• Search Search Please fill out this field.

What Is Novation?

How novation works, novation vs. assignment.

  • Novation FAQs

The Bottom Line

  • Corporate Finance

Novation: Definition in Contract Law, Types, Uses, and Example

lease assignment novation

Investopedia / Julie Bang

Novation is the replacement of one of the parties in an agreement between two parties, with the consent of all three parties involved. To novate is to replace an old obligation with a new one.

For example, a supplier who wants to relinquish a business customer might find another source for the customer. If all three agree, the contract can be torn up and replaced with a new contract that differs only in the name of the supplier. The old supplier relinquishes all rights and obligations of the contract to the new supplier.

Key Takeaways

  • To novate is to replace an old obligation with a new one.
  • In contract law, a novation replaces one of the parties in a two-party agreement with a third party, with the agreement of all three parties.
  • In a novate, the original contract is void. The party that drops out has given up its benefits and obligations.
  • In the financial markets, using a clearinghouse to vet a transaction between two parties is known as a novation.
  • Novation is different than an assignment, where the original party to the agreement retains ultimate responsibility. Therefore, the original contract remains in place.

In legal language, novation is a transfer of both the "benefits and the burdens" of a contract to another party. Contract benefits may be anything. For example, the benefit could be payments for services. The burdens are the obligations taken on to earn the payment—in this example, the services. One party to the contract is willing to forgo the benefits and relinquish the duties.

Canceling a contract can be messy, expensive, and bad for an entity's reputation. Arranging for another party to fulfill the contract on the same terms, with the agreement of all parties, is better business.

Novations are often seen in the construction industry, where subcontractors may be juggling several jobs at once. Contractors may transfer certain jobs to other contractors with the client's consent.

Novations are most frequently used when a business is sold, or a corporation is taken over. The new owner may want to retain the business's contractual obligations, while the other parties want to continue their agreements without interruption. Novations smooth the transition.

Types of Novations

There are three types of novations:

  • Standard : This novation occurs when two parties agree that new terms must be added to their contract, resulting in a new one.
  • Expromissio : Three parties must be involved in this novation; a transferor, a counterparty, and a transferee. All three must agree to the new terms and make a new contract.
  • Delegation : One of the parties in a contract passes their responsibilities to a new party, legally binding that party to the terms of the contract.

A novation is an alternative to the procedure known as an assignment .

In an assignment, one person or business transfers rights or property to another person or business. But the assignment passes along only the benefits, while any obligations remain with the original contract party. Novations pass along both benefits and potential liabilities to the new party.

For example, a sub-lease is an assignment. The original rental contract remains in place. The landlord can hold the primary leaseholder responsible for damage or non-payment by the sub-letter.

Novation gives rights and the obligations to the new party, and the old one walks away. The original contract is nullified.

In property law, novation occurs when a tenant signs a lease over to another party, which assumes both the responsibility for the rent and the liability for any subsequent damages to the property, as indicated in the original lease.

Generally, an assignment and a novation require the approval of all three parties involved.

A sub-lease agreement is usually an assignment, not a novation. The primary leaseholder remains responsible for non-payment or damage.

Novation Uses

Because a novation replaces a contract, it can be used in any business, industry, or market where contracts are used.

Financial Markets

In financial markets, novations are generally used in credit default swaps, options, or futures when contracts are transferred to a derivatives  market clearinghouse. A bilateral transaction is completed through the clearinghouse , which functions as an intermediary.

The sellers transfer the rights to and obligations of their securities to the clearinghouse. The clearinghouse, in turn, sells the securities to the buyers. Both the transferor (the seller) and transferee (the buyer) must agree to the terms of the novation, and the remaining party (the clearinghouse) must consent by a specific deadline. If the remaining party doesn't consent, the transferor and transferee must book a new trade and go through the process again.

Real Estate

Contracts are a part of real estate transactions, so novation is a valuable tool in the industry. If buyers and sellers enter into a contract, novation allows them to change it when issues arise during due diligence, inspection, or closing.

Commercial and residential rental contracts can be changed using novation if tenants or renters experience changes that affect their needs or ability to make payments.

Government Contracting

Federal, state, and local governments find it cheaper and beneficial for the economy to contract specific tasks rather than create an official workforce. Contracts are critical components for private or public companies who win a bid to do work for governments. If the contractor suddenly can't deliver on the contract or other issues prevent it from completing its task, the contractor can ask the government to recognize another party to complete the project.

A novation is not a unilateral contract mechanism. All concerned parties may negotiate the terms until a consensus is reached.

Banks use novation to transfer loans or other debts to different lenders. This typically involves canceling the contract and creating a new one with the exact terms and conditions of the old one.

Example of Novation

Novation can occur between any two parties. Consider the following example—Maria signed a contract with Chris to buy a cryptocurrency for $200. Chris has a contract with Uni for the same type of cryptocurrency for $200. These debt obligations may be simplified through a novation. By agreement of all three parties, a novation agreement is drawn, with a new contract in which Chris transfers the debt and its obligations to Maria. Maria pays Uni $200 in crypto. Chris receives (and pays) nothing.

Novations also allow for revisions of payment terms as long as the parties involved agree. For example, say Uni decided not to accept crypto but wanted cash instead. If Maria agrees, a novation occurs, and new payment terms are entered on a contract.

What Is a Novation?

In novation, one party in a two-party agreement gives up all rights and obligations outlined in a contract to a third party. As a result, the original contract is canceled.

What Is The Meaning of Novation Agreement?

In novation, the rights and obligations of one party to a two-party contract are transferred to a third party, with the agreement of all three parties.

Is Novation a New Contract?

Yes, because the old contract is invalidated or "extinguished" when the new contract is signed.

In a novation, when all parties agree, one party in a two-party agreement gives up all rights and obligations outlined in a contract to a third party. As a result, the original contract is canceled.

Novation differs from an assignment, where one party gives up all rights outlined in the contract but remains responsible for fulfilling its terms. The original contract remains in place.

International Swaps and Derivatives Association. " ISDA Novation Protocol ."

General Services Administration. " Subpart 42.12 - Novation and Change-of-Name Agreements ."

lease assignment novation

  • Terms of Service
  • Editorial Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Your Privacy Choices

Novation Agreement: Everything You Need to Know

When a third party enters the agreement, it takes the place of the departing party. 3 min read updated on February 01, 2023

Updated October 8,2020:

A novation agreement transfers the contractual obligations of one party to a third party or replaces a contractual obligation with another one. All parties involved in this type of contract must consent to the changes.

About Novation

When a third party enters the agreement, it takes the place of the departing party. Usually, novation happens when a new party assumes an obligation to pay that an original party had incurred.

The debts transfer to someone else, releasing the original debtor from the obligation. The nature of the transaction depends on the agreement that the parties make.

Three parties are involved in a novation:

  • The transferee
  • The transferor
  • The counterparty

All must sign the novation agreement.

Corporate actions such as acquisitions and mergers involve a large number of novation contracts, and it's a common method for rescheduling loans.

Different Kinds of Novation

There are three ways to make a novation and each is distinct.

  • The first, which has no official name, is simply known as a novation. This doesn't involve the introduction of a third party . Instead, someone who owes a debt enters into a new agreement with his or her creditor.
  • The second is called an expromissio, and this involves a third party entering the picture. The new party, or debtor, takes on the debt of the former debtor. When the creditor accepts this change, it discharges the first debtor from the debt.
  • The third kind is called a delegation, and this happens when a new creditor enters into the agreement in place of the old one. The debtor is discharged from the debt by the original creditor, who contracts some obligation for the new creditor.

Novation vs. Assignment

While novation and assignment are similar, there are important differences between them. A novation involves three parties, and all involved parties must consent to the new contract. A novation is able to transfer obligations as well as rights. An assignment doesn't transfer obligations.

Sometimes, a novation is called a “Hail Mary” defense for someone trying to avoid contractual liability. To establish novation, however, requires a rather high standard.

By contrast, assignment and assumption only transfer a party's contractual rights and benefits. Therefore, the original assignor/seller still has an obligation. This party can actually be held responsible if the assignee/purchaser doesn't fulfill the contractual performance. In order to protect itself from potential liability, an assignor may want to obtain an indemnity from the assignee.

Assignment doesn't necessarily require the consent of the third party the way that a novation does, and the original contract remains valid . Based on the agreement's terms, the assignor may only need to provide notice to the non-assigning party of the change.

In property law, for example, novation occurs when one tenant signs a lease over to another person. This new tenant then becomes responsible for paying rent and is liable for property damage. Novation is also common within the construction industry, when a contractor transfers a job to another contractor, as long as he or she has the consent of the client to do so.

Pros and Cons of Both

In many cases, assignment and assumption are more convenient for the seller than a novation since a seller might not need consent from a third party before assigning its interest. Still, the seller has to understand the liabilities it potentially faces if the purchaser doesn't meet contractual performance.

While a novation may protect sellers from future liabilities, it tends to be a more tedious process. In addition, if the third party doesn't provide consent, novation will not be possible. Before going ahead with novation, it's important for all involved parties to assess their relationship, particularly with the third party. If they don't believe the third party will provide the necessary consent, they may have to go with another option.

When faced with the scenario of transferring contractual rights and/or obligations, it's important to understand exactly what is being transferred. This is why it's vital that you fully comprehend all of the complex language in a contract. Consulting with a legal professional is one way to ensure you know what you're agreeing to before you sign a legally binding document .

If you need help with novation agreements or other legal matters, you can post your legal need on UpCounsel's marketplace. UpCounsel accepts only the top 5 percent of lawyers to its site. Lawyers on UpCounsel come from law schools such as Harvard Law and Yale Law and average 14 years of legal experience, including work with or on behalf of companies like Google, Menlo Ventures, and Airbnb.

Hire the top business lawyers and save up to 60% on legal fees

Content Approved by UpCounsel

  • What is Novation of Contract
  • Novation of Contract
  • Contract Novation Letter
  • Contract Novation
  • Deed of Novation
  • Assignment vs Novation
  • Loan Novation Agreement
  • Contract Novation Agreement
  • Novation Contract Example
  • Contract Transfer

What Is the Difference Between Assignment and Novation?

