U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

  • Publications
  • Account settings
  • Advanced Search
  • Journal List

Logo of foods

Mechanisms and Health Aspects of Food Adulteration: A Comprehensive Review

Associated data.

Data is contained within the article.

Food adulteration refers to the alteration of food quality that takes place deliberately. It includes the addition of ingredients to modify different properties of food products for economic advantage. Color, appearance, taste, weight, volume, and shelf life are such food properties. Substitution of food or its nutritional content is also accomplished to spark the apparent quality. Substitution with species, protein content, fat content, or plant ingredients are major forms of food substitution. Origin misrepresentation of food is often practiced to increase the market demand of food. Organic and synthetic compounds are added to ensure a rapid effect on the human body. Adulterated food products are responsible for mild to severe health impacts as well as financial damage. Diarrhea, nausea, allergic reaction, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, etc., are frequently observed illnesses upon consumption of adulterated food. Some adulterants have shown carcinogenic, clastogenic, and genotoxic properties. This review article discusses different forms of food adulteration. The health impacts also have been documented in brief.

1. Introduction

Food are organic substances consumed for energy, growth, and nutritional purpose. Food adulteration refers to the process through which the quality of food is lowered [ 1 , 2 ]. Broadly, food adulteration is a category of food fraud which is accomplished deliberately by human beings for financial gain [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 ]. It is also termed as economically motivated adulteration (EMA) that sometimes gives rise to authenticity issues: brand, origin, manufacturing ingredients, and their composition are often misrepresented [ 6 ]. Protected Designation of Origin (PDO), Protected Geographical Indication (PGI), Certificate of Specific Character (CSC), and Traditional Specialties Guaranteed (TSG) are some of the familiar terms [ 7 ]. Adulterated food products pose several health hazards, including health diseases, and they weaken the immune system.

Adulteration of foodstuffs has been frequently observed for centuries due to the contribution of several common reasons. The perishable nature, heterogeneity, and huge production of certain food items have always been tempting for dishonest traders; the similarity and diversity of animal species, stock limitation, and market price pressure also encourage them to perform intentional adulteration [ 8 ]. Some food items have been severely prone to adulteration due to possessing high dietary value and vast popularity. Food with a narrow profit margin also have frequently appeared in fraud lists [ 9 , 10 ]. Beverages and other liquid foods have drawn special attraction, with a wide variation in chemical composition, high quality, long aging time, and high production cost [ 11 , 12 ]. The competitive nature of the food industry due to consumer’s extensive demand for variety and low-cost food products has stimulated this issue further. In addition, the limitation of raw materials, demand–supply gap, and the ever-present tendency to reduce cost and maximize profits have created more opportunities and interest for invidious traders [ 13 , 14 ]. Other reasons include degraded moral society, spoiled socio-economic structure, and low legal standards, and their improper enforcement may play a significant role [ 15 , 16 ].

Many food adulteration incidents were encountered in the past. The China gutter oil scandal is such an example that used illicit cooking oil from restaurant fryers, grease traps, and slaughterhouse waste, or extracted from discarded animal parts. Later, such contaminated food products were also found in Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Singapore. Addition of Sudan dye was reported in fats and oils, herbs and spices, food additives, and flavorings several times. In 2007, two cases of tetrodotoxin poisoning were found, which were caused by substitution of monkfish with pufferfish. In 2008, the contamination of powdered infant milk in China caused illness in 294,000 children, with 50,000 hospitalizations and 6 deaths. In 2013, a methanol poisoning affected 694 patients, with 8 deaths in Iran. In 2018, methanol toxication caused extensive hemorrhagic cerebral infarction or multiple organ failure that affected 90 individuals, with 64 fatalities in Malaysia [ 17 ]. Dioxins in pork in 2008, milk with detergent, fat, and urea in 2012, and processed beef products with horsemeat in 2013 are also some renown incidences [ 18 ]. It is reported that the global food industry faces an expense of approximately USD 10-15 billion per year due to health and financial damage associated to intentionally contaminated food products [ 19 ]. The demand for food increased with the emergence of COVID-19 and Brexit, which resulted in reduced industry inspections, weakened governance, audits, and ever-increasing pressure on the food industry [ 20 ].

Several incidents on food adulteration were reported in recent times. The Trello and European Commission food fraud databases reveal many such incidents. As part of Operation OPSON XI, coordinated by Europol for EU-wide action and which took place between December 2021 and May 2022, the authorities of 26 countries seized almost 27,000 tons of fake food and 15 million liters of alcoholic beverages. In October 2022, Food Safety and Halal Food Authority of Pakistan seized 4000 L of fake honey adulterated with sugars, chemicals, and wax. In December 2022, more than 12 people died and more than 15 people lost their eyesight in Bihar, India, after consuming adulterated alcohol. In April 2022, the Spanish Agency for Food Safety and Nutrition launched an alert regarding the production of fake olive oil and extra-virgin olive oil adulterated with other vegetable oils. In Turkey, it was reported in August 2022 that ground sumac was found to be adulterated with unauthorized color. In August 2022, curry powder from Cameroon was found adulterated with Orange II by authorities in Belgium. In August 2022, authorities in Pakistan seized tea made with textile dyes, sawdust, and other fillers. Cumin seeds mixed with 30 tons of adulterants were seized by authorities in India in July 2022. Between January 2022 and March 2022, the FDA collected and tested 144 samples of imported honey and found ten percent of the samples to be adulterated with undeclared added sweeteners. In Germany, sausage and poultry meat were alleged to contain undeclared “mechanically separated meat” ingredients (March 2022).

The technical progress for food adulteration research is quite prominent in modern times. Earlier, adulterated food products were identified on the basis of a few physical parameters, such as refractive index, viscosity, melting point, saponification, iodine value, etc. With the expansion of global markets and business competition, the frequency of food adulteration has increased exponentially, which gave rise to the necessity of highly efficient techniques. The food governing authorities around the world have also established the official methods for detection of food adulteration. Currently, chromatography and spectrometry are widely used analytical techniques. Protein and DNA-based techniques are also in practice. In addition, metabolomics, hyperspectral imaging, and chemometrics are some other techniques. The state-of-the-art techniques are highly contributing to combat food adulteration. Still, there remain some drawbacks, such as complexity, excessive use of toxic compounds, laborious sample preparation, etc. [ 21 , 22 ]. Lack of collaboration between scientists and food policy-makers might be an obstacle in identifying the need for proper research and development. In addition, there lies a gap between laboratory research and practical aspects [ 23 ]. Food adulteration is a complicated phenomenon and involves the availability of numerous fraudulent options discovered by dishonest people. It is important to understand different forms and the dynamic nature of food adulteration and their impacts on human health. Regular market studies and the development of laboratory techniques for the qualitative and quantitative assessment of new forms of food adulterants would be critical. Gathering and analyzing the possible forms of adulteration in a single frame would be highly useful to bridge the gap for research.

This article presents a cohesive review of the common forms of food adulteration and origin fraud of food. In this article, the health impacts associated with adulteration have also been addressed in brief. The scientific literature for the period of 1995 to 2022 was searched using the keywords “food adulteration”, “economically motivated adulteration”, “origin fraud”,” mislabeling”, and “health impact of food adulteration”. Approximately 400 scientific articles and reports were screened and reviewed. Of those articles, 174 were found more relevant and reviewed extensively. The Trello and European Commission food fraud databases along with relevant newspapers and magazine articles were reviewed for recent food adulteration incidents. The information covered in this article will help researchers, food engineers, scientists, and policy-makers to combat food adulteration and health hazard.

2. Overview of Food Adulteration

The main purpose of food adulteration is to alter the quality of food products for economic advantage. Such actions usually take place by substitution with inferior quality or less valued food and increasing the weight or volume by admixture of undeclared ingredients. Providing a more attractive appearance by injection of artificial chemicals and colorants is also included here [ 8 , 24 ].

The principal aim behind food substitution is to reduce raw material and manufacturing cost by incorporation of inferior compounds. The physical properties and taste of food items are modified in many ways. Artificial ripening of fruits is a common means of food adulteration. Adulteration with preservatives, colorants, and artificial sweeteners are also common food adulteration techniques. Among other adulterations, falsification of origin is also labeled as adulteration, as it includes false claim for superior origin.

Figure 1 presents the key forms of intentional food adulteration, which are briefly discussed in the following sections [ 3 , 4 , 5 ].

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is foods-12-00199-g001.jpg

Major forms of food adulteration.

3. Adulteration to Improve Physical and Sensory Properties

Taste and appearance have a high impact on the commercial value of food products. Increasing the shelf life of food items gives financial benefits. Artificial ripening and sweetening are used to increase food palatability. Similarly, artificial colorants are applied to improve the appearance of food. Preservatives are added to store food in a fresh condition for a long time. The following sections briefly describe different means of adulteration to improve physical and sensory properties.

3.1. Artificial Ripening Agents

To avoid the economic loss incurred by the spoilage of climacteric fruits during the harvest, processing, and transportation process, the fruit sellers pluck the fruits much before they attain proper maturity and use chemicals to ripen them artificially just before retailing. The necessity for artificial ripening also arises if the fruit sellers wish to sell fruits before their due season to make additional profit. Ethylene, ethanol, methanol, propylene, methyl jasmonate, ethylene glycol, ethephon, and calcium carbide are used to ripen fruits and vegetables artificially [ 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 ]. The ripening agents and their key features are documented in Table 1 .

Ripening agents and their features.

3.2. Growth Hormones

Gibberellic acid, alpha naphthyl acetic acid, and oxytocin are growth hormones used on fruits and vegetables by farmers to trigger growth. Oxytocin, being a mammalian hormone and a veterinary drug, is not suitable for vegetable crops. However, it is widely used in bottle gourds, bitter gourds, pumpkins, and cucumbers to enhance size and color [ 29 ].

3.3. Artificial Sweetening Agents

Sweetness of food is an important criterion in terms of demand and marketability. So, there is always a tendency by the traders to increase the sweetness of selected food items by artificial means. Mainly, fruits and vegetables, beverages, sweeteners, and confectionary products fall into sweet food category.

