assignment, then the date of the notice will decide which assignment has priority. In the case of reassignment also, notice is necessary.

Can a policy be assigned to a minor person?

Assignment can be made in favour of a minor person. But it would be advisable to appoint a guardian to receive the policy money if it becomes due during the minority of the assignee.

Who pays premium when a policy is assigned?

When a policy is assigned normally, the assignee should pay the premium, because the policy is now his property. In practice, however, premium is paid by the assignor (policyholder) himself. When a bank gives a loan and takes the assignment of a policy a security, it will ask the assignor himself to pay the premium and keep it in force. In the case of an assignment as a gift, the assignor would like to pay the premium because he has gifted the policy.

Types of assignment

Assignment may take two forms:

  • Conditional Assignment.
  • Absolute Assignment.

1. Conditional Assignment

It would be useful where the policyholder desires the benefit of the policy to go to a near relative in the event of his earlier death. It is usually effected for consideration of natural love and affection. It generally provides for the right to revert the policyholder in the event of the assignee predeceasing the policyholder or the policyholder surviving to the date of maturity.

2. Absolute Assignment

This assignment is generally made for valuable consideration. It has the effect of passing the title in the policy absolutely to the assignee and the policyholder in no way retains any interest in the policy. The absolute assignee can deal with the policy in any manner he likes and may assign or transfer his interest to another person.

Related Posts

Marine Insurance

  • Privacy Policy
  • Life Insurance
  • Assignment Vs Nomination In Life Insurance Know The Difference
  • Understanding Nomination and its Types
  • Understanding Assignment and its Types
  • Key Differences Between Nomination and Assignment

Assignment vs Nomination in Life Insurance

Buy Policy in just 2 mins

Happy Customers

2 lakh + Happy Customers

Free Comparison

Free Comparison

Customized Term Insurance Plan for you.

Get upto 10% Online Discount*

Male icon

Select Your City

Popular Cities

Delhi Gurgaon Noida Bengaluru Chennai Ahmedabad Hyderabad Kolkata Mumbai

Select Your Annual Income Your life insurance cover limit will be calculated based on your income. You may be asked to provide income proof at the time of purchase.

15 Lacs+ P.A. 10-15 Lacs P.A. 7-10 Lacs P.A. 5-7 Lacs P.A. 3-5 Lacs P.A. Upto 3 Lacs P.A.

Enter Your Name

Mobile Number

By proceeding you are accepting our T&C and privacy policy

Confused? No Worries, We Are Here To Help!

Health offer, invest offer.

Why Choose PolicyX

Assignment vs Nomination in Life Insurance

In life insurance plans, Nomination and Assignment are the two important terms that are frequently used. Acknowledging these terms helps the policyholder to extract the benefits available under the life insurance policy without making a hole in his/her pocket.

Policyholders should know the exact difference between the two before making any decision to purchase the policy. It is required that individuals should read terms and conditions carefully so that one doesn't make any mistake and use the policy in the right way.

What is the Nomination?

The nomination is a right given to the policyholder that authorizes him/her to appoint a person (usually a close family member) to receive the benefits in the event of the death of the life assured. The person who is appointed by the policyholder to receive the benefit is called a Nominee. The nomination is governed under Section 39 of the Insurance Act, 1938.

Types of Nominees

Under the life insurance policy , the policyholder nominates a person who is entitled to receive the benefits in case something happens to the life assured. Some of the different types of nominees given below:

Beneficial Nominees

As per the law, any immediate family member (like spouse, children or parents) nominated by the policyholder is entitled to receive the monetary benefits and will be the beneficial owner of the claim benefits. It is important to note that only immediate family members can be termed as Beneficial Nominees.

Minor Nominees

Many individuals appoint their children as beneficiaries of their life insurance policies. Minor nominees (who are less than 18 years of age) are not considered eligible to handle claim amounts. For this, the policyholder needs to assign an appointee or custodian. The claim amount is paid to the appointee until the minor turns 18.

Non-family Nominees

These types of nominees can be distant relatives or even friends as the beneficiary of the life insurance policy.

Changing Nominees

Policyholders can change their nominees as many times as they want, but the latest nominee should supersede all previous ones.

Life Insurance Companies

Compare and buy the most suitable Life Insurance Plan from the below-mentioned IRDAI-approved Life Insurance companies.

  • Term Insurance

LIC Of India

Hdfc life insurance, icici prudential life insurance, sbi life insurance, max life insurance, tata aia life insurance, pnb metlife india insurance, bajaj allianz life insurance, aegon life insurance, kotak mahindra life insurance, canara hsbc life insurance, bharti axa life insurance, aviva life insurance, indiafirst life insurance, exide life insurance, edelweiss tokio life insurance, ageas federal life insurance, future generali life insurance, birla sun life insurance, reliance life insurance, pramerica life insurance limited, shri ram life insurance, sahara india life insurance.

Know More About Life Insurance Companies

LIC Term Insurance

Hdfc term insurance, icici term insurance, sbi life term insurance, max life term insurance, tata aia term insurance, pnb metlife term insurance, bajaj allianz term insurance, aegon life term insurance, kotak life term insurance, canara hsbc obc term insurance, bharti axa term insurance, aviva term insurance, indiafirst term insurance, exide life term insurance, edelweiss tokio term life insurance, ageas federal term insurance, future generali term insurance, birla sun life term insurance, reliance term insurance, pramerica term insurance.

Know More About Term Insurance Companies

Key Points to Know Regarding Nomination

  • The nomination is possible only when the policyholder and life assured are the same. In case, the policyholder and life assured are different, the claim benefits will be availed by the policyholder only.
  • The nominee cannot ask for changes/modifications to the policy.
  • There can be more than one nominee in the policy.
  • In the successive nomination, if the life assured appoints person A to be the first person to receive the claim benefits in case of assured's death and person A is no more, then the claim benefits will be passed to person B. However, if Nominee A and Nominee B have passed away, later Nominee C will be appointed to avail the benefits and so on.

What is Assignment?

Assignment of the policy refers to the transfer of rights, title, and policy ownership from the policyholder to another person or entity. The person involved in assigning/transferring the policy is called assignor, and the person/institution to which it is assigned is called the assignee. The assignment is regulated under Section 38 of the Insurance Act, 1938.

The assignment is categorized under two different types, i.e. Absolute Assignment and Conditional Assignment.

Absolute Assignment

Under the absolute assignment, all rights, title and interest are transferred by the assignor to an assignee without reversion to the assignor (in case of any event). It shifts the ownership of the insurance policy to other parties without any terms and conditions. This assignment is usually done for money consideration such as raising a loan, out of love or affection towards family members.

Conditional Assignment

It means that the transfer of rights will happen from the Assignor to the Assignee subject to certain terms and conditions. If the conditions are fulfilled, only then the policy will be transferred.

Key Points to know Regarding Assignment

  • Under the assignment, only the ownership is transferred/changed, not the risk of the policy. This means the life assured is/will be considered as the person insured.
  • The assignment may lead to cancellation of the nomination in the policy only when it is done in favour of the insurance company due to a policy loan.
  • The assignment applies to all the insurance plans except Pensions Plan and Married Women's Property Act (MWP).
  • The assignment is effected through an endorsement on the policy contract.

Difference Between Assignment and Nomination

Let's discuss how assignment differs from nomination.

Nomination and Assignment serve different purposes. The nomination protects the interests of the insured as well as an insurer in offering claim benefits under the life insurance policy. On the other hand, assignment protects the interests of an assignee in availing the monetary benefits under the policy. The policyholder should be aware of both of them before buying life insurance.

Life Insurance Articles

Top 5 Benefits of Life Insurance

Top 5 Benefits of Life Insurance Jan, 2024

GST On Life Insurance

GST On Life Insurance Aug, 2023

Importance of Life Insurance

Importance of Life Insurance Aug, 2023

Factors That Affect Life Insurance Premiums

Factors That Affect Life Insurance Premiums July, 2023

Life Insurance For Cancer Patients

Life Insurance For Cancer Patients July, 2023

Difference Between ULIP and Traditional Plans

Difference Between ULIP and Traditional Plans July, 2023

Grace Period In Life Insurance Policy

Grace Period In Life Insurance Policy July, 2023

Life Insurance With Maturity Benefits

Life Insurance With Maturity Benefits July, 2023

Difference Between Life Insurance and Health Insurance

Difference Between Life Insurance and Health July, 2023

Benefits of Life Insurance

Benefits of Life Insurance July, 2023

Advantages and Disadvantages Of Life Insurance

Advantages and Disadvantages Of Life July, 2023

Life Insurance Premium

Life Insurance Premium June, 2023

Cash Value Of Life Insurance

Cash Value Of Life Insurance June, 2023

Free Look Period in Life Insurance

Free Look Period in Life Insurance June, 2023

Ladli Laxmi Yojana Policy

Ladli Laxmi Yojana Policy May, 2023

Bima Sugam Life Insurance

Group Term Life Insurance March, 2023

Bima Sugam Life Insurance

Bima Sugam Life Insurance December, 2022

Whole Life Insurance Policy

Whole Life Insurance Policy September, 2022

Sabse Pehle Life Insurance

Sabse Pehle Life Insurance April, 2022

Life Insurance FAQs

Life Insurance FAQs September, 2021

Pandemic Challenges in Life Insurance

Pandemic Challenges in Life Insurance May, 2021

Term Life vs. Traditional Life Insurance- Which Is Better?

Term Life vs. Traditional Life Insurance- Which Is Better? January, 2021

How to Get Duplicate LIC Policy Bond?

How to Get Duplicate LIC Policy Bond? October, 2020

How To Check ICICI Prudential Life Insurance Policy Status?

How To Check ICICI Prudential Life Insurance Policy Status? May, 2020

What Are Late Payment Charges For LIC Premiums?

What Are Late Payment Charges For LIC Premiums? September, 2020

How To Check SBI Life Insurance Policy Status?

How To Check SBI Life Insurance Policy Status? April, 2020

Life Insurance Claim Process & Requirements

Life Insurance Claim Process & Requirements July, 2020

SBI Life Insurance Premium Payment

SBI Life Insurance Premium Payment April, 2020

Guaranteed Income Plan

Guaranteed Income Plan June, 2020

ICICI Prudential Life Insurance Login and Registration

ICICI Prudential Life Insurance Login and Registration April, 2020

ICICI Prudential Premium Payment

ICICI Prudential Premium Payment May, 2020

Revival of Lapsed LIC Policy - Steps to Revive It Online

Revival of Lapsed LIC Policy - Steps to Revive It Online December, 2019

See More Life Insurance Articles

Top 10 Indian Life Insurance Companies

Top 10 Indian Life Insurance Companies Jan, 2024

How To Download LIC Premium Receipt Online?

How To Download LIC Premium Receipt Online? December, 2019

Top 10 Pension Plans in India

Top 10 Pension Plans in India December, 2019

How To Check HDFC Life Policy Status?

How To Check HDFC Life Policy Status? November, 2019

Sukanya Samriddhi Yojana Vs LIC Kanyadan Policy

Sukanya Samriddhi Yojana Vs LIC Kanyadan Policy September, 2019

Best Single Premium Insurance Plans in India

Best Single Premium Insurance Plans in India December, 2019

How To Update HDFC Life Insurance Policy Online?

How To Update HDFC Life Insurance Policy Online? November, 2019

Max Life Premium Payment

Max Life Premium Payment November, 2019

What our customers have to say.

Customer Review Image

Rohit Yadav

January 25, 2024

PolicyX.com is easy to use. Everything, from putting in my information to comparing quotes and finishing the application, was simple. It is a good place for anyone who wants term insurance.

Deepanshu Mishra

I got term insurance from PolicyX.com recently, and I am really happy with their service. The website is easy to use, and I found a plan that fits my needs perfectly. The customer support team ...

Priyanshu raghav

I wanted a term insurance plan that was not too expensive, and PolicyX.com gave me just that. The website let me compare quotes from different companies, so I found a plan that fits my budget.

Ranjan Pandey

I had questions about term insurance plans, and PolicyX.com gave me all the information I needed. They replied quickly and were ready to help, making me feel sure about choosing PolicyX.com for...

Getting term insurance from PolicyX.com was easy. The online application was simple, and I could easily compare different plans. The website gave clear information, and I got my policy without ...

Rohan Verma

October 5, 2023

PolicyX.com made the process of buying Edelweiss Tokio term life insurance hassle-free. Their expertise in insurance is commendable.

Rishi Sharma

I appreciate PolicyX.com for their dedication to helping customers find the right insurance. Edelweiss Tokio term life insurance was my choice.

Edelweiss Tokio term life insurance, facilitated by PolicyX.com, offers peace of mind. Their guidance helped me make a well-informed decision.

Naval Goel

Reviewed By: Naval Goel

Naval Goel is the CEO & founder of PolicyX.com. Naval has an expertise in the insurance sector and has professional experience of more than a decade in the Industry and has worked in companies like AIG, New York doing valuation of insurance subsidiaries. He is also an Associate Member of the Indian Institute of Insurance, Pune. He has been authorized by IRDAI to act as a Principal Officer of PolicyX.com Insurance Web Aggregator.

Talk to our Trusted Insurance Advisors for Best Plans

PolicyX Logo

Search Anything

Most Searched:

  • Search Search Please fill out this field.
  • Life Insurance

What Is Collateral Assignment (of a Life Insurance Policy)?

Meredith Mangan is a senior editor for The Balance, focusing on insurance product reviews. She brings to the job 15 years of experience in finance, media, and financial markets. Prior to her editing career, Meredith was a licensed financial advisor and a licensed insurance agent in accident and health, variable, and life contracts. Meredith also spent five years as the managing editor for Money Crashers.

assignment in insurance example

Definition and Examples of Collateral Assignment

How collateral assignment works, alternatives to collateral assignment.

Kilito Chan / Getty Images

If you assign your life insurance contract as collateral for a loan, you give the lender the right to collect from the policy’s cash value or death benefit in two circumstances. One is if you stop making payments; the other is if you die before the loan is repaid. Securing a loan with life insurance reduces the lender’s risk, which improves your chances of qualifying for the loan.

Before moving forward with a collateral assignment, learn how the process works, how it impacts your policy, and possible alternatives.

Collateral assignment is the practice of using a life insurance policy as collateral for a loan . Collateral is any asset that your lender can take if you default on the loan.

For example, you might apply for a $25,000 loan to start a business. But your lender is unwilling to approve the loan without sufficient collateral. If you have a permanent life insurance policy with a cash value of $40,000 and a death benefit of $300,000, you could use that life insurance policy to collateralize the loan. Via collateral assignment of your policy, you authorize the insurance company to give the lender the amount you owe if you’re unable to keep up with payments (or if you die before repaying the loan).

Lenders have two ways to collect under a collateral assignment arrangement:

  • If you die, the lender gets a portion of the death benefit—up to your remaining loan balance.
  • With permanent insurance policies, the lender can surrender your life insurance policy in order to access the cash value if you stop making payments.

Lenders are only entitled to the amount you owe, and are not generally named as beneficiaries on the policy. If your cash value or the death benefit exceeds your outstanding loan balance, the remaining money belongs to you or your beneficiaries.

Whenever lenders approve a loan, they can’t be certain that you’ll repay. Your credit history is an indicator, but sometimes lenders want additional security. Plus, surprises happen, and even those with the strongest credit profiles can die unexpectedly.

Assigning a life insurance policy as collateral gives lenders yet another way to secure their interests and can make approval easier for borrowers.

Types of Life Insurance Collateral

Life insurance falls into two broad categories: permanent insurance and term insurance . You can use both types of insurance for a collateral assignment, but lenders may prefer that you use permanent insurance.

  • Permanent insurance : Permanent insurance, such as universal and whole life insurance, is lifelong insurance coverage that contains a cash value. If you default on the loan, lenders can surrender your policy and use that cash value to pay down the balance. If you die, the lender has a right to the death benefit, up to the amount you still owe.
  • Term insurance : Term insurance provides a death benefit, but coverage is limited to a certain number of years (20 or 30, for example). Since there’s no cash value in these policies, they only protect your lender if you die before the debt is repaid. The duration of a term policy used as collateral needs to be at least as long as your loan term.

A Note on Annuities

You may also be able to use an annuity as collateral for a bank loan. The process is similar to using a life insurance policy, but there is one key difference to be aware of. Any amount assigned as collateral in an annuity is treated as a distribution for tax purposes. In other words, the amount assigned will be taxed as income up to the amount of any gain in the contract, and may be subject to an additional 10% tax if you’re under 59 ½.

A collateral assignment is similar to a lien on your home . Somebody else has a financial interest in your property, but you keep ownership of it.

The Process

To use life insurance as collateral, the lender must be willing to accept a collateral assignment. When that’s the case, the policy owner, or “assignor,” submits a form to the insurance company to establish the arrangement. That form includes information about the lender, or “assignee,” and details about the lender’s and borrower’s rights.

Policy owners generally have control over policies. They may cancel or surrender coverage, change beneficiaries, or assign the contract as collateral. But if the policy has an irrevocable beneficiary, that beneficiary will need to approve any collateral assignment.

State laws typically require you to notify the insurer that you intend to pledge your insurance policy as collateral, and you must do so in writing. In practice, most insurers have specific forms that detail the terms of your assignment.

Some lenders might require you to get a new policy to secure a loan, but others allow you to add a collateral assignment to an existing policy. After submitting your form, it can take 24 to 48 hours for the assignment to go into effect.

Lenders Get Paid First

If you die and the policy pays a death benefit , the lender receives the amount you owe first. Your beneficiaries get any remaining funds once the lender is paid. In other words, your lender takes priority over your beneficiaries when you use this strategy. Be sure to consider the impact on your beneficiaries before you complete a collateral assignment.

After you repay your loan, your lender does not have any right to your life insurance policy, and you can request that the lender release the assignment. Your life insurance company should have a form for that. However, if a lender pays premiums to keep your policy in force, the lender may add those premium payments (plus interest) to your total debt—and collect that extra money.

There may be several other ways for you to get approved for a loan—with or without life insurance:

  • Surrender a policy : If you have a cash value life insurance policy that you no longer need, you could potentially surrender the policy and use the cash value. Doing so might prevent the need to borrow, or you might borrow substantially less. However, surrendering a policy ends your coverage, meaning your beneficiaries will not get a death benefit. Also, you’ll likely owe taxes on any gains.
  • Borrow from your policy : You may be able to borrow against the cash value in your permanent life insurance policy to get the funds you need. This approach could eliminate the need to work with a traditional lender, and creditworthiness would not be an issue. But borrowing can be risky, as any unpaid loan balance reduces the amount your beneficiaries receive. Plus, over time, deductions for the cost of insurance and compounding loan interest may negate your cash value and the policy could lapse, so it’s critical to monitor.
  • Consider other solutions : You may have other options unrelated to a life insurance policy. For example, you could use the equity in your home as collateral for a loan, but you could lose your home in foreclosure if you can’t make the payments. A co-signer could also help you qualify, although the co-signer takes a significant risk by guaranteeing your loan.

Key Takeaways

  • Life insurance can help you get approved for a loan when you use a collateral assignment.
  • If you die, your lender receives the amount you owe, and your beneficiaries get any remaining death benefit.
  • With permanent insurance, your lender can cash out your policy to pay down your loan balance.
  • An annuity can be used as collateral for a loan but may not be a good idea because of tax consequences.
  • Other strategies can help you get approved without putting your life insurance coverage at risk.

NYSBA. " Life Insurance and Annuity Contracts Within and Without Tax Qualified Retirement Plans and Life Insurance Trusts ." Accessed April 12, 2021.

IRS. " Publication 575 (2020), Pension and Annuity Income ." Accessed April 12, 2021.

Practical Law. " Security Interests: Life Insurance Policies ." Accessed April 12, 2021.

What Is A Collateral Assignment Of Life Insurance?

A couple signing up for Collateral Assignment

Our content follows strict guidelines for editorial accuracy and integrity. Learn about our editorial standards and how we make money.

A collateral assignment is sometimes a necessity if you’re applying for larger financing amounts such as a mortgage or business loan.

But what is a collateral assignment and how do you go about getting it on your life insurance policy? 

In this article, we’ll cover what collateral assignment is, how you can add it to your life insurance, and what alternatives there are out there. 

What Is Collateral Assignment? 

A collateral assignment is a process by which a person uses their life insurance policy as collateral for a secured loan.

In simple terms, collateral assignment is reassigning priorities for who gets paid the death benefit of your life insurance policy.

What Is a death benefit?

A death benefit or face value of a life insurance contract is the amount of money that your beneficiaries will receive from your policy when you die.

Once you apply for collateral assignment and it’s approved, your specified debtor (the loan provider) will be paid first and then your beneficiaries will receive what is left over in your life insurance policy.

This is different from using your cash value to loan money as you are taking out a loan from another financial institution and using your policy as a guarantee that you’ll cover any debt when you die. 

For example, let’s say you want to take out a secured loan from your local bank and want to use your life insurance policy as a collateral assignment.

In this situation, you’d still have to pay back any debt you have with interest during the loan period. 

However, the life insurance policy would be used if the borrower dies and there was an outstanding loan balance remaining. 

Secured Loans vs. Unsecured Loans

Secured loans are debts that are backed by assets that a lender can claim if the debt isn’t repaid. These types of loans often offer better interest rates and more generous payment terms.

Unsecured loans are debts that don’t have collateral. These types of loans are more expensive to repay and considered riskier than secured loans.

A woman signing up for Collateral Assignment.

Source: Pexels

How Does Applying for Collateral Assignment Work?

The process for getting collateral assignments for life insurance is the same as when you apply for new life insurance coverage. 

All you’ll be doing is indicating to your life insurance provider that your lender will be given priority for the amount of money you have borrowed through them.

There is an:

Application process.

Underwriting process.

Offer that you’ll receive.

You’ll be required to name beneficiaries as well as indicate ownership of the life insurance policy in the collateral assignment form which will be provided by your life insurance company.

This is because you’re changing the terms of your payout and your life insurance provider will need to follow these instructions once you die.

NB Some insurance companies don’t offer collateral assignment on new loans and generally only provide this feature to an existing life insurance policy.

You should check beforehand to see what will be required to apply for a collateral assignment. If you need help finding plans that offer this, send an email to a licensed insurance agent today.

Once you’ve assigned a new collateral assignee to your life insurance policy, they will be entitled to lay a claim on your death benefit for any debt you have with them.

For example, let’s say you take out a collateral assignment life insurance policy worth $200,000 for a loan of $75,000 over 7 years at an interest rate of 18%.

If you die after five years, based on these figures, you’ll still have $41,231.02 owed on your loan.

Your $200,000 life insurance plan will be used to cover this and your beneficiaries will receive the remaining $158 768.98 from your life insurance policy.

Your lender is only allowed to take the amount outstanding on the debt owed and cannot take more. 

What about Missed Payments and Cash Value Life Insurance?

If you have a permanent life policy with a cash value account, sometimes called cash value life insurance, your lender will have access to it to cover missed payments on your loan.

For example, let’s say you miss a payment on your loan and have a collateral assignment. Your lender will be able to access your cash value account and withdraw that month’s payment to cover your debt.

Who Can You Add as a Collateral Assignee?

You can add any person or institution as a collateral assignee to your life insurance policy if you owe them money.

This can include banks, lenders, private individuals, businesses, or credit card companies. 

The most common collateral assignments are for business loans and mortgages. This is because they are loans for high amounts that are paid off over several years. 

In fact, some banks and financial lenders may require that you add them as collateral assignees when you apply for any of the financing options mentioned below.

Common Collateral Assignees Include:

💵 Bank loans

💳 Credit cards

🏡 Mortgages

💼 Business loans

What Do I Do If I’ve Paid Off My Debt?

If you’ve managed to pay off your debt - firstly, congratulations! Secondly, you’ll want to notify your life insurance company that you’ll be changing your collateral assignments on your life policy.

While there is no legal claim that a company can make to debts that aren’t owed anymore, there may be a hold up in paying out the death benefit to your beneficiaries and other collateral assignees.