' decoding=

By Jordan Bramis Lawyer

Updated on November 22, 2023 Reading time: 5 minutes

This article meets our strict editorial principles. Our lawyers, experienced writers and legally trained editorial team put every effort into ensuring the information published on our website is accurate. We encourage you to seek independent legal advice. Learn more .

Assignments

Other differences between an assignment and novation, choosing between assignment and novation, key takeaways.

To further your commercial endeavours, you may wish to transfer your rights under a contract to another party. The primary legal mechanisms for transferring the rights or obligations under a contract to a third party are assignment, which involves transferring benefits or rights and novation, which facilitates the transfer of both rights/benefits and obligations. It is crucial to understand that these concepts are different. Unfortunately, many people tend to confuse the two, leading to unwanted consequences in relation to legal contracts. This article will explore the key differences between the two.

Under a contract, where a party (the original party to the contract) is initiating an ‘assignment’ , they are transferring some or all of their contractual rights to a third party, known as the “assignor”. The recipient of those contractual rights is known as the “assignee”. For instance, a party can transfer the right to receive payment or benefits under the contract through an assignment.

Following an assignment, the assignee gains the right to the benefits of the contract that the assignor has assigned. Furthermore, they gain the authority to initiate legal proceedings, either individually or in conjunction with the assignor. It is important to note, however, that the assignee does not become a contracting party to the original agreement. Under assignment, contractual burdens and liabilities cannot be transferred. Therefore, the assignor retains responsibility for fulfilling any remaining contractual obligations that still need to be discharged.

In most cases, assignment necessitates the consent of the obligor (the party obligated to fulfil the contract). The obligor needs to agree to the assignee taking over the rights held by the assignor. Additionally, the assignor must provide notice to the obligor about the assignment. This notice serves to inform the obligor that they should now deal with the assignee regarding the assigned rights.

By comparison, a novation agreement achieves the transfer of both rights and obligations to a third party. Here, the new party (the “novatee”) steps into the shoes of the original party (the “novator”) and assumes both the rights and obligations. 

A novation agreement essentially terminates the contract with the original party and creates a new contract with the new party. A novation agreement means you can substitute one party for another without changing the obligations agreed to in the original contract. 

Novation most often arises in big corporate takeovers or on the sale of a business. On takeover, deeds of novation are used to transfer contracts from the seller to the buyer and allow the buyer to carry on the seller’s business.

All involved parties, including the remaining contractual party, the novator, and the novatee, must unanimously agree to the novation. It is a collective decision to replace the old contract with a new one.

Novation creates an entirely new legal relationship. The old contract is set aside, and the new contract, which includes the novatee, comes into effect. Following novation, the novator is released from all obligations and liabilities associated with the original contract.

The choice between assignment and novation depends on various factors.

If a party wishes to maintain some level of involvement and responsibility in the original contract, assignment is often the better choice. It enables the transfer of specific rights while retaining some obligations. For a complete break from the original contract, where a party wishes to shed all obligations and liabilities, novation may be preferential.

One of the most important and sometimes overlooked steps is to document what you have agreed to in writing. Have your agreement written up, signed and stored safely. The area where most disputes and disagreements arise is where parties have not written down what they agree to. This results in a conflict that could have been easily avoided.

Front page of publication

When you are ready to sell your business and begin the next chapter, it is important to understand the moving parts that will impact a successful sale.

This How to Sell Your Business Guide covers all the essential topics you need to know about selling your business.

If you intend to assign your rights under a contract to a third party, you can do so through an assignment or a novation. However, be aware that these differ. An assignment gives some rights to a third party, whereas a novation transfers both rights and obligations to a third party. Ensure that whichever method you choose, you document this in a written agreement.

If you need further assistance with an assignment or novation, our experienced contract lawyers can assist you as part of our LegalVision membership. For a low monthly fee, you will have unlimited access to lawyers to answer your questions and draft and review your documents. Call us today on 1300 544 755 or visit our membership page .

We appreciate your feedback – your submission has been successfully received.

Register for our free webinars

Navigating legal privilege: conflict strategies for in-house counsel, venture debt: is it the solution for your startup, preparing your business for legal and financial success in 2024, minimising legal risks in ndis staff hiring: ensuring proper contracts and payments, contact us now.

Fill out the form and we will contact you within one business day

Related articles

' decoding=

What Is a Deed of Novation and How Does It Affect My Business?

' decoding=

You’re entering into a deed of novation – what to consider?

' decoding=

What is the Difference Between an Agreement and a Deed?

' decoding=

How do I negotiate a sale of business agreement?

We’re an award-winning law firm

Award

2023 Fast Firms - Australasian Lawyer

Award

2022 Law Firm of the Year - Australasian Law Awards

Award

2021 Law Firm of the Year - Australasian Law Awards

Award

2020 Excellence in Technology & Innovation Finalist - Australasian Law Awards

Award

2020 Employer of Choice Winner - Australasian Lawyer

  • Contact Support
  • Returning Customer?
  • Sign in to your account
  • Contact support
  • New Zealand
  • South Africa

Novation and assignment

Article Image

Changing the parties bound to a contract

What is novation, is novation a new contract, what is a deed of novation, why novation can be difficult, when do you use an assignment agreement to transfer a debt or obligation, transfer of a debt, transfer of service contracts.

Novation and assignment are ways for someone to transfer their interest in a contract to someone else.

Whilst the difference between assignment and novation is relatively small, it is an essential one. Assigning when you should novate could leave you in a position of being liable for your original contract when the other party is not liable to perform their obligations.

In contract law the principle of privity of contract means that only the parties to a contract have the obligation to fulfill it and the right to enforce it. Statute law has created a few exceptions but they apply rarely.

The legal concepts of novation and assignment have been developed to overcome the restrictions imposed by the doctrine.

Novation is a mechanism where one party transfers all its obligations and rights under a contract to a third party, with the consent of their original counter-party.

Novation in practice

Let us suppose Michael buys a car from Peter, owing him £5,000 as part of the sale price until Peter obtains a certifcate of authenticity.

Michael then sells the car to Fred under the same terms. Michael wants out, but has obligations to both parties.

Michael persuades Peter and Fred to enter into a novation agreement, signed by all three of them, whereby Fred takes over Michael’s obligations to Peter and Fred now deals with Peter in Michael’s place.

Other examples

The seller of a business transfers the contracts with their customers and suppliers to the buyer. A novation process transfers each contract by the mutual agreement of all three parties.

A design and build contractor in the construction industry transfers a construction contract to a new, substitute contractor. A novation agreement is necessary.

A novation agreement is a new contract that 'extinguishes' the old one.

Because it is a new contract, there can be new terms within it, giving additional rights and obligations.

There are times when and why you should use a deed explains exactly when you need to use one. Novation is not among them.

A Deed of Novation is a relic from long ago when lawyers were even more inclined to cloak their knowledge in obscurity.

One of the main purposes in using the deed format is that it provides the necessity for an unconnected witness to sign the document. So it is that much more difficult for one of the parties to say it was forged or signed a year later than the date shown.

But in a novation, there are at least three parties by definition; three parties who are most unlikely to be connected and each of whom has their separate interest. So you can be pretty sure the agreement has not been tampered with. A witness cannot improve on that. So you do not need a deed.

Another reason to use a deed could be when there is no 'consideration', that is when one of the original contracting parties receives no benefit - monetary or otherwise - in return fot the novation. However, in commercial circumstances you could nearly always argue that there is an advantage to each of the parties. The extinction of the old contract or subjectively more favourable terms within the new contract would both count as fair consideration.

Do you need a deed of novation for your situation? The answer is usually no, as an agreement is fine.

The exception to the rule is that if the original contract was signed as a deed, you need to use a deed to novate it. Real property transaction are by deed. That includes a consent to assign a lease, which has three parties. There are special reasons for that.

There are other examples too, which are more obscure.

When a contract is novated, the other (original) contracting party must be left in the same position as they were in prior to the novation being made.

Novation requires the agreement of all three parties. While obtaining the agreement of the transferor and transferee is easy, obtaining the agreement of the other original party can be more difficult:

The other original party may not understand the benefit to them of having the original contract novated and require extra information about the process that is time consuming to provide.

They may need extra assurance to be persuaded that they won’t be worse off as a result of the novation (especially common where there is a transfer of service contracts between suppliers).

It is possible that they could play up to delay the transfer and squeeze extra concessions from you.

The only way to transfer your rights or obligations is by an agreement signed by all three parties.

But what happens if you are a service provider selling your business with tens of thousands of customers? You can hardly ask every one of them to sign up to their own separate novation.

In practice, a well drawn original agreement will contain a provision which permits the service provider to assign (transfer its contract) without the permission of the customer.

But what happens if it does not?

In practice what happens is that the buyer 'takes a flyer'. The deal is done in the hope that the customers stay with the new owner.

Maybe the buyer obtains an indemnity from the seller to cover their loss if many leave. Maybe the buyer will write to the customers to encourage them to stay. Maybe the customers simply make the next payment and thereby confirm acceptance in law.

In each of those cases, the acquirer will be safe because the customers remain (or become) bound to the terms of the original contract.

Net Lawman offers an assignment agreement to cover that exact situation, together with a draft letter of the sort that might convince customers to stay with the new owner.

The other situation in which assignment is used is where the new party trusts the original party assigning the contract. For example, a subsidiary company may assign contractual obligations to a parent company confident that the parent will uphold the contract.

A construction company is a subsidary in a group. It is working in partnership with another business on several projects to build houses. The other business is a minor partner in the deal. The partnership has run out of money and the smaller partner is unable to inject any more funds. The parent business is unwilling to have its subsidiary fund the remainder of the projects by itself.

A solution may be for the parent to pay both its subsidiary and the third party for the construction contracts to be assigned to it (in other words, buy the contractual rights from the partnership). The assignment provisions would give the parent the obligation to finish the project, which it may be able to do without the third party.