Artificial sweeteners are injected by injector pumps on one side of fruit to alter the natural sweetness. To ensure uniform distribution, sellers inject sweeteners from several points in the fruit. Saccharine mixture was found to be injected into melons and watermelons to enhance sweetness artificially [ 29 ]. The addition of external sugar or sugar solution is a common form of adulteration of fruit juice. In the case of export purpose, the concentrated fruit juice is shipped; later, external water and sugar are added to the concentrated fruit juice to give natural properties similar to that of natural juice [ 11 ]. In addition, high-fructose corn syrup, partially hydrolyzed cane syrup, and beet medium invert sugar are also added to increase the Brix value and to improve composition quite similar to authentic juice [ 36 ]. The direct addition of sucrose, glucose, fructose, maltose, beet sugar, corn sugar, and cane sugar in honey is widely practiced [ 37 ]. Adulteration of honey and confectionary products with fructose or glucose changes the fructose-to-glucose ratio [ 38 ]. Feeding honeybees with syrups and industrial sugars after the broods have been naturally available is known as an indirect form of adulteration which is very difficult to detect. Feeding low quality honey to honeybees is also reported [ 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 ]. Different confectionary and bakery products are sweetened with Acesulfame-K and Aspartame [ 42 , 43 ]. Sugar, coloring agents, synthetic red dyes, aromatizing agents, and sweeter foreign wines are often added into wine for quality enhancement purpose [ 44 , 45 ]. Glycerol reduces the acidity and bitter taste, increases the sweetness, and stops fermentation, while diethylene glycol imparts relish to wines. The addition of root or cane sugar to tequila and the addition of cane or beet ethanol to whiskey have also been noted [ 46 , 47 ].

3.4. Artificial Coloring Agents

Color, texture, and appearance of food products are important criteria in the selection of desired food items by consumers. Foods with attractive color increase marketability and profit. Thus, following this trend, various natural as well as synthetic dyes are applied to different food items. Most of the colorful food items are at risk of such malpractice. Among those, fruits and vegetables, egg and egg-derived food, spices, sweeteners, and confectionary products are prime choices. Coloring agents are also added in processed meat and fish [ 48 ]. Paprika oleoresin is commonly used as a natural coloring agent in meat-based food products [ 49 ].

Natural colors, such as chlorophyll, annatto, and caramel, have been reported several times in fruits and vegetables. Synthetic dyes are more popular among the sellers, as those exceed natural ones in many aspects. These are chemically synthesized, more stable, shiny, and highly efficient. Their cheapness and easy availability are also considerable factors. Rhodamine B, auramine, Metanil yellow, Congo red, Orange II, malachite green, and other permitted and non-permitted colors are used in cut fruits and vegetables. Red dye is injected into watermelons to enhance the acceptability of the consumers. Malachite green is widely used to make green vegetables, such as green chili, green peas, bitter gourds, lady finger, and pointed gourdd, look greener, fresh, bright, and glowing. Another reagent frequently reported for bitter gourd and lady finger to be dipped into is copper sulfate solution, which is bright blue in hydrous form and pale green in anhydrous form. Mobile oil for coloring and carbofuran for a fresh purple appearance are injected into brinjals, tomatoes, cauliflowers, and cabbages. Phosphomidone, methyl parathion, monocrotophos, and formaldehyde are also injected for a fresh white appearance [ 29 ].

Eggs are dyed artificially by azo dyes. The addition of illegal synthetic dyes is inspiring among the traders, as eggs’ nutritional value and freshness are predicted by judging the egg yolk color. Sudan dyes are a type of synthetic azo dye that is used in industry or printing. Another azo dye, Para red, is chemically similar to Sudan dye I and is used for printing purposes. The yellow-orange-hue-colored eggs are preferable by consumers. So, the sellers often feed hens food mixed with dyes to enhance the color of egg yolk [ 50 ].

Sudan I, Sudan Ⅳ, Metanil Yellow, Sudan III, Oil Orange SS, Rhodamine B, Auramine O, coal tar red, Para Red, etc., are applied in red pepper chili powder. Sudan I, Sudan Ⅳ, Acid Black I, Annatto, etc., are mixed with paprika powder. Sudan I, Metanil Yellow, Lead Chromate, etc., are added with turmeric powder. Amaranth Red and Basic Red 46 are added into sumac. Auramine O and Chrysoidin are mixed with curry powder. Acid Orange II, Metanil Yellow, Ponceau 4R, Gardenia Yellow, dye extracted from the flowers of Buddleja officinalis Maxim, etc., are added with saffron flower. Crystal Violet is mixed into cayenne pepper. In addition to synthetic dyes, colored paper and wood are also used [ 9 ].

Dark honey or “forest honey” is richer in minerals and nutritional value than light honey and possesses a higher commercial value. That is why light honey is often tainted with sulfite ammonia caramel and presented as dark honey [ 40 , 41 ].

3.5. Adulteration to Improve Food Consistency

Detergents, along with oil and fat, have been used to improve consistency of dairy products. In addition, one of the reasons for the accidental presence of detergent in milk products is lack of hygiene, sanitation, and improper cleaning in the dairy industries [ 51 , 52 , 53 ]. Along with detergent, other compounds, such as salt, glucose, starch, neutralizers, pulverized soap, surfactant, and coloring agent, are also mixed to adjust the whiteness, viscosity, thickness, and solid-not-fat content. Addition of gelatin, stabilizers, enzymes, and external reagent to improve food consistency are also reported [ 15 , 51 ].

3.6. Preservatives

Preservatives are usually added to increase the shelf life of food items. Addition of preservatives is one of the most practiced forms of adulteration at present. Fruits and vegetables, fish and seafood, meat and processed meat, milk and dairy products, and beverages are the most tempting targets.

Formaldehyde is the most reported preservative used in fruits and vegetables. Formalin inhibits the growth of microbes by interacting with the amino groups of adenine, cytosine, and guanine and denaturing them. It also penetrates the interiors of bacterial spores, which makes it capable of preventing microbial contamination and prolonging the shelf life of food. Although there is no set standard for the daily intake of formaldehyde from food, the World Health Organization (WHO) estimated it to be in the range of 1.5–14 mg/d (mean 7.75 mg/d) for an average adult. According to the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), the daily oral exposure to formaldehyde should not exceed 100 mg formaldehyde per day [ 54 ]. In a recent study, the formaldehyde level in fish and seafood were found to be higher than the recognized safety level of 5 mg/kg [ 55 ].

In addition to formalin, wax components, and different forms of esters, are also used to reduce the water loss and surface abrasion. The other purpose is to control internal gas composition and provide the shiny appearance of those fruits and vegetables that lost their natural wax during primary processing. Compared with other lipid and non-lipid coatings, wax coatings provide better resistance to moisture loss. Due to petroleum-based wax containing harmful wood rosins and solvent residues, beeswax, carnauba wax, and shellac are preferable. Fruits and vegetables are dried well before waxing and handling [ 29 ]. With the increasing demand and distant transportation of fish and seafood, the addition of low-cost preservatives has been a long-practiced issue. Fish, dry fish, and seafood are usually adulterated with preservatives, such as formalin, chlorofluorocarbon, and DDT powder, to tackle the spoilage and quality deterioration [ 56 ]. External parasites of fish egg are also treated with formalin [ 57 ]. Since a small quantity of formaldehyde is also naturally produced in fish as a byproduct of amine oxide degradation, artificially added formalin is quite difficult to detect [ 58 ]. Increment of shelf life by inhibiting microbial activities is a common form of milk and dairy product adulteration. It is accomplished by adding several preservative chemicals, such as formalin, urea, nitrate or pond water, borax acid, boric acid, cane sugar, sucrose, glucose, caustic soda, salicylic acid, hydrogen peroxide, benzoic acid, hypochlorite, and potassium dichromate [ 15 , 59 , 60 ]. Hydrogen peroxide acts as a preservative for pasteurized milk by activating the natural enzyme lactoperoxidase [ 60 ]. On the other hand, a significant reason for adding urea in dairy products is to elongate the shelf life. Preservatives, such as salicylic acid and benzoic acid, are added for preserving cheap wines prone to souring. Citric acid is added for pH adjustment. Beet sugar, cane sugar, concentrated rectified must, grape must, or grape wine are added to increase the natural content of ethanol and overall commercial value [ 51 ].

The key preservatives used in food items are listed in Table 2 .

Preservatives and corresponding food items [ 61 , 62 ].

4. Food Substitution

Substitution is the most diverse form of intentional food adulteration, which includes the direct alteration of a part or whole food item or external addition of other inferior food products or fake nutritional compounds. The common forms of food substitution are discussed in the following section.

4.1. Substitution of Species and Tissue

4.1.1. fishery substitution:.

Substitution of fish species is the most practiced form of fish fraud [ 63 ]. It refers to the replacement of a highly reputed fish species by a bad or inferior species [ 14 ]. A commercially valuable fish species is substituted with a low-value, non-declared, and non-specified species to make extra profit and to compensate for high tariffs paid for some species [ 14 , 19 , 64 ]. Crustaceans and high-quality shrimps are more prone to substitution due to their high market demand [ 65 ]. The traditional method of species identification is morphological analysis; however, in the case of seafood, it is quite inefficient as those are phenotypically similar and their external body parts are often removed during processing [ 63 ]. A risk of willful or unintentional substitution also prevails as visual specification becomes more difficult once fish has been processed into another form [ 66 ].

4.1.2. Substitution in Meat Products

In the case of inter-species substitution, meats with similar color, such as beef and horse meat, beef and mutton, or poultry and pork are visually quite difficult to distinguish when frozen or processed into another form and shape. Sausage is one such processed meat product highly relished worldwide that is traditionally made from intestine or obtained synthetically. Though it can be made from beef, chicken, or pork, fraudulent substitution of species is also prevalent here [ 67 ]. Minced meat, one of the most versatile meat products, used in hamburgers, patties, meatballs, sausages, and salami, is prone to frequent adulteration by substitution with other meat species [ 68 ]. In this case, identification of meat species is very difficult as the morphological structure gets removed during mincing, and the adulterated minced meat appears very similar to the authentic product [ 69 ]. The undeclared addition of animal tissue, such as collagen and offal, are also prevalent, which is profitable for the traders [ 70 , 71 ]. Due to pork being cheaper and more readily available than other meat species, frequent substitution of other meat with porcine meat is reported [ 67 , 72 , 73 ].