Life insurance companies will have to figure out who must be paid first, according to the order stated in your collateral assignment terms.

In general, life insurance policies will settle claims within 24 hours of being notified of a policyholder’s death.

The process can be delayed if you do not release your collateral assignees from your life insurance contract. 

Tips to Make Sure Your Life Policy Is Paid Out Quickly

Here are some tips if you want your beneficiary claims to be handled as fast as possible:

1) Keep a copy of your life insurance policy and policy number in a safe place or with your lawyer, financial advisor, or estate planner.

2) Speak to your beneficiaries about your policies and give them the contact details of the relevant life insurance company.

3) Make sure your life insurance contract is updated to reflect your latest list of beneficiaries.

4) Make sure you have your beneficiaries' details listed in the contract or with your lawyer.

The Benefits of Using Collateral Assignment of Life Insurance

While adding a collateral assignment to your current life insurance policy may require an application, paperwork, and time, there are benefits:

Many lenders like it: Banks and financial institutions sometimes prefer it when applicants use their life insurance policy as collateral for a loan. This is because they know that their debt will be serviced long-term by your insurance company which makes their loan to you a lower risk.

Your private property won’t be jeopardized: The last thing you want when you go into debt is to put your personal items, such as your car, investments, or home on the line as collateral. Using collateral assignment is an alternative to this and can protect you in the event that you can’t service your debt.

It can be affordable for some people: If you’re in good health and young, you may be paying affordable rates for permanent life cover. In situations like this, it can make sense to use your life cover as collateral for debts you’ve incurred.

A form to sign up for Collateral Assignment.

What Are Some Alternatives to Collateral Assignment?

Term Life Insurance: Getting a term life insurance contract to cover specific debts is one way of ensuring your estate and family are protected when you die.

There are multiple types of term life insurance plans and they are more affordable than permanent life insurance. This makes options like level term life insurance and decreasing term life insurance ideal for different types of debts you may have over your lifetime.

What Is Term Life?

Term life is a temporary life coverage option that lasts for a specific period of time. It is different from permanent life insurance which lasts until you die or you stop paying premiums.

Term life contracts are typically between 5 to 20 years, however, you can get renewable term life plans and even a forty-year term life plan .

Borrow from your life insurance: If you have a permanent life insurance policy, such as universal, whole, or indexed life cover, you can borrow money from your cash value account. 

However, keep in mind that you’ll be required to pay interest on any amount that you borrow and any amount of debt incurred will be deducted from your policy’s death benefit when you die.

What Is Cash Value?

Cash value is a feature of permanent life insurance plans that policyholders can contribute additional money toward while they have a policy in force.

This money is set aside in a cash value account which is tax-deferred and can be used in a number of ways.

In some cases, if your policy allows it, you can end your contract and get the cash surrender value of it. This amount is usually much less than the value of your total life insurance contract. 

Our Verdict on Collateral Assignment

Many banks, lenders, and financial institutions want long-term guarantees that you’ll be able to service your debt if anything happens to you.

In some situations, getting collateral assignments on your life insurance to cover these debts is a good option for people who are trying to access finance from these institutions. 

However, there is a risk that your death benefit payout may be delayed for your beneficiaries if you don’t keep your different collateral assignees up to date.

If you already have a life insurance policy, you should contact your provider to find out what the process is and what you’ll need to do to change the collateral assignees on your policy.

If you don’t have a policy yet, our advice is to look at all of your options before you decide to take a permanent life insurance contract with a collateral assignment.

There are alternatives out there that are more affordable if you’re looking to protect your family and estate from debt.

Term life is one such option that is adaptable to your life and easy to get. 

For example, a decreasing term life insurance policy might be the right choice for someone who has recently bought a home and wants to cover their mortgage while they pay it back.

Another option is final expense insurance, which is a permanent life policy for smaller amounts, usually under $50,000.

With final expense insurance, your beneficiaries can pay for anything they want, including any debts you may have had in your life.

The process for applying is simple and you won't have to go through a medical exam or intensive underwriting as you would with traditional permanent life insurance. 

If you need any assistance with finding, comparing, or learning about the different life insurance options to cover your debts, speak to one of our expert advisors today at 1-888-912-2132 or [email protected] .

Where Can I Learn More about Life Insurance?

If you’re looking to learn more about life insurance, different kinds of coverage, or costs, visit our life insurance hub to find our latest articles.

We do the research so that you don’t have to and our articles cover complicated topics like what is a cash value account, what is key person insurance, or how long life insurance takes to pay out a death benefit.  

If you need help with quotes, try out a life insurance quote finder or reach out to us via email at [email protected] to get in touch with a licensed life insurance agent for your state.

  • Practical Law

Assignment of insurance policies and claims

Practical law uk practice note w-031-6021  (approx. 19 pages).

  • Construction and engineering
  • Construction insurance
  • Credit, terrorism and political risks
  • Cyber insurance
  • Directors and officers
  • Disputes, investigations and enforcement
  • Insurance in commercial transactions
  • Insurance intermediaries
  • Legal expenses
  • Making and dealing with claims
  • Reinsurance
  • Security, risk management and business continuity

Livewell

Financial Tips, Guides & Know-Hows

Home > Finance > What Is An Assignee On A Life Insurance Policy?

What Is An Assignee On A Life Insurance Policy?

What Is An Assignee On A Life Insurance Policy?

Published: October 14, 2023

Learn the role of an assignee on a life insurance policy and how it can impact your finances. Discover what it takes to become a finance-savvy assignee.

(Many of the links in this article redirect to a specific reviewed product. Your purchase of these products through affiliate links helps to generate commission for LiveWell, at no extra cost. Learn more )

Table of Contents

Introduction, definition of assignee, role of assignee in a life insurance policy, rights and responsibilities of an assignee, process of assigning a life insurance policy, benefits of assigning a life insurance policy, considerations before assigning a life insurance policy, potential challenges and risks for assignees.

Life insurance is a crucial financial tool that provides protection and financial security to individuals and their loved ones in case of unexpected events. While the primary purpose of life insurance is to provide a death benefit to beneficiaries, policy owners also have the flexibility to assign or transfer their policy rights to another person or entity. This is where an assignee comes into play.

An assignee on a life insurance policy refers to the individual or entity who is designated to receive the policy benefits or be the recipient of any policy changes. Assigning a life insurance policy can be a strategic move for policyholders who want to transfer ownership rights or allocate the proceeds to a specific person or organization.

In this article, we will delve deeper into the role of an assignee in a life insurance policy, their rights and responsibilities, as well as the process of assigning a policy. We will also explore the benefits and considerations involved in assigning a life insurance policy, along with potential challenges and risks that assignees may encounter.

Understanding the concept of assignees in life insurance policies is essential for policyholders who may be considering transferring their policy rights or for beneficiaries who need to comprehend the implications of an assigned policy. Without further ado, let’s dive into the details of assignees on a life insurance policy.

An assignee on a life insurance policy is an individual or entity that is designated to receive the policy benefits or take over the ownership rights and responsibilities. When a policyholder assigns their life insurance policy, they transfer their rights to the assignee, who then becomes the new owner of the policy.

The assignee can be a spouse, child, relative, friend, or even a business entity such as a trust or corporation. The assignee can be named at the time the policy is initially taken out, or the policyholder can choose to assign the policy at a later date. In some cases, a policyholder may assign their policy to a lender or creditor as collateral for a loan.

It is important to note that the assignee is distinct from the beneficiary. The beneficiary is the person or entity who receives the death benefit proceeds upon the death of the insured. While the assignee assumes ownership of the policy, they may or may not be the same person as the beneficiary.

Assigning a life insurance policy can be a way for policyholders to ensure that the intended recipient receives the policy benefits or to transfer the financial responsibility and management of the policy to someone else.

Now that we have established the definition of an assignee in a life insurance policy, let’s explore their role in more detail.

The assignee plays a significant role in a life insurance policy once they have been designated as the new owner. Their responsibilities and authority may vary depending on the terms of the policy and the specific agreement between the policyholder and the assignee. Here are some key roles an assignee may have:

  • Policy Ownership: As the assignee, they become the legal owner of the life insurance policy. This means they have the rights to manage and make decisions regarding the policy, subject to any limitations or conditions outlined in the assignment agreement.
  • Premium Payments: The assignee is generally responsible for paying the premiums to keep the policy in force. They may choose to use their own funds or utilize the policy’s cash value, if available, to cover the premiums.
  • Beneficiary Designation: The assignee may have the authority to change the beneficiary designation if permitted by the policy terms. This gives them the ability to redirect the policy’s death benefit to another individual or entity.
  • Policy Modifications: Depending on the specific agreement, the assignee may have the power to make changes to the policy, such as increasing or decreasing the coverage amount, adjusting the policy term, or adding additional riders.
  • Access to Policy Information: As the new policy owner, the assignee has the right to access and review the policy information, including the policy terms, conditions, and any associated documents.
  • Claims Processing: In the event of the insured’s death, the assignee is responsible for initiating the claims process and ensuring that the death benefit proceeds are disbursed to the designated beneficiary.

It’s important to note that the specific roles and authority of the assignee can vary based on the terms of the assignment agreement. It is essential for both the policyholder and the assignee to have a clear understanding of their respective roles and responsibilities to avoid any confusion or disputes in the future.

Now that we have examined the role of an assignee in a life insurance policy, let’s explore the rights and responsibilities they have in more detail.

When an individual or entity becomes the assignee of a life insurance policy, they acquire certain rights and responsibilities associated with the policy. These rights and responsibilities can vary depending on the terms of the assignment agreement and the specific provisions of the policy. Let’s take a closer look at the rights and responsibilities of an assignee:

Rights of an Assignee:

  • Ownership Rights: As the assignee, they have the right to the policy benefits and any cash value that has accumulated. They can make decisions regarding the policy, such as changing the beneficiary, modifying coverage, or accessing policy information.
  • Premium Payments: The assignee has the right to receive premium payments from the policyholder, which they can use to keep the policy in force. They may also have the right to access the policy’s cash value, if available.
  • Policy Modifications: Depending on the terms of the assignment agreement, the assignee may have the right to make changes to the policy, such as adjusting the coverage amount, policy term, or adding additional riders.
  • Access to Policy Information: The assignee has the right to access and review the policy information, including the terms, conditions, and any associated documents. This allows them to stay informed about the policy’s provisions and make informed decisions.
  • Claims Processing: In the event of the insured’s death, the assignee has the right to initiate the claims process and receive the death benefit proceeds. They are responsible for disbursing the proceeds to the designated beneficiary, if applicable.

Responsibilities of an Assignee:

  • Premium Payments: As the assignee, they are responsible for making premium payments to keep the policy in force. This ensures that the policy remains active and the coverage continues.
  • Policy Management: The assignee has the responsibility to manage and maintain the policy. This includes reviewing the policy regularly, staying informed about any changes in the terms and conditions, and making decisions that align with the policyholder’s intentions.
  • Beneficiary Designation: If authorized by the assignment agreement, the assignee may have the responsibility to change the beneficiary designation if necessary. This involves ensuring that the intended recipient of the death benefit is correctly designated.
  • Communication: The assignee has the responsibility to maintain open communication with the policyholder, beneficiaries, and any other parties involved. This helps in addressing any questions, concerns, or changes that may arise regarding the policy.

It’s important for both the assignee and the policyholder to have a clear understanding of these rights and responsibilities to ensure a smooth and effective management of the policy. Now that we have explored the rights and responsibilities of an assignee, let’s move on to understand the process of assigning a life insurance policy.

The process of assigning a life insurance policy involves transferring the ownership rights and control of the policy from the policyholder to the assignee. While the specific steps may vary based on the insurance company and policy terms, the general process typically includes the following:

  • Review Policy Terms: The policyholder should carefully review the terms and conditions of their life insurance policy to understand any limitations or restrictions on assigning the policy.
  • Choose an Assignee: The policyholder selects an individual or entity to be the assignee. This can be a family member, friend, trust, or even a business entity. It is essential to consider the long-term goals and intentions when choosing an assignee.
  • Obtain Consent: The policyholder must obtain the consent of the proposed assignee to ensure they are willing to assume the responsibilities and obligations associated with the policy.
  • Prepare Assignment Agreement: The policyholder and the assignee should work together to prepare an assignment agreement. This is a legal document that outlines the terms of the assignment, including the assignee’s rights, responsibilities, and any potential compensation or considerations involved.
  • Notify the Insurance Company: The policyholder must contact their insurance company to inform them of the intention to assign the policy. The insurance company may require specific forms to be filled out, along with a copy of the assignment agreement.
  • Insurance Company Approval: The insurance company will review the assignment request and the assignment agreement to ensure they comply with their policies and regulations. Once approved, they will update their records to reflect the new assignee.
  • Update Beneficiary Designation: If the assignee is different from the original beneficiary, the policyholder may need to update the beneficiary designation to ensure that the intended recipient receives the death benefit.

It is crucial for both the policyholder and the assignee to consult with legal and financial professionals to ensure that the assignment process is conducted properly, adhering to any legal requirements and optimizing the financial outcomes for all parties involved.

Now that we have discussed the process of assigning a life insurance policy, let’s move on to explore the benefits of assigning a life insurance policy.

Assigning a life insurance policy can offer several benefits for both the policyholder and the assignee. Here are some key advantages of assigning a life insurance policy:

  • Control and Flexibility: Assigning a life insurance policy allows the policyholder to have control over who will manage and benefit from the policy. It provides flexibility to designate a specific person or entity to take over the ownership rights and responsibilities.
  • Estate Planning: Assigning a life insurance policy can be an effective estate planning strategy. It allows the policyholder to transfer assets outside of their estate, which may help in minimizing estate taxes and ensuring a smooth transfer of wealth to the intended recipients.
  • Creditor Protection: By assigning a life insurance policy to a trust or business entity, the policy cash value and death benefit may be protected from potential creditors. This provides an added layer of financial security for the assignee and the intended beneficiaries.
  • Financial Assistance: Assigning a life insurance policy can be beneficial in scenarios where the assignee needs financial assistance. For example, if the assignee is facing financial hardship or requires funds for a specific purpose, they may be able to access the policy’s cash value or even borrow against the policy.
  • Charitable Giving: Assigning a life insurance policy to a charitable organization can be a meaningful way to support a favorite cause. It allows the policyholder to make a significant charitable contribution, and the assignee, in this case, would be responsible for managing the policy and ensuring that the proceeds benefit the designated charity.

It’s important to note that the benefits of assigning a life insurance policy can vary depending on the specific circumstances and goals of the policyholder. Therefore, it is advisable to consult with financial advisors, estate planning professionals, and insurance experts to assess the suitability of assigning a policy and to maximize the potential benefits.

Now that we have explored the benefits of assigning a life insurance policy, let’s move on to discuss some considerations before making the decision to assign a policy.

Before deciding to assign a life insurance policy, it is crucial to carefully consider a few key factors. These considerations will help ensure that the decision aligns with your financial goals and meets your specific needs. Here are some important points to ponder:

  • Impact on Beneficiaries: Assigning a life insurance policy may have implications for the intended beneficiaries. It is essential to consider their needs and financial security before assigning the policy to someone else or an entity. Make sure to have open conversations with the beneficiaries to discuss any changes in the policy ownership and how it may impact them.
  • Future Financial Needs: Assess your own future financial needs before assigning a life insurance policy. Life circumstances can change, and it is crucial to determine if the policy’s cash value or death benefit might be required for your own financial stability or long-term goals. Balancing immediate financial needs with the desire to assign the policy is important.
  • Trustworthiness of the Assignee: Consider the trustworthiness and reliability of the proposed assignee. Assigning a life insurance policy involves transferring ownership rights and responsibilities, so it is crucial to choose someone who will effectively manage the policy and fulfill the agreed-upon obligations. Conduct thorough due diligence and consider seeking legal advice to ensure the assignee is the right choice.
  • Tax Implications: Assigning a life insurance policy may have tax implications. Consult with tax professionals to understand any potential tax consequences of the assignment, such as gift tax or estate tax considerations. Proper planning and knowledge of tax laws will help mitigate any unexpected tax liabilities.
  • Insurance Company Policy: Review the terms and conditions of your life insurance policy regarding assignments. Some policies may have restrictions or limitations on assigning a policy, and it’s important to understand these provisions. Contact your insurance company directly to clarify any concerns or questions related to the assignment process.
  • Legal Considerations: Assigning a life insurance policy involves legal documentation and agreements. It is advisable to consult with legal professionals who specialize in insurance and estate planning to ensure that the assignment is conducted in compliance with applicable laws and meets your specific needs.

Considering these factors will help you make an informed decision about whether assigning a life insurance policy is the right choice for you. Assess your individual situation, speak with professionals, and review your long-term goals to determine if assigning the policy aligns with your overall financial plan.

Now that we have explored the considerations before assigning a life insurance policy, let’s discuss some potential challenges and risks for assignees.

While assigning a life insurance policy can have its benefits, there are also potential challenges and risks that assignees should be aware of. Understanding these risks will help you make informed decisions and take necessary precautions. Here are some potential challenges and risks for assignees:

  • Financial Responsibility: As the assignee, you become responsible for paying the policy premiums to keep the coverage in force. Failure to pay the premiums can result in the policy lapsing, causing loss of coverage and potential loss of the policy’s cash value.
  • Potential Conflict: Assigning a life insurance policy may lead to conflicts, especially if the policyholder has multiple beneficiaries or if the assigned policy conflicts with other estate planning arrangements. It is important to communicate and coordinate with all involved parties to minimize potential disputes.
  • Changing Circumstances: Life circumstances can change, and the assigned policy may no longer align with the assignee’s needs or financial goals. Review the policy periodically to ensure it still meets your objectives. If necessary, consult with professionals to explore options for policy modifications or changes.
  • Loss of Control: By assigning a policy, you relinquish control over certain aspects of the policy. The assignee may need to consult the policyholder or beneficiaries before making any changes or important decisions. This loss of control should be carefully considered before proceeding with the assignment.
  • Insurance Company Approval: The insurance company typically has the final say in approving the assignment. They will review and confirm the assignment agreement to ensure compliance with their policies. If the assignment is not approved, it can impede the intended transfer of ownership.
  • Tax Implications: Assigning a life insurance policy may have tax consequences for the assignee, such as potential income tax on the policy’s cash value or estate tax implications. Consult with tax professionals before finalizing the assignment to fully understand these potential tax implications.

It is crucial for assignees to carefully weigh these challenges and risks against the potential benefits before accepting the assignment of a life insurance policy. Be proactive in communicating with the policyholder and beneficiaries, stay informed about policy details, and seek professional guidance to navigate any potential challenges or risks.

Now that we have discussed the potential challenges and risks for assignees, let’s wrap up our article.

Assigning a life insurance policy can be a strategic financial move that offers flexibility and control over the policy’s ownership and benefits. By designating an assignee, individuals can ensure that the policy proceeds are directed to the intended recipient or utilize the expertise of an entity to manage the policy. However, before proceeding with an assignment, it is important to carefully consider various factors.

Understanding the role, rights, and responsibilities of an assignee is vital to ensure a smooth transition and effective management of the policy. The assignee assumes ownership of the policy, enjoying benefits such as decision-making authority and control over premiums. They also have responsibilities, including making premium payments, managing the policy, and initiating claims if the insured passes away.

The process of assigning a life insurance policy involves reviewing policy terms, choosing an assignee, obtaining consent, preparing an assignment agreement, and notifying the insurance company. It is crucial to review the policy specifics and consult legal and financial professionals to ensure compliance with regulations and optimize financial outcomes.

Assigning a life insurance policy offers numerous benefits, such as control, estate planning opportunities, creditor protection, and financial assistance. However, there are considerations to keep in mind, including the impact on beneficiaries, future financial needs, and tax implications.

Assignees may face potential challenges, such as financial responsibility, conflicts of interest, changing circumstances, loss of control, and insurance company approval. These risks should be carefully assessed, and open communication with the policyholder and beneficiaries is essential to minimize disputes and ensure a smooth transition.

In conclusion, assigning a life insurance policy requires thoughtful deliberation and consultation with professionals. Assessing your financial goals, considering the needs of beneficiaries, and understanding the potential risks will help make an informed decision. Assigning a life insurance policy can provide peace of mind, but careful consideration and planning are essential to ensure the assigned policy aligns with your long-term financial goals.

img

What Is Umbrella Insurance Policy? Definition And If You Need It

img

Variable Life Insurance: Definition, Tax Benefits, Vs. Term Life

img

20 Quick Tips To Saving Your Way To A Million Dollars

img

Our Review on The Credit One Credit Card

img

How Does Business Loans Work

img

Reservable Deposit Definition

Latest articles.

img

Variance Swap: Definition Vs. Volatility Swap And How It Works

Written By:

img

What Is Variance In Statistics? Definition, Formula, And Example

img

Variable Ratio Write Definition

img

Variable Price Limit Definition

img

Variable Overhead Spending Variance: Definition And Example

Related post.

What Is An Endowment Life Insurance Policy?

By:  •  Finance

What Is An Index Life Insurance Policy?

Please accept our Privacy Policy.

We uses cookies to improve your experience and to show you personalized ads. Please review our privacy policy by clicking here .

  • https://livewell.com/finance/what-is-an-assignee-on-a-life-insurance-policy/

Collateral assignment of life insurance

Advertiser disclosure.

We are an independent, advertising-supported comparison service. Our goal is to help you make smarter financial decisions by providing you with interactive tools and financial calculators, publishing original and objective content, by enabling you to conduct research and compare information for free - so that you can make financial decisions with confidence.

Our content is backed by Coverage.com, LLC, a licensed insurance producer (NPN: 19966249). Coverage.com services are only available in states where it is licensed . Coverage.com may not offer insurance coverage in all states or scenarios. All insurance products are governed by the terms in the applicable insurance policy, and all related decisions (such as approval for coverage, premiums, commissions and fees) and policy obligations are the sole responsibility of the underwriting insurer. The information on this site does not modify any insurance policy terms in any way.

How We Make Money

The offers that appear on this site are from companies that compensate us. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site, including, for example, the order in which they may appear within the listing categories, except where prohibited by law for our mortgage, home equity and other home lending products. But this compensation does not influence the information we publish, or the reviews that you see on this site. We do not include the universe of companies or financial offers that may be available to you.

  • Share this article on Facebook Facebook
  • Share this article on Twitter Twitter
  • Share this article on LinkedIn Linkedin
  • Share this article via email Email

A businessowners shaking hands with an life insurance rep

At Bankrate, we take the accuracy of our content seriously.

“Expert verified” means that our Financial Review Board thoroughly evaluated the article for accuracy and clarity. The Review Board comprises a panel of financial experts whose objective is to ensure that our content is always objective and balanced.

Their reviews hold us accountable for publishing high-quality and trustworthy content.

The Bankrate promise

At Bankrate we strive to help you make smarter financial decisions. While we adhere to strict editorial integrity , this post may contain references to products from our partners. Here's an explanation for how we make money . This content is powered by HomeInsurance.com (NPN: 8781838). For more information, please see our Insurance Disclosure .

Founded in 1976, Bankrate has a long track record of helping people make smart financial choices. We’ve maintained this reputation for over four decades by demystifying the financial decision-making process and giving people confidence in which actions to take next.

Bankrate follows a strict editorial policy , so you can trust that we’re putting your interests first. All of our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts , who ensure everything we publish is objective, accurate and trustworthy.

Our banking reporters and editors focus on the points consumers care about most — the best banks, latest rates, different types of accounts, money-saving tips and more — so you can feel confident as you’re managing your money.

Editorial integrity

Bankrate follows a strict editorial policy , so you can trust that we’re putting your interests first. Our award-winning editors and reporters create honest and accurate content to help you make the right financial decisions.

Key Principles

We value your trust. Our mission is to provide readers with accurate and unbiased information, and we have editorial standards in place to ensure that happens. Our editors and reporters thoroughly fact-check editorial content to ensure the information you’re reading is accurate. We maintain a firewall between our advertisers and our editorial team. Our editorial team does not receive direct compensation from our advertisers.