Assignment transfers benefits only

Even if the assignee promises to take on the liability of the assignor to the third parties, the assignor remains personally liable if they fail to do so. An obligation to a third party cannot be assigned without their consent.

When assignment can invalidate your contract

Terms in an original contract can restrict or prohibit assignments. This is particularly common in construction contracts but can apply in any agreement. If you attempt to assign a contract that cannot be assigned, you risk invalidating the original contract.

Personal obligations and assignment

Be particularly careful of an assignment if your obligations can only be performed personally. A good example would be sale of a hair dressing business. Quite apart from the risk of the clients leaving, the actual forward appointments could be interpreted as contracts with the seller, even though they would have no way to fulfill them because they have sold the business.

Buying the right document

Very generally, if you are unsure whether you should assign or novate, we recommend that you novate and obtain consent of all parties. We offer a number of novation and assignment agreement templates for different situations.

For example: You borrow from a lender and you later want to transfer the debt to someone else (maybe a friend, a business partner or a the buyer of your business) so that they become liable to repay the lender instead of you. In this situation you should use an agreement that novates the debt .

This is a common consideration when a business is sold and outstanding debts of the business are transferred to the new owner (perhaps loans of money but maybe also loans of goods for sale).

Alternatively, you could novate in order to change who should pay back a personal loan between individuals.

Transfer of a right to receive the repayment of a debt

For example: You make a loan to someone (it could be money or goods) and later you want to change who receives the repayment (an agreement to change who the creditor is ).

The transaction might relate to the sale of a business where the buyer takes on the assets of the seller (the loans to other parties), or when factoring debt.

For example: You provide a service to someone and you want to transfer the obligation of providing that service to another person or company.

Again, a common use for a service contract novation agreement is where a business is sold and the buyer takes on the service contracts of the seller. The service could be in any industry, from a fixed period gardening contract to an on-going IT or website maintenance. Novation changes who is providing the service.

Transfer of an architectural or building contract

For example: You buy a building or property development that is still under construction and you want the existing contractor to continue work despite the original contract being between the contractor and the seller.

In this situation you should use a novation agreement for a building contract .

Our standard assignment agreement can be used for most assignments (exceptions given below). It is not specific to circumstances.

Assignment of a business lease

If you wish to transfer a commercial property lease to another business tenant during the fixed term, Net Lawman offers an agreement to assign a lease .

We have an article specifically about assigning a business lease that may be useful further reading.

It is not advisable to assign a residential tenancy agreement. We would suggest that you cancel the original agreement and draw up a new agreement with the new tenants.

Assignment of copyright

We have  number of assignment agreements for intellectual property rights .

They are effectively sale or transfer agreements where some rights are retained by the seller (such as to buyback the assigned work, or for the work only to be used in certain locations).

They relate to IP in media (such as a film or a music score) and to inventions.

Assignment of a life insurance policy or endowment policy

These agreements allows you to transfer the rights to receive payments from a life insurance policy or endowment policy. We offer both a deed of assignment of a policy on separation or divorce and a deed of assignment to gift or sell the policy to someone else .

Assignment and collateral warranties in the construction industry

Probably the most common use of assignment in the construction industry today is in relation to collateral warranties.

The collateral warranties given by consultants, contractors and sub-contractors in construction contracts are often assigned to subsequent owners or leases. Assignment can do no more than transfer rights available to the assignor. It is not capable of creating new rights and obligations in favour of an assignee.

So while the client can, in theory, assign the right to have a building adequately designed, it is unclear what right would be transferred to sue for damages in the event of breach. If the developer (who would usually be the assignor) has sold the building or created a full-repairing lease, then their right would be to nominal damages only. This is one situation where you should definitely use a deed of novation.

lease assignment novation

Assignment and Novation: Spot the Difference 12 November 2020

  • EPC Contract
  • Power Plant
  • Transfer of rights

The English Technology and Construction Court has found that the assignment of a sub-contract from a main contractor to an employer upon termination of an EPC contract will, in the absence of express intention to the contrary, transfer both accrued and future contractual benefits.

In doing so, Mrs Justice O’Farrell has emphasised established principles on assignment and novation, and the clear conceptual distinction between them. While this decision affirms existing authority, it also highlights the inherent risks for construction contractors in step-in assignment arrangements.

"This decision shows the court’s desire to give effect to clear contractual provisions, particularly in complex construction contracts, even where doing so puts a party in a difficult position."

This preliminary issues judgment in the matter of Energy Works (Hull) Ltd v MW High Tech Projects UK Ltd & Others¹ , is the latest in a long series of decisions surrounding the Energy Works plant, a fluidised bed gasification energy-from-waste power plant in Hull². The defendant, MW High Tech Projects UK Ltd (“MW”), was engaged as the main contractor by the claimant and employer, Energy Works (Hull) Ltd (“EWHL”), under an EPC contract entered into in November 2015. Through a sub-contract, MW engaged Outotec (USA) Inc (“Outotec”) to supply key elements for the construction of the plant.

By March 2019, issues had arisen with the project. EWHL terminated the main contract for contractor default and, pursuant to a term in the EPC contract, asked MW to assign to it MW’s sub-contract with Outotec. The sub-contract permitted assignment, but MW and EWHL were unable to agree a deed of assignment. Ultimately, MW wrote to EWHL and Outotec, notifying them both that it was assigning the sub-contract to EWHL. EWHL subsequently brought £133m proceedings against MW, seeking compensation for the cost of defects and delay in completion of the works. The defendant disputed the grounds of the termination, denied EWHL’s claims, and sought to pass on any liability to Outotec through an additional claim under the sub-contract. Outotec disputed MW’s entitlement to bring the additional claim on the grounds that MW no longer had any rights under the sub-contract, because those rights had been assigned to EWHL.

The parties accepted that a valid transfer in respect of the sub-contract had taken place. However, MW maintained that the assignment only transferred future rights under the sub-contract and that all accrued rights – which would include the right to sue Outotec for any failure to perform in accordance with the sub-contract occurring prior to the assignment – remained with MW. In the alternative, MW argued that the transfer had been intended as a novation such that all rights and liabilities had been transferred. As a secondary point, MW also claimed eligibility for a contribution from Outotec under the Civil Liability (Contribution) Act 1978 for their alleged partial liability³.

An assignment is a transfer of a right from one party to another. Usually this is the transfer by one party of its rights and remedies, under a contract with a counterparty, to a third party. However, importantly, the assignor remains liable for any obligations it owes under the contract. As an example, Party A can assign to Party C its right to receive goods under a contract with Party B, but it will remain liable to pay Party B for those goods. Section 136 of the Law of Property Act 1926 requires a valid statutory assignment to be absolute, in writing, and on notice to the contractual counterparty.

Key contacts

Rebecca Williams

Rebecca Williams

Partner London

Mark McAllister-Jones

Mark McAllister-Jones

Counsel London

"In the absence of any clear contrary intention, reference to assignment of the contract by parties is understood to mean assignment of the benefit, that is, accrued and future rights."

In this case, the precise scope of the transferred rights and the purported assignment of contractual obligations were in issue. Mrs Justice O’Farrell looked to the House of Lords’ decision in Linden Gardens⁴ to set out three relevant principles on assignment:

  • Subject to any express contractual restrictions, a party to a contract can assign the benefit of a contract, but not the burden, without the consent of the other party to the contract;
  • In the absence of any clear contrary intention, reference to assignment of the contract by parties is understood to mean assignment of the benefit, that is, accrued and future rights; and
  • It is possible to assign only future rights under a contract (i.e. so that the assignor retains any rights which have already accrued at the date of the assignment), but clear words are needed to give effect to such an intention.

Hence, in relation to MW’s first argument, it is theoretically possible to separate future and accrued rights for assignment, but this can only be achieved through “careful and intricate drafting, spelling out the parties’ intentions”. The judge held that, since such wording was absent here, MW had transferred all its rights, both accrued and future, to EWHL, including its right to sue Outotec.

Whereas assignment only transfers a party’s rights under a contract, novation transfers both a party’s rights and its obligations . Strictly speaking, the original contract is extinguished and a new one formed between the incoming party and the remaining party to the original contract. This new contract has the same terms as the original, unless expressly agreed otherwise by the parties.

Another key difference from assignment is that novation requires the consent of all parties involved, i.e. the transferring party, the counterparty, and the incoming party. With assignment, the transferring party is only required to notify its counterparty of the assignment. Consent to a novation can be given when the original contract is first entered into. However, when giving consent to a future novation, the parties must be clear what the terms of the new contract will be.

"Mrs Justice O’Farrell stressed that “it is a matter for the parties to determine the basis on which they allocate risk within the contractual matrix.”"

A novation need not be in writing. However, the desire to show that all parties have given the required consent, the use of deeds of novation to avoid questions of consideration, and the use of novation to transfer ‘key’ contracts, particularly in asset purchase transactions, means that they often do take written form. A properly drafted novation agreement will usually make clear whether the outgoing party remains responsible for liabilities accrued prior to the transfer, or whether these become the incoming party’s problem.

As with any contractual agreement, the words used by the parties are key. Mrs Justice O’Farrell found that the use of the words “assign the sub-contract” were a strong indication that in this case the transfer was intended to be an assignment, and not a novation.

This decision reaffirms the established principles of assignment and novation and the distinction between them. It also shows the court’s desire to give effect to clear contractual provisions, particularly in complex construction contracts, even where doing so puts a party in a difficult position. Here, it was found that MW had transferred away its right to pursue Outotec for damages under the sub-contract, but MW remained liable to EWHL under the EPC contract. As a result, EWHL had the right to pursue either or both of MW and Outotec for losses arising from defects in the Outotec equipment, but where it chose to pursue only MW, MW had no contractual means of recovering from Outotec any sums it had to pay to EWHL. Mrs Justice O’Farrell stressed that “it is a matter for the parties to determine the basis on which they allocate risk within the contractual matrix.” A contractor in MW’s position can still seek from a sub-contractor a contribution in respect of its liability to the employer under the Civil Liability (Contribution) Act 1978 (as the judge confirmed MW was entitled to do in this case). However, the wording of the Act is very specific, and it may not always be possible to pass down a contractual chain all, or any, of a party’s liability.