4.1.3. Substitution in Milk Products

The milk used to manufacture dairy products are usually derived from cow, sheep, goat, and buffalo. Cow milk is widely used both in developed and developing countries; however, there are incidents when cow milk is avoided due to allergenic reaction, religious restriction, ethical or cultural issues, personal preference, and impudence for certain food products [ 74 , 75 ]. Fraudulent substitution of other expensive milk with cow milk is very common. She-donkey milk, possessing high commercial value, is often substituted by cow or goat milk [ 60 ]. People with allergenic problems to cow milk prefer caprine milk due to its being easily digestible and containing low lactose content. Another example of malpractice is representing bovine milk as caprine milk [ 74 , 76 ]. Fraudulent replacement of sheep and goat milk with cheaper cow milk is also reported [ 77 ]. Replacement of fresh cow milk with reconstituted skim milk powder due to the popularity of cow milk is also reported [ 78 ].

Traditional cheese products, such as feta, manchego, and pecorino are manufactured from the mixture of ovine and caprine milk or solely ovine milk. However, the seasonal production and higher price of ovine and caprine milk make those cheese items prone to substitution by cheap bovine milk. Cheese products labelled as “pure buffalo mozzarella” are often found to contain cow milk. Cheese products made from one pure species and with protected designation of origin are rarely proved authentic and should be monitored from time to time [ 77 ].

4.1.4. Coffee Substitution

Admixture of costly coffee beans with comparatively cheap beans is a very common practice. The two commercially important species, Arabica coffee ( Coffea arabica ) and Robusta coffee ( Coffea canephora ) are different in quality and botanical characteristics. Arabica coffee is costlier and has greater acceptability than robusta coffee due to its organoleptic properties. As a blend of these two varieties is also available in the market, the valid representation and labelling as pure Arabica is often susceptible. It is possible to distinguish these two types of beans through visual inspection; however, for coffee in ground and roasted form, it is not possible to distinguish in such a way [ 79 , 80 , 81 ]. Similarly, other commercially valued high quality and rare coffee species, such as Kona coffee grown in Kona Island, Blue Mountain, Tanzanian Peaberry, and Indonesian palm civet coffee ( Kopi luwak ), are often substituted by coffee beans with cheap species. Foreign fillers and coffee byproducts are also admixed with pure coffee products [ 79 ].

4.2. Substitution of Protein Content

4.2.1. protein substitution in meat.

Animal protein, such as egg, gluten, and porcine gelatin are often added to meat products to increase the apparent protein content [ 67 ]. Soybean proteins and cereal flours are used in sausages to recover the desired all-meat properties, such as emulsifying capacity, emulsion stability, and water-binding capacity. Plasma protein is a complex mixture of serum albumin, globulins, and fibrinogen that possesses the ability to produce and stabilize foams and emulsions and to form heat-induced gel. It is utilized by the food industry to control the texture and desired structure of processed meat products [ 82 , 83 ]. Enzymes such as fibrinogen and thrombin are used as blood-based binding agents both in chilled and raw states to give a desired mass and shape to processed meat products [ 71 , 82 ]. Thrombin is used in conjunction with blood plasma as meat binders to give the desired shape in minced meat products. Collagen and its denatured form known as gelatin casing, is considered an important molecule. It offers excellent uniformity of appearance and strength and is usually used to fix the size and shape of processed meat products [ 84 ]. Gelatin solution is often injected into cured meats, which solidifies and increases water retention and resistance to cutting. Again, being a potential source of cheap and high-quality protein, chickpea flour added to comminuted meats increases cooking varieties and provides a softer texture that becomes commercially more valuable. Addition of organic compounds, such as melamine, milk, and urea, are also reported [ 85 ].

4.2.2. Protein Substitution in Milk

Milk protein, which is considered a precursor of many bioactive peptides with antimicrobial activity, is not only a good source of calcium, zinc, copper, and phosphate ions but also helps in the absorption of many other nutrients [ 86 , 87 , 88 ]. Compounds with high nitrogen content can mimic a high protein concentration [ 88 ]. As the non-protein nitrogen cannot be distinguished by Kjeldhal and Dumas methods used for the determination of total protein content, the addition of various nitrogenous compounds in dairy products to increase the apparent protein content is quite frequent. In this case, melamine, urea, and whey are the most reported agents [ 88 , 89 ].

Addition of urea has also been reported several times. A low concentration of urea is naturally present in milk that generally comes from the grass or feed given to dairy cattle [ 45 , 90 ]. Due to being comparatively cheaper than other alternatives, it is extensively used to increase the apparent protein content [ 60 , 76 ]. If the amount of urea is found greater than the permissible limit of 10–16 mg/dL, it simply indicates an external addition [ 90 ].

Whey, being produced in large volume as a cheap byproduct of cheese and caseinates manufacturing, is added to liquid milk as whey protein to increase both the protein content and the total volume [ 60 , 76 ]. The fraudulent addition of rennet whey solids has been reported several times. As cheese whey costs four to five times less than milk and does not affect the sensory properties, it is a lucrative option for dishonest traders [ 91 , 92 ].

Vegetable proteins, such as low-grade soya powder, pea, and wheat also contribute to increasing the protein content of milk and are a convenient option due to being cheap and easily available. Rice and almond proteins are sold as milk supplements for consumers possessing lactose intolerance [ 15 , 93 ].

4.2.3. Protein Substitution in Egg and Egg-Derived Foods

For eggs, melamine is a preferred compound to mimic proteins due to its nitrogen content of approximately 66.7%. Similarly, egg powder and some other egg-derived food products are also at risk of being contaminated with melamine to increase the apparent protein content for uplifting their market value [ 94 ].

4.2.4. Protein Substitution in Staple Foods

Staple foods undergo various types of substitution involving quality discrimination. One of the most well-known substitution cases is the admixture of gluten containing cereals in gluten-free products. Gluten induces allergenic reactions to many individuals for whom gluten-free food has gained much popularity. However, many traders violate the regulation of compulsory declaration of the presence of elements prone to create allergenic reaction through the fraudulent admixing of gluten-containing cereals in gluten-free diets [ 95 , 96 , 97 ]. Peanuts are also another allergen mixed into bulk cereals, legumes, oilseeds, and bulk samples [ 98 ]. Lupin flour is also used as a soybean protein substitute [ 99 ]. In addition, wheat flour, gluten, and soybeans are frequently adulterated with melamine to increase their apparent protein content [ 96 ].

4.3. Substitution of Fat Content

4.3.1. fat substitution in milk.

Being one of the major constituents of milk, the milk fat consisting of 97–98% triacylglycerols is present in all dairy products that contain milk and accounts for 3 to 5% in m/m of cow’s milk [ 60 , 100 ]. However, milk fat is costlier than most other edible fats; thus, production of milk derivatives is also an expensive process. Therefore, manufacturers often replace it with cheaper fats, such as vegetable fats or animal fats, not only for reducing manufacturing cost and to achieve an additional economic benefit but also to hide the effect of fraudulent dilution [ 15 , 76 , 101 ].

4.3.2. Substitution of Oil and Fat Content in Oil and Fat

Due to higher market value and limited production, some oils are more at risk of being adulterated. Extra virgin olive oil is high quality olive oil [ 102 , 103 ]. It is an important source of fatty acids and natural antioxidants [ 104 ]. It has a high market value for its nutritional property, excellent taste, and aroma. However, the market price difference between extra virgin olive oil and other edible oils encourages the dishonest traders to adulterate it with other cheaper oils with similar fatty acid and sterol profiles. Hazelnut oil, seed oils, esterified oils, refined olive oils, and olive–pomace oils are examples of such oils [ 101 , 105 , 106 ]. Virgin coconut oil is another type of high-value oil, which is often adulterated with palm kernel oil, palm oil, and lard. Cod liver oil possesses some therapeutic effects on human health due to the presence of fatty acids and other nutritional values. It is usually adulterated with animal fats, especially lard, chicken fat, mutton fat, and beef fat [ 103 ]. Pure sesame oil, having a unique flavor and high nutrition, is adulterated with various cheaper oils, such as soybean oil, corn oil, rapeseed oil, and palm oil [ 106 ]. In this category, the other possible adulterations are adulteration of soybean oil to groundnut and sunflower seed oil, adulteration of sunflower seed oil to safflower oil, adulteration of borage oil to evening promise oil [ 107 ], adulteration of rice bran oil to mustard oil [ 107 ], and adulteration of argemone Mexican seed oil to other edible oils. Mineral oils, such as sesame oil, linseed oil, cottonseed oil, and castor oil are found in high-value oils. Minimally processed oils or cod-pressed oils are often replaced by refined oils. Adulteration of vegetable oil with lard and beef tallow to minimize production cost of margarines and shortenings is also reported [ 107 ].

4.4. Food Dilution

Food dilution is the addition of a cheaper ingredient to a high-value food stuff without declaring it [ 20 ]. Dilution and overdilution are widely practiced adulterations. Not only liquid but also solid food items are prone to dilution with water or other liquids. This phenomenon is conventionally confirmed by refractometric Brix determination or density measurements. It is the most common form of adulteration in liquid milk [ 45 ]. It affects the density, refractive index of lactoserum, and freezing point of adulterated milk items [ 76 ]. Honey and other sweeteners are also often diluted with water, which causes honey to deteriorate faster during storage. Therefore, honey overdiluted with water lacks proper consistency and nutritional value [ 37 ]. Meat products are also prone to such activity. The lean meat acquires a high water-binding capacity after being chopped and, thus, absorbs a large quantity of water, which has been claimed to give necessary consistency for stuffing into thin cases. It was detected frequently in frankfurters, bologna, and pork sausages [ 85 ]. Technology is used to fraudulently increase the weight of fish and seafood in order to make extra economic benefit. Over-treating, which means over-breeding or over-glazing, soaking fish in brine solution, injecting chemicals to increase muscle water-holding capacity, injection of fish byproducts back into the fillet, and water addition are such instances [ 14 , 64 ].

Fruit juices in high demand are reported to be substituted and adulterated using cheap fruit juice [ 49 ]. Orange juice is adulterated with other citrus juices when their prices fall [ 108 ]. Adulteration of pomegranate juice with natural grape pigments to represent the actual color is practiced. Adulteration with poor quality juice and peel extract is another well-known practice [ 109 ]. Commercialization of reconstituted juice made from concentrate as fresh squeezed juice is also practiced [ 49 , 110 ]. The admixing of vinegar derived from a C3 or C4 plant is widely accomplished due to economic advantage and availability [ 111 ]. Admixing various proportions of wine vinegars and alcohol vinegars to reduce production cost and selling as pure wine vinegar is another frequently reported malpractice [ 112 ].