Editorial Independence

Bankrate’s editorial team writes on behalf of YOU — the reader. Our goal is to give you the best advice to help you make smart personal finance decisions. We follow strict guidelines to ensure that our editorial content is not influenced by advertisers. Our editorial team receives no direct compensation from advertisers, and our content is thoroughly fact-checked to ensure accuracy. So, whether you’re reading an article or a review, you can trust that you’re getting credible and dependable information.

How we make money

You have money questions. Bankrate has answers. Our experts have been helping you master your money for over four decades. We continually strive to provide consumers with the expert advice and tools needed to succeed throughout life’s financial journey.

Bankrate follows a strict editorial policy , so you can trust that our content is honest and accurate. Our award-winning editors and reporters create honest and accurate content to help you make the right financial decisions. The content created by our editorial staff is objective, factual, and not influenced by our advertisers.

We’re transparent about how we are able to bring quality content, competitive rates, and useful tools to you by explaining how we make money.

Bankrate.com is an independent, advertising-supported publisher and comparison service. We are compensated in exchange for placement of sponsored products and services, or by you clicking on certain links posted on our site. Therefore, this compensation may impact how, where and in what order products appear within listing categories, except where prohibited by law for our mortgage, home equity and other home lending products. Other factors, such as our own proprietary website rules and whether a product is offered in your area or at your self-selected credit score range, can also impact how and where products appear on this site. While we strive to provide a wide range of offers, Bankrate does not include information about every financial or credit product or service.

Insurance Disclosure

This content is powered by HomeInsurance.com, a licensed insurance producer (NPN: 8781838) and a corporate affiliate of Bankrate.com. HomeInsurance.com LLC services are only available in states where it is licensed and insurance coverage through HomeInsurance.com may not be available in all states. All insurance products are governed by the terms in the applicable insurance policy, and all related decisions (such as approval for coverage, premiums, commissions and fees) and policy obligations are the sole responsibility of the underwriting insurer. The information on this site does not modify any insurance policy terms in any way.

Using your life insurance policy as collateral is one way of securing a loan without the risk of using your home or car. Most loans are either secured or unsecured, and while an unsecured loan does not require collateral, they are not always the most affordable or available option to many loan seekers. Bankrate breaks down the collateral assignment of life insurance process along with alternative options to help you decide what type of loan may be best for you.

Compare life insurance providers quickly and easily

See which provider is right for you.

Whole life insurance combines life insurance with an investment component.

  • Coverage for life
  • Tax-deferred savings benefit if premiums are paid
  • 3 variations of permanent insurance: whole life, universal life and variable life include investment component

Term life insurance is precisely what the name implies: an insurance policy that is good for a specific term of time.

  • Fixed premium over term
  • No savings benefits
  • Outliving policy or policy cancellation results in no money back

This advertising widget is powered by HomeInsurance.com, a licensed insurance producer (NPN: 8781838) and a corporate affiliate of Bankrate. HomeInsurance.com LLC services are only available in states where it is licensed and insurance coverage through HomeInsurance.com may not be available in all states. All insurance products are governed by the terms in the applicable insurance policy, and all related decisions (such as approval for coverage, premiums, commissions and fees) and policy obligations are the sole responsibility of the underwriting insurer. The information on this site does not modify any insurance policy terms in any way.

What is collateral assignment of life insurance?

A collateral assignment of life insurance is a method of securing a loan by using a life insurance policy as collateral . If you pass away before the loan is repaid, the lender can collect the outstanding loan balance from the death benefit of your life insurance policy. Any remaining funds from the death benefit would then be disbursed to the policy’s designated beneficiary(ies).

Why use life insurance as collateral?

There are several reasons why you might want to use life insurance as collateral for a loan. Among them:

  • It can be affordable. Depending on your age, health, the type and value of policy, life insurance costs vary. However, life insurance premiums may be less than what you would pay for an unsecured loan with higher interest rates.
  • You are not jeopardizing your personal property. By using life insurance as collateral, you might be able to take out a secured loan without putting your home or vehicle at risk. If you pass away before the loan is repaid, the lender will use funds available from your life insurance policy’s death benefit to pay off the loan.
  • It may be attractive to lenders. Many financial institutions view life insurance as a good option for collateral, knowing that they will very likely have the money to pay off your loan in the event of your death.

Of course, there are also some situations in which a collateral assignment of life insurance is not the best option. Some people are unable to obtain affordable life insurance due to their age or health complications. It can also be difficult to use an existing life insurance policy as collateral for a loan; a lender may require you to take out a new policy, specifically for the purpose of the collateral assignment.

How do I take out a loan using a collateral assignment of life insurance?

If you would like to take out a loan using life insurance as collateral, your first step should be to find a lender willing to issue this type of loan. After you confirm the lender’s requirements, you may be able to use your existing life insurance policy (if the lender will allow it) or you might need to purchase a new policy for a collateral assignment.

If you take out a new policy, the application process is the same as applying for any other type of life insurance and may require extensive underwriting, including a medical exam. After you have purchased the new policy, you will need to ask the insurance company for a collateral assignment form that you will need to complete, noting your lender as an assignee. Generally, a lender will not be listed as a beneficiary. The beneficiary(ies)will be the person you would like to receive any leftover benefits not claimed by the lender.

What types of life insurance can I use as collateral for a loan?

Both main types of life insurance, term life insurance and permanent life insurance , can be used to secure a loan. If you have a policy that falls into a subcategory of permanent life insurance, such as whole life, universal life, variable life or variable-universal life, these too are eligible to be used as collateral. However, each financial institution will likely have different requirements. Make sure to discuss these requirements with your lender before purchasing life insurance with the specific intention to use it as collateral. If more than one option is available, you may want to compare the cost of premiums for each type of policy.

Alternatives to life insurance as collateral

If you are considering a collateral assignment of life insurance, there are a few alternative funding options that might be worth exploring. Since many factors determine each option, working with a financial advisor may be the best way to find the ideal solution for your situation.

Unsecured loan

Depending on your situation, an unsecured loan may be more affordable than a secured loan with life insurance as collateral. This is more likely to be the case if you have good enough credit to qualify for a low interest rate without having to offer any type of collateral. There are many different types of unsecured loans, including credit cards and personal loans.

Cash value life insurance

Some permanent life insurance policies accumulate cash value over time that you can use in different ways. If you have such a policy, you may be able to partially withdraw the cash value or take a loan against your cash value. However, there are implications to using the cash value in your life insurance policy, so be sure to discuss this solution with a life insurance agent or your financial advisor before making a decision.

Home equity line of credit (HELOC)

A home equity line of credit (HELOC), is a more flexible way to access funds than a standard secured loan. While HELOCs carry the downside of risking your home as collateral, you retain more control over the amount you borrow. Instead of receiving one lump sum, you will have access to a line of credit that you can withdraw from as needed. You will only have to pay interest on the actual amount borrowed.

Frequently asked questions

What is the best life insurance company, what type of loans are collateral assignments usually associated with, what are other common forms of collateral, related articles.

What is the SBA line of credit?

What is the SBA line of credit?

Car accident

What to do after a hit-and-run in North Dakota

A female business owner talks with her partner in their restaurant.

What is an unsecured business loan and how does it work?

car accident crash

What to do after a hit and run in Wyoming

menu

Assignment of Life Insurance Policy

The person who assigns the policy, i.e. transfers the rights, is called the Assignor and the one to whom the policy has been assigned, i.e. the person to whom the policy rights have been transferred is called the Assignee.

article image

Assignment of a Life Insurance Policy simply means transfer of rights from one person to another. The policyholder can transfer the rights of his insurance policy to another for various reasons and this process is called Assignment.

The person who assigns the policy, i.e. transfers the rights, is called the Assignor and the one to whom the policy has been assigned, i.e. the person to whom the policy rights have been transferred is called the Assignee. Once the rights have been transferred to the Assignee, the rights of the Assignor stands cancelled and the Assignee becomes the owner of the policy.

assignment in insurance example

here are 2 types of Assignment:

  • Absolute Assignment – This means complete Transfer of Rights from the Assignor to the Assignee, without any further conditions applicable.
  • Conditional Assignment – This means that the Transfer of Rights will happen from the Assignor to the Assignee subject to certain conditions. If the conditions are fulfilled then only the Policy will get transferred from the Assignor to the Assignee.

Let’s take an example:

Rahul owns 2 Life Insurance policies of value Rs 2 lakhs and Rs 5 lakhs respectively. He would like to gift one policy of Rs 2 lakhs to his best friend Ajay. In that case, he would like to absolutely assign the policy in his name such that the death or maturity proceeds are directly paid to him. Thus, after the assignment, Ajay becomes the absolute owner of the policy. If he wishes, he may again transfer it to someone else for any other reason. This type of Assignment is called Absolute Assignment.

assignment in insurance example

Now, Rahul needed to take a loan for Rs 5 lakhs. So, he thought of doing so against the other policy that he owned for Rs 5 lakhs. To take a loan from ABC bank, he needed to conditionally assign the policy to that Bank and then the bank would be able to pay out the loan money to him. If Rahul failed to repay the loan, then the bank would surrender the policy and get their money back.

Once Rahul’s loan is completely repaid, then the policy would again come back to him. In case, Rahul died before completely repaying the loan, then also the bank can surrender the policy to get their money back. This type of Assignment is called Conditional Assignment.

assignment in insurance example

Sachin Telawane is a Content Manager and writes on various aspects of the Insurance industry. His enlightening insights on the insurance industry has guided the readers to make informed decisions in the course of purchasing insurance plans.

article image

  • Type 2 Diabetes
  • Heart Disease
  • Digestive Health
  • Multiple Sclerosis
  • COVID-19 Vaccines
  • Occupational Therapy
  • Healthy Aging
  • Health Insurance
  • Public Health
  • Patient Rights
  • Caregivers & Loved Ones
  • End of Life Concerns
  • Health News
  • Thyroid Test Analyzer
  • Doctor Discussion Guides
  • Hemoglobin A1c Test Analyzer
  • Lipid Test Analyzer
  • Complete Blood Count (CBC) Analyzer
  • What to Buy
  • Editorial Process
  • Meet Our Medical Expert Board

Medicare Assignment: Everything You Need to Know

Medicare assignment.

  • Providers Accepting Assignment
  • Providers Who Do Not
  • Billing Options
  • Assignment of Benefits
  • How to Choose

Frequently Asked Questions

Medicare assignment is an agreement between Medicare and medical providers (doctors, hospitals, medical equipment suppliers, etc.) in which the provider agrees to accept Medicare’s fee schedule as payment in full when Medicare patients are treated.

This article will explain how Medicare assignment works, and what you need to know in order to ensure that you won’t receive unexpected bills.

fizkes / Getty Images

There are 35 million Americans who have Original Medicare. Medicare is a federal program and most medical providers throughout the country accept assignment with Medicare. As a result, these enrollees have a lot more options for medical providers than most of the rest of the population.

They can see any provider who accepts assignment, anywhere in the country. They can be assured that they will only have to pay their expected Medicare cost-sharing (deductible and coinsurance, some or all of which may be paid by a Medigap plan , Medicaid, or supplemental coverage provided by an employer or former employer).

It’s important to note here that the rules are different for the 29 million Americans who have Medicare Advantage plans. These beneficiaries cannot simply use any medical provider who accepts Medicare assignment.

Instead, each Medicare Advantage plan has its own network of providers —much like the health insurance plans that many Americans are accustomed to obtaining from employers or purchasing in the exchange/marketplace .

A provider who accepts assignment with Medicare may or may not be in-network with some or all of the Medicare Advantage plans that offer coverage in a given area. Some Medicare Advantage plans— health maintenance organizations (HMOs) , in particular—will only cover an enrollee’s claims if they use providers who are in the plan's network.

Other Medicare Advantage plans— preferred provider organizations (PPOs) , in particular—will cover out-of-network care but the enrollee will pay more than they would have paid had they seen an in-network provider.

Original Medicare

The bottom line is that Medicare assignment only determines provider accessibility and costs for people who have Original Medicare. People with Medicare Advantage need to understand their own plan’s provider network and coverage rules.

When discussing Medicare assignment and access to providers in this article, keep in mind that it is referring to people who have Original Medicare.

How to Make Sure Your Provider Accepts Assignment

Most doctors, hospitals, and other medical providers in the United States do accept Medicare assignment.

Provider Participation Stats

According to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, 98% of providers participate in Medicare, which means they accept assignment.

You can ask the provider directly about their participation with Medicare. But Medicare also has a tool that you can use to find participating doctors, hospitals, home health care services, and other providers.

There’s a filter on that tool labeled “Medicare-approved payment.” If you turn on that filter, you will only see providers who accept Medicare assignment. Under each provider’s information, it will say “Charges the Medicare-approved amount (so you pay less out-of-pocket).”

What If Your Provider Doesn’t Accept Assignment?

If your medical provider or equipment supplier doesn’t accept assignment, it means they haven’t agreed to accept Medicare’s approved amounts as payment in full for all of the services.

These providers can still choose to accept assignment on a case-by-case basis. But because they haven’t agreed to accept Medicare assignment for all services, they are considered nonparticipating providers.

Note that "nonparticipating" does not mean that a provider has opted out of Medicare altogether. Medicare will still pay claims for services received from a nonparticipating provider (i.e., one who does not accept Medicare assignment), whereas Medicare does not cover any of the cost of services obtained from a provider who has officially opted out of Medicare.

If a Medicare beneficiary uses a provider who has opted out of Medicare, that person will pay the provider directly and Medicare will not be involved in any way.

Physicians Who Have Opted Out

Only about 1% of all non-pediatric physicians have opted out of Medicare.

For providers who have not opted out of Medicare but who also don’t accept assignment, Medicare will still pay nearly as much as it would have paid if you had used a provider who accepts assignment. Here’s how it works:

  • Medicare will pay the provider 95% of the amount they would pay if the provider accepted assignment.
  • The provider can charge the person receiving care more than the Medicare-approved amount, but only up to 15% more (some states limit this further). This extra amount, which the patient has to pay out-of-pocket, is known as the limiting charge . But the 15% cap does not apply to medical equipment suppliers; if they do not accept assignment with Medicare, there is no limit on how much they can charge the person receiving care. This is why it’s particularly important to make sure that the supplier accepts Medicare assignment if you need medical equipment.
  • The nonparticipating provider may require the person receiving care to pay the entire bill up front and seek reimbursement from Medicare (using Form CMS 1490-S ). Alternatively, they may submit a claim to Medicare on behalf of the person receiving care (using Form CMS-1500 ).
  • A nonparticipating provider can choose to accept assignment on a case-by-case basis. They can indicate this on Form CMS-1500 in box 27. The vast majority of nonparticipating providers who bill Medicare choose to accept assignment for the claim being billed.
  • Nonparticipating providers do not have to bill your Medigap plan on your behalf.

Billing Options for Providers Who Accept Medicare

When a medical provider accepts assignment with Medicare, part of the agreement is that they will submit bills to Medicare on behalf of the person receiving care. So if you only see providers who accept assignment, you will never need to submit your own bills to Medicare for reimbursement.

If you have a Medigap plan that supplements your Original Medicare coverage, you should present the Medigap coverage information to the provider at the time of service. Medicare will forward the claim information to your Medigap insurer, reducing administrative work on your part.

Depending on the Medigap plan you have, the services that you receive, and the amount you’ve already spent in out-of-pocket costs, the Medigap plan may pay some or all of the out-of-pocket costs that you would otherwise have after Medicare pays its share.

(Note that if you have a type of Medigap plan called Medicare SELECT, you will have to stay within the plan’s network of providers in order to receive benefits. But this is not the case with other Medigap plans.)

After the claim is processed, you’ll be able to see details in your MyMedicare.gov account . Medicare will also send you a Medicare Summary Notice. This is Medicare’s version of an explanation of benefits (EOB) , which is sent out every three months.

If you have a Medigap plan, it should also send you an EOB or something similar, explaining the claim and whether the policy paid any part of it.

What Is Medicare Assignment of Benefits?

For Medicare beneficiaries, assignment of benefits means that the person receiving care agrees to allow a nonparticipating provider to bill Medicare directly (as opposed to having the person receiving care pay the bill up front and seek reimbursement from Medicare). Assignment of benefits is authorized by the person receiving care in Box 13 of Form CMS-1500 .

If the person receiving care refuses to assign benefits, Medicare can only reimburse the person receiving care instead of paying the nonparticipating provider directly.

Things to Consider Before Choosing a Provider

If you’re enrolled in Original Medicare, you have a wide range of options in terms of the providers you can use—far more than most other Americans. In most cases, your preferred doctor and other medical providers will accept assignment with Medicare, keeping your out-of-pocket costs lower than they would otherwise be, and reducing administrative hassle.

There may be circumstances, however, when the best option is a nonparticipating provider or even a provider who has opted out of Medicare altogether. If you choose one of these options, be sure you discuss the details with the provider before proceeding with the treatment.

You’ll want to understand how much is going to be billed and whether the provider will bill Medicare on your behalf if you agree to assign benefits (note that this is not possible if the provider has opted out of Medicare).

If you have supplemental coverage, you’ll also want to check with that plan to see whether it will still pick up some of the cost and, if so, how much you should expect to pay out of your own pocket.

A medical provider who accepts Medicare assignment is considered a participating provider. These providers have agreed to accept Medicare’s fee schedule as payment in full for services they provide to Medicare beneficiaries. Most doctors, hospitals, and other medical providers do accept Medicare assignment.

Nonparticipating providers are those who have not signed an agreement with Medicare to accept Medicare’s rates as payment in full. However, they can agree to accept assignment on a case-by-case basis, as long as they haven’t opted out of Medicare altogether. If they do not accept assignment, they can bill the patient up to 15% more than the Medicare-approved rate.

Providers who opt out of Medicare cannot bill Medicare and Medicare will not pay them or reimburse beneficiaries for their services. But there is no limit on how much they can bill for their services.

A Word From Verywell

It’s in your best interest to choose a provider who accepts Medicare assignment. This will keep your costs as low as possible, streamline the billing and claims process, and ensure that your Medigap plan picks up its share of the costs.

If you feel like you need help navigating the provider options or seeking care from a provider who doesn’t accept assignment, the Medicare State Health Insurance Assistance Program (SHIP) in your state may be able to help.

A doctor who does not accept Medicare assignment has not agreed to accept Medicare’s fee schedule as payment in full for their services. These doctors are considered nonparticipating with Medicare and can bill Medicare beneficiaries up to 15% more than the Medicare-approved amount.

They also have the option to accept assignment (i.e., accept Medicare’s rate as payment in full) on a case-by-case basis.

There are certain circumstances in which a provider is required by law to accept assignment. This includes situations in which the person receiving care has both Medicare and Medicaid. And it also applies to certain medical services, including lab tests, ambulance services, and drugs that are covered under Medicare Part B (as opposed to Part D).

In 2021, 98% of American physicians had participation agreements with Medicare, leaving only about 2% who did not accept assignment (either as a nonparticipating provider, or a provider who had opted out of Medicare altogether).

Accepting assignment is something that the medical provider does, whereas assignment of benefits is something that the patient (the Medicare beneficiary) does. To accept assignment means that the medical provider has agreed to accept Medicare’s approved fee as payment in full for services they provide.

Assignment of benefits means that the person receiving care agrees to allow a medical provider to bill Medicare directly, as opposed to having the person receiving care pay the provider and then seek reimbursement from Medicare.

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Medicare monthly enrollment .

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Annual Medicare participation announcement .

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Lower costs with assignment .

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Find providers who have opted out of Medicare .

Kaiser Family Foundation. How many physicians have opted-out of the Medicare program ?

Center for Medicare Advocacy. Durable medical equipment, prosthetics, orthotics, and supplies (DMEPOS) updates .

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Check the status of a claim .

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Medicare claims processing manual. Chapter 26 - completing and processing form CMS-1500 data set .

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Ambulance fee schedule .

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Prescription drugs (outpatient) .

By Louise Norris Louise Norris has been a licensed health insurance agent since 2003 after graduating magna cum laude from Colorado State with a BS in psychology.

Shop for Car Insurance

Other Insurance Products

Types of mortgages

Calculators

Find & Compare Credit Cards

Cards with Rewards

Cards for a Purpose

Cards for Building Credit

Credit Card Reviews

Understanding Credit & Score

Student Loans

Paying for College

Personal Finance for College Students

Life Events

On This Page:

  • How It Works
  • Overview of Application Process
  • Pros and Cons
  • Impact on Beneficiaries
  • Alternatives
  • Related Content

What Is Collateral Assignment of Life Insurance?

Advertising & Editorial Disclosure

Nathan Paulus

Quality Verified

About Nathan Paulus

Nathan Paulus headshot

Nathan Paulus is the director of content marketing at MoneyGeek. Nathan has been creating content for nearly 10 years and is particularly engaged in personal finance, investing, and property management. He holds a B.A. in English from the University of St. Thomas Houston.

  • MyNewMarkets.com
  • Claims Journal
  • Insurance Journal TV
  • Academy of Insurance
  • Carrier Management

Insurance Journal - Property Casualty Industry News

Featured Stories

  • Liberty Mutual to Eliminate 250 Positions
  • Pennsylvania’s 7.8% Workers’ Comp Cut to Take Effect

Current Magazine

current magazine

  • Read Online

Post-Loss Assignments of Claims Under Insurance Policies

In the settlement of lawsuits involving insured claims, it is not uncommon that one condition of the settlement is that the defendant assign his or her claims under all applicable insurance policies to the party that filed suit.

Indeed, it is frequently the case that the defendant, particularly when the defendant is an individual, has a limited ability to pay a judgment and insurance coverage offers the best opportunity for a recovery by the suing party. Usually, such settlements are made without any serious thought being given to whether the defendant’s claim against its insurer is assignable; the assumption being that it is assignable.

However, insurance policies generally have anti-assignment clauses which prohibit the assignment of the policy, or an interest in the policy, without the insurer’s consent. These clauses come into play in determining the validity or enforceability of the assignment of a claim under an insurance policy and should be considered when such an assignment is part of a settlement.

When considering the enforceability of anti-assignment clauses in insurance policies, the courts generally draw a distinction between an assignment made prior to the occurrence of a covered loss (a “pre-loss” assignment) and an assignment made after the occurrence of a covered loss (a “post-loss” assignment).

In analyzing pre-loss assignments, the courts recognize that requiring an insurer to provide coverage to an assignee of its policy prior to the occurrence of a covered loss would place the insurer in the position of covering a party with whom it had not contracted nor been allowed to properly underwrite to assess the risks posed by that potential insured, and, accordingly, determine the appropriate premium to charge for the risks being undertaken or choose to decline coverage.

Post-loss assignments, on the other hand, take place after the insurer’s obligations under its policy have become fixed by the occurrence of a covered loss, thus the risk factors applicable to the assignee are irrelevant with regard to the covered loss in question. For these reasons, the majority of the courts enforce anti-assignment clauses to prohibit or restrict pre-loss assignments, but refuse to enforce anti-assignment clauses to prohibit or restrict post-loss assignments.

Katrina Cases

The Louisiana Supreme Court, which had not previously addressed the enforceability of anti-assignment clauses for post-loss assignments, was recently confronted with this issue in the In re: Katrina Canal Breaches Litigation, litigation involving consolidated cases arising out of Hurricane Katrina. The issue arose as a result of a lawsuit brought by the State of Louisiana as the assignee of claims under numerous insurance policies as part of the “Road Home” Program. The Road Home Program was set up following Hurricanes Katrina and Rita to distribute federal funds to homeowners suffering damage from the hurricanes. In return for receiving a grant of up to $150,000, homeowners were required to execute a Limited Subrogation/Assignment agreement, which provided in pertinent part:

Pursuant to these Limited Subrogation/Assignments, the State of Louisiana brought suit against more than 200 insurance companies to recover funds dispensed under the Road Home Program. The suit was removed to Federal Court under the Class Action Fairness Act and the insurers filed motions to dismiss, arguing that the assignments to the State of Louisiana were invalid under the anti-assignment clauses in the homeowner policies at issue.