Commercially, contractors often assume some risk of liability to the employer without the prospect of recovery from a sub-contractor, such as where the sub-contractor becomes insolvent, or where the sub-contract for some reason cannot be negotiated and agreed on back-to-back terms with the EPC contract. However, contractors need to consider carefully the ramifications of provisions allowing the transfer of sub-contracts to parties further up a contractual chain and take steps to ensure such provisions reflect any agreement as to the allocation of risk on a project.

This article was authored by London Dispute Resolution Co-Head and Partner Rebecca Williams , Senior Associate Mark McAllister-Jones and Gerard Rhodes , a trainee solicitor in the London office.

[1] [2020] EWHC 2537 (TCC)

[2] See, for example, the decisions in Premier Engineering (Lincoln) Ltd v MW High Tech Projects UK Ltd [2020] EWHC 2484, reported in our article here , Engie Fabricom (UK) Ltd v MW High Tech Projects UK Ltd [2020] EWHC 1626 (TCC) and C Spencer Limited v MW High Tech Projects UK Limited [2020] EWCA Civ 331, reported in our article here .

[3] The Civil Liability (Contribution) Act 1978 allows that “ any person liable in respect of any damage suffered by another person may recover contribution from any other person liable in respect of the same damage whether jointly with him or otherwise .”

[4] Linden Gardens Trust Ltd v Lenesta Sludge Disposals Ltd [1994] 1 AC 85

Related stories

Ofgem launches tender process for appointing offshore transmission owner for world’s largest offshore wind farm, commercial disputes weekly – issue 194, deep seabed mining insights: dispute settlement options under unclos, follow us on.

  • X (Twitter)
  • Mining and Commodities
  • Oil and Gas
  • Infrastructure
  • Corporate Jets
  • Helicopters
  • Containers and Logistics
  • LNG and Offshore
  • Commercial Shipping
  • Ports and Terminals
  • Loan Portfolios
  • Corporate Trust and Agency
  • Debt Capital Markets
  • Derivatives
  • Equity Capital Markets
  • Structured Finance
  • Corporate and Acquisition Finance
  • Joint Ventures and Strategic Alliances
  • Dispute Resolution
  • ECA Finance
  • Islamic Finance
  • Real Estate Finance
  • Project Finance
  • Asset Finance and Leasing
  • Private Equity
  • Real Estate Disputes
  • Hotels and Hospitality
  • Environment, Health and Safety
  • EU and Competition
  • Financial Services Regulation
  • Restructuring and Insolvency

Looking for someone?

Or view everyone

More about us

Visit our Insights Hub

Global Aviation Resource Index (GARI)

Us sanctions on venezuela substantially eased, energy act 2023 – a decade in the making.

Company name

Enquiry type General New Client Accounts Recruitment

Your message

I accept the terms and Privacy policy

Please leave this field empty.

Assignment And Novation Agreement

Jump to section, what is an assignment and novation agreement.

An assignment and novation agreement is a contract between two parties where one gives up their rights and responsibilities under an original contract. An assignment cancels the original contract and transfers the rights and responsibilities of one of the parties to another, third party. In novation, one of the parties surrenders their rights but retains the duties they took on under the original contract.

Each of these agreements allow a contract party to give up their rights if they desire. The specific type of agreement necessary depends on whether both parties can agree to removing both rights and responsibilities and canceling the original agreement

Common Sections in Assignment And Novation Agreements

Below is a list of common sections included in Assignment And Novation Agreements. These sections are linked to the below sample agreement for you to explore.

Assignment And Novation Agreement Sample

Reference : Security Exchange Commission - Edgar Database, EX-10.4 5 ex10-4.htm ASSIGNMENT AND NOVATION AGREEMENT , Viewed September 18, 2022, View Source on SEC .

Who Helps With Assignment And Novation Agreements?

Lawyers with backgrounds working on assignment and novation agreements work with clients to help. Do you need help with an assignment and novation agreement?

Post a project  in ContractsCounsel's marketplace to get free bids from lawyers to draft, review, or negotiate assignment and novation agreements. All lawyers are vetted by our team and peer reviewed by our customers for you to explore before hiring.

Meet some of our Assignment And Novation Agreement Lawyers

Emmanuel K. on ContractsCounsel

Emmanuel K.

I am a corporate Attorney licensed in the state of Georgia and Ghana. My professional career started in 2016 as a litigator in a private law firm in Ghana. Subsequently in 2018, I moved in house to work for the University of Ghana and this is where my corporate transactional work experience began. Since coming to the US in 2019, I have gained significant transactional experience through internships at Verizon and Tricentis (a software testing company) during law school at UGA. Since graduating from UGA law school, I have worked as a corporate transactional attorney of an AmLaw 200 firm. In that role, I helped foreign companies entering the US market to establish a presence and comply with applicable corporate laws while doing business. I also assisted customers and service providers in the software and technology industry by reviewing SaaS and similar contracts. Also, I helped energy utilities in the renewable energy space navigate regulatory and policy issues and establish contractual business relationships through contract reviews.

Merry A. on ContractsCounsel

Merry Kogut is a licensed attorney based in Washington State who has been a legal expert on JustAnswer since 2008 specializing in employment law, consumer protection and discrimination issues. She has been an attorney handling WA State phone consultations for Arag Legal Insurance since April, 2023. She has also been an attorney in private practice since 1986, and was in-house legal counsel for multiple WA State government agencies. She brings nearly 50 years combined legal and professional writing experience. Earlier in her career, Merry served as a law clerk for the Washington State Court of Appeals, and as a discrimination specialist, investigator and legislative liaison. She also helped establish the “Legal Writing Institute,” a national association of legal writing instructors and administrators. Merry earned her law degree from the Seattle University (formerly University of Puget Sound) School of Law.

Luiza D. on ContractsCounsel

I represent business owners throughout California with their business, IP and employment law matters.

Brett S. on ContractsCounsel

I attended the University of Illinois- College of Law on a full merit scholarship. While in law school, I was a 711 Attorney at the Lake County State's Attorney's Office, specializing in traffic and misdemeanor cases. After graduation, I served as in-house counsel for one of the largest insurance companies in the world, managing thousands of cases from initial intake to trial. Upon leaving this position, I accepted a role as Legal Counsel to the Illinois Senate Minority Leader. There, I advised Senators on legislative matters, labor and employment law, and complex constitutional questions. After leaving public service, I accepted a role at a mid-size Chicago-based law firm, where I practice insurance defense and litigation. In addition to this, I also serve as outside general counsel to a food brokerage business, where I handle all of their labor and employment matters.

Zachary D. on ContractsCounsel

Helping small business owners meet their legal needs.

Charles M. on ContractsCounsel

Mr. McElvenny has extensive experience handling and developing strategy for complex commercial and real estate cases. He’s drafted hundreds of complaints ranging from simple breaches of contract to complex commercial claims including breach of fiduciary duty, constructive trusts and misappropriation of trade secrets. He has an excellent record in trial, arbitration and mediation. He also has significant experience in motion practice in both state and federal court. Through his work in corporate law, Mr. McElvenny has developed considerable experience with Limited Liability Company member disputes and general corporate governance. He’s drafted a number of industry-specific documents such as Operating Agreements (for Limited Liability Companies), commercial leases, settlement agreements and employment contracts. Mr. McElvenny has also represented criminal defendants in felony matters and assisted in the defense of civil matters arising from alleged SEC violations. He has represented individuals appearing before the Illinois Department of Professional Regulation as a result of SEC proceedings. After graduating with a B.A. in Philosophy, Mr. McElvenny proceeded from Loyola University-Chicago to DePaul University College of Law, receiving his JD from that institution in 2002. In 2010, he earned his Master’s of Science in Accounting from Loyola University-Chicago’s Graduate School of Business. Mr. McElvenny was selected to Illinois’ Super Lawyers Rising Stars in 2010, 2012 and 2013.

Marykaren R. on ContractsCounsel

Marykaren R.

I provide legal advice and guidance on complex privacy laws and regulations including: Privacy Policies, incident response & state data breach notification laws, privacy risk and risk assessments, PIAs/DPIAs, contracts, and policies and procedures to help build consumer trust and ensure compliance. I am successful by encouraging collaboration with stakeholders to ensure a successful and sustainable program.

Find the best lawyer for your project

How it works.

Post Your Project

Get Free Bids to Compare

Hire Your Lawyer

Business lawyers by top cities

  • Austin Business Lawyers
  • Boston Business Lawyers
  • Chicago Business Lawyers
  • Dallas Business Lawyers
  • Denver Business Lawyers
  • Houston Business Lawyers
  • Los Angeles Business Lawyers
  • New York Business Lawyers
  • Phoenix Business Lawyers
  • San Diego Business Lawyers
  • Tampa Business Lawyers

Assignment And Novation Agreement lawyers by city

  • Austin Assignment And Novation Agreement Lawyers
  • Boston Assignment And Novation Agreement Lawyers
  • Chicago Assignment And Novation Agreement Lawyers
  • Dallas Assignment And Novation Agreement Lawyers
  • Denver Assignment And Novation Agreement Lawyers
  • Houston Assignment And Novation Agreement Lawyers
  • Los Angeles Assignment And Novation Agreement Lawyers
  • New York Assignment And Novation Agreement Lawyers
  • Phoenix Assignment And Novation Agreement Lawyers
  • San Diego Assignment And Novation Agreement Lawyers
  • Tampa Assignment And Novation Agreement Lawyers

related contracts

  • 93a Demand Letter
  • Accounting Services Agreement
  • Accounts Receivable Purchase Agreement
  • Ad Agency Contract
  • Adhesion Contract
  • Advertising Services Agreement
  • Agency Agreement
  • Agency Contract

other helpful articles

  • How much does it cost to draft a contract?
  • Do Contract Lawyers Use Templates?
  • How do Contract Lawyers charge?
  • Business Contract Lawyers: How Can They Help?
  • What to look for when hiring a lawyer

lease assignment novation

Quick, user friendly and one of the better ways I've come across to get ahold of lawyers willing to take new clients.