Edible wheat consists of common wheat and durum wheat [ 113 ]. The coarse flour obtained from durum wheat is the primary ingredient of pasta. Pasta made from 100% durum wheat is considered of the highest quality since it imparts unique and firmer dough. Therefore, there is a price difference between these two types of wheats that exists in the market and tempts the manufacturers to admix common wheat with durum wheat [ 95 , 96 , 114 ]. Due to the growing interest in organic food, organic wheat flour has a huge market demand and is often adulterated with common wheat flour, cassava flour, and corn flour. Their visual detection is quite difficult, as organic wheat flour is nearly the same in color as cassava flour and corn flour [ 115 ].

Another widespread adulteration is the admixing of high-quality rice with low quality rice. Rice of different varieties are cultivated which can be admixed fraudulently during the cultivation, harvesting, transporting, and processing [ 116 ]. As most varieties of rice are almost similar to look at, their visual discrimination is nearly impossible [ 117 ]. Basmati rice, grown in India and Pakistan, holds a prime position among the more than 5000 rice varieties all over the world for its high quality and fragrance. It is sold at 2–3 times higher in price than other varieties in the market [ 118 ]. These phenomena provide an incentive for dishonest merchants to adulterate Basmati rice with non-Basmati rice, such as Jasmine rice, long grain rice, etc. [ 119 ].

Spices and spices powders are frequently subject to substitution with low quality substances [ 120 ]. Table 3 presents spices and their adulterants.

Spices and their adulterants [ 9 , 120 , 121 , 122 ].

Dried bread, corn meal, potato starch, crackers, waste biscuit, and boiled rice are usually used as fillers in sausages [ 85 ]. Instead of the natural smoking of meat, smoke aromas are fraudulently used [ 71 ]. Other additives, such as natural bacon flavors, glycerin, and lecithin from animal fat, are also in use. Alcohol ingredients made from pork fat, such as lard, mono- and diglycerides, sodium stearoyl lactylate, and polysorbate 60 or 80, are also added. Grain or plant-based ingredients with pig-based carrier, such as Beta carotene, are also used [ 67 ]. Salt is used to increase the water holding capacity and weight of meat products artificially for economic gain, which causes changes in the secondary structure of the proteins [ 118 ].

The substitution adulteration with food items is summarized in Table 4 .

Various substitution adulteration with food items.

5. Organic and Synthetic Adulterants

Illegal addition of organic acids, alcohols, and esters in certain food products are frequently reported. Synthetic pharmaceutical compounds and drugs are also added into food items to induce therapeutic effects. Dietary supplement is the most famous food category in this regard, making headlines in newspapers and food crime logs regularly.

5.1. Adulteration with Soymilk

Soymilk possesses similar properties to cow milk. Hence, soymilk is often fraudulently added to cow milk and buffalo milk in preparation of different dairy products [ 76 , 126 ]. The production cost of soymilk is 70% less than pure milk [ 15 ]. A combination of urea, vegetable oil, emulsifier, fat, and nitrogen content provide synthetic milk the same color, specific gravity, and consistency of pure buffalo milk and becomes undetectable. Its milky aroma turns it into a commercially valuable product; thus, 5–10% adulteration of dairy milk has been reported [ 76 ].

5.2. Adulteration with Organic Acids

Organic acids, such as malic acid, are added to apple juice concentrate to increase commercial value [ 45 ]. Unauthorized addition of organic acids, such as citric and tartaric acid, is beneficial because the sensory properties and commercial value of certain type of fruit juices rises with acidity level. Amino acids, such as glycine and glutamic acid or protein hydrolysates, are also added to food items to boost the total amino acid content. Addition of mixture of flavors, organic acids, and sugars is a commonly added chemical cocktail to fruit extract [ 11 ].

5.3. Adulteration with Synthetic Acetic Acids

The authenticity issues associated with vinegar is related to the raw material source and manufacturing processes [ 111 ]. Synthetic acetic acid is produced from non-biological origins obtained from either petroleum derivatives or by pyrolysis of wood. Synthetic acetic acid is reported to be sold as organic acetic acid or mixed with organic acetic acid to increase the volume [ 112 , 127 , 128 ].

5.4. Adulteration with Artificial Wine

Some adulterated wines are called artificial wine that consists of components organoleptically perceived as grape wine. Water, yeast, sugar, potassium tartarate, crystalline tartaric and citric acids, tannin, glycerol, ethanol, and ethyl esters of high fatty acids are the typical constituents of artificial wine [ 42 ]. Glycerol, diethylene glycol, citric acid, and semi-volatile additives, such as propylene glycol, sorbic acid, and benzoic acid, are also mixed for wine enhancement; other compounds, such as rectified alcohols, components of non-grape origin, and natural and synthetic flavor compounds, are also added [ 41 , 42 , 49 ].

5.5. Adulteration with Unrecorded and Surrogate Alcohol

Such alcohols represent alcoholic beverages that either do not possess an official registration in the jurisdiction, are manufactured illegally, or are consumed by cross-border trade. Alcohols that are not produced for human consumption, such as medicinal alcohol, disinfectant alcohol, denatured alcohol, synthetic alcohol, and other industrial alcohols, are often added to alcoholic beverages to increase their alcohol content [ 42 ].

5.6. Synthetic Pharmaceutical Adulterants

Addition of synthetic pharmaceutical ingredients in dietary supplements is a great concern of the present time. Dietary supplements marketed for various health benefits are fraudulently admixed with pharmaceutical compounds to boost the desired effect on the human body [ 129 ].

Various approved pharmaceutical drugs and their analogues, which are often very difficult to detect, have been found in food supplements advertised as a remedy for diseases [ 129 ]. The phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE-5) inhibitors, such as sildenafil citrate, tadalafil hydrochloride, vardenafil hydrochloride, udenafil, mirodenafil hydrochloride, lodenafil carbonate, avanafil, and their unapproved designer analogues, are fraudulently added to herbal supplements. More exotic analogues synthesized by minor modifications to parent structures of approved PDE-5 inhibitors also have been added by traders to make their detection much more difficult [ 130 , 131 ]. In addition, adulteration with optical isomers of tadalafil has also been reported [ 131 , 132 ]. Up to the year of 2018, 80 synthetic PDE-5 inhibitors were found in herbal supplements among which, 62% of sildenafil, 26% of tadalafil, 9% of vardenafil, and 3% of others were reported [ 133 ]. Analgesics, such as paracetamol, antihistamines, theophylline, bromhexine, diazepam, chlordiazepoxide, glibenclamide, hydrochlorothiazide, aminopyrine, and phenytoin are frequently found in food supplements. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, such as aspirin, mefenamic acid, and phenacetin, have also been reported in several dietary supplements [ 129 , 130 , 134 , 135 , 136 , 137 ].

To get rid of obesity and extra weight, people purchase several weight-reducing dietary supplements, which are often adulterated with synthetic drugs. Some are controlled by regulatory agencies and others are banned due to their adverse effect on human health [ 138 , 139 ]. Table 5 shows some examples of these adulterants.

Adulterant category for psychiatric issues, obesity, and other health problems with examples [ 138 , 139 ].

Plant food supplements prepared for body-building and athletic performance enhancement are often found adulterated with anabolic steroids or prohormones. Performance-enhancing drugs listed by the World Anti-Doping Agency [ 140 ] are defined as pharmacological substances by World Anti-Doping Code and are not allowed for human therapeutic use. Some of those drugs are presented in Table 6 .

Adulterant category to improve body-building and athletic performance with examples [ 139 , 140 , 141 , 142 , 143 , 144 ].

Other related substances are growth hormone, erythropoietin, chorionic gonadotropin, β-2 agonists, hormones, and metabolic modulators, such as aromatase inhibitors and selective estrogen receptor modulators. Cannabinoids and glucocorticosteroids are also prohibited in athletic competition. New, modified, or “designer” steroids are of greatest concern because of the relatively little information available about their pharmacology and probable side effects. The presence of such adulterants poses a major risk for athletes since it results in a positive anti-doping control test, and the World Anti-Doping Agency does not justify whether it was deliberate or accidental doping [ 139 , 145 ].

6. Fraud and Mislabeling

Quality and origin of foodstuffs are of great concern to the consumers as food grown in certain regions and some special species have higher economic value due to their superior quality. Environmental pollution of the geographical origins is also another considerable factor in this regard [ 146 ]. Food from high quality batches, species, and cultures are not only often replaced with low quality products but also mislabeled deliberately by the traders for extra profit. Such malpractice violates customers’ rights, reduces the benefits of local cultivators, and creates unfair business competition [ 147 ]. Traceability is assured only by labelling and administrative documentation and, thus, is prone to frequent fraudulent practice. The evidence of such issues with fish, seafood, meat, processed meat, and staple foods is found mostly in scientific reports [ 63 , 71 , 117 , 148 ]. There are also reports on origin fraud and mislabeling of tea, fruit juice, vinegar, honey, and alcoholic beverages [ 41 , 45 , 47 , 149 ]. Expensive honey, such as pine, thyme, orange blossom, chestnut, heather, manuka, acacia, litchi, and linden, are frequently reported for mislabeling with respect to botanical origin [ 150 , 151 ]. The plant-based food “Fava Santorinis” having protected designation of origin (PDO) is often replaced with inferior yellow split peas [ 152 ]. ‘Eglouvis’ lentils cultivated in the Ionian Islands is often subject to origin fraud [ 153 ].

Misrepresentation of geographical and botanical origin is seen mostly in the case of olive oils and cocoa butter. The quality and constituents of olive oils vary with certain regional characteristics, surroundings, and manufacturing technique, holding different commercial values [ 104 ]. For example, some olive cultivars of Olea europaea L. are known to possess better quality because of breeding and selection strategies. Olive oils derived from those regions or cultivars are specified by labelling. Due to their high market value, they are often misrepresented [ 154 , 155 , 156 ]. Extra virgin olive oil has protected designation of origin (PDO) due to possessing a high content of monounsaturated fatty acids, vitamins, and antioxidants. Due to high commercial value, it is often mislabeled [ 157 , 158 ].

7. Health Impact

There is much historical evidence on the health hazard resulting from food adulteration. Some food adulterants do not participate in health degradation. Those only affect the nutritional parameter and reduce food quality. Species substitution of coffee products is such an example. Other adulterants are potential source of mild to severe illness. The financial loss associated with hospitalization and medication is also not negligible.