On appeal, the United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals certified the following question to the Louisiana Supreme Court: “Does an anti-assignment clause in a homeowner’s insurance policy, which by its plain terms purports to bar any assignment of the policy or an interest therein without the insurer’s consent, bar an insured’s post-loss assignment of the insured’s claims under the policy when such an assignment transfers contractual obligations, not just the right to money due?”

In answering this question, the Louisiana Supreme Court began by noting that, as a general matter, contractual rights are assignable unless the law, the contract terms or the nature of the contract preclude assignment. Specific to the certified question, Louisiana Civil Code article 2653 provides that a right “cannot be assigned when the contract from which it arises prohibits the assignment of that right.” The Louisiana Supreme Court observed that the language of article 2653 is broad and, on its face, applies to all assignments, including post-loss assignments of insurance claims. The Court, therefore, construed the issue confronting it as whether Louisiana public policy would enforce an anti-assignment clause to preclude post-loss assignments of claims under insurance policies.

In addressing the public policy question, the Louisiana Supreme Court recognized the distinction between pre-loss assignments and post-loss assignments discussed by courts from other states and noted that the prevailing view was that anti-assignment clauses were invalid and/or unenforceable when applied to post-loss assignments. Notwithstanding this weight of authority, the Louisiana Supreme Court stated:

“[W]hile the Louisiana legislature has clearly indicated an intent to allow parties freedom to assign contractual rights, by enacting La. C.C. art. 2653, it has also clearly indicated an intent to allow parties freedom to contractually prohibit assignment of rights. We recognize the vast amount of national jurisprudence distinguishing between pre-loss and post-loss assignments and rejecting restrictions on post-loss assignments, however we find no public policy in Louisiana favoring assignability of claims over freedom of contract.”

Thus, Court refused to invalidate the enforceability of the anti-assignment clauses to the post-loss assignments before it based on public policy, adding that public policy determinations are better suited to the legislature.

Nonetheless, after having recognized the general enforceability of anti-assignment clauses to post-loss assignments, the Court immediately placed limits on when those clauses would be applicable, stating that to be applicable, they “must clearly and unambiguously express that the non-assignment clause applies to post-loss assignments.” The Court refused “to formulate a test consisting of specific terms or words,” which would satisfy this condition and remanded the case to the federal courts to determine whether the individual anti-assignment clauses in the various policies were sufficiently clear and explicit to be enforced with respect to post-loss assignments at issue.

A Broad Application

It should be noted that the Court’s opinion appears to apply broadly to all post-loss assignments irrespective of what specific rights are being assigned, despite the fact that the certified question was narrower and asked only about the applicability of a post-loss assignment where the assignment “transfers contractual obligations, not just the right to money due.”

In a footnote at the beginning of its opinion, the Louisiana Supreme Court observed that in certifying the question to it, the Fifth Circuit “disclaimed any intent” that the Court “confine its reply to the precise form or scope of the legal questions certified.” The footnote indicates that the Court’s opinion was not intended to be limited to only those post-loss assignments involving the assignment of contractual obligations.

Louisiana has departed from the majority view in holding that as a matter of general law, anti-assignment clauses are not inherently void with regard to post-loss assignments. However, it may be that in practical application, the results of individual cases may well be consistent with the majority rule of not enforcing anti-assignment clauses with regard to post-loss assignments because Louisiana courts may be reluctant to find that the anti-assignment clauses are sufficiently “clear and explicit” unless they specifically state that they apply to post-loss assignments, notwithstanding the Louisiana Supreme Court’s unwillingness to “formulate a test consisting of specific terms or words.”

Topics Lawsuits Carriers Profit Loss Claims Louisiana Hurricane Homeowners

Was this article valuable?

Thank you! Please tell us what we can do to improve this article.

Thank you! % of people found this article valuable. Please tell us what you liked about it.

Here are more articles you may enjoy.

assignment in insurance example

Written By Robert Redfearn, Jr.

From this issue.

Insurance Journal July 18, 2011

Excess, Surplus & Specialty Markets Directory Vol. II – The Industry’s Leading Coverage Placement Directory

Interested in carriers .

Get automatic alerts for this topic.

Insurance Jobs

  • Personal Lines Account Manager – Insurance – REMOTE - Ogden, UT
  • Underwriter or Underwriter Assistant – Personal Lines – REMOTE - Irving, TX
  • Excess & Surplus Lines Underwriter – REMOTE - Remote
  • Business Analyst 3 (Remote) - Minneapolis, MN
  • Commercial Claims Adjuster – Carrier or TPA – REMOTE - Long Beach, CA

MyNewMarkets

  • Do Regulators, Insureds and Agents Understand How Reciprocal Carriers and Some New MGAs Work?
  • A Deep Dive into the Diligent Effort (Search) Requirement
  • A Woman's Place Is in the Construction Insurance Space
  • An Apprenticeship
  • 5 Worthy New Year’s Resolutions

Claims Journal

  • Southern California Tops List of Wheel and Tire Claims for Second Straight Quarter
  • Coalition Backing Bill to Improve Administration of Medicare with Workers' Comp
  • Bayer Fights String of Roundup Trial Losses Including $2.25B Verdict in Philadelphia
  • Charlie Javice Fails to Get JPMorgan to Pay for Her Suit Against Firm
  • Study Finds Urban Environment Plays Major Role in Fault-Finding When Cars Hit Pedestrians

Academy of Insurance education

  • February 15 Growth Strategies
  • February 20 The E&O of E&S: Avoiding the Pitfalls of the Surplus Market
  • February 22 Emerging E&O Risks for Agencies
  • February 29 Making Sense of It All: Reading Insurance Policies
  • sample policy

FREE 11+ Assignment of Insurance Policy Samples in PDF | MS Word

fiscal policy image

People want security amidst uncertainty. To grasp it, they use financial planning tools or purchase marine insurance, fire insurance, homeowners insurance, loan insurance, life insurance, funeral insurance, etc. As an insurance company leader, it is your job to provide them this assurance. To do that, you need to provide an assignment of insurance policy once the customer agrees with the  insurance proposal . In this article, we will discuss more of it.

Assignment Of Insurance Policy

What is an insurance policy, what is an assignment of insurance policy, 11+ assignment of insurance policy samples in pdf | doc, 1. assignment of insurance policy sample, 2. bank assignment of insurance policy template, 3. assignment of insurance policy template, 4. assignment of insurance policy example, 5. assignment of insurance policy in india, 6. assignment of insurance policy form, 7. assignment of insurance policy to bank sample, 8. formal assignment of insurance policy template, 9. assignment and transfer of insurance policies, 10. general assignment of insurance policy sample, 11. basic assignment of insurance policy template, 12. assignment of insurance policy in doc, how to assign an insurance policy, step one: determine the type of assignment, step two: secure the notice of assignment, step three: secure the necessary document, step four: get the necessary fees, step five: update for the decision, what are the types of life insurance, traditional whole life insurance, term life insurance, what are the insurance exclusions, what is an insuring agreement.

An insurance policy is a type of contract that both you, as an insurer or insurance provider, and the insured or policyholder agree. It contains  terms and conditions  about the insurance claims and benefits, which you need to fulfill accordingly in exchange for an initial payment, which is also known as premium.

An insurance contract should include a beneficiary who will receive the benefits and claims. With an assignment of insurance policy, you can state this information. Meaning, through an assignment, the insured can determine who will receive the benefits and claims of the insurance policy under what terms and conditions. Depending on the type of insurance, the insured can also use it as a collateral assignment. In this case, the insured can use the value of the insurance policy as security for a loan. Meaning, the creditor will get full control of the benefits and other claims included in the policy in case the insured, who is the borrower, is unable to pay the loan, especially if the individual dies.

Did you know that in 2018, the United States was the country in terms of the required amount to pay for  life insurance  premiums? It is! Jennifer Rudden of Statista reported on February 24, 2020, that the state has a total of $593.4 billion life direct premiums written, which Japan tailed with a $334.24 billion premiums written. By broadening and improving the scope of the policy insurance you offer, you may attract more clients to invest in your company. Start by obtaining or enhancing your product’s assignment form. Check out the following examples for you to get an idea of how you will design your assignment of the insurance policy.

assignment of insurance policy sample

Size: 570.1 KB

bank assignment of insurance policy template

Size: 356.6 KB

assignment of insurance policy template

Size: 118.4 KB

assignment of insurance policy example

Size: 770.0 KB

assignment of insurance policy in india

Size: 56.1 KB

assignment of insurance policy form

Size: 32.2 KB

assignment of insurance policy to bank sample

Size: 236.6 KB

formal assignment of insurance policy template

Size: 67.3 KB

assignment and transfer of insurance policies

Size: 373.1 KB

general assignment of insurance policy sample

Size: 904.8 KB

basic assignment of insurance policy template

Size: 658.8 KB

assignment of insurance policy in doc

Size: 21.6 KB

Guide your clients in accomplishing an assignment of insurance policy by following the steps below.

There are different types of assignments that the insured can choose from, which can be a conditional or absolute assignment.

Conditional Assignment

A conditional assignment is the most common type of insurance policy assignment. You can see it mostly in life insurance contracts. An insured can use it to ensure that his relatives or any specified individuals can get the benefits and proceeds of the policy in case something happens to the individual, such as death or disability. However, aside from death or permanent disabilities, you can agree to other conditions. In this case, the policyholder, which is the insured, can restore his rights once he fulfills these conditions.

Absolute Assignment

In this assignment, the insured can specifically assign the individual where he wants to transfer the rights, benefits, and liabilities of the policy without terms and conditions, giving the assignee full control over the insurance policy.

The next thing the insured has to accomplish is to submit a  notice of assignment  and  deed of assignment , which your company will provide. For documentation and legal purposes, make sure that he or she fills out the necessary forms with a signature and reason for the assignment.

For the same reason for securing the notice of assignment, you need to collect the client’s proof of income, verified copies of photo ID, address proof, and PAN card.

Depending on the policy your company adheres to, you can collect fees as you have agreed in the contract. You can also include  stamps  if your company has one.

You have the right to decide whether or not the assignment request is appropriate, especially if it conflicts with the contract that you and your client have both agreed. Nevertheless, inform the person of your decision to set proper expectations. You can also offer an alternative option if available, in case you decide to reject the request. In this way, you can negate the unfavorable news that you are going to share with the client.

There are many types of life insurance, but most of them fall under the following major types of life insurance.

It is a type of life insurance where the insured needs to pay for it until his or her death.

It is a type of life insurance that has a specific timeframe.

Aside from the insuring agreement, you can include exclusions in the insurance contract to create a more defined contract coverage. This section will clarify the situations that the policy does not cover.

It is a section of an insurance contract that describes the perils and risks that the insurance policy covers.

To offer clients a more valuable insurance policy, you can include an assignment of insurance policy. By making your products more valuable, you will attract more potential clients. You can also develop  product management  to create more improved insurance products.

Related Posts

Free 30+ appraisal forms in pdf, free 9+ employee self-assessment samples in ms word pdf, free 36+ examples of termination letter templates in pdf ms ..., free 45+ sample proposal forms in pdf ms word, free 7+ sample project closeout in pdf ms word, free 6+ sample agent appointment letter templates in pdf ms ..., free 20+ sample buy sell agreement templates in pdf ms word ..., free 19+ sample rental agreement templates in pdf ms word, sample extended service contract, free 11+ consulting agreement samples in pdf ms word ..., 9+ freelance contract templates in google docs ms word | pdf ..., free 9+ sample board resolution agreement templates in pdf, free 22+ letter of support samples in pdf ms word, free 9+ sample two party contract templates in pdf ms word, free 9+ sample notice agreement templates in pdf, free 10+ sample valuation reports in pdf, free 6+ sample medical claim forms in pdf, free 32+ business plan templates in google docs ms word ..., free 9+ sample medical website terms and conditions in pdf.

Coach B. Insurance

March 23, 2021 By csbenton

While our site doesn’t feature every company or financial product on the open market, we believe everyone should be able to make great financial decisions with the utmost confidence. The guidance we offer, the information we provide, and the tools we create are objective, independent, straightforward — and free.

So how do we make money? Our partners compensate us. This may influence what products we write about and review and where on the site we put them. In no way does this affect our recommendations or advice, which are grounded in many hours of research. Our partners cannot pay us to guarantee favorable reviews of their products or services. Here is a list of our partners.

The Truth About Collateral Assignment of Life Insurance Policies

If you have a life insurance policy, a collateral assignment will let you use it as loan collateral. But, if you die before the loan is paid off, the lender will get paid first, and what is left will go to your beneficiaries.

Google

  • updated last on March 11, 2023

Quick Article Guide:

How Does Collateral Assignment Work?

Getting life insurance to acquire a loan, collateral assignment of life insurance , do not assign the lender as beneficiary, the type of insurance policies best used as collateral assignment of a life insurance policy, collateral assignment of life insurance sample:, what is a collateral assignment of life insurance.

Collateral assignment of life insurance is a way of using life insurance to protect a loan or other secured credit such as real estate or automobiles. The borrower assigns all rights to the death benefit of their life insurance policy to the lender, who can then use it to cover the debt if the policyholder passes away before paying off their loan.

A collateral assignment of life insurance provides an extra layer of security to the lender, knowing that their loan will be repaid—even if the borrower deceases before fulfilling their debt obligations. It also provides the policyholder with peace of mind, knowing that their loan and other debts are taken care of in the event of death. Additionally, a collateral assignment can help reduce the lender’s risk when providing a loan to someone considered a high-risk borrower due to poor credit or other factors.

In case you are experiencing a problem with your finances, it is good to know that life insurance is applicable as collateral for a loan. Today, lenders are now accepting insurance, especially  life insurance , as collateral to a loan. It is because it has a guaranteed fund. Therefore, if something worse happens to you, they will get paid. Knowing more about the collateral assignment of life insurance policy and how it can help you get the loan you need. The following are important facts that you need to know.

Universal life insurance

Insureds have the liberty to use it as a collateral assignment of life insurance as long as there is no limitation within your policy contract. Therefore, there is a need to do a quick review of your existing contract to find out. One must not forget to read and review their contract before using their insurance as collateral. It can avoid future problems.

Once you know that there is no limitation with your contract, you can now apply for a loan. Surprisingly, one can use it to apply for more than one loan. For example, a $500,000 policy can be separated into two portions and apply for two different loans. Using an assignment, the insured can transfer the portion of the policy’s rights to the assignee. Moreover, the collateral assignment of life insurance policy depends on the agreement between the lender and the borrower or the policyholder.

Questions On Collateral Assignments?

Let us help you get that business loan covered.

life insurance approved - coach b. insurance

In the event of your passing right, before you finish paying the loan, the lender will receive the amount you still owed from the death benefit. Furthermore, the remaining balance is given to the beneficiary. However, the policy needs to stay current; it means that you need to keep up with paying the entire premium until the loan’s life. In that case, your family needs to take care of the payment.

Also, you have limited access to the cash value to safeguard the collateral. In case you have paid for the loan before you die, then the lender will no longer have access to the death benefit. The cash value assignment is more attractive for most loan companies because they can recover the fund even if the borrower is still alive.

Although you should inform the insurance provider about the collateral assignment of life insurance, they do not have any involvement with you and the loan’s lender agreement.

It is important to avoid making the mistake of assigning the lender as the beneficiary. The reason is the fact that the lender can get the whole insurance benefit. It can happen once you die, and you only pay half of the loan. A contract is given more importance than a will.

The bank only needs a collateral assignment. Therefore, as the owed amount decrease, the money that goes to the bank also decreases. The rest of the amount will go to the primary beneficiary of the policy.

life insurance definition

The permanent life insurance type has a cash value, and the lender can get access to it if the borrower or insured permits. However, the insured has limited access to the cash value to protect the collateral. There is no need to worry about anything as long as the loan is fully paid before you die.  The collateral assignment is removed from the policy, and the loan company does not have any access to the death benefit.

A term life insurance policy is a good choice to get a loan. Loan companies only require a certain period for the loan so that it can coincide with the insurance policy term. For instance, term life can go as far as 5 to 10 years. Once you already paid the loan amount, you can terminate the policy or keep it.

If you get a $300,000 term life policy and borrow $150,000 from a bank, you can choose the collateral assignment. In case your children are the beneficiaries, then both your children and the bank have the right to the claim. However, the main priority is the money owed from the bank. Therefore the policy needs to settle the remaining amount from the loan. It means that they will receive the payment first before your children as the beneficiary receive their share of the death benefit.

The Process of Collateral Assignment

Most lenders will accept the existing policy as assignment collateral. However, some loan companies will require you to get a new policy for it. One can opt for either of the two ways as insurers are aware of this practice and handle the process very well.

Firstly, start by getting a loan. One must go to the bank and ask for the requirements and what type of loans they offer. Also, most of the loans come from the Small Business Administration , and it is sold through larger banks such as Chase, Wells Fargo, or Bank of America. Besides, you may also opt for smaller banks.  Taking one’s time to further their financial education is something everyone should do.

life insurance may not pay off

Lastly, it is a good idea to discuss the matter with an insurance agent like Coach B. at Coach B. Insurance.  A good no medical exam life insurance policy usually takes a week maybe two for under $500,000 face amount to get approved.  Also, do not make the mistake of not reviewing your existing policy agreement. For a new policy, it is good to ask the insurer upfront about getting a loan.

Banks that accept collateral assignment

Many banks and other financial institutions accept collateral assignments as a form of security for loans, including online lenders like LendingClub, Upstart, and SoFi. Collateral investment firms such as Full Life are also great options for those seeking to secure a loan with their life insurance policy. To learn more about how these companies work and which organization best suits your financial needs, contact us today! With traditional banks and lenders, collateral assignments are typically used to secure loans for homeowners or business owners. When you pledge your life insurance as collateral to secure a loan, the financial institution will place a lien on your policy so that if you fail to meet the requirements of your loan agreement, they have recourse to liquidate some or all of your death benefits. This can help borrowers access capital when they may not otherwise qualify for a loan due to a lack of collateral.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who can authorize to assign a life insurance policy as collateral for a loan?

To authorize a life insurance policy as collateral for a loan, the insured must specifically endorse it in writing. The only person who can endorse the policy is an authorized representative from the insurer or the insured themselves.

What Are the Benefits of Collateral Assignment of Life Insurance?

Collateral assignment of life insurance provides many benefits, including more flexibility and control over the policy, improved liquidity in case of an unexpected financial need, tax benefits, and excellent safety against creditors. The key benefit is that the insured can leverage their life insurance policy as collateral to secure a loan or line of credit. This type of asset-back lending may be used for business expansion, investment, debt consolidation, and many other uses.

What is an example of collateral assignment?

An example of a collateral assignment is when an insurance policy is assigned to a third party as security for a loan or the repayment of an existing debt. The collateral assignment creates a legally binding agreement between the insurer, the lender, and the debtor.

Meet the team

About Coach B.

After starting his financial career with Phoenix Home Life Insurance Company back in 1992, Scott decided he wanted to provide people with an easier and more enjoyable way to buy life insurance. That was the start of Coach B. Life Insurance, whose mission is to be transparent, honest, and helpful to customers — without ever bugging or pushing them.

In the years since then, he has worked tirelessly to improve the process of shopping for insurance. His goal is to make sure that everyone who comes to Coach B. — whether they end up buying a policy or not — has the best possible experience.

More Articles

Life insurance for non-us citizens (2024).

Advertiser disclosure While our site doesn’t feature every company or financial product on the open market, we believe everyone should be able to make great

Discover the Benefits of Life Insurance with No Physical Exam

Is there a waiting period for life insurance.

Advertiser disclosure While our site doesn’t feature every company or financial product on the open market, we believe everyone should be able to make great

Term Life Insurance Disadvantages, Benefits

Cremation cost: breakdown for all 50 states, how much can i borrow from my life insurance policy.

Coach B. Insurance

Get help from a licensed agent at no-cost and no-obligation

Disclaimer: Coach B. Insurance strives to keep its information accurate and up to date. This information may be different than what you see when you visit a financial institution, service provider or specific product’s site. All financial products, shopping products and services are presented without warranty. When evaluating offers, please review the financial institution’s Terms and Conditions. 

Testimonials

Call us (800) 342-1537

Medicare Supplements

Types of Life Insurance

No Medical Exam Term Insurance

Affordable Term Life Insurance

Instant Issue Life Insurance

Final Expense Life Insurance

Universal Life Insurance

Guaranteed Issue Life Insurance

Accidental Death Life Insurance

Living Benefits Life Insurance

Let Us Shop For You

FAQ’s

Life Insurance Calculator

Google Reviews

© Copyright 2020 – Coach B. Life Insurance                            Sitemap         Privacy Policy       Terms and Conditions

  • Assignments In Insurance Law

Introduction

  • 1.1 Nature Of Insurance Policies

1.2 Assignment

  • 2. Application Of English Law

2.1 Generally

  • 2.2 Policies Of Assurance Act 1867

2.3 Marine Insurance Act 1906

3. marine insurance, 4. property insurance, 5. motor insurance, 6. life insurance, 6.1 legal assignment, 6.2 equitable assignment, 6.3 incomplete assignment, 6.4 priorities.

  • 7.1 Assignment Of Insurance Policies
  • 7.2 Assignment Of The Proceeds Of Insurance Policies
  • 7.3 Assignment Of The Subject Matter Of Insurance Policies
  • 7.4 Assignment By Operation Of Law
  • 7.5 Conditions Prohibiting Assignment
  • 8. Conclusion

Assignments in Insurance Law

The concept of assignments in insurance law takes on many forms - firstly due to the various branches of insurance law and secondly due to the various components in an insurance transaction that can be assigned. The format of this discussion, therefore, is reflective of this framework.

Assignments are first discussed in the context of the following branches of insurance law:

(i) marine insurance,

(ii) property insurance,

(iii) motor insurance, and

(iv) life insurance.

The next stage of this discussion focuses on what may be assigned in an insurance transaction and how such assignments are legally effected, namely, the assignment of:

(a) an insurance policy,

(b) the proceeds of an insurance policy, and

(c) the subject matter of an insurance policy.

1.1 Nature of Insurance Policies

A. A. Tarr, Kwai-Lian Liew & W. Holligan writes:

“The origins of insurance date back thousands of years. For example, a central feature of insurance, that of risk interference, was incorporated in commercial arrangements effected by the Babylonians, Phoenicians, Greeks and Romans. However, the infancy of the modern insurance contract is founded on the practices adopted by Italian merchants in the 14th century. These merchants fostered the development of marine insurance and were reluctant to accept the numerous and diverse risks associated with the mercantile adventure of transporting goods across the sea; an early policy entered into in 1385 insured a ship and cargo against loss arising ‘from Acts of God, of the sea, of fire, of jettison, of confiscation by princes or cities or any other person, of reprisal, mishap or any other impediment’. Merchants in their relations with one another tended to uniformity on commercial matters and this tendency led to the rapid dissemination if marine insurance practices to other countries, and, in particular, to the low countries, Spain and England.” [1]

Lord Hailsham of St. Marylebone writes:

“Non-marine insurance first made its appearance in the form of life and fire insurance, but until the middle of the nineteenth century these three [2] types of insurance comprised, in practice, substantially the whole range of insurance.”

The practice of taking insurance and property and later, lives, has a long and rich history. Unsatisfied with leaving the health and safety of property and lives to the capricious whims of fate alone, our ancestors have sought to ‘hedge their bets’ by entering into an insurance transaction.