Contracts Counsel was incredibly helpful and easy to use. I submitted a project for a lawyer's help within a day I had received over 6 proposals from qualified lawyers. I submitted a bid that works best for my business and we went forward with the project.

I never knew how difficult it was to obtain representation or a lawyer, and ContractsCounsel was EXACTLY the type of service I was hoping for when I was in a pinch. Working with their service was efficient, effective and made me feel in control. Thank you so much and should I ever need attorney services down the road, I'll certainly be a repeat customer.

I got 5 bids within 24h of posting my project. I choose the person who provided the most detailed and relevant intro letter, highlighting their experience relevant to my project. I am very satisfied with the outcome and quality of the two agreements that were produced, they actually far exceed my expectations.

Want to speak to someone?

Get in touch below and we will schedule a time to connect!

Find lawyers and attorneys by city

Difference Between

10 Tips for Understanding the Difference Between Novation and Assignment

Introduction.

Understanding the legal concepts Novation and Assignment are fundamental when entering contractual agreements, both parties involved in negotiations as well as legal professionals must grasp them to fully comprehend their implications and the benefits for both.

Novation involves the transfer of contractual rights and obligations; assignment differs in its fundamental nature and implications – being aware of these differences is vitally important when entering negotiations as well as legal advice services.

In this content outline, we will investigate the differences between novation and assignment by outlining their definitions, processes, legal implications and key distinctions. Additionally, we will present practical examples demonstrating their implementation across various situations.

By the time this content outline concludes, you will have gained an in-depth knowledge of both concepts to enable you to navigate contractual agreements with greater confidence and clarity.

What is Novation?

A novation is a legal concept which refers to the practice of replacing one party with another within an agreement, generally by creating an entirely new contract that replaces it and releases some rights and duties of both original parties, while taking on all obligations and rights belonging to their counterpart.

All parties involved must consent for this procedure which typically results in creating an entirely new contractual arrangement thereby effectively ending one contractual relationship while creating another one instead.

What is Assignment?

Legally defined, an assignment refers to the transference of rights or benefits within an asset or contract from one party (the assignor) to another (the assignee), without needing a new agreement being drawn up between them both. An assignment alters an original contract by assigning its rights and obligations to someone other than its original signatory; typically gaining them the ability to benefit from contract terms or perform them more readily than originally envisaged by its signator.

Once completed, no further rights or involvement from assignor remain; often their consent must be secured prior to proceeding as must fulfilling certain legal criteria such as having written evidence that supports assignment as required in original contracts or fulfilling specific conditions set out therein.

Comparative Table of Novation & Assignment

Sure!   This table highlights the main differences between novation vs. assignment:

The specific legal requirements, implications and novation or assignment will vary depending on jurisdiction and contract terms. To ensure compliance with the applicable laws and regulations, it is recommended that you seek legal counsel when dealing with novation.

Examples and Scenarios

Example 1 of Novation: Transferring a Rental Agreement: Tenant A has signed a rental agreement for a commercial building with Landlord; however, Tenant B wishes to transfer that lease agreement over to them instead. Substituting Parties in a Construction Contract : Contractor X entered into a construction contract with Client Y; however, due to unforeseeable events he cannot complete his task of construction project completion on his own.

Instead, Contractor X seeks to replace Contractor Z as responsible party. By agreement both parties (Contractor X and Z) agree on breaking away from his previous agreement in order to form one between Contractor Z and Client Y directly.

Example Assignments of Ownership Transfer in a Patent: Invention A holds a patent on its technological invention and decides to give his rights over to company B by assigning ownership and benefit rights over to it, giving B the chance to use and protect this innovation.

This assignment grants rights of use as well as any future royalties accruing thereto from using or protecting this invention in future projects by Company Assignation of Account Receivables: Supplier X still has outstanding accounts receivable with Customer Y and decides that these will be assigned to a factoring firm called Company Z as its right of collection will now lie with this factoring firm instead of Supplier X directly.

By assigning them this way, Supplier X transfers its right to payment directly with Company Z instead of to itself. Attentiveness to legal requirements and consensus among parties are of the utmost importance for successful business transactions.

Transfer of Obligations

There is a difference between assignement and novation when it comes to transferring obligations. Novation involves discharging an original contract and creating a new one with obligations fully transferred from one party to the other, in effect creating two contracts simultaneously and assigning new obligations entirely on to each new party responsible for fulfilling them all.

Transfer of obligations is key component of novation as it replaces one party’s responsibility with that of another party. Transferring Obligations: An assignment does not automatically involve the transfer of obligations; rather, its execution relies on agreement between both parties to assign both rights and responsibilities based on agreement terms or contractual arrangements between them; in most instances requiring consent of counterparty for transferring obligations via assignment. Assignment refers primarily to the transfer of rights. Unless otherwise agreed upon, assignor may remain responsible for fulfilling obligations until another agreement has been made.

Transferring an Existing Lease Agreement

Transferring a lease contract may involve either novation or assignment depending on its circumstances. These two methods can help transfer it. Here is more on this subject:

This process includes three steps. All parties involved (landlord, current tenant (assignor), and new tenant (assignee)) must agree upon a novation arrangement.

 Release of Original Tenant (Assignor): Any rights and obligations stemming from their lease are transferred back to them as soon as it becomes an assignee agreement.

Create a New Lease Agreement: Add your new tenant as a signatory on this new agreement for their lease terms and conditions to reside. This new agreement should detail what conditions may arise during occupancy of the property by its tenants.

All parties involved, such as landlord, original tenant and new tenant must agree and sign onto a new lease contract which replaces their original one.

Assignment: As another means of transferring a lease agreement, assignment allows its rights and benefits to pass to its new tenant without losing them altogether. Usually this involves several steps. Consent of Landlord: Before assigning leases, in most instances the consent of the landlord must first be secured; either explicitly stated in the lease agreement, or alternatively obtained separately.

Notice to Landlords: An assignor provides written notification to his/her landlord about an assignment agreement as part of an official notice to renters process.

Contractual ownership – Once an assignment takes effect, its rights and obligations pass to its assignee tenant; however, any obligations to which either tenant was originally responsible remain the responsibility of both tenants unless agreed otherwise.

Review the original lease contract and consult a lawyer to ascertain which method would best serve to transfer a lease; the answer can depend on its terms, local regulations and your own jurisdiction’s specific legislation. Novation or assignation could both work, depending on local laws applicable in each jurisdiction.

Assignment of accounts receivable

Assignment of accounts receivable

It is becoming more prevalent for businesses to assign accounts receivable to third-party assignees as an easy way to transfer ownership rights on invoices they still owe and secure payment from customers more efficiently. Here’s how the typical assignment works:

An agreement: Companies looking to assign receivables enter into contracts with third-party entities such as factoring firms or financial institutions in order to assign accounts receivable. The terms and conditions will determine what accounts receivable are being assigned as well as any fees due for doing so.

Notification to Customers: Informing its customers of the assignment. This notification alerts debtors of their obligations to make future payments directly to the assignee. Assignation of Receivables – To assign receivables, one party transfers their right to collect payments on those receivables to another, often through an assignment agreement or notice of assignment that details all details about what accounts were assigned including amounts and due dates.

The assignee will then take responsibility for collecting payments from debtors and applying them towards assigned receivables, deducting any agreed-upon fees or purchase prices before sending any remaining funds back to assignor.

In most instances, assignors remain responsible for any disputes pertaining to receivables they assign; however, since collection rights were transferred over, this burden has now fallen on assignee.

Assignment of accounts receivables provides immediate working capital by turning outstanding invoices into cash quickly, decreasing risk and speeding up cashflow through faster funds receipt. Meanwhile, assignees earn money collecting receivables.

As with any financial or legal transaction, it is wise to seek professional advice in reviewing any agreement in order to comply with local regulations and laws.

Highlighting the key differences

Assign: Most contracts typically involve only the transfer of rights and benefits; all obligations and responsibilities remain with the original party unless agreed otherwise. Create A New Contract Novation: Novations refers to the process of creating an entirely new contract in place of one already existing. All parties involved must agree upon its creation; then an entirely new arrangement comes into being.

Assignment of Rights Does Not Create Contract: Transferring rights does not enact a new agreement; rather, the assignee assumes all of the original contract’s provisions while still fulfilling them as originally stipulated by its originator (in this instance).

By way of novation, the original contract is completely terminated; and in its place a new one comes into effect. When assigning is used instead of novation to dissolve an agreement, rights and obligations of that original contract remain with its assignee until otherwise agreed by both parties involved.

For any changes made after assignment consent must still be obtained prior to taking place. Agreement must be obtained from both sides when changing a contract’s subject matter; this includes both parties to the original agreement as well as those entering into it as new counterparties.

Consent must be obtained from both parties involved before assigning contracts; depending on the terms and conditions of your original contract, you may require both of their signatures as well.

Contract confidentiality: Novation: Novations establishes privity of contract between a new counterparty and party. For Assignment, neither counterparty and assignee have direct contractual ties – as third-party beneficiaries they enforce each others rights through third-party beneficiary arrangements.

These differences are crucial in order to illustrate the various effects and characteristics of novation vs assignment contracts transfers in order to comply with legal regulations and accurately assign rights and obligations between all involved parties.

Understanding their differences is necessary in order to successfully manage contract transfers in compliance with legal standards as well as accurately assign rights and obligations between participants involved.

Similarities Between Novation and Assignment

Although novation and assignment are distinct legal concepts, they share similarities in their application and purpose. Understanding these similarities will help clarify their relationship to one another.

Both agreements involve the transfer of contractual rights and obligations:

Novation: Through novation, rights and obligations can be fully transferred between parties to an existing contract and those involved in creating a new one with fresh parties.

Assignment: Under assignment, some rights and obligations of an original contract remain valid while certain rights or obligations are transferred to a third party. Both can occur voluntarily between parties:

Novation is a voluntary agreement between original parties and new ones that requires mutual consent for approval. Assignment, on the other hand, is also voluntary in that an assignor willingly transfers rights or obligations to an assignee.