Consumption of fruits adulterated with ripening agents have been proved to be carcinogenic to the human body [ 25 ]. Other health issues, such as headache, dizziness, nausea, and kidney failure are also visible [ 32 , 34 , 159 ]. Similarly, artificial coloring agents have shown carcinogenic and genotoxic properties [ 9 ]. Artificial sweetening agents have been proved to be clastogenic and genotoxic [ 42 ]. Uterine cancer, exhaustion, and loss of energy have been found to be associated with the consumption of growth hormones [ 29 ]. Consumption of melamine with food products causes renal failure, kidney stones, and infection in urinary tract [ 15 , 88 , 160 ]. People consuming food preserved with formaldehyde have fallen victim to disturbances in the nervous system, kidney, liver, and lungs [ 54 ].

Substitution of food items can also be health hazardous. Fishery substitution may result into the consumption of illegal poisonous fish species that even cause death [ 14 ]. Substituted meat products may cause allergic reactions, diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases [ 72 , 161 , 162 ]. Evidence of massive death has been found from the consumption of Raki, a Turkish traditional aniseed-flavored distilled spirit [ 49 ]. Substitution of spices have resulted into intoxication, neurological, and gastrointestinal problems in children [ 163 ]; anaphylaxis, liver, and stomach problems have also been reported [ 9 ]. Species substitution in milk and dairy products may cause allergic reactions [ 164 ]. Oil substitution may result in gall bladder cancer, epidemic dropsy, glaucoma, loss of eyesight, paralysis, liver damage, and cardiac arrest [ 105 , 165 ].

Some notable food adulterants and their possible health effects are presented in Table 7 .

Food adulterants and their possible health effects.

8. Conclusions

Food adulteration has been a major global concern due to its impact on health and economy. For years, food items have been decorated with artificial colorants to attract consumers. Protection of external freshness through the addition of several preservatives have been frequently accomplished by food traders. Deliberate substitution of high-quality food with inferior food products has been a regularly practiced issue. Alteration of nutritional parameters through fraudulent substitution has also been prominent. Food is directly related to health, and any form of alteration in its natural composition should be prohibited. The opportunities existing in favor of food contamination should be analyzed. Lack of proper legislations and their strict application is one of the root causes of rapidly increasing adulteration of food.

Though the food officials from around the world are trying to combat adulteration of food, there still exists some limitations. Adulterated food is usually not identified until it shows a health hazard. In addition, many developing countries still lag in terms of food adulteration analysis techniques. Proper law enforcement and regular inspection of food quality can bring about drastic changes. In the modern time, the contribution of scientists and researchers on food adulteration detection and quantification technologies is highly appreciable. The documentation of ever-increasing fraudulent ideas and practices with food must be kept up to date to cope up with food crimes. Different forms of food adulteration and associated health impacts should be well-documented and analyzed. Considering the detrimental health impacts, food safety and quality assurance is an urgent necessity. Considering the prospects of a rapidly expanding global food market, the regulation of food quality should be of prime importance. In a nutshell, food adulteration is a broad concept and cannot be managed only by the policymakers and executors. The food manufacturers and sellers, along with the customers, should contribute to making their country a safe place to live.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express gratitude to the Department of Chemical Engineering, BUET and Bangladesh Agriculture Development Corporation (BADC) for technical assistance. The authors would also like to express gratitude to Tahiya Hossain, Islamic University of Technology, for assistance in organizing the manuscript. This article was supported by BUET CASR Research Fund and ESTex Research Fund.

Funding Statement

This research was funded by BUET CASR Research Fund and ESTex Research Funding.

Author Contributions

M.M. contributed to the conceptualization of the study, carried out the literature review, and drafted and finalized the manuscript; S.Y.B. carried out the literature review; M.S.K. conceived the study, supervised the research project and manuscript preparation, contributed to the writing, and reviewed, edited, and finalized the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Data Availability Statement

Conflicts of interest.

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Food authentication and adulteration control based on metrics data of foods and chemometrics

  • Review Article
  • Published: 18 February 2024

Cite this article

  • Ioannis Konstantinos Karabagias 1  

38 Accesses

Explore all metrics

Great effort has been carried out the last years from the food sector for the understanding of food authentication, as the term has been well supported by numerous research articles, including data raised from conventional and instrumental analyses in combination with chemometrics or other machine learning tools. The term is getting more and more value by the official authorities as the last years the economically motivated adulteration (food fraud) happens more often with the economic losses for the Governments at a global level being really scaring. Considering the above, the current review highlights a considerable number of recent protocols implemented for the authentication and adulteration control of plant-based and animal-based foods, focusing on honey, olive oil, seafood, juices, spices, pine nuts, etc., based on metrics data of foods, to cover all the essential aspects of food authentication and defense against food adulteration/fraud.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Institutional subscriptions

research papers on food adulteration

Data availability

The manuscript includes all relevant data.

Institute of Food Science and Technology (IFST) (2021) ‘’Food Fraud’’, https://www.ifst.org/resources/information-statements/food-fraud .

Huck CW, Pezzei CK, Huck-Pezzei V-AC (2016) An industry perspective of food fraud. Curr Opin in Food Sci 10:32–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cofs.2016.07.004

Article   Google Scholar  

FDA (U.S. Food & Drug Administration) (2023) ‘’ Economically motivated adulteration (Food Fraud)’’, 01-31-2023, www.fda.gov .

Moyer DC, DeVries JW, Spink J (2017) The economics of a food fraud incident–case studies and examples including melamine in wheat gluten. Food Cont 71:358–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.07.015

Department for environment, food and rural affairs (2018), www.gov.uk .

Karabagias IK (2020) Advances of spectrometric techniques in food analysis and food authentication implemented with chemometrics. Foods 9(11):1550. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9111550

Article   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Barham E, Sylvander B (2011) Labels of origin for food: local development, global Recognition. CABI, UK, p. 17. ISBN 9781845933777.

Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs. L343/1–29.

Visciano P, Schirone M (2021) Food frauds: global incidents and misleading situations. Trends Food Sci Technol 114:424–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2021.06.010

Article   CAS   Google Scholar  

Karabasanavar NS, Singh SP, Kumar D, Shebannavar SN (2014) Detection of pork adulteration by highly-specific PCR assay of mitochondrial D-loop. Food Chem 145:530–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.08.084

Article   CAS   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Kalogianni DP (2018) DNA-based analytical methods for milk authentication. Eur Food Res Technol 244(5):775–793. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-017-3016-x

Bougadi ET, Kalogianni DP (2020) Paper-based DNA biosensor for food authenticity testing. Food Chem 322:126758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.126758

Magiati M, Myridaki VM, Christopoulos TK, Kalogianni DP (2019) Lateral flow test for meat authentication with visual detection. Food Chem 274:803–807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.09.063

Masoomi S, Sharifi H, Hemmateenejad B (2024) A paper-based optical tongue for characterization of Iranian honey: identification of geographical/botanical origins and adulteration detection. Food Cont 155:110052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2023.110052

Bo H, Xianrong M, Liyuan Z, Jinyue G, Shaowen L, Hui J (2015) Development of a sensitive and specific multiplex PCR method for the simultaneous detection of chicken, duck and goose DNA in meat products. Meat Sci 101:90–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.11.007

Di Febo T, Schirone M, Di Domenico M, Visciano P, Krasteva I, Sonsini L et al (2020) Detection of undeclared bovine milk in different food matrices by a multitechnique approach. Int Dairy J 111:104845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2020.104845

Bontempo L, Paolini M, Franceschi P, Ziller L, García-González DL, Camin F (2019) Characterisation and attempted differentiation of European and extra-European olive oils using stable isotope ratio analysis. Food Chem 276:782–789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.10.077

Jiménez-Morillo NT, Palma V, Garcia R, Pereira JA, Dias CB, Cabrita MJ (2020) Multivariate geostatistical analysis of stable isotopes in Portuguese varietal extra virgin olive oils. Microchem J 157:105044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2020.105044

Ross A, Brunius C, Chevallier O, Dervilly G, Elliott C, Guitton Y et al (2020) Making complex measurements of meat composition fast: application of rapid evaporative ionisation mass spectrometry to measuring meat quality and fraud. Meat Sci 6:108333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2020.108333

Mendes TO, da Rocha RA, Porto BLS et al (2015) Quantification of extra-virgin olive oil adulteration with soybean oil: a comparative study of NIR, MIR, and Raman spectroscopy associated with chemometric approaches. Food Anal Meth 8:2339–2346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12161-015-0121-y

Chaudhary V, Kajla P, Dewan A, Pandiselvam R, Socol CT, Maerescu CM (2022) Spectroscopic techniques for authentication of animal origin foods. Front in Nutr 9:979205. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.979205

McGrath TF, Haughey SA, Patterson J, Fauhl-Hassek C, Donarski J, Alewijn M et al (2018) What are the scientific challenges in moving from targeted to nontargeted methods for food testing and how can they be addressed? – Spectroscopy case study. Trends Food Sci Technol 76:38–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2018.04.001

Gottstein V, Lachenmeier DW, Kuballa T, Bunzel M (2023) 1 H NMR-based approach to determine the geographical origin and cultivation method of roasted coffee. Food Chem. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.137278

Article   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Esteki M, Simal-Gandara J, Shahsavari Z, Zandbaaf S, Dashtaki E, Vander Heyden Y (2018) A review on the application of chromatographic methods, coupled to chemometrics, for food authentication. Food Cont 93:165–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2018.06.015

Jin W, Zhao S, Sun H, Pei J, Gao R, Jiang P (2023) Characterization and discrimination of flavor volatiles of different colored wheat grains after cooking based on GC-IMS and chemometrics. Curr Res Food Sci 7:100583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crfs.2023.100583

Article   CAS   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Carabetta S, Di Sanzo R, Fuda S, Muscolo A, Russo M (2023) A predictive model to correlate amino acids and aromatic compounds in Calabrian honeys. Foods 12:3284. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12173284

Karabagias I, Michos Ch, Badeka A, Kontakos S, Stratis I, Kontominas MG (2013) Classification of Western Greek virgin olive oils according to geographical origin based on chromatographic, spectroscopic, conventional and chemometric analyses. Food Res Int 54(2):1950–1958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2013.09.023

Czipa N, Kovács B, Alexa L et al (2023) Determination of trace, micro and macro elemental concentration of Eritrean honeys. Biol Trace Elem Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-023-03821-x

Manning L (2016) Food fraud: policy and food chain. Curr Opin Food Sci 10:16–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cofs.2016.07.001

Kucharska-Ambrożej K, Karpinska J (2020) The application of spectroscopic techniques in combination with chemometrics for detection adulteration of some herbs and spices. Microchem J 153:104278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2019.104278