John Lowry & Philip Rawlings writes:

“The aim of insurance is to shift risk from one person (the insured) to another (the insurers): the owner of a house enters into a fire policy under which an insurer, in exchange for a premium paid by the insured, agrees to pay for damage caused to the property by fire.” [3]

Professor K. S. N. Murthy & K. V. S. Sarma writes:

“The aim of all insurance is to protect the owner from a variety of risks which he anticipates.” [4]

John Birds and Norma J. Hird observe that:

“It is suggested that a contract of insurance is any contract whereby one party assumes the risk of an uncertain event, which is not within his control, happening at a future time, in which event the other party has an interest, and under which contract the first party is bound to pay money or provide its equivalent if the uncertain event occurs.” [5]

In Rayner v Preston [6] , Brett L.J. explained the nature of a contract of insurance in the following terms:

“Now, in my judgment, the subject-matter of the contract of insurance is money, and money only. The subject-matter of insurance is a different thing from the subject-matter of the contract of insurance. The subject-matter of insurance may be a house or other premises in a fire policy, or may be a ship or goods in a marine policy. These are the subject-matter of insurance, but the subject-matter of the contract is money, and money only. The only result of the policy, if an accident which is within the insurance happens, is a payment of money. It is true that under certain circumstances in a fire policy there may be an option to spend the money in rebuilding the premises, but that does not alter the fact that the only liability of the insurance company is to pay money. The contract, therefore, is a contract with regard to the payment of money, and it is a contract made between two persons, and two persons, only, as a contact.” [7]

Poh Chu Chai writes:

“A contract of insurance constitutes a highly personal contract and as a general rule, such a contract is generally not assignable.” [8]

The insurer fixes the premium after considering the particular risks associated with the property and handling of the property in the hands of the insured. As such, as a general rule, an insurance policy is not casually assignable to another party. Nevertheless, assignments are not an unheard of option in an insurance transaction.

Before embarking on the discovery of how assignments in insurance law can be legally effected, it may prove beneficial to consider the nature of what is meant by this phrase which takes centre stage in this discussion, an ‘assignment’.

R. C. Kohli explains:

“Transfer of interest from one to another is called assignment. In insurance also when rights and obligation under the contract are transferred from one to another, the same is called assignment of the policy. There can be another assignment in insurance which is assignment of benefits under the policies. Assignment of policy and assignment of benefits are quite distinct. Whereas in the former all the rights and obligations are transferred, in the latter only benefits (i.e. money due under the policy etc) are transferred. In insurance the assignment means assignment of rights under the contract. An assignee for all purposes becomes the owner of the policy and enjoys all rights thereunder. However, by assignment no change is made in the subject matter insured by the policy and it remains unaltered.” [9]

David Norwood and John P. Weir writes:

“There is no special form of assignment document, no magic words which must be used to create a valid and effective legal assignment. As was expressed in one case [10] : ‘[An assignment] ... may be addressed to the debtor. It may be couched in the language of command, It may be a courteous request. It may assume the form of mere permission. The language is immaterial if the meaning is clear.’

The only important point is that the instrument recording the assignment must make it clear that one party with a contractual right against another party is transferring their right of enforcement of the obligations of the contract to another person.” [11]

Malcolm A. Clarke writes :

“Assignment must have been intended. Intention is ascertained by the substance rather than the form of what is said or done.” [12]

2. Application of English Law

Another introductory matter which must be considered in this discussion is the source of law in the insurance arena in Malaysia.

The governing statute in Malaysia in the field of insurance law is the Insurance Act 1996 [13] . This Act, however, does not seem to mention the issue of assigning insurance policies. As such, the provisions of the Civil Law Act 1956 [14] may be referred to in order to provide valuable guidance on the matter.

Section 3 of the Civil Law Act 1956 provides:

“Save so far as other provision has been made or may hereafter be made by any written law in force in Malaysia, the Court shall -

(a) in West Malaysia or any part thereof, apply the common law of England and the rules of equity as administered in England on the 7 th day of April, 1956;...

Provided always that the said common law, rules of equity and statutes of general application shall be applied so far only as the circumstances of the States of Malaysia and their respective inhabitants permit and subject to such qualifications as local circumstances render necessary.”

Section 5(1) of the Civil Law Act 1956 makes particular reference to life and fire insurance. This section provides that :

“In all questions or issues which arise or which have to be decided in the States of West Malaysia ... with respect to the law of ... marine insurance, average, life and fire insurance ... the law to be administered shall be the same as would be administered in England in the like case at the date of the coming into force of this Act [15] , if such question or issue had arisen or had to be decided in England, unless in any case other provision is or shall be made by any written law.”

With the aid of these provisions, English law has often been referred to for guidance in resolving legal dilemmas in the field of insurance law and since the Malaysian Act on point does not seem to have covered the matter of the assignment of insurance policies, as will be discussed below, many academicians and Malaysian judges have relied on the principles enunciated in the English courts and Parliament on this matter.

2.2 Policies of Assurance Act 1867

There is one particular dilemma highlighted by Nik Ramlah Mahmood with regard to the applicability of the Policies of Assurance Act 1867 [16] of England with regard to the legal assignment of life policies. As this author explains :

“In England, a life policy can be legally assigned in accordance with the Policies of Assurance Act 1867 which deals specifically with such assignment or in accordance with section 136 of the Law of Property Act 1925 [17] which deals with the assignment of a chose in action. [18] ...

As there is no parallel local statute, the Policies of Assurance Act 1867 (UK) is assumed to be applicable in Malaysia and is generally regarded as the only basis for legal assignment of a life policy. The validity of this assumption, however, is questionable. There is in Malaysia a provision similar to section 136 of the Law of Property Act 1925 (UK). This is section 4(3) of the Civil Law Act 1956 which provides for the absolute assignment of a chose in action. The existence of this provision can have two possible effects on the law relating to legal assignment of life policies in Malaysia.

One possible effect is that contrary to popular belief and practice, the Policies of Assurance Act 1867 (UK) is in fact inapplicable in Malaysia. According to section 5 of the Civil Law Act 1856, an English Act like the 1867 Act can only be applied if there are no local statutory provisions on the related issue. As the assignment of a life policy is in fact the assignment of a chose in action and there is a local provision on this, there seems to be no valid justification for applying the Policies of Assurance Act 1867 in Malaysia.

The other possible effect is that there are, in Malaysia as in England, two different statutory provisions relating to the assignment of life policies, one under the Policies of Assurance Act 1867 (UK) and the other under the Civil Law Act 1956. As the Civil Law Act provision deals with the assignment of a chose in action generally, its existence should not prevent the application of an English statute which deals specifically with the assignment of life policies.

While a finding by a Malaysian court in favour of the first possible interpretation may alarm those in the insurance industry who have always regarded the Policies of Assurance Act 1867 of England to be the sole basis for the legal assignment of a life policy, such a finding may in the long term bring the practices of the industry in Malaysia in line with those in England where such assignments are now more commonly done under the Law of Property Act than under the Policies of Assurance Act.” [19]

There is no statute in Malaysia that deals exclusively with the area of marine insurance. As such, as Salleh Abas C.J. clarified in The “Melanie” United Oriental Assurance Sdn. Bhd. Kuantan v. W.M. Mazzarol [20] :

“... we must refer to ... the Marine Insurance Act 1906 of the United Kingdom. This Act is made applicable to Malaysia as part of our law by virtue of section 5(1) [21] of our Civil Law Act 1956.” [22]

The Marine Insurance Act 1906 [23] contains a few sections dealing with the concept of assignment in marine insurance. Section 50 of this Act states :

“(1) A marine policy is assignable unless it contains terms expressly prohibiting assignment. It may be assigned either before or after loss.

(2) Where a marine policy has been assigned so as to pass the beneficial interest in such policy, the assignee of the policy is entitled to sue thereon in his own name; and the defendant is entitled to make any defence arising out of the contract which he would have been entitled to make if the action had been brought in the name of the person by or on behalf of whom the policy was effected.

(3) A marine policy may be assigned by indorsement thereon or in other customary manner.” [24]

Section 51 of this Act reads :

“Where the assured has parted with or lost his interest in the subject-matter insured, and has not, before or at the time of so doing, expressly or impliedly agreed to assign the policy, any subsequent assignment of the policy is inoperative.

Provided that nothing in this section affects the assignment of a policy after loss.” [25]

In Colinvaux’s Law of Insurance , section 51 of this Act is explained as having the effect such that :

“This rule is an obvious corollary of insurable interest: if the assignor loses insurable interest, the policy lapses and there is thus nothing to assign. In the converse case, where the assured assigns the policy without assigning the subject-matter, the assignee has no insurable interest and is thus unable to sue on the policy.” [26]

Section 15 of this Act provides :

“Where the assured assigns or otherwise parts with his interest in the subject-matter insured, he does not thereby transfer to the assignee his rights under the contract of insurance, unless there can be an express or implied agreement with the assignee to that effect.

But the provisions of this section do not affect a transmission of interest by operation of law.” [27]

In the book, Macgillivray & Parkington on Insurance Law - relating to all risks other than marine [28] , the position when the subject-matter insured is assigned is summarised as :

“If the assured voluntarily parts with all his interest in the subject-matter of the insurance policy, the policy lapses since the assured no longer has any insurable interest and can have suffered no loss [29] . The assignment must, however, be complete [30] and if the assured retains any insurable interest he will be able to recover under the policy; thus, if he enters into a contract to convey the subject-matter and the subject-matter is lost or damaged, the assured can still recover even though the risk has passed to the purchaser [31] ; until the vendor is paid he cannot be certain of receiving the purchase price and it is in effect this risk which, in such a case, is the subject of insurance. [32] The policy will probably remain in force ever after conveyance if the purchase price has not been paid, provided that the vendor has not parted with his lien. The lien will ensure that the assured still has an insurable interest. [33] An assured who enters into a contract of sale will often agree to transfer the insurance policy and, if he effectively does so, the transferee will be able to recover under it.”

Digby C. Jess writes:

“Property and liability insurances are personal contracts, and do not run with the property if it is sold or otherwise disposed of or with a transfer of liabilities of the insured. Therefore, both at common law and equity, as assignment of a policy of insurance can only be valid of the insurer consents to this course, whereby, in truth a new contract of insurance is effected between the assignee and the insurer, and that between the assignor (the original insured) and the insurer lapses.” [34]

In The North of England Pure Oil-Cake Company v The Archangel Maritime Insurance Company, [35] a firm insured a cargo of linseed to be transported by sea. The policy was to cover every stage of the voyage as if each stage of the voyage were separately insured and the policy of insurance was expressed to be for the benefit of the firm and the assignees. During the voyage, the firm sold the cargo. Part of the cargo was sunk due to perils within the terms of the policy. Later, the firm assigned the policy to the purchasers of the linseed.

Cockburn C.J. in this case held :

“We are agreed on one point, which entitles the defendants to judgment, viz. that, the policy not having been assigned until after the interest of the assignors had ceased, an effective assignment was impossible.” [36]

In Sadler’s Company and Badcock, [37] a lessee of a house insured the house from fire. After the lessee’s lease expired but while the insurance policy was still in effect, the house burnt down. Following the destruction of the house, the lessee assigned the policy to the landlords. The landlords then attempted to claim the benefit of the policy from the insurance company.

The Lord Chancellor in this case decided that a policyholder could not assign a policy at a point in time when the policyholder does not have any interest in the insured property. The lessee in this case was not able to assign the policy since at the time the lessee purported to assign the policy the lessee had no longer any interest in the house. In the words of the judge :

“And I am of opinion that the party insured ought to have a property in the thing insured at the time of the insurance made, and at the time of the loss by fire, or he cannot be relieved. Mrs. Strode [the lessee] had no property at the time of the fire, consequently no loss to her; and if she had no interest, nothing could pass to the plaintiffs [landlords] by assignment. ...

If the insured was not to have a property at the time of the insurance or loss, any one might insure another’s house, which might have a bad tendency to burning houses. Insuring the thing from damage is not the meaning of the policy, it must mean insuring Mrs. Strode from damage, and she has suffered none.” [38]

In The Ecclesiastical Commissioners for England v The Royal Exchange Assurance Corporation, [39] one ecclesiastical body sold a farm that was covered by a fire insurance policy to another ecclesiastical body. At the time of the sale, no mention was made about the assignment of the policy. After the sale, the farm burnt down and the purchaser seeks to claim on the policy.

The insurance company argues that there was no valid assignment of the policy and as such, the insurance company is not liable to the seller since the seller had no interest in the insured property and thus have no insurable interest at the time of the accident nor the purchaser since the policy has not been validly assigned to the purchaser. Charles J. in this case agreed with the arguments of the insurance company and held:

“The whole transaction was complete. Can anybody sue? The Commissioners [seller] cannot sue because there has been no assignment of the policy to them. ... In this case the vendors have conveyed away their property and received their consideration ... I must therefore give judgment for the defendants [insurance company], with costs.” [40]

In Collinridge v The Royal Exchange Assurance Corporation, [41] a company which owned a number of buildings insured the same against fire. These buildings were indeed destroyed by fire. However, before the fire took place, these buildings were in the process of being acquired by the Metropolitan Board of Works. There was no mention of an accompanying assignment of the fire insurance policy. The Board had yet to make payments for the conveyance. The insurance company disputes liability.

Mellor J. in this case held:

“It appears that the plaintiff at the time of the fire was in the position of unpaid vendor, and had possession of his premises. Under these circumstances, I think there is nothing to prevent him from bringing an action to recover the amount which he has insured.” [42]

Lush J. in this case concurred :

“The plaintiff is in the position of a person who has entered into a contract to sell his property to another. ... The contract will no doubt be completed, but legally the buildings are still his property. The defendants [insurance company] by their policy undertook to make good any loss or damage to the property by fire. There is nothing to shew that any collateral dealings with the premises, such as those stated in this case, are to limit his liability. If the plaintiff had actually conveyed them away before the fire, that would have been a defence to the action, for he would have then have had no interest at the time of the loss. But in the present case he still has a right to the possession of his property, and the defendants are bound to pay him the insurance money ...” [43]

In Rayner v Preston, [44] a set of buildings covered by a fire insurance policy were contracted to be sold. After the date the contract was signed but before the contract was completed, the buildings were damaged by fire. The contract contained no mention of the fire insurance policy. The insurance company made payments to the seller of the buildings. The purchaser seeks to claim this money or to compel the seller to apply the money received towards making repairs to the buildings.

The first argument proposed by the purchaser was that although the contract made no specific mention of the insurance policy, the contract gave the purchaser a right to all contracts related to the buildings. Cotton L.J. in this case was not in support of this contention and held :

“The contact passes all things belonging to the vendors appurtenant to or necessarily connected with the use and enjoyment of the property mentioned in the contract, but not, in my opinion, collateral contracts; and such, in my opinion, ... the policy of insurance is. It is not a contract limiting or affecting the interest of the vendors in the property sold, of affecting their right to enforce the contract of sale, for it is conceded that, if there were no insurance and the buildings sold were burnt, the contract for sale would be enforced. It is not even a contract in the event of a fire to repair the buildings, but a contract in that event to pay the vendors a sum of money which, if received by them, they may apply in any way they think fit. It is a contract, not to repair the damage to the buildings, but to pay a sum not exceeding the sum insured or the money value of the injury. In my opinion, the contract of insurance is not of such a nature as to pass without apt words under a contract for sale of the thing insured.” [45]

The next argument proposed by the purchaser was that between the time of the contract being made and the conveyance being completed, the seller was a trustee of the property for the purchaser and as such, the seller is a trustee for the purchaser with regard to the money received for the property during this period of trusteeship. This argument did not find favour with the court either and Cotton L.J. held:

“An unpaid vendor is a trustee in a qualified sense only, and is so only because he has made a contact which a Court of Equity will give effect to by transferring the property sold to the purchaser, and so far as he is a trustee he is so only in respect of the property contracted to be sold. Of this the policy is not a part. A vendor is in no way a trustee for the purchaser of rents accruing before the time fixed for completion, and here the fire occurred and the right to recover the money accrued before the day fixed for completion. The argument that the money is received in respect of the property which is trust property is, in my opinion, fallacious.” [46]

Brett L.J. in this case concurred :

“... I venture to say that I doubt whether it is a true description of the relation between the parties to say that from the time of the making of the contract, or at any time, one is ever trustee for the other. They are only parties to a contract of sale and purchase of which a Court of Equity will under certain circumstances decree a specific performance. But even if the vendor was a trustee for the vendee, it does not seem to me at all to follow that anything under the contract of insurance would pass. As I have said, the contract of insurance is a mere personal contact for the payment of money. It is not a contract which runs with the land. If it were, there ought to be a decree that upon completion of the purchaser the policy be handed over. But that is not the law. The contract of insurance does not run with the land; it is a mere personal contract, and unless it is assigned no suit or action can be maintained upon it except between the original parties to it... [47]

“I therefore, with deference, think that the Plaintiffs here [purchaser] cannot recover from the Defendant [seller], on the ground that there was no relation of any kind or sort between the Plaintiff and the Defendant with regard to the policy, and therefore none with regard to any money received under the policy.” [48]

James L.J. in this case gave a dissenting judgment on this point and held that :

“... the relation between the vendor and the purchaser became, and was in law, as from the date of the contract and up to the completion of it, the relation of trustee and cestui que trust , and that the trustee received the insurance money by reason of and as the actual amount of the damage done to the trust property.” [49]

In Castellain v Preston and Others, [50] the defendants owned a piece of land and buildings which were covered by a fire insurance policy. The defendants entered into negotiations to sell the premises to their tenants. In the midst of these negotiations, a fire broke out which damaged a part of the buildings. By the time of the fire the contract of sale was signed, a deposit was paid but the contract was not completely performed as yet. The insurance company made payments to the defendants on the insurance policy for the fire. The tenants paid the full purchase price and proceeded with the slae despite the fire. The insurance company brings the present action.

Brett L.J. commented on the foundation of insurance law :

“The very foundation, in my opinion, of every rule which has been applied to insurance law is this, namely, that the contract of insurance contained in a marine or fire policy is a contract of indemnity, and of indemnity only, and that this contract means that the assured, in case of a loss against which the policy has been made, shall be fully indemnified, but shall never be more than fully indemnified. That is the fundamental principle of insurance, and if ever a proposition is brought forward which is at variance with it, that is to say, which either will prevent the assured from obtaining a full indemnity, or which will give to the assured more than a full indemnity, that proposition must certainly be wrong.” [51]

Cotton L.J. added :

“The policy is really a contract to indemnify the person insured for the loss which he has sustained in consequence of the peril insured against which has happened, and from that it follows, of course, that as it is only a contract of indemnity, it is only to pay that loss which the assured may have sustained by reason of the fire which has occurred. In order to ascertain what that loss is, everything must be taken into account which is received by and comes to the hand of the assured, and which diminishes the loss. It is only the amount of the loss, when it is considered as a contract of indemnity, which is to be paid after taking into account and estimating those benefits or sums of money which the assured may have received in diminution of the loss... [52]

Therefore the conclusion at which I have arrived is, that if the purchase-money has been paid in full, the insurance office will get back that which they have paid, on the ground that the subsequent payment of the price which had been before agreed upon, and the contract for payment of which was existing at the time, must be brought into account by the assured, because it diminishes the loss against which the insurance office merely undertook to indemnify them [53] .”

Mahinder Singh Sidhu observes :

“An assignment of the policy means a ‘change of interest’ i.e., somebody else is substituted for the original insured in the motor insurance contract. All motor policies can be validly assigned but the insurer’s prior consent is essential.” [54]

Mahinder Singh Sidhu also writes :

“A motor insurance contract is always personal in the sense that some human element is inevitably involved, and in a technical sense, the insurer’s decision to enter on the contract depends on the personal qualities of the insured and the insurer’s confidence in him. The insurers have the right to question and investigate the proposed insured and vary the terms of the contract. If an assignment takes place it is termed as a “novation”, since the assignment virtually creates a new contract with the assignee.

A valid assignment gives the assignee the right to sue and gives the insurance company a good legal discharge without the necessity of joining the assignor. Where there is a conditional sale of a car to the new purchaser, the ownership of the car still remains with the insured, and does not amount to any transfer of his insurable interest. But where there has been a complete sale and transfer of the vehicle and handing over of the policy documents to the purchaser, it does not create a valid assignment, though there is a transfer of interest of the subject matter of the insurance. The transfer of the insurable interest causes the policy to lapse, and the purchaser has no insurance cover if he drives the car and meets with an accident.” [55]

In Peters v General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corporation Ltd. [56] , the owner of a motor van sold the vehicle to another person and purportedly assigned the motor insurance policy for the van to the purchaser. After the sale, the purchaser was involved in an accident and attempted to make a claim to the insurance company based on the motor insurance policy purportedly assigned. The insurance company disputed the purchaser’s right to claim under the insurance policy issued to the seller of the van.

Sir Wilfred Greene M.R. in this case decided that:

“Assuming in his favour that there was an intention to assign the policy, the fundamental remains : Is this policy one which is capable of assignment? The judge held that it was not, and I am in entire agreement with that.” [57]

The effect of the motor insurance policy was that the insurance company undertook to indemnify the policyholder in the case of an accident while the car was driven by the policyholder or anyone else driving the vehicle with the policyholder’s consent or permission.

Sir Wilfred Greene M.R. explained the effect of deciding that such a policy was assignable:

“It appears to me as plain as anything can be that a contract of this kind is in its very nature not assignable. The effect of the assignment, if it were possible to assign, was ... that, from and after the assignment, the name of Mr. Pope, the assignee [the purchaser], would have taken the place of that of Mr. Coomber [the seller] in the policy, and the policy would have to be read as though Mr. Pope’s name were mentioned instead of Mr. Coomber’s. In other words, the effect of the assignment would be to impose upon the insurance company an obligation to indemnify a new assured, or persons ordered or permitted to drive by that new assured. That appears to be altering in toto the character of the risk under a policy of this kind. The risk that A.B. is going to incur liability by driving his motor car, or that persons authorised by A.B. are going to cause injury by driving his motor car, is one thing. The risk that C.D. will incur liability by driving a motor car, or that persons authorised by C.D. will incur liability through driving a motor car, is, or may be, a totally different thing.” [58]

One reason given by Sir Wilfred Greene M.R. for deciding that an insurance policy of this kind was not capable of assignment was that :

“The insurance company in this case, as in every case, make inquiries as to the driving record of the person proposing to take out a policy of insurance with them. The business reasons for that are obvious, because a man with a good record will be received at an ordinary rate of premium and a man with a bad record may not be received at all, or may be asked to pay a higher premium. The policy is, in a very true sense, one in which there is inherent a personal element of such a character as to make it, in my opinion, quite impossible to say that the policy is one assignable at the volition of the assured.” [59]

The second reason given by the judge as the basis of his judgement was that the according to the Road Traffic Act 1930 [60] in the United Kingdom, it is unlawful for anyone to use a motor vehicle or permit anyone else to use the motor vehicle unless that user or other person permitted by the user is covered by a motor insurance policy for the use of the motor vehicle. [61] Additionally under the statute, if a judgment is obtained in respect of a liability covered by the policy against any person insured by the policy, then the insurance company is generally liable to make the required payment to the person who has the benefit of the judgment. [62]

The purchaser of the car in this case argued that he was driving the car with the permission of the policyholder [63] and as such, should receive the same benefit of coverage in terms of the insurance policy. Based on this rationale, the purchaser argued that since judgment was obtained against him in respect of the accident and since he was covered by the policy, the insurance company should be liable under the judgment and make payments to the party who obtained the judgment. The court, however, held that :

“At the date when the accident took place, the entire property in this car was vested in Pope [the purchaser]. He had bought the car. On the sale of the car, the property passed to him ... The property, therefore, passed to the purchaser long before this accident took place. The circumstance that he had not paid the whole of the purchase price is irrelevant for that purpose, because that circumstance does not leave in the vendor, Mr. Coomber, any interest in the car. There is no vendor’s lien, or anything of that sort. The car had become the out-and-out property of Pope. When Pope was using that car, he was not using it by the permission of Coomber [the seller]. It is an entire misuse of language to say that. He was using it as owner, and by virtue of his rights as owner, and not by virtue of any permission of Coomber.” [64]

In Smith v Ralph, [65] the scenario was basically the same as above, namely, that the purchaser of a motor vehicle again tried to claim the coverage of the insurance policy issued to the seller of the motor vehicle on the basis that the purchaser was driving the motor vehicle with the permission or consent of the policyholder.