 Both documents can be used to transfer rights under a contract:

Novation: Novation is an innovative solution designed to facilitate the transfer of rights and obligations from one party to the next, ensuring an effortless transition without interrupting contractual obligations. Assignment: Assignment allows the assignor to transfer rights or obligations to an assignee, giving them either all of its advantages or burdens under a contract agreement. Even though novation and assignment share many similarities, it is crucial to comprehend their specific characteristics and legal ramifications; please see the following sections for details.

Both involve the transfer of contractual rights and obligations

Both involve the transfer of contractual rights and obligations

Although novation and assignment are separate legal concepts, they do share similarities in their applications and purposes. By understanding these commonalities between them, one can better comprehend their relationship. Here are the key similarities between them:

 Assigning contractual rights and obligations:

Novation: Novation is the process by which all rights and obligations transferred from original parties to new ones in a contract are fully transferred over, effectively replacing it.

Assignment: Assignment involves the transfer of specific rights or obligations from one party to another without changing the overall contractual arrangements, although both parties continue to retain rights and obligations under their original agreements.

Novation: Novation is an agreement among all involved parties–original and new -that involves replacing an original contract with one that replaces it voluntarily and mutually. All involved must agree upon its implementation before proceeding with novation and replacing it with one of their own choosing.

Voluntary agreement between parties:

Assignment: Assignment is a voluntary act wherein one party transfers specific rights or obligations to another without necessarily needing consent of both parties involved, although typically written notice will be sent out with regard to this change in status.

 Impact on contractual relationships:

Novation: Novation is defined as the discharge of original parties’ obligations and the establishment of a new contractual relationship among new ones, effectively replacing their old contract with an entirely different agreement.

Assignment: Assignment does not constitute the termination of an existing contract; rather, it introduces a third-party (known as an assignee ) who assumes certain rights and responsibilities associated with that existing agreement.

 Legal Implications:

Novation: By novation, original parties are relieved from their obligations under an existing contract and fully transferred over to new parties; original parties no longer bear responsibility for its obligations.

Assignment: Assignor remains ultimately liable for fulfilling their assigned obligations, although assignee has gained the ability to enforce them directly against each party involved. Novation and assignment both involve the transfer of contractual rights and obligations, but it is crucial to recognize their differences because each can have different repercussions for both the original contract and all involved parties.

Both can be used to transfer rights under a contract

Novation and assignment both serve to facilitate the transfer of rights under contracts, sharing several similarities that facilitate their transference. Such similarities include:

Transfer of Contractual Rights:

Novation: Novation allows for the transfer of all rights and obligations between original parties to new ones, including contractual rights such as payments, benefits or performance obligations.

Assignment: Assignment allows an assignor to transfer specific rights under their contract to an assignee, such as payments or intellectual property rights. B. Ensuring continuity of rights: By using assignment as a mechanism for passing specific contractual rights over to their new owners, assignments ensure their continuation over time.

Facilitating the continuity of rights:

Novation: Novation ensures the continuity of rights by replacing original parties with new parties who assume all of their responsibilities and rights as stipulated under the original contract, thus creating a seamless transition and safeguarding the original terms of it. Assignment: Assignment ensures that specific rights are passed effectively from assignor to assignee, enabling them to enjoy and exercise benefits previously held by assignor.

 Enhancing flexibility and efficiency:

Novation: Novation is an effective means for parties to restructure their contractual relationships by adding new parties while simultaneously relieving original parties from any of their obligations, thus adapting contracts to changing circumstances.

Assignment: Assignment provides parties with a quick and effective means of assigning individual rights or obligations to third parties without completely revamping their original contract. Assignment is also an efficient means of allocating specific rights.

While both novation and assignment involve the transfer of rights under a contract, it is crucial to recognize their individual characteristics and legal implications to determine which approach would be most suitable in each instance.

Understanding the differences between novation and assignment is crucial for successfully managing contractual agreements.Novation involves replacing an existing agreement with one that meets all parties’ approval, leading to both discharge of existing contractual obligations as well as creating new ones; on the other hand, assignment involves passing specific rights or obligations from one party to another while keeping the original contract intact.

No matter their differences, novation and assignment share some similarities. Both involve the transfer of contractual rights and obligations, providing continuity for parties involved in an existing contract. Furthermore, both are voluntary acts which require consent from both sides involved and provide flexibility and efficiency when altering contractual relationships.

Legal briefing - Novation and assignment of contracts

Publication date: 19 May 2017

In this issue:

What is the difference between novation and assignment?

When is a novation or assignment required and which one do you use, issues to consider when deciding whether to agree to a novation or assignment, executing the novation or assignment.

Commonwealth entities encounter a variety of situations where contractual rights and obligations may need to be transferred from one legal entity to another. This can arise where a supplier is restructuring its operations or as part of a sale of a business. In these situations, there are 2 legal tools available to achieve a transfer of rights or obligations: novation and assignment. This legal briefing sets out some key considerations for Commonwealth entities when considering a novation or assignment.

While this legal briefing looks at novation and assignment of contracts generally, additional issues can arise in the context of interests in land, such as leases – these issues are beyond the scope of this legal briefing.

The following table compares the general principles that distinguish novation from assignment. 1

Table 1: Differences between novation and assignment

A novation is the mechanism by which a contract is terminated and a new contract is made between different or additional parties. 2 The new contract is generally on the same terms as the original contract. A novation has the effect of substituting one party for another party without necessarily changing the rights and obligations under the original contract. The rights and obligations under the original contract can be transferred to the new party.

A novation requires the consent of all the parties to the original contract as well as the consent of the new party. 3 It is a tripartite agreement between the original parties and the new party. Consent of all the parties to enter into the agreement is therefore crucial. 4 A novation usually takes the form of a deed.

Example of novation

The Commonwealth and B have a contract under which B provides certain services.

B is proposing to sell its business to C. C is prepared to take on B’s obligation under the contract with the Commonwealth. The Commonwealth undertakes its due diligence and agrees to the substitution of B with C. For the substitution to occur, a novation is needed. Once the novation is signed, C is responsible to the Commonwealth for the services under the contract.

The following diagram demonstrates this novation.

Diagram 1: Transfer of both rights and obligations

Diagram 1: Transfer of both rights and obligations

An assignment is the mechanism by which a party to a contract (the assignor) transfers its existing rights and benefits under that contract to a third party (the assignee). 5 Importantly, the assignor cannot transfer its burdens, obligations or liabilities to the assignee through an assignment. 6 This means that the assignor is not released from its obligations under the contract. Further, the assignee does not become a party to the original contract but can enforce their right to receive the assigned benefits.

An assignment does not require a new contract. The assignor must only record the assignment in writing, 7 sign it and provide written notice of the assignment to the other party to the contract. At law it is possible for an assignment of rights to take place without the consent of the other party to the contract. 8 This can be problematic if the other party to the contract prefers to deal with the assignor rather than the new third party. For this reason, most Commonwealth contracts contain a clause which prevents the contractor from assigning its rights under the contract, in whole or in part, without first obtaining the written consent of the Commonwealth. Sometimes the contract will also provide that the Commonwealth is not obliged to give its consent. Sometimes, this clause will refer to the consent not being ‘unreasonably withheld’.

Example of assignment

The Commonwealth and B have a contract under which B provides consultancy services to the Commonwealth. B wants to transfer its right to receive payment for the services to a third party, C. For this to occur, B can assign its rights to receive payment under the contract to C. This can be achieved through a deed of assignment between B and C. At law, the assignment can occur without any involvement of or consent from the Commonwealth. Importantly, B continues to remain a party to the contract with the Commonwealth, so B is still obliged to perform the services and B’s contractual liabilities remain unchanged. However, the third party, C, will have a legally enforceable right to receive the Commonwealth’s payment for the services that B performs.

Although C is not made a party to the original contract between the Commonwealth and B, the practical result of the assignment is that C can enforce the right to receive payment under the contract against the Commonwealth.

The following diagram demonstrates this arrangement.

Diagram 2: Transfer of rights only

Diagram 2: Transfer of rights only

Commonwealth entities are often asked to consider requests to novate or assign agreements. These requests can arise with funding agreements, contracts for goods and services and other agreements for a variety of reasons.

Where a change to the underlying contractual arrangements is requested, the Commonwealth entity will need to consider whether the proposed change is acceptable and determine whether a novation or an assignment is most appropriate. 9

Do I use a novation or an assignment?

Is the new party taking over both rights and obligations , with the existing contractor not to have an ongoing role under the contract?

  • a novation will usually be required.

Is the new party taking over contractual rights only , with the existing contractor continuing to be responsible for performing obligations?

  • an assignment will usually be required.

The table below outlines some common situations in which the question of novation or assignment might arise.

Table 2: Circumstances that may result in a novation or assignment

When an agency is considering whether to agree to a novation or assignment, there will be a range of matters that will need to be addressed. In some cases, it may be appropriate to terminate the existing contract and undertake a new procurement or funding process.

First, the terms of the existing contract should be considered. The contract may include provisions dealing directly with novation or assignment. Many Commonwealth contracts prohibit novation or assignment without the consent of the Commonwealth entity. This allows the Commonwealth entities to carefully select their suppliers, contractors, funding recipients and other parties that they are dealing with. It is common for these contractual provisions to specify that the Commonwealth will not unreasonably withhold approval for novation or assignment. Conversely, the contract may include a standing consent 11  by the Commonwealth to certain kinds of novation or assignment (for example, within the same corporate group). Even in this case, a formal deed of novation will usually still be required.

Second, when an agency is deciding whether to agree to a novation or assignment, it may need to consider a range of approval processes and risk management requirements that apply to this commitment of relevant money. It may be necessary to check the Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013 (in particular, s 15, s 16 and ss 25–29), the Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Rules 2014 (in particular, rule 18), the accountable authority instructions and other applicable legislation that may specifically apply to the contract.

Third, although strictly not directly relevant to the novation or assignment, it is common for variations to the contract to be raised at the same time. Agencies should approach any request for a variation as part of a novation or assignment in the same way they would at any other point in the contract period.