Karabagias IK, Badeka AV, Kontakos S, Karabournioti S, Kontominas MG (2014) Botanical discrimination of Greek unifloral honeys with physico-chemical and chemometric analyses. Food Chem 165:181–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.05.033

Dayananda B, Cozzolino D (2023) Statistical and mathematical models in food authentication. In: Pastor K (ed) Emerging food authentication methodologies using GC/MS. Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30288-6_2

Chapter   Google Scholar  

da Silva CET, Filardi VL, Pepe IM, Chaves MA, Santos CMS (2015) Classification of food vegetable oils by fluorimetry and artificial neural networks. Food Cont 47:86–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2014.06.030

Naccarato A, Furia E, Sindona G, Tagarelli A (2016) Multivariate class modeling techniques applied to multielement analysis for the verification of the geographical origin of chili pepper. Food Chem 206:217–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.03.072

Roy M, Yadav BK (2022) Electronic nose for detection of food adulteration: a review. J Food Sci Technol 59:846–858. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-021-05057-w

Sales C, Cervera MI, Gil R, Portolés T, Pitarch E, Beltran J (2017) Quality classification of Spanish olive oils by untargeted gas chromatography coupled to hybrid quadrupole-time of flight mass spectrometry with atmospheric pressure chemical ionization and metabolomics-based statistical approach. Food Chem 216:365–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.08.033

Moncayo S, Manzoor S, Navarro-Villoslada F, Caceres JO (2015) Evaluation of supervised chemometric methods for sample classification by laser induced breakdown spectroscopy. Chem Intell Labor Syst 146:354364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2015.06.004

Miller JN, Miller JC (2010) Statistics and Chemometrics for Analytical Chemistry, 6th Ed., Pearson Education Limited, Edinburgh Gate, Harlow, Essex CM20 2JE, England.

Skov T, Honoré AH, Jensen HM, Næs T, Engelsen SB (2014) Chemometrics in foodomics: handling data structures from multiple analytical platforms. TrAC Trends Anal Chem 60:71–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2014.05.004

Granato D, Santos JS, Escher GB, Ferreira BL, Maggio RM (2018) Use of principal component analysis (PCA) and hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) for multivariate association between bioactive compounds and functional properties in foods: a critical perspective. Trends Food Sci Technol 72:83–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2017.12.006

Brigante FI, Mas AL, Pigni NB, Wunderlin DA, Baroni MV (2020) Targeted metabolomics to assess the authenticity of bakery products containing chia, sesame and flax seeds. Food Chem 312:126059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.126059

Karabagias IK, Nayik GA (2023) Machine learning algorithms applied to aemi-quantitative data of the volatilome of citrus and other nectar honeys with the use of HS-SPME/GC-MS analysis, lead to a new index of geographical origin authentication. Foods 12(3):509. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12030509

European Commission (2009). European Commission 182/2009 of 6 March 2009 amending regulation (EC) no. 1019/2002 on marketing standards for olive oil. Official Journal of the European Union L63:6–8

Menapace L, Colson G, Grebitus C, Facendola M (2011) Consumers’ preferences for geographical origin labels: evidence from the Canadian olive oil market. Eur Rev Agric Econom 38:193–212. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbq051

Souayah F, Rodrigues N, Veloso ACA et al (2017) Discrimination of olive oil by cultivar, geographical origin and quality using potentiometric electronic tongue fingerprints. J Amer Oil Chemists’ Soc 94:1417–1429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11746-017-3051-6

Carranco N, Farrés-Cebrián M, Saurina J, Núñez O (2018) Authentication and quantitation of fraud in extra virgin olive oils based on HPLC-UV fingerprinting and multivariate calibration. Foods 7:44. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods7040044

Karabagias IK, Badeka A, Casiello G, Longobardi F, Kontominas MG (2019) Rapid screening of olive oil cultivar differentiation based on selected physicochemical parameters, pigment content and fatty acid composition using advanced chemometrics. Eur Food Res Technol 245:2027–2038. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-019-03310-3

Borghi FT, Santos PC, Santos FD, Nascimento MHC, Corřea T, Cesconetto M et al (2020) Quantification and classification of vegetable oils in extra virgin olive oil samples using a portable near-infrared spectrometer associated with chemometrics. Microchem J 159:105544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2020.105544

Eriotou E, Karabagias IK, Maina S et al (2021) Geographical origin discrimination of “Ntopia” olive oil cultivar from Ionian islands using volatile compounds analysis and computational statistics. Eur Food Res Technol 247:3083–3098. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-021-03863-2

Silletti S, Morello L, Gavazzi F, Gianì S, Braglia L, Breviario D (2019) Untargeted DNA-based methods for the authentication of wheat species and related cereals in food products. Food Chem 271:410–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.07.178

Izquierdo M, Lastra-Mejías M, González-Flores E, Pradana-López S, Cancilla JC, Torrecilla JS (2020) Visible imaging to convolutionally discern and authenticate varieties of rice and their derived flours. Food Cont 110:106971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2019.106971

Ch R, Chevallier O, McCarron P, McGrath TF, Wu D, Nguyen Doan Duy L et al (2021) Metabolomic fingerprinting of volatile organic compounds for the geographical discrimination of rice samples from China, Vietnam and India. Food Chem 334:127553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.127553

Kouvoutsakis G, Mitsi C, Tarantilis PA, Polissiou MG, Pappas CS (2014) Geographical differentiation of dried lentil seed ( Lens culinaris ) samples using diffuse reflectance fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (DRIFTS) and discriminant analysis. Food Chem 145:1011–1014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.09.041

Longobardi F, Casiello G, Cortese M, Perini M, Camin F, Catucci L, Agostiano A (2015) Discrimination of geographical origin of lentils ( Lens culinaris Medik.) using isotope ratio mass spectrometry combined with chemometrics. Food Chem 188:343–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.05.020

Longobardi F, Innamorato V, Di Gioia A, Ventrella A, Lippolis V, Logrieco AF, Catucci L, Agostiano A (2017) Geographical origin discrimination of lentils ( Lens culinaris Medik.) using 1 H NMR fingerprinting and multivariate statistical analyses. Food Chem 237:743–748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.05.159

Esteki M, Farajmand B, Kolahderazi Y, Simal-Gandara J (2017) Chromatographic fingerprinting with multivariate data analysis for detection and quantification of apricot kernel in almond powder. Food Anal Meth 10:3312–3320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12161-017-0903-5

Campmajó G, Navarro GJ, Núñez N, Puignou L, Saurina J, Núñez O (2019) Non-targeted HPLC-UV fingerprinting as chemical descriptors for the classification and authentication of nuts by multivariate chemometric methods. Sensors 19(6):1388. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19061388

Article   ADS   CAS   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

von Wuthenau K, Segelke T, Müller M-S, Behlok H, Fischer M (2022) Food authentication of almonds ( Prunus dulcis mill.). Origin analysis with inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) and chemometrics. Food Cont 134:108689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.108689

Longobardi F, Ventrella A, Bianco A, Catucci L, Cafagna I, Gallo V, Mastrorilli P, Agostiano A (2013) Non-targeted 1 H NMR fingerprinting and multivariate statistical analyses for the characterization of the geographical origin of Italian sweet cherries. Food Chem 141:3028–3033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.05.135

Centonze V, Salvatore Cervellieri VL, Damascelli A, Casiello G, Pascale M, Logrieco AF, Longobardi F (2019) Discrimination of geographical origin of oranges ( Citrus sinensis L. Osbeck) by mass spectrometry-based electronic nose and characterization of volatile compounds. Food Chem 277:25–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.10.105

Karabagias VK, Karabagias IK, Louppis A, Badeka A, Kontominas MG, Papastephanou C (2019) Valorization of prickly pear juice geographical origin based on mineral and volatile compound contents using LDA. Foods 8:123. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods8040123

Vavoura MV, Karabagias IK, Kosma IS, Badeka AV, Kontominas MG (2022) Characterization and differentiation of fresh orange juice variety based on conventional physicochemical parameters, flavonoids, and volatile compounds using chemometrics. Molecules 27(19):6166. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27196166

Springer AE, Riedl J, Esslinger S, Roth T, Glomb MA, Fauhl-Hassek C (2014) Validated modeling for German white wine varietal authentication based on headspace solid-phase microextraction online coupled with gas chromatography mass spectrometry fingerprinting. J Agric Food Chem 62:6844–6851. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf502042c

Karabagias IK, Karabagias VK, Badeka AV (2021) Volatilome of white wines as indicator of authenticity and adulteration control using statistical analysis. Austr J Grape Wine Res 27(3):269–279. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajgw.12486

de Moura Ribeiro MV, Boralle N, Pezza HR, Pezza L, Toci AT (2017) Authenticity of roasted coffee using 1 H NMR spectroscopy. J Food Comp Anal 57:24–30

Wang H, Hu L, Zhou P, Ouyang L, Chen B, Li Y et al (2021) Simultaneous determination of fructose, glucose and sucrose by solid phase extraction-liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and its application to source and adulteration analysis of sucrose in tea. J Food Comp Anal 96:103730

Ferreira T, Farah A, Oliveira TC, Lima IS, Vitório F, Oliveira EMM (2016) Using real-time PCR as a tool for monitoring the authenticity of commercial coffees. Food Chem 199:433–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.12.045

Karabagias IK, Badeka AV (2021) Physicochemical parameters and volatile compounds of herbal teas as indicators of products’ brand name using chemometrics. Eur Food Res Technol 247:961–974. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-020-03677-8

Pages-Rebull J, Pérez-Ràfols C, Serrano N, Manel del Valle JMD-C (2023) Classification and authentication of spices and aromatic herbs by means of HPLC-UV and chemometrics. Food Biosci 52:102401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbio.2023.102401

Grace D (2019) Food fraud. Encycl Food Secur Sustain 1:238–248

Google Scholar  

Drabova L, Alvarez-Rivera G, Suchanova M, Schusterova D, Pulkrabova J, Tomaniova M et al (2019) Food fraud in oregano: Pesticide residues as adulteration markers. Food Chem 276:726–734

de Lima ABS, Batista AS, de Jesus JC, de Jesus SJ, de Araújo ACM, Santos LS (2020) Fast quantitative detection of black pepper and cumin adulterations by near-infrared spectroscopy and multivariate modeling. Food Cont 107:106802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2019.106802

Galvin-King P, Haughey SA, Elliott CT (2021) Garlic adulteration detection using NIR and FTIR spectroscopy and chemometrics. J Food Comp Anal 96:103757. https://doi.org/10.1016/jfca.2020.103757