Lord Parker of Waddington C.J. in this case similarly held that the purchaser was not covered by the policy as the policyholder could not assign any rights in the policy when he no longer had any interest in the vehicle covered by the policy. In the words of the judge :

“Any permission or authority given by the policyholder ... could not extend beyond the time when he ceased to be a policyholder in the sense of having any insurable interest.” [66]

In Nanyang Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Salbiah & Anor, [67] a car was bought on behalf of a company. The company then entered into negotiations to sell the car to the purchaser. The terms of the proposed sale in the written contract included the obligation of the purchaser to make an initial payment and thereafter to continue paying for the car in instalments. The parties varied this term by oral agreement when the purchaser did not make this initial payment in full by allowing him to make this initial payment in instalments. The car was involved in an accident and judgment was obtained against the driver of the car who was the purchaser. The insurance company disputed liability for the claim against them to honour the judgment obtained as they argued that the seller of the car no longer had any insured interest with the proposed sale of the car and as such, the insurance policy has lapsed.

Azmi C.J. in this case held:

“It is therefore quite clear in my view from the evidence, that the company intended to retain the property in the car until Abdul Karim [the purchaser] has paid in full the initial payment of $1,000 under the D.6 [the contract] when he could execute a hire-purchase agreement with a financial company. ...

For the above reason, I would therefore with respect, agree with the finding of the trial judge that the appellants [seller] had an insurable interest in the car on the date of the accident and the car was being driven by Abdul Karim with the permission of the insured.” [68]

In People’s Insurance Co. of Malaya Ltd. v Ho Ah Kum & Anor, [69] the driver of a van was sued by the estate of a deceased who was killed in an accident due to the negligent driving of this driver. The estate of the deceased obtained judgment against the driver of the van. The driver, it was alleged, was driving the van with the permission of the owner of the van who had an insurance policy on the van. The question that arose in this case was whether the driver was so driving with the permission of the owner or whether the owner of the van had sold the van to the driver and as such parted with possession of the van before the date of the accident.

The driver was actually an employee of the owner of the van who at the time of the accident was using returning from a delivery made on behalf of the employer in the course of his employment. The evidence showed that the owner told the driver that the ownership of the van would not be transferred unless and until the driver made full payment of the purchase price. The owner was aware that the reason the driver bought the van was to use the van in making these deliveries.

Wee Chong Jin C.J. in this case held on the facts that:

“In any event, having regard to the relationship between Foo [driver] and Yeo [owner] throughout the material times; to the purpose for which Foo agreed to purchase from Yeo the motor van; and most important of all to the uncontradicted evidence of Foo that when the accident occurred he was returning after delivering Yeo’s flour and there being no evidence to the contrary, I take the view that there is sufficient evidence on the record for me to find and I do find that at the time of the accident Foo was driving the van on the order of the insured.” [70]

In Tattersall v. Drysdale, [71] the driver of a car was involved in an accident and judgment was obtained against him. The driver had an insurance policy with the London & Edinburgh Insurance Company for a Standard Swallow Saloon car. This Standard car was sold to a company who was in turn selling the driver a Riley Saloon car belonging to the director of this company which was under a Lloyd’s Eclipse insurance Policy. The driver was in the process of having his insurance company, the London & Edinburgh Insurance Company, cover the Riley car and no longer cover the Standard car. However, this change was not made before the accident as yet. The question that arose was which insurance company was liable for the accident.

Goddard J. in this case held :

“As to the question of permission, I am clearly of opinion that he was driving with Gilling’s [the director of the company the Riley car was bought from] permission. ... The truth is that no bargain about insurance was ever made. Gilling, on handing over his car after the bargain had been made, wished the plaintiff [driver] to insure it and he was willing to do so, but he was allowed to drive it as he wished ...” [72]

Both insurance policies contained a clause that coverage is extended to indemnify a person driving the insured car with the assured’s permission provided that the driver is not entitled to indemnity under any other insurance policy. The next question that arose, as such, was whether the Riley car was covered by the insurance policy of the driver. The judge held that it did not. This insurance policy was stated to cover the Standard car which had been sold. The Riley car was not entered on this policy. The coverage was extended to the situation when the assured drove another car temporarily but it is the car stated in the policy which is the subject of the insurance. As such, this insurance policy in the name of the driver lapsed when the car the insurance policy was stated to cover, namely the Standard car, was sold.

The driver held to be driving the Riley car with the permission of the assured, namely the director of the company who owned this car with an insurance policy, the judge went on to direct that the insurance company of the director, namely, the Lloyd’s Eclipse insurance Policy, through the extension clause discussed above, covered the driver of the Riley car and as such, was liable on the judgment obtained for the accident.

In Roslan bin Abdullah v. New Zealand Insurance Co. Ltd, [73] there was a collision between 2 trucks. Judgment was obtained and the appellant then sought to claim against the insurance company who had issued an insurance policy on the respondent’s truck. The insurance company disputed liability as the judgment obtained was not entered against the assured as the assured was the previous owner of the truck and not the current owner, the respondent company.

Wan Suleiman F.J. [74] in this case, with regard to whether there was any assignment or novation of the insurance policy from the previous owner to the new owner, affirmed the following principles from the judgment of Goddard J. in Peters v General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corporation Ltd. [75]

Goddard J. (as he then was) held:

(a) when the vendor sold the car, the insurance policy automatically lapsed.

(b) at the time of the accident, the purchaser could not be said to be driving the car by the order or with the permission of the vendor, as the car was then the purchaser’s property.

(c) the insured is not entitled to assign his policy to a third party. An insurance policy is a contract of personal indemnity, and the insurer cannot be compelled to accept responsibility in respect of a third party who may be quite unknown to them.” [76]

Wan Suleiman F.J., with regard to whether the driver, as an employee of the current owner of the truck was driving with the permission of the previous owner of the truck, held :

“We are informed by counsel for the appellant that Wee & Wee Realty Sdn. Bhd. [the previous owner of the truck] and United Malaysia Co. Ltd. [the current owner of the truck] the second defendant in C.S. K.124/76 are sister companies. Be that as it may they are distinct entities. The respondents were no longer the owners of the truck and therefore there cannot be any question of them ordering or permitting the first defendant [employee of the current owner of the truck] in C.S. K.124/76 to drive it.” [77]

S. Santhana Dass writes :

“Life insurance seeks to reduce the financial uncertainties arising from the natural contingencies in old age and death and to ease the burden in the case of possible misfortunes - injury and sickness. The principal function of life insurance business is to furnish protection against the financial needs which may be caused by disability and death. It provides food, shelter and clothing, when illness, injury or death cuts off the income of the breadwinner.” [78]

In the book, Colinvaux’s Law of Insurance , it is written:

“Life policies are to be considered something more than a contract. They are treated as securities for money payable at an uncertain but future date which is bound to occur.” [79]

Robert J. Surridge, Sara Forrest, Noleen Dignan, Alison Broadberry & Duncan Backus writes :

“A practical definition might be that a life assurance contract is one whereby one party (the insurer) undertakes for a consideration (the premium) to pay money (the sum assured) to or for the benefit of the other party (the assured) upon the happening of a specified event, where the object of the assured is to provide a sum for himself or others at some future date, or for others in the event of his death.” [80]

Robert J. Surridge, Sara Forrest, Noleen Dignan, Alison Broadberry & Duncan Backus also write with regard to the assignment of life policies that :

“An assignment of a life policy is a document or action which is effective to transfer the ownership of the policy from one person to another. Assignments may be made for a variety of reasons, including:

- Sale of exchange;

- Gift or voluntary transfer;

- Settlement, transferring the policy to trustees to give effect to successive or contingent interests;

- Transfer to existing trustees of a settlement or to beneficiaries in pursuance of the trusts;

- Mortgage; transfer of mortgage; or reassignment on repayment;or

- Assignment to a trustee for the benefit of creditors.” [81]

Nik Ramlah Mahmood writes:

“In relation to life insurance, an assignment means the transfer of one’s interest in the policy to another. Such an assignment commonly happens when an insured under an own life policy uses the policy, which is a valuable piece of property, as security for a loan and assigns it to the creditor. This usually takes the form of a conditional assignment whereby the policy would be reassigned to the insured once he has paid all his debts. Banks and other credit-giving institutions which lend huge sums of money to individuals normally insist that the borrower takes out a policy on his life and assigns it to them as security for the loan.

A life policy can also be unconditionally or absolutely assigned either as a gift or under a contract of sale. Such an assignment is absolute and does not leave any residual rights with the assignor.” [82]

In Dalby v. The India and London Life-Assurance Company, [83] the Anchor Life-Assurance Company insured the life of his late Royal Highness, the Duke of Cambridge. This policy was effected by Wright on behalf of the company.

Parke B. stated in this case:

“The contract commonly called life-assurance, when properly considered, is a mere contract to pay a certain sum of money on the death of a person, in consideration of the due payment of a certain annuity for his life, - the amount of the annuity being calculated, in the first instance, according to the probable duration of the life; and when once fixed, it is constant and invariable. The stipulated amount of annuity is to be uniformly paid on one side, and the sum to be paid in the event of death is always (except when bonuses have been given by prosperous offices) the same, on the other. This species of insurance in no way resembles a contract of indemnity.

Policies of assurance against fire ands against marine risks, are both properly contracts of indemnity, - the insurer engaging to make good, within certain limited amounts, the losses sustained by the assured in their buildings, ships, and effects... [84]

... a contract of indemnity only. But that is not of the nature of what is termed an assurance for life; it really is what it is on the fact of it, - a contract to pay a certain sum in the event of death [85] .”

S. Santhana Dass points out that:

“An assignee under a life insurance contract can re-assign the policy to the original owner.” [86]

The Policies of Assurance Act 1867 [87] defines a life insurance policy as “... ‘any instrument by which the payment of moneys, by or out of the funds of an assurance company, on the happening of any contingency depending on the duration of human life, is assured or secured’. [88] ”

The Policies of Assurance Act 1867 provides that an assignee can sue in his own name if [89] :

(i) the assignee has the right in equity to receive and the right to give a valid discharge to the assurance company for the policy money, that is, it was a precondition that the assignee be beneficially entitled to the policy money or entitled to receive the policy money as a trustee or mortgagee at the time of the claim;

(ii) the assignee has obtained an assignment, either by endorsement on the policy or by separate instrument, in the words or to the effect set forth in the Schedule to this Act; and

(iii) written notice of the assignment had been given to the insurance company.

Cotton L.J. in the case In re Turcan [90] commented :

“Before the Act of 1867 [91] (30 & 31 Vict. C. 144) a policy could not be assigned at law, but now it can ...” [92]

Section 4(3) of the Civil Law Act 1956 [93] states :

“Any absolute assignment, by writing, under the hand of the assignor, not purporting to be by way of charge only, of any debt or other legal chose in action, of which express notice in writing has been given to the debtor, trustee or other person from whom the assignor would have been entitled to receive or claim the debt or chose in action, shall be, and be deemed to have been, effectual in law, subject to all equities which would have been entitled to priority over the right of the assignee under the law as it existed in the State before the date of the coming into force of this Act [94] , to pass and transfer the legal right to the debt or chose in action, from the date of the notice, and all legal and other remedies for the same, and the power to give a good discharge for the same, without the concurrence of the assignor.”

S. Santhana Dass has summarised the requirements under section 4(3) of the Civil Law Act 1956 in order to effect a legal assignment of a life insurance policy as follows :

“The requirements for an absolute assignment of a life policy are as follows:-

(a) the assignment must be in writing and signed by the assignor (the insured);

(b) it must be absolute and not by way of charge only; and

(c) notice in writing of the assignment must be given to the insurer.” [95]

S. Santhana Dass goes on to explain:

“The common practice amongst insurers with respect to assignments (be it under the Section 4(3) of the Civil Law Act 1956 or the Policies of Assurance Act 1867 (U.K.) can be summarised as follows:-

(i) An assignment should be in writing and a life policy can be assigned absolutely or conditionally.

(ii) The written notice of assignment must be sent to the Head Office or the Principal Office of the insurer.

(iii) Upon receipt of the assignment notice the insurer registers each notice.

(iv) If there is no written notice given to the insurer and the insurer has made payment to a person other than the assignee, the insurers shall not be liable to the assignee thereafter. The assignee cannot sue the insurer for recovery of any benefit under the policy unless a notice of assignment has been sent to the insurer.

(v) An assignment can be done by effecting an endorsement and attaching it to the back of the policy. Otherwise it is effected by a separate deed signed by all parties concerned i.e. the assignor, assignee and the insurer.

(vi) If there is more than one assignment, the priority of claims by the assignor will depend upon the priority in the date of receipt of the notice by the insurer. Thus position has now been altered by Section 168(2) of the Insurance Act 1996 where priority is based on the date of the assignment rather than date of the notice.” [96]

Robert J. Surridge, Sara Forrest, Noleen Dignan, Alison Broadberry & Duncan Backus writes:

“Where there has not been a legal assignment but the assignee has given consideration , equity will (subject to the riles on priority) assist him to perfect his title against third parties, even though he may not have obtained formal assignment.

If, however, a voluntary assignee seeks the support of equity, he will succeed only where:

(1) the assignment is complete between assignor and assignee, ie everything necessary has been done to make a present transfer and render the assignment binding; or

(2) the assignor has constituted himself as trustee for the assignee.” [97]

Roy Hodgin writes :

“Assignment can be made in equity ... commonly, under the Policies of Assurance Act 1867, which requires that notice of such assignment be given in writing to the insurer. Under the 1867 Act, the assignment may be made either by an endorsement on the policy or by a separate document using the wording set out in the Schedule to the Act.” [98]

Cohen L.J. in Inland Revenue Commissioners v. Electric and Musical Industries, Ltd. [99] explained :

“It is quite true that as a matter of law there is no special form required to constitute an equitable assignment. Whether or not what has been done in any particular transaction amounts to an equitable assignment is a matter of inference from the facts and documents concerned ...” [100]

“There is no specific method of effecting an equitable assignment of a life policy. The only important requirement is that there must be a clear indication that the object of the transaction is to transfer the benefits in the policy from one party to another. No written document is necessary. A common way of effecting an equitable assignment is by the assignor depositing the policy of insurance with the assignee. An equitable assignee cannot enforce his rights directly against the insurer in his own name, he must either compel the assignor to sue on his behalf or sue the assignor and join the insurer to the action. The equitable assignee is thus not in a position to give a legal disharge to the insurer.” [101]

Tan Lee Meng writes:

“For the assignor to claim under the policy, the assignment must be complete.” [102]

In the case In re Williams [103] , an owner of an insurance policy paid the insurance premiums until his death. The court had to construe a purported assignment of the policy to his housekeeper through the following signed endorsement:

“’I authorise Ada Maud Ball, my housekeeper and no other person to draw this insurance in the event of my predeceasing her this being my sole desire and intention at time of taking this policy out and this is my signature.’” [104]

Lord Cozens-Hardy M.R. held:

“According to my construction it is not an assignment at all. The question whether in the circumstances there is a voluntary gift always involves the consideration not whether the donor might have given the property, but what is the form in which he has purported to give it. Take the case of shares in a limited company which are only transferable by deed, or the case of Consols which are only transferable at the Bank of England; it is quite clear that a mere letter not under seal in either of these cases purporting to assign the property would not have been complete, the donor would not have done all he could to perfect it, and the intended gift would have failed. Of course if there had been valuable consideration for the assignment the position would have been different.” [105]

Warrington L.J. in this case agreed:

“The assignee in the present case is a volunteer, and she claims to have received in the assignor’s lifetime the gift of a certain chose in action, namely, a policy of insurance, the amount secured by which is in its nature only to be paid on the death of the assured. It is a policy on the assignor’s own life. Claiming as she does as a volunteer and alleging that the assignor made this gift to her, she can only succeed if she can show that the assignor did everything which according to the nature of the property comprised in the assignment was necessary to be done in order to transfer the property and render the assignment binding upon him. ...

The question turns largely if not entirely on the construction of the document. Of course the mere form of words is immaterial if the assignor has used any form of words which expressed a final and settled intention to transfer the property to the assignee there and then. That would be sufficient. He need not use the word “give” or “assign” or any particular words.” [106]

Warrington L.J. construed the words of the endorsement and came to the conclusion that it merely created a revocable authority to receive the policy money after the assignor’s death which was a nullity as the authority would be revoked by the assignor’s death [107] . Lord Cozens-Hardy M.R. similarly construed the endorsement as either a mere: [108]

• power of attorney, though not under seal, authorising the person named to receive the money which power becomes inoperative on the death of the person conferring it; or

• mandate which ceased to be operative at death.

In Newman v. Newman, [109] section 3 of the Policies of Assurance Act 1867 was construed. This section states:

“No assignment made after the passing of this Act of a policy of life assurance shall confer on the assignee therein named, his executors, administrators, or assigns, any right to sue for the amount of such policy, or the moneys assured or secured thereby, until a written notice of the date and purport of such assignment has been given to the assurance company liable under such policy at its principal place of business for the time being; and the date on which such notice was received shall regulate the priority of all claims under any assignment; and a payment bona fide made in respect of any policy by any assurance company before the date on which such notice was received shall be as valid against the assignee giving such notice as if this Act had not been passed.” [110]

North J. in this case interpreted this section in the following manner:

“That Act was passed in order to avoid the necessity of joining the assignor of the policy in actions against the insurance office, and it provides that if a certain notice is given to the office then the assignee may sue without joining the assignor. Then these words occur ‘And the date on which such notice shall be received shall regulate the priority of all claims under any assignment.’ It was contended that these words went much further than was necessary for the protection of the insurance office, and affected the rights of the parties inter se . ... In my opinion that is not the meaning of the statute, which was not intended to give a simpler remedy against an insurance office, and also to give facilities to insurance offices in settling claims by enabling them to recognise as the first claim the claim of the person who first gave such notice as required by the statute. It was not intended in my opinion to enact that a person who had advanced money upon a second charge without notice of the first, and made subject to it, should be giving statutory notice of the office exclude the person who had the prior incumbrance.” [111]

In Spencer v. Clarke [112] , a life insurance policy was used as security for two separate loans from separate parties. The contention was then which party had priority in terms of the security.

Hall, V.C. held:

“I am of the opinion that as between the Plaintiffs [the second creditor] in this action and the Defendant Tranter [the first creditor], the Defendant Tranter is entitled to priority as to the policy in the Westminster and General Life Assurance Association . That policy was deposited with him by way of equitable security. He is first in point of time, and therefore first as regards his security.” [113]

The first creditor then contended that he obtained priority by giving notice to the insurance office of his claim first in accordance with the Policies of Assurance Act 1867 . However, Hall V.C. held on this point that :

“In order to bring the case within the statute, there must, according to the plain words of the statute and the explanatory form of assignment given in the schedule, be an assignment, and an agreement to assign upon request is not an assignment.” [11]

“In essence, whether there has been a valid assignment under the provisions of the Policies of Assurance Act or section 4(6) of the Civil Law Act, all claims to priority amongst the assignees and encumbrances of a policy are dealt with on the basis that all claimants are equitable assignees so long as the proceeds of a policy are with the insurers or have been paid into court. The priority of equitable assignment is dependent on the date of assignment and the fact that there has been notice of prior equities does not affect the position. However, if X is an equitable assignee for value and Y is the holder of a prior equity, X can claim priority over Y if he has no actual or constructive notice of the earlier assignment and if he has given formal notice to the insurers of the assignment before the insurers have come to know of Y’s interest or if X has been misled by Y into taking the assignment or if Y has by his negligence contributed to the creation of the assignment to X.” [115]

Robert M. Merkin writes with regard to priorities of assignments:

“... a number of basic principles may be stated. First, the general equitable rule is that assignments rank in priority in order of their date of creation, but this is subject to the further rule that, where one or more assignees have given notice to the insurer, priority is determined by the date of notice. Secondly, the giving of notice to the insurer will obtain priority only for an assignee, whether legal or equitable, who was unaware of earlier assignments at the date of his own assignment. Knowledge for these purposes may be actual or constructive; the fact, for example, that the assured cannot deposit the policy with the assignee has been held [116] to put him on notice that it may have been deposited by way of assignment earlier. ... Thirdly, it is possible to have a legal assignment only by the giving of notice to the insurer.” [117]

S. Santhana Dass points out that :

“This common law position has been altered by Section 168(2) of the Insurance Act 1996 ... Notice of assignment to the insurers are no more relevant for the purpose of determining priority which puts the insurer in a more difficult position. Do they have to ensure that there are no prior assignment before paying to an assignee? It would be impractical to impose such a duty on the insurers because they would have no means of getting such information. As long as they pay to the assignee, whose assignment they had notice, they would be free of liability in respect of any claim, provided they have no knowledge of any earlier assignment. It may be prudent for insurers to include in their standard assignment form, a declaration by the insured that he has not created any prior assignment in respect of the policy at the time of execution of the assignment.” [118]

Section 168(2) of the Malaysian Insurance Act 1996 [119] provides :

“Where more than one person are entitled under the security or the assignment, the respective rights of the persons entitled under the security or the assignment shall be in the order of priority according to the priority of the date on which the security or the assignment was created, both security and assignment being treated as one class for this purpose.”

7.1 Assignment of Insurance Policies

Francis Tierney and Paul Braithwaite writes:

“An insurance policy is a contract under which the insured has defined rights and obligations. An assignment of an insurance policy may be defined as follows:

An assignment of an insurance policy by an insured is the transfer of the rights and obligations of the insured under the policy to another who then becomes the insured in place of the original insured.” [120]

Ray Hodgin writes:

“Assignment of insurance policies has an important role in commercial life. A common example is where a mortgagee requires the mortgagor to effect a life policy to cover the extent of the loan should the mortgagor die before the loan is repaid. The policy is then assigned to the mortgagee [121] .”

Roy Hodgin points out the “... desire of the courts to make the policy assignable and therefore as flexible as possible ...” [122] In order to illustrate this point, this author discusses the United States case of Grigsby v Russell [123] where a life policy was taken out by someone on his own life. This person paid two premiums and no more as he required the money for medical care. This person assigned the policy to someone else for value and the assignee continued to pay the premiums. Upon the assignor’s death, the question that arose was whether the insurance company should pay the proceeds to the assignor’s estate or the assignee. The Supreme Court of the United Stated held that the proceeds should be paid to the assignee. Mr. Justice Holmes in this case commented:

“Of course, the ground suggested for denying the validity of an assignment for a person having no interest in the life insured is the public policy that refuses to allow insurance to be taken out by such persons in the first place ... the ground for the objection to life insurance without interest in the earlier English cases was not the temptation to murder but the fact that such wagers came to be regarded as a mischievous kind of gaming ... On the other hand, life insurance has become in our days one of the best recognised forms of investment and self-compelled savings. So far as reasonable safety permits, it is desirable to give to life policies the ordinary characteristics of property ... To deny the right to sell except to persons having such an interest is to diminish appreciably the value of the contract in the owner’s hands.”

This indication of the attitude of the American courts as quoted by an English writer is noteworthy. However, in Malaysia, the courts are bound by the beneficiary of a life policy proving that he/she has an insurable interest in the life insured under section 152 of the Insurance Act 1996. [124]

assignment in insurance example

  • Tax Planning

assignment in insurance example

What is ‘Assignment’ of Life Insurance Policy?

Insurance is a contract between the insurance company (insurer) and you (policyholder) . It is a contract with full of jargon. As much as possible, we must try to understand all the insurance terms mentioned in the policy bond (certificate) . One such insurance jargon which is mostly used is Assignment .

If you are planning to apply for a home loan, your home loan provider may surely use this term. So, what is Assignment? Why assignment of a life insurance policy is required? What are different types of assignment? What are the differences between Assignment & Nomination?

What is Assignment?

Assignment of a life insurance policy means transfer of rights from one person to another. You can transfer the rights on your insurance policy to another person / entity for various reasons. This process is referred to as ‘ Assignment ’.

The person who assigns the insurance policy is called the Assignor (policyholder) and the one to whom the policy has been assigned, i.e. the person to whom the policy rights have been transferred is called the  Assignee .