Due diligence

The information you need will vary from case to case but might include the following.

Background entity information on the new party

  • What are the management capabilities of the entity?
  • Has the Commonwealth previously dealt with the entity?
  • Is the body a foreign entity? If so, advice may be required as to whether it has executed a binding contract.
  • Is the body a partnership or unincorporated association? If so, who will be bound by the contract following the novation?
  • Is the body the trustee of a trust? If so, does the trustee have the requisite authority under the trust deed?
  • Do you have information on any relevant ‘fit and proper person’ considerations?

Financial status information

  • How does the financial status of the new contractor compare with that of the existing contractor?
  • Should you seek a parent guarantee or other security (is the body a $2 company)?
  • Do you require independent financial advice on any figures that the new party has provided?
  • Can the new party meet the insurance requirements specified in the contract?

Evidence of the company’s ability to perform the contract

  • What is happening to any key personnel under the contract? Are they moving to the new party?
  • Will the new party have access to all relevant facilities and specialist equipment?
  • Does the new party hold all relevant licences and registrations?
  • Do you have evidence that the company will satisfy the conditions or requirements of the contract – for example, will it hold funding in a special account or satisfy milestone requirements or any relevant eligibility criteria for funding?

Proposed transitional arrangements

If it is decided that a novation or assignment will be agreed to then it may be necessary to put transitional arrangements in place. Matters that may need to be considered will include the following:

  • What are the interim arrangements for performance of the activity (for example, arrangements between the time the novation is agreed to and the deed of novation is executed)?
  • Is there a transition plan?
  • What resources will be needed to manage the transition? Who will bear the cost?

Novations: matters to consider

  • Is the Commonwealth satisfied that the new contractor can perform the obligations under the contract and manage risk? Is the new contractor an acceptable entity to contract with in terms of due diligence process on probity issues, financial viability and capability?
  • Who will be liable for past performance or defaults before the new contractor takes over? Will the existing contractor remain liable for its performance or will the new contractor take on responsibility for any problems with the original contractor’s performance?
  • Will the novation have any impact on subcontracts or other contracts – for example, contracts with other parties working on the same site?
  • Are there any issues with the existing contractor’s performance that should be addressed and finalised before agreeing to the deed of novation? Make sure that you do not inadvertently make unintended amendments to the contract. For example, an acknowledgement of correspondence about a proposed novation which mentions a related delay in delivery may be taken to be acceptance of the delay.
  • Are there specific issues for the particular type of contract? For example, where a grant agreement deals with assets purchased with the grant, you may need to ensure those assets are being transferred to the new contractor (unless otherwise agreed).
  • Are there any existing securities or financial arrangements under the original contract that need to be replaced or updated? For example, even if both the existing and new contractor are subsidiaries of the same parent entity, an existing parent guarantee or other security may need to be amended to cover the new contractor. There may also be Personal Property Security Register entries that need to be updated.
  • At what point will the new contractor take over from the existing contractor: the date the novation deed is signed or a different date?
  • Are there any additional costs and who will bear these costs? Usually the party that is seeking the novation is required to meet the other party’s costs.

Assignments: matters to consider

  • Is the Commonwealth satisfied that the assignor can continue to perform its obligations under the contract without receiving payment?
  • Does the assignor have financial viability issues? Has the assignor sold its right to receive payment from the Commonwealth as part of a settlement of a debt with a creditor?
  • What is the underlying reason for the proposed assignment?
  • Is the proposed assignment detrimental to the Commonwealth?
  • Does the contract between the Commonwealth and the proposed assignor propose to create a confidential relationship or an enduring relationship? Does the Commonwealth want to have any engagement with the proposed assignee?

Once an agency has decided to accept a novation or assignment, the new arrangements must be recorded. The original contract may establish the form of instrument required to execute the novation or assignment. 12 In any event, the instrument may need to reflect the following.

A deed of novation will typically:

  • substitute one party for another
  • include mutual release of future obligations under the original contract between the Commonwealth and the original contractor
  • clearly specify responsibilities and liability of the original contractor and the new contractor for the pre-novation period – often supported by indemnities
  • include representations and warranties with respect to the power of the original contractor and the new contractor to enter into the deed of novation
  • include an agreement as to costs that the parties will bear in connection with the preparation, execution and completion of the novation – it is common for the other parties to pay the Commonwealth’s costs.

A deed of assignment will typically:

  • unconditionally transfer the relevant benefit to the assignee, giving the assignee complete control of that benefit, including the right to take legal action to enforce it
  • clearly specify whether there will be a redemption or reassignment in the future – for example, upon repayment of a loan
  • confirm arrangements for the ongoing performance of the contract by the assignee
  • include agreement as to costs to be borne by the parties in connection with the preparation, execution and completion of the assignment – it is common for the other parties to pay the Commonwealth’s costs.

1 See generally Olsson v Dyson (1969) 120 CLR 365, 388.

2 See Olsson v Dyson (1969) 120 CLR 365, 388.

3 See Olsson v Dyson (1969) 120 CLR 365, 388. Note that, in Leveraged Equities Ltd v Goodridge (2011) 191 FCR 71, the Full Federal Court held that it is possible for a contracting party to prospectively authorise a novation to be made by another party unilaterally. See also CSG Ltd v Fuji Xerox Australia Pty Ltd [2011] NSWCA 335,134.

4 See F ightvision Pty Ltd v Onisforou (1999) 47 NSWLR 473, 491–492; and Vickery v Woods (1952) 85 CLR 33, 345.

5 Norman v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1963) 109 CLR 9, 26.

6 ALH Group Property Holdings Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue (2012) 245 CLR 338, 346 [12].

7 This is a legislative requirement in each state: see, for example, Property Law Act 1958 (Vic) s 134.

8 See Olsson v Dyson (1969) 120 CLR 365, 388.

9 In CSG Limited v Fuji Xerox Australia Pty Ltd [2011] NSWCA 335, [133], Sackville AJA (Bathurst CJ and Campbell JA agreeing) observed that the end result in a case of novation and a case of assignment may be similar.

10 In some cases the contract may require agency approval to some of these changes or other amendments to the contract. This is different from a novation or assignment.

11 See note 3.

12 In Leveraged Equities Ltd v Goodridge (2011) 191 FCR 71, the Court stressed the importance of drafting novation and assignment clauses in the original contract clearly to avoid ambiguity when one or more parties later seek to novate or assign.

Deputy General Counsel Commercial

Senior Lawyer

The material in this briefing is provided to AGS clients for general information only and should not be relied upon for the purpose of a particular matter. Please contact AGS before any action or decision is taken on the basis of any of the material in this briefing.

You are using an outdated browser. Please upgrade your browser or activate Google Chrome Frame to improve your experience.

Watson & Associates LLC Government Contracts Blog

To Avoid Costly Mistakes Call (866) 601-5518 for a Free Initial Consultation

Search

Sign up for Monthly Retainer     Join Our Team Careers

Government Contract Novation Vs Assignment of Contract & FAR 42.1204 Novation Clause

Assignment of Contract Clause and Government Novation Agreement Business Sales FAR 42.1204

All should be aware that the contracting officer does not have to approve every assignment of contract transactions under the FAR 42.1204 contract novation clause .

  • Avoid the costly mistake of assuming that the government must approve all novations.
  • If done improperly, contractors can be found in breach of contract terms and can even face suspension or debarment .

Novation Agreement FAR 42.1204 Definition

In federal government contracting,  developing a novation can be somewhat unique because depending on the facts of each case, the original parties may still be responsible for performance to the government.  Whereas, in the commercial sector, the contract novation definition means that a new party to the contract essential substitutes the original party. In other words in the commercial sector, the original party’s obligation is discharged and substitution of an original party to a contract with a new party, or substitution of an original contract with a new contract.

Federal Government Contract Novation vs Assignment of Contract

Business Asset Purchase Agreement and Contract Assignment  Clause Issues

What is the difference between assignment and novation? Simply executing a business asset purchase agreement and a signed novation contact agreement  when buying or selling a business is not the end of the legal analysis when there is a government contract involved.  The contracting officer must approve the assignment of government contracts and or novation agreement . Your novation letter should address critical issues that answer the contracting officer’s concerns about the risk of performance. Novating government contracts is all about minimizing the risk to the agency.

In one case , SBA OHA ignored the argument that when novating a contract, its purchase and sale contract with the buyer had the legal effect of divesting the seller of any control over the current contracts. In that case, there was no formally approved novation agreement FAR contract. As a result, the whole transaction went to waste because the parties lacked a full understanding of the rules. A Government contract may not be automatically transferred to a third party. See 41 USC 15.

  • In government contracting, if there is a performance problem, for example in construction, and a termination for default is an issue, or the surety is called upon for obligations under a performance bond, then the original party may not necessarily be discharged.
  • Assignment of government contracts decisions, when there is a purchase and sale agreement involving a company that has existing government contracts, should be met with caution.

On the issue of contract novation vs assignment , although the FAR 42.1204 assignment novation clause allows the buying and selling parties to execute a novation vs assignment agreement due to an asset purchase or stock sale, companies should still assess legal issues related to violation of SBA small business size standards. 

  • Companies should always keep the agency involved from the beginning of the process to the end.

41 USC 6305 – Contract Assignment Clause – Prohibition on transfer of contract and certain allowable assignments

Under the federal contract assignment clauses, when there are business sales that involve government contracts, the purchase and sale agreement suggests that the contracts would be transferred to the buyer either through a business asset purchase agreement sale or stock sale.

However, the reality is that although FAR 42.1204 allows for a novation of contract agreement, the contracting officer is not obligated to approve it.  A federal government contracting agency, only when it determines it to be in its interest, may accept a third party as the successor in interest when the third party’s interest in the contract arises out of the transfer of all of the contractor’s assets or the entire portion of the contractor’s assets involved in performing the contract. FAR 42.1204 (a). See also How Do Federal Government Contractors Deal With COVID-19 Problems ?