Vishnuraj MR, Devatkal S, Vaithuyanathan S, Uday Kumar R, Mendiratta SK (2021) Development and validation of miRNA based method for rapid identification of offal meats in processed chicken meat products. Food Cont 121:107593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107593

Prandi B, Varani M, Faccini A, Lambertini F, Suman M, Leporati A, Sforza S (2019) Species specific marker peptides for meat authenticity assessment: a multispecies quantitative approach applied to bolognese sauce. Food Cont 97:15–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2018.10.016

Dolch K, Judas M, Schwägele F, Brüggemann DA (2019) Development and validation of two triplex real-time PCR systems for the simultaneous detection of six cereal species in processed meat products. Food Cont 101:180–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2019.02.025

López-Maestresalas A, Insausti K, Jarén C, Pérez-Roncal C, Urrutia O, Beriain MJ, Arazuri S (2019) Detection of minced lamb and beef fraud using NIR spectroscopy. Food Cont 98:465–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2018.12.003

Derz W, Pavlovic M, Huber I, Schalch B, Gerdes L (2021) Food fraud in the Alps? - detection of chamois ( Rupicapra rupicapra ) in firm raw sausages, ham, and meat via qualitative duplex real-time PCR. Food Cont 123:107764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107764

Rodrigues Júnior PH, De Sa ’ Oliveira K, Almeida CERD, De Oliveira LFC, Stephani R, Pinto MDS et al (2016) FT-Raman and chemometric tools for rapid determination of quality parameters in milk powder: classification of samples for the presence of lactose and fraud detection by addition of maltodextrin. Food Chem 196:584–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.09.055

Gregorcic SH, Potocnik D, Camin F, Ogrinc N (2020) Milk authentication: Stable isotope composition of hydrogen and oxygen in milks and their constituents. Molecules 25:4000. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25174000

Marchetti P, Mottola A, Tantillo G, Castrica M, Di Pinto A (2021) Short communication: detection of undeclared presence of cow milk in buffalo yogurt. J Dairy Sci 104(4):4056–4061. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2020-19194

Standal IB, Axelson DE, Aursand M (2010) 13C NMR as a tool for authentication of different gadoid fish species with emphasis on phospholipid profiles. Food Chem 121(2):608–615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.12.074

Ortea I, Gallardo JM (2015) Investigation of production method, geographical origin and species authentication in commercially relevant shrimps using stable isotope ratio and/or multi-element analyses combined with chemometrics: an exploratory analysis. Food Chem 170:145–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.08.049

Velioĝlu HM, Temiz HT, Boyaci IH (2015) Differentiation of fresh and frozen-thawed fish samples using Raman spectroscopy coupled with chemometric analysis. Food Chem 172:283–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.09.073

Kuś PM, van Ruth S (2015) Discrimination of Polish unifloral honeys using overall PTR-MS and HPLC fingerprints combined with chemometrics. LWT-Food Sci Technol 62:69–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2014.12.060

Louppis AP, Karabagias IK, Kontakos S, Kontominas MG, Papastephanou C (2017) Botanical discrimination of Greek unifloral honeys based on mineral content in combination with physicochemical parameter analysis, using a validated chemometric approach. Microchem J 135:180–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2017.09.004

Gerhardt N, Birkenmeier M, Schwolow S, Rohn S, Weller P (2018) Volatile compound fingerprinting by headspace-gas-chromatography ion-mobility spectrometry (HS-GC-IMS) as a benchtop alternative to 1 H NMR profiling for assessment of the authenticity of honey. Anal Chem 90:1777–1785. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.7b03748

Sobrino-Gregorio L, Vilanova S, Prohens J, Escriche I (2019) Detection of honey adulteration by conventional and real-time PCR. Food Cont 95:57–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2018.07.037

Download references

Acknowledgements

The current study was supported by the funding programme ‘’ MEDICUS ’’ of the University of Patras.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Department of Food Science and Technology, School of Agricultural Sciences, University of Patras, G. Seferi 2, 30100, Agrinio, Greece

Ioannis Konstantinos Karabagias

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ioannis Konstantinos Karabagias .

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest.

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest or competing interests.

Research involving human participants and/or animals

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects.

Informed consent

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Karabagias, I.K. Food authentication and adulteration control based on metrics data of foods and chemometrics. Eur Food Res Technol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-024-04477-0

Download citation

Received : 25 November 2023

Revised : 06 January 2024

Accepted : 13 January 2024

Published : 18 February 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-024-04477-0

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

  • Food authentication
  • Adulteration control
  • Food metrics
  • Chemometrics
  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

food adulteration Recently Published Documents

Total documents.

  • Latest Documents
  • Most Cited Documents
  • Contributed Authors
  • Related Sources
  • Related Keywords

Use of convolutional neural network (CNN) combined with FT-NIR spectroscopy to predict food adulteration: A case study on coffee

Food adulteration.

Food adulteration is a prevalent issue in the food industry. It affects safety and quality of food and causes harm to the health of the consumer. To reduce incidence of adulteration in food, it is necessary to study adulterants being added to food. Food safety concerns arise when adulteration occurs for a variety of reasons. The act includes use of expired ingredients, deceptive adulterated food labels, addition of harmful compounds to food, and more. Tests and techniques for suspected food items that are commonly adulterated with certain food or non-food products are studied and described here. The detection of adulteration in food sectors can be done qualitatively and quantitatively. Various methods like chemical analysis, spectroscopic, and chromatographic techniques used to detect adulteration are reviewed. Various laws and regulations are in effect around the world in order to prevent adulteration and ensure food safety to protect the consumers. Regulatory agencies play an important role in putting a check to food adulteration by monitoring the quality of food and penalizing defaulters.

Trends of Food Adulteration in Developing Countries and Its Remedies

Food adulteration and its impacts on our health/balanced nutrition, quality and methods of adulteration of meat and fish products on the polish market in 2010-2020.

Background. Globalisation is the direct or indirect source and cause of many economic, social, political and cultural processes and phenomena. These processes also affect agribusiness and food production. One of the important developments in recent decades is the ever-increasing scale of food adulteration. Its consequence is a reduction in the level of food safety, both in its health and economic aspects. The latter is due to the presence of impaired, or even adulterated, food on the market, which exposes consumers to non-equivalent exchanges. Sectors particularly vulnerable to these illegal trade practices include meat and fish products. Objective. The aim of the article is to identify the dominating methods/categories of food adulteration using the example of the Polish market for the food production sectors of meat and fish. Material and methods. The research was conducted using data from the Agricultural and Food Quality Inspection (AFQI), the official food control institution responsible for quality and food adulteration controls in Poland. The study covered the period from 2010 to 2020. Results. Research has shown an exceptionally significant level and diversity of methods of adulterating meat and fish products. These products are adulterate much more often than other food products. The conducted research has shown many methods and ways of adulterating both meat and fish products. It is worth emphasizing that the greater concentration of counterfeiting methods concerns meat products. The study revealed an extremely significant variety of adulterating methods for meat and fish products, significantly beyond those typically cited in the literature. Conclusions. The results of the research indicate the need to intensify official food controls on the Polish market. In particular, this should apply to the group of meat and fish products due to their high level of adulteration.

Application of quantum cascade laser to rapid detection of food adulteration

Discrimination of four cinnamomum species with physico-functional properties and chemometric techniques: application of pca and mda models.

Discrimination of highly valued and non-hepatotoxic Cinnamomum species (C. verum) from hepatotoxic (C. burmannii, C. loureiroi, and C. cassia) is essential for preventing food adulteration and safety problems. In this study, we developed a new method for the discrimination of four Cinnamomum species using physico-functional properties and chemometric techniques. The data were analyzed through principal component analysis (PCA) and multiclass discriminant analysis (MDA). The results showed that the cumulative variability of the first three principal components was 81.70%. The PCA score plot indicated a clear separation of the different Cinnamomum species. The training set was used to build the discriminant MDA model. The testing set was verified by this model. The prediction rate of 100% proved that the model was valid and reliable. Therefore, physico-functional properties coupled with chemometric techniques constitute a practical approach for discrimination of Cinnamomum species to prevent food fraud.

DNA Accounting: Tallying Genomes to Detect Adulterated Saffron

The EU General Food Law not only aims at ensuring food safety but also to ‘prevent fraudulent or deceptive practices; the adulteration of food; and any other practices which may mislead the consumer’. Especially the partial or complete, deliberate, and intentional substitution of valuable ingredients (e.g., Saffron) for less valuable ones is of concern. Due to the variety of products on the market an approach to detect food adulteration that works well for one species may not be easily applicable to another. Here we present a broadly applicable approach for the detection of substitution of biological materials based on digital PCR. By simultaneously measuring and forecasting the number of genome copies in a sample, fraud is detectable as a discrepancy between these two values. Apart from the choice of target gene, the procedure is identical across all species. It is scalable, rapid, and has a high dynamic range. We provide proof of concept by presenting the analysis of 141 samples of Saffron (Crocus sativus) from across the European market by DNA accounting and the verification of these results by NGS analysis.

Real-Time PCR Assay for the Detection and Quantification of Roe Deer to Detect Food Adulteration—Interlaboratory Validation Involving Laboratories in Austria, Germany, and Switzerland

Game meat products are particularly prone to be adulterated by replacing game meat with cheaper meat species. Recently, we have presented a real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay for the identification and quantification of roe deer in food. Quantification of the roe deer content in % (w/w) was achieved relatively by subjecting the DNA isolates to a reference real-time PCR assay in addition to the real-time PCR assay for roe deer. Aiming at harmonizing analytical methods for food authentication across EU Member States, the real-time PCR assay for roe deer has been tested in an interlaboratory ring trial including 14 laboratories from Austria, Germany, and Switzerland. Participating laboratories obtained aliquots of DNA isolates from a meat mixture containing 24.8% (w/w) roe deer in pork, roe deer meat, and 12 meat samples whose roe deer content was not disclosed. Performance characteristics included amplification efficiency, level of detection (LOD95%), repeatability, reproducibility, and accuracy of quantitative results. With a relative reproducibility standard deviation ranging from 13.35 to 25.08% (after outlier removal) and recoveries ranging from 84.4 to 114.3%, the real-time PCR assay was found to be applicable for the detection and quantification of roe deer in raw meat samples to detect food adulteration.