Once the rights have been transferred from the Assignor to the Assignee, the rights of the policyholder stands cancelled and the assignee becomes the owner of the insurance policy.

Assigning one’s life insurance policy to a bank is fairly common. In this case, the bank becomes the policy owner whereas the original policyholder continues to be the life assured on whose death the bank or the policy owner is entitled to receive the insurance money.

Types of Assignment

The assignment of an insurance  policy can be made in two ways;

  • Example : Mr. PK Khan owns a life insurance policy of Rs 1 Crore. He would like to gift this policy to his wife. He wants to make ‘absolute assignment’ of this policy in his wife’s name, so that the death benefit (or) maturity proceeds can be directly paid to her. Once the absolute assignment is made, Mrs. Khan will be the owner of the policy and she may again transfer this policy to someone else.
  • Example : Mr. Mallya owns a term insurance policy of Rs 50 Lakh. He wants to apply for a home loan of Rs 50 Lakh. His banker has asked him to assign the term policy in their name to get the loan. Mallya can conditionally assign the policy to the home loan provider to acquire a home loan. If Mallya meets an untimely death ( during the loan tenure) , the banker can receive the death benefit under this policy and get their money back from the insurance company.

Conditional assignment life insurance pic

  • In case if the death benefit received by the banker is more than the outstanding loan amount, the insurer will pay the bank the outstanding dues and pay the balance to the nominee directly. The balance amount (if any) will be paid to Mallya’s beneficiaries ( legal heirs / nominee) .

How to assign a life insurance policy?

The Assignment must be in writing and a notice to that effect must be given to the insurer. Assignment of a life insurance policy may be made by making an endorsement to that effect in the policy document (or) by executing a separate ‘ Assignment Deed ’.  In case of assignment deed, stamp duty has to be paid. An Assignment should be signed by the assignor and attested by at least one witness.

Download absolute assignment deed sample format / conditional assignment deed format.

application for assignment life insurance policy pic

Nomination Vs Assignment

Nomination is a right given to the policyholder to appoint a person(s) to receive the death benefit (death claim) . The person in whose favor the nomination is effected is termed as ‘nominee’. The nominee comes into picture only after the death of the life assured (policy holder) . The nominee will not have the absolute right over the money (claim proceeds) . The other legal heirs of the policy holder can also recover money from the nominee.

(However, as per Insurance Laws (Amendment) Act, 2015 – If an immediate family member such as spouse / parent / child is made as the nominee, then the death benefit will be paid to that person and other legal heirs will not have a claim on the money)

Under nomination, the rights of the policyholder are not transferred. But, assignment is transfer of rights, interest and title of the policy to some other person (or) entity. To make assignment, consent of the insurer is also required.

Important Points

  • Assignment of policies can be done even when a loan is not required or for some special purposes.
  • If you assign the policy for other purpose other than taking a loan, the nomination stands cancelled.
  • If the policy is assigned, then the assignee will receive the policy benefit. Death benefit will be paid to the Nominee, in case the policy is not assigned.
  • The policy would be reassigned to you on the repayment of the loan (under conditional assignment) .
  • Types of insurance policies used for assignment purpose to get business loans, generally include an endowment plan, money back policy or a ULIP. Home loan providers generally ask for the assignment of Term insurance plans on their names. (The term plan tenure should be more than the home loan tenure)
  • An assignment of a life insurance policy once validly executed, cannot be cancelled or rendered in effectual by the assignor. The only way to cancel such assignment would be to get it re-assigned by the assignee in favor of the assignor.
  • You can also raise a loan against your policy from your insurance company itself. In this case, your policy would have to be assigned to insurance company.
  • An insurer may accept the assignment or decline. (The insurer shall, before refusing to act upon the endorsement, record in writing the reasons for such refusal and communicate the same to the policy-holder not later than thirty days from the date of the policy-holder giving notice of such transfer or assignment)
  • In case of death of the absolute Assignee (to whom the policy rights have been transferred under absolute assignment) , the rights under the policy will be transferred to the legal heirs of the assignee.
  • You can also assign a life insurance policy under Married Women’s Property Act . (At the time of making the application (buying a policy), a separate MWPA form has to be filled by the proposer for it to be covered under MWP Act. Do note that the existing life insurance policies cannot be assigned under MWP Act)
  • Partial assignment or transfer of a policy can also be made. But banks will accept any of your life insurance policies as long as the sum assured is equal to or greater than the loan amount.

Hope you find this post informative and do share your comments.

(Image courtesy of Stuart Miles at FreeDigitalPhotos.net)

About The Author

' data-src=

Sreekanth Reddy

' data-src=

Can a LIC policy be assigned to someone not related by blood??

' data-src=

Dear Chowdhury, Yes, it is possible. However, Assignment is not permitted on all life insurance policies issued under How to buy Term Life Insurance under Married Women’s Property Act?

' data-src=

Very useful and gathered more knowledge

' data-src=

Hi, I got a question in CFP EXAM 5( case study paper) with regard to assignment of money back policy to a minor. I would like to know can a conditional assignment be made to a minor and if yes what about the premium that is yet to be paid? and would a guardian need to be appointed till the minor attains majority? and is it possible that an absolute assignment can be made?

' data-src=

Dear Dhaarini,

Where an assignment is made in favour of minor, the policy can not be dealt with during the minority of the assignee, even with consent of natural guardian or appointed guardian. This means minor assignee cannot raise loan, surrender or further assign the policy during his/her minority.

If the assignment is in favour of a minor, in the event of claim, policy money cannot be paid to him, as he cannot give valid discharge. It is therefore desirable that where the assignee is minor, testamentary guardian should be appointed in respect of all the properties of such minor including the policy moneys. The father i.e. natural guardian of the minor can only appoint the testamentary guardian. The appointment can be done by a separate instrument or on the back of the policy.

' data-src=

What if a wife has taken a policy in the name of his husband and put the nominee herself and also pays all the premiums herself, and now they are taking divorce. So, now can husband assign the policy to her and what benefits she can receive after assignment. Can she withdraw tha amount of the policy??

Dear Monika, Yes, he can make an Absolute assignment in the name of Wife..

' data-src=

Under Life Assurance one can assign a policy only if that policy is a policy of his/her own life. Here wife has taken a policy on her husband life and hence assignment does not arise. In the event of death of her husband she receives the death benefit irrespective of her relationship at the time of death. This is because under Life Assurance the Insurable Interest is required at the proposal stage and needs not be present at the claim stage.

' data-src=

I wanna give my policy to new owner

' data-src=

A assigned his policy to his brother B and B is paying premiums. A’s nominee is his father. What will happen if B dies?

Dear Mr Naidu, May I know what type of Assignment is this??

A assigned his policy to his brother B, out of love and affection as absolute assignment. Whose life is covered?. What happens if B dies?

Dear Mr Naidu, If the assignee (Mr B) dies, then his/her legal heirs will be entitled to the policy money. Kindly note that an assignee cannot make a nomination on the policy which is assigned to him.

“Absolute assignment is generally made for valuable consideration e.g. raising of loan from an individual / institution. This assignment has the effect of passing the title in the policy absolutely to the assignee and the policyholder in no way retains any interest in the policy. The absolute assignee can deal with the policy in any manner he likes and may even transfer his interest to another person or surrender the policy. Under absolute assignment when the assignee (Mr B) dies the benefits go to the legal heirs of the assignee and not to the heirs of the life assured.”

' data-src=

What is the procedure to get the policy assigned? How much time does it take?

' data-src=

Thanks for this. I always like to use study materials by Indians in preparing for my professional exams. The contents here are superb and easy to understand.

' data-src=

Once assignment is done, on whose name Renewal receipts and PPC will be generated.

Dear Gayu ..in the name of Policyholder only.

' data-src=

My colleagues were looking for USPS PS 1000 this month and were informed of an online platform that hosts a ton of fillable forms . If people are wanting USPS PS 1000 too , here’s https://goo.gl/Qqo6in .

' data-src=

Dear Sreekanth, I am having an LIC policy for the past 10 year. now i would like to assign the same to my mother. Now after the assignment, whose life is covered and who gets all the benefit? Do i have to appoint a new nominee after the assignment?

Dear Bhavik ..Life cover will be in your name only. Your mother can get the benefits. You can make her as the nominee.

' data-src=

If policy assigned to absolute assignment from A to B. B is the assignee of the policy and he have all rights of the policy. After assignment who will have a life cover A or B. Who will get the death benefits

Dear Senthil, Life cover – A. Beneficiary – B.

' data-src=

Thanks for this information, Let me know who will pay the remaining premium after assignment.and what are the other reasons for assignment except loan and gift. Manish

Dear Manish ..The policy holder only has to pay the premium.

' data-src=

I have a ULIP assigned to my home loan. I have paid two annual premiums till now. If I dont pay the next premium, will it have any impact on my home loan ? I know that my ulip will get discontinued in this case but can the bank force me to pay the premium legally ?

Dear Kalis, If sum assured falls below the outstanding loan amount then you banker may ask you to assign another policy or pay the premiums on this one.

Thanks. Sum assured is already below the loan amount. In this case, can bank take any legal action against me if I don’t pay the premium?

Dear Kalis..Why do you want to take this risk?

' data-src=

Who will have to pay tax if single premium ULIP where premium is >20% of sum assured is assgned to spouse & she then sureender it.

Dear Vishal ..The insured (policyholder)..

' data-src=

my father aged 72 has taken a ULIP policy on my Child with coverage 10 lakhs .But now he would like to Assign the policy to my mother’s Name aged 67.

Please Clarify weather the life coverage and policy benefits will be transferred to my Mother or will it continue with my son.

Dear Nisha, May I know who is the ‘insured’ in this policy? Is the child just a nominee to the policy? “If he assigns the policy for other purpose other than taking a loan, the nomination stands cancelled. If the policy is assigned, then the assignee will receive the policy benefit. “

' data-src=

Hi.. Really nice blog.very informative and useful. I liked the way You explained very briefly about Assignment’ of Life Insurance Policy.

' data-src=

Hi Srikanth,

Nice article on Assignment!

I Just wanted to know If i nominate my spouse for the life insurance or nominate my child and appoint my spouse how these to things are different in terms claim settlement of life insurance.

Ideally I may want my spouse to look-after my child education until they turn major and they do not misuse the claim amount.

Please let me know if possible your contact number so that we discuss further..

Please suggest.

Thanks, Shravan

Dear Shravan, If you are planning to buy a new Term plan, you can assign the policy under MWP Act by mentioning the Percentages (share in death benefits) among your legal heirs (spouse & kids). You also have the option to write a WILL and give detailed instructions about how the claim amount (if any, on such policy) should be used or allocated.

' data-src=

Dear Sreekant, Thanks for such valuable information. Please do correction on your post that the existing life insurance policies cannot be assigned under MWP Act. Pl correct me if I am wrong. Please let me know that even if I assign the policy unconditionally to the bank for home loan purpose, after repaying the home loan successfully, the bank should re-assign the policy to me. If it does not do this, what options do I have? Thanks again.

Dear Vivek, Yes, only new insurance policies can be assigned (while purchasing new ones) under MWP. I should have written the sentence as ‘You can also assign a new life insurance policy under….’ Thank you for pointing this out. (I have provided all the details about MWP act in another article).

If a policy is assigned with absolute assignment, it cannot be cancelled. It can be done only by another valid re-assignment. So, the banker has to re-assign it after the repayment of loan. When you do not wish to give away your complete control over policy, do not go in for absolute assignment.

thanks for prompt response.

assignment in insurance example

ReLakhs.com is a blog on personal finances. The main aim of this blog is to help you make INFORMED financial decisions by presenting the content on money matters in a simple, unbiased and easy to understand manner.

Popular Posts

Latest court judgements on women’s property rights, who gets the joint bank account monies if one account holder dies, income tax deductions list fy 2023-24 | under old & new tax regimes, top 5 best aggressive hybrid equity mutual funds | equity-oriented balanced funds, useful links.

  • Community (Forum) - SignUp
  • Forum (Old)
  • Privacy Policy

Viewsletter

© 2023, Cared by T-Square Cloud

Session expired

Please log in again. The login page will open in a new tab. After logging in you can close it and return to this page.

  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Email
  • Credit Cards
  • All Credit Cards
  • Find the Credit Card for You
  • Best Credit Cards
  • Best Rewards Credit Cards
  • Best Travel Credit Cards
  • Best 0% APR Credit Cards
  • Best Balance Transfer Credit Cards
  • Best Cash Back Credit Cards
  • Best Credit Card Sign-Up Bonuses
  • Best Credit Cards to Build Credit
  • Best Credit Cards for Online Shopping
  • Find the Best Personal Loan for You
  • Best Personal Loans
  • Best Debt Consolidation Loans
  • Best Loans to Refinance Credit Card Debt
  • Best Loans with Fast Funding
  • Best Small Personal Loans
  • Best Large Personal Loans
  • Best Personal Loans to Apply Online
  • Best Student Loan Refinance
  • Best Car Loans
  • All Banking
  • Find the Savings Account for You
  • Best High Yield Savings Accounts
  • Best Big Bank Savings Accounts
  • Best Big Bank Checking Accounts
  • Best No Fee Checking Accounts
  • No Overdraft Fee Checking Accounts
  • Best Checking Account Bonuses
  • Best Money Market Accounts
  • Best Credit Unions
  • All Mortgages
  • Best Mortgages
  • Best Mortgages for Small Down Payment
  • Best Mortgages for No Down Payment
  • Best Mortgages for Average Credit Score
  • Best Mortgages No Origination Fee
  • Adjustable Rate Mortgages
  • Affording a Mortgage
  • All Insurance
  • Best Life Insurance
  • Best Life Insurance for Seniors
  • Best Homeowners Insurance
  • Best Renters Insurance
  • Best Car Insurance
  • Best Pet Insurance
  • Best Boat Insurance
  • Best Motorcycle Insurance
  • Travel Insurance
  • Event Ticket Insurance
  • Small Business
  • All Small Business
  • Best Small Business Savings Accounts
  • Best Small Business Checking Accounts
  • Best Credit Cards for Small Business
  • Best Small Business Loans
  • Best Tax Software for Small Business
  • Personal Finance
  • All Personal Finance
  • Best Budgeting Apps
  • Best Expense Tracker Apps
  • Best Money Transfer Apps
  • Best Resale Apps and Sites
  • Buy Now Pay Later (BNPL) Apps
  • Best Debt Relief
  • Credit Monitoring
  • All Credit Monitoring
  • Best Credit Monitoring Services
  • Best Identity Theft Protection
  • How to Boost Your Credit Score
  • Best Credit Repair Companies
  • Filing For Free
  • Best Tax Software
  • Best Tax Software for Small Businesses
  • Tax Refunds
  • Tax Brackets
  • Taxes By State
  • Tax Payment Plans
  • Help for Low Credit Scores
  • All Help for Low Credit Scores
  • Best Credit Cards for Bad Credit
  • Best Personal Loans for Bad Credit
  • Best Debt Consolidation Loans for Bad Credit
  • Personal Loans if You Don't Have Credit
  • Best Credit Cards for Building Credit
  • Personal Loans for 580 Credit Score Lower
  • Personal Loans for 670 Credit Score or Lower
  • Best Mortgages for Bad Credit
  • Best Hardship Loans
  • All Investing
  • Best IRA Accounts
  • Best Roth IRA Accounts
  • Best Investing Apps
  • Best Free Stock Trading Platforms
  • Best Robo-Advisors
  • Index Funds
  • Mutual Funds
  • Home & Kitchen
  • Gift Guides
  • Deals & Sales
  • Sign up for the CNBC Select Newsletter
  • Subscribe to CNBC PRO
  • Privacy Policy
  • Your Privacy Choices
  • Terms Of Service
  • CNBC Sitemap

Follow Select

Our top picks of timely offers from our partners

Choice Home Warranty

5 key types of car insurance — and how they work

These coverage types will help you build the car insurance policy you need..

thumbnail

When you're deciding how much car insurance you need , it comes down to picking the right types and correct amounts of coverage. You want to make sure you're sufficiently protected without overpaying for the coverage you might not need.

CNBC Select breaks down the types of auto insurance coverage and how they work so you can decide whether to add them to your policy.

Types of car insurance

  • Liability insurance
  • Uninsured or underinsured motorist coverage
  • Collision coverage
  • Compehensive coverage
  • Personal injury protection

Bottom line

1. liability insurance.

Auto insurance requirements vary by state , but almost all states require drivers to carry at least the minimum liability insurance . This essential type of coverage helps for damages and injuries when you're at fault in an accident. The coverage consists of two components:

  • Property damage liability, which covers the repair costs of property, such as other vehicles, buildings, fences and more.
  • Bodily injury liability, which pays for medical expenses resulting from an accident.

In your policy, the limits for this coverage are most likely expressed in three numbers — the bodily injury per person limit, the bodily injury limit for each accident, and to total property damage limit per accident. For example, if you see 25/50/10, that means you get $25,000 in bodily injury per person and $50,000 in total bodily injury payout per accident, as well as $10,000 in total property damage per accident.

2. Uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage

This is another type of coverage that your state might require. It financially protects you in case you or your passengers are injured, or your vehicle is damaged in an accident caused by another driver without sufficient insurance.

Some drivers might opt to carry only this and/or liability insurance coverage to comply with state laws as a way to save money. Auto-Owners Insurance , for example, is a great option in such cases as it offers especially affordable minimum coverage. It also ranks highly for customer satisfaction.

Auto-Owners Insurance

The best way to estimate your costs is to request a quote

App available

Policy highlights.

Auto-Owners offers affordable premiums with high customer satisfaction ratings. There are 12 different types of discounts available, as well as various other types of insurance besides auto.

Terms apply.

However, when you carry the minimum amount of insurance required, you leave yourself vulnerable to the financial distress that an accident can cause. From medical expenses and lost wages to repair costs and sometimes legal fees, a single accident can wreak havoc on your finances — especially if you're found at fault. Plus, minimum coverage doesn't protect you in instances of theft, vandalism and car theft.

To avoid that, you may need to significantly increase the amount of insurance you carry and add additional types of coverage to your policy.

3. Collision coverage

As the name implies, collision coverage applies when you collide with another vehicle or object, such as a fence or guardrail. It can cover repairs or replacement of your car if it's totaled.

Note that while this coverage is optional, your lender is likely to require it if you're financing or leasing a car .

4. Comprehensive coverage

Often coupled with collision coverage, comprehensive insurance covers most damage that collision insurance doesn't. This includes damage due to vandalism, accidents with animals and certain weather events. It can also provide coverage in case of theft.

Like collision insurance, this type of coverage is typically optional but may be required by your lender.

Collision, comprehensive and liability insurance are sometimes referred to as full coverage when combined. Such coverage can protect you in a wide variety of situations, from certain types of crashes to losing your car to theft. However, it's typically much more expensive compared to minimum coverage.

That's why it's important to shop around for auto insurance so you can compare multiple quotes and pick the best deal. We recommend looking into providers such as Nationwide which offers more affordable premiums for full coverage. Plus, it's available in most states, so you shouldn't have any trouble obtaining insurance.

Nationwide Auto Insurance

Nationwide offers near-nationwide availability and personalized services, such as On Your Side® Review, a free annual insurance evaluation to ensure you are adequately protected and are taking advantage of any discounts available to you.

5. Personal injury protection

Personal injury protection can help with medical expenses if you or your passengers are injured in an accident — even if you're at fault. In addition, this coverage can help pay for financial losses caused by the accident, from lost wages and child care to funeral costs.

In 15 states , the law requires you to have personal injury protection insurance. If your state doesn't require either, you may want to skip it if you have good health insurance. Just remember that your health insurance policy won't cover lost wages or any services you might need while recovering from an accident.

Money matters — so make the most of it. Get expert tips, strategies, news and everything else you need to maximize your money, right to your inbox.  Sign up here .

Before you purchase car insurance, make sure you understand what each type of coverage can help you with. And if something isn't clear, it may be a good idea to ask your insurance agent. Once you know what kind of coverage you want and how much, make sure to call several providers and compare quotes . This way, you'll be able to find a solid deal.

Why trust CNBC Select?

At CNBC Select, our mission is to provide our readers with high-quality service journalism and comprehensive consumer advice so they can make informed decisions with their money. Every insurance guide is based on rigorous reporting by our team of expert writers and editors with extensive knowledge of insurance products . While CNBC Select earns a commission from affiliate partners on many offers and links, we create all our content without input from our commercial team or any outside third parties, and we pride ourselves on our journalistic standards and ethics.

Catch up on CNBC Select's in-depth coverage of  credit cards ,  banking  and  money , and follow us on  TikTok ,  Facebook ,  Instagram  and  Twitter  to stay up to date.

Chime

  • Here are all of the documents you need to file taxes Ryley Amond
  • Rejected for homeowners insurance? Here's what you can do Liz Knueven
  • The average cost of full car insurance went up 26% in 2024 — these states saw the biggest increase Ana Staples

comscore

  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to FDA Search
  • Skip to in this section menu
  • Skip to footer links

U.S. flag

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

U.S. Food and Drug Administration

  •   Search
  •   Menu
  • Compliance & Enforcement (Food)
  • Sampling to Protect the Food Supply

Microbiological Surveillance Sampling: FY21-22 Sample Collection and Analysis of Domestic Refrigerated RTE Dips and Spreads

Microbiological Surveillance Sampling Main Page

Gourmet Dips and Spreads

In 2021, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) conducted a routine assignment to collect domestic multi-commodity ready-to-eat (RTE) refrigerated dips and spreads to test for Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella spp . The agency’s goal in conducting this assignment was to determine the presence of these pathogens in RTE dips and spreads and remove adulterated product from the market, when possible. This sampling assignment started in early March 2021 and sample collection and analysis completed in January 2022.

This assignment is part of the FDA’s risk-based approach to food safety, as outlined in the FDA Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) . The agency is reviewing this assignment’s findings to identify common factors or patterns (e.g., origin, variety, manufacturing practices) related to the contamination of RTE dips and spreads, when possible. This data will help FDA develop guidance and update program priorities, including sampling assignments and the prioritization of surveillance inspections.

Refrigerated dips and spreads is a broad and growing category of food that encompasses a diverse range of products including hummus, tahini, pimento cheese, and yogurt-based products. A “dip” is thinner in consistency and another piece of food (e.g., chip, vegetable) is submerged into it, such as salsa. A “spread” is food that is spreadable, usually with a knife, onto other foods (e.g., bread, crackers), such as pimento cheese.

Many Americans purchase refrigerated RTE dips and spreads for quick and nutritious snacks. In response to consumers’ lifestyles and preferences, dips and spreads manufacturers have created on-the-go and portion control packaging. [1] In 2020, 191.14 million Americans used dips as snacks. [2] As the popularity of plant-based diets continues to grow, so does the consumer demand for RTE dips and spreads. U.S. refrigerated plant-based dip annual sales increased from about three million dollars in April 2016 to about 11 million dollars in April 2019. [3]

RTE foods can become contaminated through environmental pathogens (i.e., harborage and cross-contamination within the food manufacturing environment/process) or contaminated ingredients (i.e., during or after processing). Dips and spreads may have pH and water activity that make it easy for bacteria to survive and grow, if present. Consumers typically eat these dips and spreads without a ‘kill step,’ [4] such as cooking, to reduce or eliminate any pathogenic bacteria that may be present. As such, dips and spreads contaminated with L. monocytogenes or Salmonella can present a significant public health risk and have been associated with multiple recalls over the past few years. This assignment was established due to the five recalls of hummus products and six recalls of multi-commodity dips due to contamination with L. monocytogenes or Salmonella from FY2017 through FY2020.

Methodology

The agency planned to collect and test 750 domestic samples of multi-commodity, refrigerated RTE dips and spreads that contain ingredients such as sesame, vegetables, cheese, and seafood for this assignment. Since the agency conducted a large-scale sampling assignment on processed avocado and guacamole from FY17-19, this assignment did not include the collection of guacamole. Due to the foreign inspection limitations of COVID at the time of this assignment, imported multi-commodity RTE dips and spreads were excluded from this assignment and collected using our regular import sampling procedures.

The FDA collected and tested 747 samples for L. monocytogenes and Salmonella . Of these samples, the agency collected 743 domestic samples. The assignment did not include the collection of import or domestic/import samples, however there were also 4 domestic/import samples collected (products originated in Canada (2), Jordan (1), and Mexico (1)). The agency collected samples from as many different brands and manufacturers as possible, depending on inventory available at the time of sampling. Samples were collected nationwide from manufacturers/processors (9.9%), distributors/warehouses (16.5%), and retail operations (73.6%) (i.e., grocery stores).

A minimum of 10 and a maximum of 30 subsamples were collected per sample. Each subsample included one container weighing at least 8 ounces. Subsamples were collected from the same lot. The agency collected a total of approximately 11,400 subsamples. This approach – the collection and testing of samples composed of multiple subsamples – increases the probability of detecting pathogens when their presence is low and/or not uniformly distributed.

RTE Refrigerated Dips and Spreads Samples (747 Total Samples)

Agency field staff collected unopened samples in accordance with the FDA’s Investigation Operations Manual (IOM).

COVID-19 Precautions

Taking into consideration the COVID-19 pandemic, the agency took additional precautions to ensure the integrity of sample collection and the safety of FDA investigators, firm or company employees, and any other parties present at the companies visited. Agency field staff completed COVID training, were provided personal protective equipment, and followed state, local, and applicable CDC guidance. The agency offered FDA investigators the COVID-19 vaccination and provided access to testing.

Out of the 747 samples tested in this assignment, four were detected to have a human pathogen. The FDA shared these findings with the responsible firms and determined appropriate follow up as described below.

Pathogen Findings: Salmonella

The agency detected Salmonella spp. in one hummus sample collected from a retail establishment in Kingsburg, CA. The FDA detected the serovar Salmonella Havana in one of the two composites. Upon detecting Salmonella spp., the FDA performed Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) analysis on the organism and determined that it did not match any known human illnesses and was not linked to any other product or environmental samples.

Pathogen Findings: Listeria monocytogenes

The FDA detected Listeria monocytogenes in three dips and spreads samples – two cheese samples, one cheese and pepper sample – collected from a retail establishment in Colorado Springs, CO. All three of the samples contaminated with L. monocytogenes were produced by the same manufacturer. After detecting L. monocytogenes , the agency conducted WGS analysis on the organisms and determined they did not match any known human illnesses and were not linked to any other product or environmental samples.

During the assignment, the agency also detected two subspecies (i.e., Listeria welshimeri , Listeria innocua ) of non-pathogenic Listeria spp. in three samples – two samples collected from retail establishments and one sample collected from the manufacturer/processor. Since these samples were non-pathogenic, they were not analyzed by WGS.

The agency submitted the WGS results for the Salmonella spp. and L. monocytogenes pathogenic findings to the national GenomeTrakr database .

Follow-Up Actions

Upon detecting four positive findings, the agency assessed that further follow-up actions were needed to identify potential routes and sources of contamination and protect the public health.

Follow-Up Actions: Salmonella

Upon identifying Salmonella spp. in a sample of hummus from a retail establishment in California, the FDA notified the firm about the positive sample. The firm initiated a recall of the product associated with the positive finding. Upon learning about the positive findings, the firm identified areas for correction and started to institute some of these corrections prior to the agency’s follow-up actions.

The FDA conducted a follow-up inspection at the manufacturer identified as the producer of the contaminated product to evaluate the firm’s manufacturing operations and collect environmental samples. The environmental samples collected at the follow-up inspection did not yield any positive pathogens and FDA shared the results with the firm. After taking corrective actions the firm was unable to identify a root cause for the Salmonella Havana contamination in the hummus.

The follow-up inspection covered the firm’s written food safety plan and its implementation, including hazard analysis, preventive controls and their management components (i.e., monitoring, verification including validation), records, and current good manufacturing practices (e.g., training, manufacturing operations and equipment, plant and grounds, and pest control). The FDA found that the firm did not establish and implement adequate written procedures for monitoring sanitation control procedures (i.e., cleanliness of food-contact surfaces) and the firm initiated voluntary corrections. The agency issued the firm a warning letter after the follow-up inspection.

Follow-Up Actions: L. monocytogenes

Once the FDA identified L. monocytogenes in three samples from a retail establishment in Colorado, the agency notified the firm where the positive samples were manufactured. All three of the samples contaminated with L. monocytogenes were produced by the same manufacturer. Upon notification of the contaminated samples, the firm recalled and destroyed the products associated with the positive findings. The agency issued a Consumer Advisory in conjunction with the firm’s recall.

The agency conducted a follow-up inspection at the manufacturer of the three contaminated products. The follow-up inspection sought to evaluate the firm’s manufacturing operations and collect environmental samples to determine potential sources and routes of contamination. The FDA found L. monocytogenes in 23 swabs collected within the production environment, including samples collected from food contact surfaces. WGS analysis was conducted on the L. monocytogenes isolates [5] obtained from both the retail product samples and the inspection environmental samples. The isolates were a genomic match to each other, representing a single strain of L. monocytogenes . No additional isolates were determined to match this strain of L. monocytogenes .

The FDA’s follow-up inspection determined the firm’s employees were not trained on safety or hygiene and found multiple instances of deficient sanitation practices related to equipment, utensils, employees. The agency determined that the firm did not respond appropriately to the positive samples at issue in this report and had not addressed the objectionable conditions that were observed by the FDA during a previous 2020 inspection. At the end of June 2021, the firm went out of business and no longer produces any products. The agency issued the firm a post inspection letter.

Over the past few years, there have been a few outbreaks and many recalls of dips and spreads. In FY2019, there were two outbreaks of Salmonella linked to Tahini (12 confirmed cases, 1 hospitalizations). In FY2017, there were two outbreaks of L. monocytogenes linked tohummus (31 confirmed cases, 26 hospitalizations, 3 fetal losses); one of the outbreaks may have contributed to 3 deaths. These past outbreaks and recalls are what prompted FDA to initiate this surveillance sampling assignment to survey the industry, perform follow-up inspections to positive samples to identify potential routes and sources of contamination, when possible, and ensure potentially contaminated product was removed from the retail market to protect public health.

In the absence of good manufacturing practices and implementation of preventive controls, pathogens can become resident strains which put a firm’s food products at increased risk of contamination from the manufacturing environment. The findings of this assignment suggest that Salmonella spp. and L. monocytogenes were not widespread in the multi-commodity RTE dips and spreads collected nationwide. Since the three L. monocytogenes positives were from the same manufacturer and collected on the same day and retail establishment, these are not representative of the entire population of cheese dips and spreads.

The FDA cautions against making inferences more broadly about the contamination or potential for contamination of RTE dips and spreads based solely on this assignment’s findings. However, the presence of contamination in the samples suggests the risk of contamination still exists. For example, from FY2017 through FY2022, there were a total of 22 recalls of dips and spreads due to potential Salmonella or L. monocytogenes contamination; of these hummus and cheese dips and spreads make up 64% of the recalls (10 hummus recalls, 4 cheese dips and spread recalls).

As stated in the “Findings” section, the FDA detected Salmonella spp. in one sample and L. monocytogenes in three samples out of the 747 collected and tested samples. All four of the positive samples were collected from retail establishments. None of the positive findings were linked to any known human illness, though, based on the agency’s WGS analysis.

The agency’s finding of three positive product samples and over 23 positive environmental samples all from one firm indicates that the controls that firm established were not effective at significantly minimizing or preventing L. monocytogenes from contaminating their RTE finished products. The large number of positive environmental samples found in the follow-up inspection indicates the firm had not implemented effective sanitation controls. The agency followed up to ensure the business implemented corrective actions to the previously identified deficiencies and no contaminated or potentially contaminated products entered commerce. The firm ultimately made the decision to discontinue their manufacturing operations.

As noted in the “Background” section, RTE dips and spreads can be contaminated with pathogenic bacteria and can support their survival and/or growth. Since refrigerated RTE dips and spreads do not undergo a ‘kill step’ prior to consumption, consumers should immediately refrigerate or freeze this commodity to reduce the potential for pathogen growth. Once a frozen RTE dip or spread is thawed for use, do not refreeze it. To reduce the risk of foodborne illness, consumers should read and follow the package instructions for use and storage on RTE dips and spreads. When serving RTE dips and spreads on a buffet, make sure to keep cold foods cold (at or below 40 °F) – by placing shallow food containers inside a pan filled with ice – and hot foods hot (at or above 140 °F) – by using chafing dishes, warming trays, or slow cookers.

[1] U.S. Refrigerated Spreads and Dips - Statistics & Facts | Statista

[2] U.S.: usage of dips for snacks and vegetables 2020 | Statista

[3] Plant-based dips retail sales U.S. 2019 | Statista

[4] The step where pathogens (e.g., Salmonella ) are reduced or removed from a food product, usually by killing the pathogen. Executing a ‘kill step’ (e.g., cooking, frying, pasteurization) drastically reduces pathogens in food.

[5] A culture of microorganisms isolated for study

Lehigh University Libraries - Library Guides

Bios 098 human genomes, ancestry, and health spring 2024.

  • Guide Roadmap, Contact info, VPN

WORKED EXAMPLE

  • Scholarly versus Popular Articles
  • Background Information
  • Evaluating Scientific Credibility
  • Scholarly Articles
  • Finding Scholarly Review Articles
  • Popular Resources
  • Citing and plagiarism
  • Finding & Using Visual & Audio Content
  • How to Read a Scientific Article
  • Govertnment documents

After doing this assignment (and after doing the tutorial) you'll know much of what you need to know about using library resources for this or other classes, including ones outside the sciences!

Do your own work on the assignment but you may help each other interpret the directions below or ask for help from the professor or science librarian .  Do not intentionally choose the same items as a classmate for this assignment. 

ASSIGNMENT STEPS:

(1) Review differences between scholarly & popular articles

Read the page "Scholarly versus Popular Articles".

(2)    Find a *popular* account of research that appeared in a scientific/scholarly journal article.

To get an illustration of what this question asks for, scroll down and review Part A of the "Worked Example" in the box below this one. For this exercise, do not use the particular item mentioned in the example titled :  Did we come close to extinction?  ).   

(a. ) Go to the "Popular Resources" page of this guide (see on the left) and select an information resource to search. You can select "Research Library" (used in the worked example below this box) or one of the other resources. 

(b.) Use the popular resource to find a recent (within the past two years) popular media item that:

  • is for a popular audience, for example, a newspaper or magazine article, podcast, Youtube, or TV news segment.
  • describes research that appeared in a scholarly article; the research must be related to human genes or genomes and that has an evolutionary focus or that deals with ancestry in some way. 

Ideally the popular item will say something like "last week researchers at ABC institution published a study in Journal 123 about their new discovery of XYZ ."  But in some cases, as in the worked example in the box below, it will not be this simple. You may need to do some detective work by finding bits of information that lead you to discover the full text of the article. Ask for help if you have trouble.

Provide: Title, article or publication name, date, and web address associated with the item.

(3) Summarize the popular item  

How is the topic of the popular item you found related to human genomes? Summarize the main points of the item in 3 - 6 sentences or bullet points. 

(4) Use the CRAAP (C-Test)  to evaluate the popular item

Evaluate whether the popular item meets the C-Test criteria in the page of this guide titled "Evaluating Scientific Credibility". Describe the evidence for each criterion. (You may find it useful to read the material below each element of the C-Test test, for future reference.)

(5) Find the scholarly article that the popular item references

Review Part B  of the "Worked Example" in the box below this one.

Use one of these ways to look up the full text of the scholarly article mentioned in the popular item you found:

  • Google Scholar  As in the worked example in the box below, put whatever clues into Google Scholar the popular article gives you for finding the scholarly article--for example, the author of the study or the journal in which the research appeared.
  • If Google Scholar doesn't work, use another database that appears in Scholarly Articles.

In (12) you'll provide a citation for the scholarly article.

(6)  Use the popular article to frame some questions to inform your reading of the scholarly article

Before reading the scientific article that the popular item references,  pose two questions about it based on your reading of the popular item. Example questions: how the scientists conducted their research, what evidence they report, how they interpret this evidence, or what other research has been done in this area.

(7) Compare the scholarly and popular articles

Write two or three sentences comparing the popular item to the scholarly article. You don't need to read the scholarly article in depth to do so.

See the resource in question (1) above for points of comparison.    

(8). Find a non-review journal article

Find one non-review article about the topic of the journal article you found. To do so, write up a search statement and run it in Web of Science. Click on the one of the search results and make sure it says  "Document Type: Article", and not "Document Type: Review".

In (12) you'll provide a citation to the item.

(9). Was the article cited?

How many times was the article cited by other article(s) in Web of Science?  Finding articles that cite articles published earlier in time (whether or not they are review articles!) is a powerful way to build bibliography. 

(10).  Find a review article.

Now find a review article by limiting the search results from the search in (9) to a review article. You can do this to the left of the search results by Document Type "Review Article".

(11). Use "background information" to understand a concept 

Go to the background information page of this guide and find one resource that explains or defines a concept mentioned in the scholarly article you found in (5). Make sure it is not a scientific or scholarly article (including reviews).  Provide: Title, article or publication name, date, and web address associated with the item.

(12).  Create a references in National Library of Medicine style for the scholarly articles you found above in (5), (9) and (11).   

Put the journal articles you found into the National Library Medicine reference style. This is not for an in-text citation but for the full citation reference as it would appear at the end of a  journal article.

Go to the page of this guide titled "Citing and Plagiarism".  You can ignore for now the information about in-text citations on this page; just focus on creating a full reference citation.   First use Zoterobib to generate a full reference citation. Then check whether Zoterobib accurately rendered the citation. To do so, compare the Zoterobib output to the example in the box labeled "Journal Citation Style -- NLM".

NOTE: don't confuse the journal name with the publisher or database name. 

WORKED EXAMPLE 

PART A:  HOW TO FIND A POPULAR ARTICLE THAT DISCUSSES A SCHOLARLY ARTICLE

This is the example we did in class. 

Go to Research Library In the Advanced Search page, put in this search:

genom* AND (evol* OR ancestr*) AND human*

Select Publication date.  Select last one year. Under "Source Type" on the same page, select  popular sources such as Magazines and Newspapers. This will bring up popular sources. (You can also add blogs, podcasts and websites.)

The search comes up with an entry: Did we come close to extinction?  from the popular magazine "New Scientist".

This article describes research disclosed in a scientific article.

PART B:  HOW TO FIND THE SCHOLARLY ARTICLE Look in this popular article for clues that will lead you to the scholarly article.

Clues: 

  • a researcher named Haipeng Li of the Shanghai Institute of Nutrition and Health 
  • the article names  the scholarly journal where the research was published ( Science) [ignore this: d0i.0rg/gsnt3b--it's not a correct link]
  • assume it was published in 2023, on the basis that the New Scientist article is from Sept. 2023 and may be reporting a recent journal article 
  • Go go Google Scholar . 
  • Select hamburger icon, upper left.
  • Select the advanced search.
  • Return articles authored by:   Haipeng Li
  • Return articles published in: Science
  • "Return articles dated between":  2023-2023.

Now you can find the full text of the scholarly article:

Genomic inference of a severe human bottleneck during the Early to Middle Pleistocene transition (Hu et al., Science August 2023)

To get to the full text, look for Lehigh Links and go out to the full text. If you don't see Lehigh Links, follow the instructions here  for making Lehigh Links visible in Google Scholar.

  • << Previous: Tutorial
  • Next: Scholarly versus Popular Articles >>
  • Last Updated: Feb 14, 2024 1:02 PM
  • URL: https://libraryguides.lehigh.edu/bios98_spring_2024

IMAGES

  1. FREE 11+ Assignment of Insurance Policy Samples in PDF

    assignment in insurance example

  2. Claim Assignment Agreement Template

    assignment in insurance example

  3. Partial Assignment of Life Insurance Policy as Collateral

    assignment in insurance example

  4. Assignment of Insurance Proceeds

    assignment in insurance example

  5. Free Insurance Assignment Agreement

    assignment in insurance example

  6. Assignment Form of Life Insurance Prudential

    assignment in insurance example

VIDEO

  1. Auto Insurance Assignment

  2. INS200 GROUP ASSIGNMENT (ZURICH TRAVEL INSURANCE)

  3. INS 200 GROUP ASSIGNMENT (ETIQA CAR INSURANCE)

  4. INS200

  5. INS200 ZURICH INSURANCE (VIDEO ASSIGNMENT)

  6. Principles of Insurance || Insurance

COMMENTS

  1. A Collateral Assignment of Life Insurance

    Example of Collateral Assignment of Life Insurance . For example, say you have a business plan for a floral shop and need a $50,000 loan to get started. When you apply for the loan, the bank says ...

  2. Free Insurance Assignment Agreement

    The Insurance Policy Beneficiary will have to be identified for this assignment to function properly. This will be the Party who is designated on the concerned insurance policy as the Recipient of its benefits (i.e. payment). Produce this Beneficiary's full name and address. (3) Assuming Party.

  3. Assignment in Insurance Policy

    Assignment is governed by Section 38 of the Insurance Act 1938 in India. Assignment can also be done in favour of a close relative when the policyholder wishes to give a gift to that relative. Such an assignment is done for "natural love and affection". An example, a policyholder may assign his policy to his sister who is handicapped.

  4. Can You Assign Your Insurance Benefits to Someone Else?

    The anti-assignment clause doesn't distinguish between assignments made before a loss and those made afterward. Even so, courts in most states have allowed policyholders to assign their rights to another party after a loss has occurred. Pre-loss assignments are still prohibited. Here is an example of a post-loss assignment of insurance benefits.

  5. How Is A Collateral Assignment Used In A Life Insurance Contract

    1. Access to Funds. One of the primary benefits of a collateral assignment is the ability to access funds without surrendering the life insurance policy. By using the death benefit as collateral, the policyholder can secure a loan or obtain financing for personal or business purposes.

  6. Assignment vs Nomination in Life Insurance

    Nomination and Assignment serve different purposes. The nomination protects the interests of the insured as well as an insurer in offering claim benefits under the life insurance policy. On the other hand, assignment protects the interests of an assignee in availing the monetary benefits under the policy. The policyholder should be aware of ...

  7. What Is Collateral Assignment?

    Definition and Examples of Collateral Assignment. Collateral assignment is the practice of using a life insurance policy as collateral for a loan. Collateral is any asset that your lender can take if you default on the loan. For example, you might apply for a $25,000 loan to start a business. But your lender is unwilling to approve the loan ...

  8. assignment

    Assignment is a transfer of legal rights under or interest in an insurance policy to another party. Additional Information In most instances, the assignment of such rights can only be effected with the written consent of the insurer.

  9. What Is A Collateral Assignment Of Life Insurance?

    For example, let's say you take out a collateral assignment life insurance policy worth $200,000 for a loan of $75,000 over 7 years at an interest rate of 18%. If you die after five years, based on these figures, you'll still have $41,231.02 owed on your loan.

  10. Assignment of insurance policies and claims

    Assignment of insurance policies and claims. An overview of the legal principles that apply when assigning an insurance policy or the right to receive the insurance monies due under the policy to a third party. It considers the requirements that must be met for the assignment to be valid and explains the difference between assignment, co ...

  11. What Is An Assignee On A Life Insurance Policy?

    The process of assigning a life insurance policy involves reviewing policy terms, choosing an assignee, obtaining consent, preparing an assignment agreement, and notifying the insurance company. It is crucial to review the policy specifics and consult legal and financial professionals to ensure compliance with regulations and optimize financial ...

  12. Life Insurance Assignments: Definition & Parties

    There are three main parties to an assignment of a life insurance contract. In our example, Jim is the assignor who grants ownership rights to his lender, the assignee.Jim had originally ...

  13. Collateral Assignment of Life Insurance

    A collateral assignment of life insurance is a method of securing a loan by using a life insurance policy as collateral. If you pass away before the loan is repaid, the lender can collect the ...

  14. Assignment of Life Insurance Policy

    Assignment of a Life Insurance Policy simply means transfer of rights from one person to another. The policyholder can transfer the rights of his insurance policy to another for various reasons and this process is called Assignment. The person who assigns the policy, i.e. transfers the rights, is called the Assignor and the one to whom the ...

  15. Medicare Assignment: What It Is and How It Works

    Here's how it works: Medicare will pay the provider 95% of the amount they would pay if the provider accepted assignment. The provider can charge the person receiving care more than the Medicare-approved amount, but only up to 15% more (some states limit this further). This extra amount, which the patient has to pay out-of-pocket, is known as ...

  16. What Is Collateral Assignment of Life Insurance?

    Quality Verified. Collateral assignment of life insurance is an arrangement where a policyholder uses the face value of their life insurance policy, which can be a term or permanent life insurance policy, as collateral to secure a loan. If the policyholder dies before the loan is paid off, the lender is prioritized to receive a portion of the ...

  17. Post-Loss Assignments of Claims Under Insurance Policies

    Post-loss assignments, on the other hand, take place after the insurer's obligations under its policy have become fixed by the occurrence of a covered loss, thus the risk factors applicable to ...

  18. FREE 11+ Assignment of Insurance Policy Samples in PDF

    Check out the following examples for you to get an idea of how you will design your assignment of the insurance policy. 1. Assignment of Insurance Policy Sample. 2. Bank Assignment of Insurance Policy Template. 3. Assignment of Insurance Policy Template. 4. Assignment of Insurance Policy Example.

  19. The Truth About Collateral Assignment of Life Insurance

    Collateral Assignment of Life Insurance Sample: If you get a $300,000 term life policy and borrow $150,000 from a bank, you can choose the collateral assignment. In case your children are the beneficiaries, then both your children and the bank have the right to the claim. However, the main priority is the money owed from the bank.

  20. ASSIGNMENTS IN INSURANCE LAW

    For example, a central feature of insurance, that of risk interference, was incorporated in commercial arrangements effected by the Babylonians, Phoenicians, Greeks and Romans. However, the infancy of the modern insurance contract is founded on the practices adopted by Italian merchants in the 14th century. ... 7.1 Assignment of Insurance ...

  21. Assignment of Insurance Definition

    Examples of Assignment of Insurance in a sentence. Topic #595 Assignment of Insurance BenefitsAssignment of insurance benefits is the process by which a specified party (for example, provider or policyholder) becomes entitled to receive payment for claims in accordance with the insurance company policies.. Topic #595 Assignment of Insurance BenefitsAssignment of insurance benefits is the ...

  22. Assignment of Insurance Sample Clauses: 465 Samples

    Copy. Assignment of Insurance. Grantor hereby assigns to Lender, as additional security for payment of the Obligations, any and all monies due or to become due under, and any and all other rights of Grantor with respect to, any and all policies of insurance covering the Collateral. So long as no Default or Event of Default has occurred and is ...

  23. Assignment of Life Insurance Policy : Types, Details & Rules

    Types of Assignment. The assignment of an insurance policy can be made in two ways; Absolute Assignment - Under this process, the complete transfer of rights from the Assignor to the Assignee will happen. There are no conditions applicable. Example: Mr. PK Khan owns a life insurance policy of Rs 1 Crore.

  24. 5 Key Types Of Car Insurance

    For example, if you see 25/50/10, that means you get $25,000 in bodily injury per person and $50,000 in total bodily injury payout per accident, as well as $10,000 in total property damage per ...

  25. Microbiological Surveillance Sampling: FY21-22 Sample Collection and

    During the assignment, the agency also detected two subspecies (i.e., Listeria welshimeri, Listeria innocua) of non-pathogenic Listeria spp. in three samples - two samples collected from retail ...

  26. Assignment

    You can select "Research Library" (used in the worked example below this box) or one of the other resources. (b.) Use the popular resource to find a recent (within the past two years) popular media item that: is for a popular audience, for example, a newspaper or magazine article, podcast, Youtube, or TV news segment.