Food adulteration with genetically modified soybean and maize, meat of animal species and ractopamine residues, in different food products

Export citation format, share document.

research papers on food adulteration

Analytical Methods

A paper-based chromogenic strip and electrochemical sensor for the detection of 4-(dimethylamino)azobenzene †.

ORCID logo

* Corresponding authors

a Food Toxicology Group, CSIR-Indian Institute of Toxicology Research, Vishvigyan Bhawan, 31, Mahatma Gandhi Marg, Lucknow 226001, Uttar Pradesh, India E-mail: [email protected] , [email protected] Tel: +91-7080541888

b Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), Ghaziabad 201002, India

Natural and synthetic dyes are added to different food commodities to enhance their appearance and acceptance by consumers. Acute and chronic exposure owing to the consumption of non-permitted dyes may lead to health concerns such as allergic reactions, eczema, and asthma. 4-(Dimethylamino)azobenzene (4-DMAAB) is a non-permitted dye that has been reported in adulterated mustard oil. Consumption of 4-DMAAB poses severe risks due to its mutagenic and carcinogenic properties. Several sensitive methods such as FT-NIR, FT-MIR and SERS are available for the detection of 4-DMAAB. Here, a spectrophotometric method was developed for the detection of 4-DMAAB. The developed method was translated to a point-of-test paper-based, chromogenic strip which showed a detection limit of 0.025 mM for 4-DMAAB. Also, an electrochemical sensor was developed by electro-depositing the test solution on a screen-printed electrode. The electrochemical sensor showed an LOD of 0.027 ± 0.008 mM with recovery in the range of 91–107% of 4-DMAAB. Oil samples collected from the market were processed by liquid–liquid extraction and the content of 4-DMAAB was assessed. The developed point-of-use sensors for the detection of 4-DMAAB have potential for use by the consumers, food industry and regulatory agencies for on-site analysis and assuring the quality of edible oils.

Graphical abstract: A paper-based chromogenic strip and electrochemical sensor for the detection of 4-(dimethylamino)azobenzene

Supplementary files

  • Supplementary information PDF (581K)

Article information

Download citation, permissions.

research papers on food adulteration

A paper-based chromogenic strip and electrochemical sensor for the detection of 4-(dimethylamino)azobenzene

P. Rai, S. Mehrotra, S. Verma and S. K. Sharma, Anal. Methods , 2024, Advance Article , DOI: 10.1039/D3AY01928D

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page .

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page .

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content .

Social activity

Search articles by author.

This article has not yet been cited.

Advertisements

IMAGES

  1. (PDF) Food Adulteration Awareness : A Powerful Weapon to Combat the

    research papers on food adulteration

  2. (PDF) Food adulteration: A global public health concern

    research papers on food adulteration

  3. (PDF) Food Adulteration: A Review

    research papers on food adulteration

  4. (PDF) Food Adulteration and Consumer Awareness in Dhaka City, 1995-2011

    research papers on food adulteration

  5. (DOC) A Report on Food Adulteration

    research papers on food adulteration

  6. (PDF) Adulteration in food

    research papers on food adulteration

VIDEO

  1. PPSC Food Grains Supervisor Past Papers

  2. ADULTERATION IN FOOD || CATEGORIES || TYPES

  3. Unmasking Food Adulteration by Psoodlein Research

  4. Food adulteration case argue with expiry date of product

  5. Chemistry project on Food Adulteration #creative #short

  6. Paragraph : Food Adulteration

COMMENTS

  1. Mechanisms and Health Aspects of Food Adulteration: A Comprehensive Review

    1. Introduction Food are organic substances consumed for energy, growth, and nutritional purpose. Food adulteration refers to the process through which the quality of food is lowered [ 1, 2 ]. Broadly, food adulteration is a category of food fraud which is accomplished deliberately by human beings for financial gain [ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ].

  2. (PDF) An overview of food adulteration: Concept, sources, impact

    An overview of food adulteration: Concept, sources, impact, challenges and detection 10.22271/chemi.2020.v8.i1am.8655 Authors: Ankita Choudhary Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences...

  3. Food Adulteration

    Food adulteration can be defined as the addition of cheaper, inferior, harmful, or unnecessary substance (s) to food that could affect the nature and quality of the original food (Bell and Gillatt, 2004). From: Advances in Food Authenticity Testing, 2016 Related terms: Food Legislation Dioxin Food Authentication Edible Oil Food Additive Fruit Juice

  4. (PDF) Food Adulteration: A Review

    [1] Abhirami, S. and Radha (2015). Detection of food adulteration in selected food items procured by homemaker. International Journal of Recent Scientific Research. 6 (8): pp 593 8-5843....

  5. A systematic account of food adulteration and recent trends ...

    Article A systematic account of food adulteration and recent trends in the non-destructive analysis of food fraud detection Review Paper Published: 16 February 2023 Volume 17 , pages 3094-3114, ( 2023 ) Cite this article Download PDF Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization Aims and scope Submit manuscript Raouf Aslam, Sajeev Rattan Sharma,

  6. Mechanisms and Health Aspects of Food Adulteration: A ...

    Food are organic substances consumed for energy, growth, and nutritional purpose. Food adulteration refers to the process through which the quality of food is lowered [1,2].Broadly, food adulteration is a category of food fraud which is accomplished deliberately by human beings for financial gain [1,2,3,4,5].It is also termed as economically motivated adulteration (EMA) that sometimes gives ...

  7. A Review on Food Adulteration Detection Techniques: Methodologies

    This review paper presents an overview of the current state of the art in detecting food adulteration and summarizes various techniques and applications used to detect food adulteration, including traditional analytical techniques and machine learning.

  8. Food Adulteration Detection using Artificial Intelligence: A ...

    25 Citations Explore all metrics Abstract Food Adulteration is a deceptive act of misleading food buyers for economic gain. It has been a major concern due to its risk to public health, reduction of food quality or nutritional value.

  9. [PDF] An overview of food adulteration: Concept, sources, impact

    Adulteration in food has been a concern since the beginning of civilization, as it not only decreases the quality of food products but also results in a number of ill effects on health. Food is any substance composed of carbohydrates, water, fats and proteins, which can be eaten or drunk by humans or animals for nutrition or very important aspect for life. Food products are often a target of ...

  10. The use of rapid spectroscopic screening methods to detect adulteration

    The analytical instruments for detecting food adulteration are steadily becoming more and more advanced and sensitive, and include methods for molecular, elemental and isotopic composition. ... Despite the recent 'horse meat scandal' [32], it is for example surprisingly difficult to find research papers that report on the use of NIR ...

  11. food adulteration research: Topics by Science.gov

    This article provides an overview of the child health impacts of food adulterants in two recent food adulteration incidents in the Greater China Region: (1) a plasticizer incident in Taiwan and (2) a 2,4,6-triamino-1,3,5-triazine (melamine)-tainted milk incident in China.

  12. PDF An overview of food adulteration: Concept, sources, impact, challenges

    Neeraj Gupta Division of Food Science and Technology, SKUAST-J, Chatha, Jammu and Kashmir, India Abstract Food is any substance composed of carbohydrates, water, fats and proteins, which can be eaten or drunk by humans or animals for nutrition or very important aspect for life.

  13. Food adulteration: A global public health concern

    Food is the basic necessity of humans and other living creatures for supporting life. Food adulteration is highly rampant in many developing countries, such as Pakistan, Bangladesh, China ...

  14. Food authentication and adulteration control based on ...

    Great effort has been carried out the last years from the food sector for the understanding of food authentication, as the term has been well supported by numerous research articles, including data raised from conventional and instrumental analyses in combination with chemometrics or other machine learning tools. The term is getting more and more value by the official authorities as the last ...

  15. food adulteration Latest Research Papers

    The research was conducted using data from the Agricultural and Food Quality Inspection (AFQI), the official food control institution responsible for quality and food adulteration controls in Poland. The study covered the period from 2010 to 2020.

  16. PDF Adulteration In Food: An Overview

    IJCRT2203560 International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts (IJCRT) www.ijcrt.org e836 ... Food adulteration is a process in which the quality of food is lowered or reduced by replacing food ... used in milk are water, chalk, urea, caustic soda and skimmed milk, while Khoya is adulterated with paper, refined oil and skimmed milk powder ...

  17. (PDF) FOOD ADULTRATION

    Abstract Food adulteration means anything adding or subtracting with food making it injurious to health. This adulteration may be done intentionally or unintentionally. Intentional...

  18. PDF Food Adulteration and Some Methods of Detection, Review

    ABSTRACT Most of the Foods we are having are prone to food fraud and adulteration. Food adulteration is either the addition of a non-food item to increase the quantity of raw or prepared food intentionally or non food substances added unintentionally.

  19. PDF Critical Analysis of Food Adulteration in India

    In India the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 was enforced to fortify that the food is pure and has not been adulterated, and also to provide punishment for import, export, manufacture, sale etc. of any food article which has been adulterated.

  20. PDF Problem of Food Adulteration: A Study in Jammu City

    research papers, articles, and other online materials. Further, the doctrinal part of the study is limited only to ... Food Adulteration is a global issue, but how it has become a norm in Jammu city is fearsome (Singh, 1989). Jammu city is a municipal area within the Jammu district of Jammu and Kashmir (J&K), India. The

  21. (PDF) Food Adulteration Detection using Artificial Intelligence: A

    Parteek Bhatia Thapar University Kashish Goel Thapar University Figures (12) Abstract and Figures Food Adulteration is a deceptive act of misleading food buyers for economic gain. It has been...

  22. A paper-based chromogenic strip and electrochemical sensor for the

    Natural and synthetic dyes are added to different food commodities to enhance their appearance and acceptance by consumers. Acute and chronic exposure owing to the consumption of non-permitted dyes may lead to health concerns such as allergic reactions, eczema, and asthma. 4-(Dimethylamino)azobenzene (4-DMAAB) is a non-permitted dye that has been reported in adulterated mustard oil.

  23. Dual mode multispectral imaging system for food and agricultural

    Abstract: Multispectral imaging coupled with Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning and Signal Processing techniques work as a feasible alternative for laboratory testing, especially in food quality control. Most of the recent related research has been focused on reflectance multispectral imaging but a system with both reflectance, transmittance capabilities would be ideal for a wide array ...

  24. (PDF) FOOD ADULTERATION: A SOCIO-LEGAL PROBLEM

    The paper aims to highlight the problem of food adulteration, its modes and impacts on producers, consumers and food enterprises and to suggest some safety measures to prevent adulteration of food ...