  • The contracting officer is not forced to approve the  FAR novation clause language if the transaction is not in the government’s best interest.
  • If the government declines to novate a contract, the original contractor is still responsible for performance. FAR 42.1204 (c) contract novation clause.
  • If the assignment of contract is not recognized by the contracting officer, and the original contractor does not perform, the original contractor can be terminated for default.

Potential SBA Size Standard Violations

When assessing government novation contract law rules, the SBA found in one case that since there was no approved assignment of the contract through an approved government novation agreement, the two businesses were deemed affiliated through the identity of interest rule.

On appeal, OHA found that since there was no formal contract novation, the seller was still responsible for the contract performance, and both companies were in the same line of business. In that case, the SBA also found that there was no clear fracture between the buyer and seller. The two businesses were therefore also affiliated with the newly organized concern rule.

Help With Government Contracting Companies for Sale

Oftentimes, buyers and sellers do not understand the complex regulations involved with government contracting companies for sale. Not only are novation agreements a potential issue, the due diligence needed and the ability to address buyers’ other business relationships that can impact their small business size status can be a huge problem. Contact Theodore Watson at 720.941.7200 for immediate help.

Legal Issues Regarding Novation Vs Assignment 

Assignment vs novation. Know the difference: There are several legal issues that arise under federal contract novation agreement FAR law during the purchase and business sales, assignment and transfer of federal contracts when government contracts are involved.  Common issues that occur with the assignment novation clause terms include: (1) whether the seller is simply trying to sell the contract with no real assets, (2) how to structure the asset purchase agreement and whether wait for contracting officer novation approval first and (3) to what degree does the contracting officer have to approve the novation. The first step is to be proactive in the early stages of the asset purchase or stock sale process.

Having the right contract clauses in the sales agreement is critical in the event that the contracting officer does not approve the contract novation. Other issues with novating a contract include the buyer maintaining its small business status in the event of recertification or option year decisions. Find out more about Signs of Being Under Investigation (Federal)

For additional questions about what is the difference between assignment and novation for federal contractors buying and selling a business that includes an assignment and FAR novation agreement or assignment of contract issues under FAR 42.1204 novation clause, or need help with government contracting companies for sale, call Watson & Associates’ government  contract novation law lawyers for immediate help. Call 1-866-601-5518. FREE INITIAL CONSULTATION.

4 comments on “ Government Contract Novation Vs Assignment of Contract & FAR 42.1204 Novation Clause ”

Comments are closed.

Privacy Overview

Assignment and Novation

What are assignment and novation clauses.

The two main legal tools for the transfer of the rights and/or obligations under a contract to another party are: assignment, for the transfer of benefits; and novation, for the transfer of rights/benefits and obligations. Each has unique features that must be taken into account when deciding which is the preferred option.

Assignment and novation clauses

Assignment, novation and other dealings boilerplate clauses, non-assignment clauses, withholding consent to an assignment.

The two main legal tools for the transfer of the rights and/or obligations under a contract to another party are:

  • assignment, for the transfer of benefits; and
  • novation, for the transfer of rights/benefits and obligations

Each has unique features that must be taken into account when deciding which is the preferred option.

Assignment clauses

A contracting party at common law has a general right to assign its rights without any consent or approval from the other party (unless by its very nature the right is personal). An assignment clause may be included in an agreement to exclude or limit this common law right. In order for the assignment of rights by one party to not be exercised unilaterally without the knowledge of the other party, it is common for contracts to include a provision that a party can only assign its rights under the contract with the consent of the other party.

After assignment, the assignee is entitled to the benefit of the contract and to bring proceedings (either alone or by joining the assignor depending in whether the assignment is legal or equitable) against the other contracting party to enforce its rights. The assignee does not become a party to the contract with the promisor. As the burden or obligations of the contract cannot be assigned, the assignor remains liable post assignment to perform any part of the contract that has not yet been performed.

Novation clauses

By executing a novation, a party can transfer both its rights/benefits and obligations. At common law, the obligations under a contract can only be novated with the consent of all original contracting parties, as well as the new contracting parties. This is because the novation extinguishes the old contract by creating a new contract.

A novation clause will usually provide that a party cannot novate a contract without the prior written consent of existing parties. Including a novation clause in an agreement is designed to prevent oral consent to a novation, or consent being inferred from a continuing party’s conduct. However, a court will look to the substance of what has occurred, and such a clause is not effective in all situations.

It is possible for a novation clause to prospectively authorise a novation to be made by another party unilaterally to a party chosen by the novating party. The courts will give effect to a novation made in this manner provided it is authorised by the proper construction of the original contract.

Option 1 – Assignment, novation and other dealings – consent required

A party must not assign or novate this [deed/agreement] or otherwise deal with the benefit of it or a right under it, or purport to do so, without the prior written consent of each other party [which consent is not to be unreasonably withheld/which consent may be withheld at the absolute discretion of the party from whom consent is sought].

Option 2 – Assignment, novation and other dealings – specifies circumstances in which consent can reasonably be withheld

(a)   [ Insert name of Party A ] may not assign or novate this [deed/agreement] or otherwise deal with the benefit of it or a right under it, or purport to do so, without the prior written consent of [ insert name of Party B ], which consent is not to be unreasonably withheld . 

(b) [ Insert name of Party A ] acknowledges that it will be reasonable for [ insert name of Party B ] to withhold its consent under this clause if:

(i)      [ Insert name of Party B ] is not satisfied with the ability of the proposed assignee to perform [ insert name of Party A ]’s obligations under this [deed/agreement];

(ii)      [ Insert name of Party B ] is not satisfied with the proposed assignee’s financial standing or reputation;

(iii)     the proposed assignee is a competitor of [ insert name of Party B ]; or

(iv)       [ Insert name of Party B ] is in dispute with the proposed assignee .

Click  here  for information on how to use this boilerplate clause.

A non-assignment clause prevents a party or parties from assigning the benefit of the contract. Non-assignment clauses are generally effective if they have been clearly drafted.

Contracts commonly provide for assignment with the consent of the other party. Such provisions usually provide that consent must not be unreasonably withheld and, where there is no such proviso, one may be implied. Accordingly, if it is intended that a party may withhold its consent to an assignment for any reason whatsoever (including on unreasonable grounds) clear contractual language should be used.

A purported assignment that contravenes such contractual restriction may constitute a breach of contract and result in an ineffective assignment.

The ‘reasonableness’ of withholding consent to an assignment is assessed by an objective standard and given a broad and common sense meaning.

The relevant factors in assessing reasonableness will differ in each case and heavily depend on the particular circumstances, including the nature and object of the specific contract and the purpose of the non-assignment clause.  Relevant factors may include any defaults in obligations under the contract and the solvency and identity of the assignee.

A party’s actions in withholding consent will generally be considered unreasonable if the grounds relied upon to support the withholding are:

  • extraneous or disassociated from the subject matter of the contract;
  • materially inconsistent with any provision(s) of the contract; or
  • based on collateral or improper considerations.

It is advisable, where withholding consent to an assignment, to clearly set out the reasons for withholding consent in a letter to the other party.

What is the Difference Between an Assignment and a Novation in the UK?

' decoding=

By Edward Carruthers

Updated on 21 November 2022 Reading time: 5 minutes

This article meets our strict editorial principles. Our lawyers, experienced writers and legally trained editorial team put every effort into ensuring the information published on our website is accurate. We encourage you to seek independent legal advice. Learn more .

  • What is an Assignment? 

What is a Novation?

Two key differences between an assignment and a novation, key takeaways, frequently asked questions.

As a business owner, you may encounter occasions where you must transfer certain beneficial rights or obligations to a third party. For example, your business may stop performing a service and wish to transfer the rights conveyed to you under a particular contract to another party. An assignment or a novation can help you do this. However, they act in very different ways and have differing requirements. This article will explain the main differences between an assignment and a novation and the circumstances where you may wish to use them. 

What is an Assignment? 

Under the terms of a standard contractual agreement, you or your business partners will receive rights or benefits. You can transfer the right to receive these benefits through an assignment to anyone who is not part of the original agreement. Assignments are made through an assignment deed, which will set out the benefits you wish to bestow on another person. It is worth noting that you can only assign your own rights. You cannot assign any other person’s rights conveyed in a contract.

Once you (the assignor) transfer your rights to the third party (the assignee), they can enjoy the benefits of the contract you provided.

Assignments are common in construction contracts where a property developer may enter into a building contract with a contractor. The developer can transfer their rights under that contract to anyone buying the property. Those rights then allow the purchaser to demand the contractor perform their duties under the original arrangement. Otherwise, they can make a claim against the contractor for a breach of contract. 

Novations are slightly more complicated than assignments. They transfer both the rights and obligations that you have under a contract. You may use a novation to leave a contract you no longer wish to be a party to and find a replacement. For example, if you stop trading in a specific service or line of goods, you can use a novation deed to remove yourself from a contract to provide these services. The novation deed will then allow you to substitute yourself for someone else willing to do this work.

Technically, a novation cancels the original contract you held with your business partner and creates a duplicate contract. In that duplicate, a third party will take the rights, benefits, and obligations conveyed to you from that agreement.

As the party leaving the contract, you will let go of all your rights to your benefits under the original contract. You will also no longer need to perform your contractual duties. It is worth noting that the burden of finding a replacement party for the novation often falls on the person leaving the contract. Therefore, to set up a novation, you must find the replacement yourself. However, you should be aware that any party involved in the existing contract can veto your decision to bring in a replacement if they are unsatisfied.

Novations often happen where businesses are bought and sold or where debt transactions occur. For example, when a company borrows money from a lender and wants to transfer the obligations to repay the debt to a third party. They can transfer these obligations via a novation. 

As discussed above, the main difference between an assignment and a novation is that a novation transfers your obligations and rights under that contract. By contrast, an assignment transfers only your rights and benefits.

But there are other differences between the two that business owners must be aware of.

1. Novations Require the Consent of All Parties

An assignment does not require the consent of all parties to the contract to transfer the rights. Additionally, you do not necessarily have to notify the other parties to an agreement that an assignment is taking place. However, as a commercial courtesy, it is wise to notify your business partners that you intend to assign your rights to a third party. It is also essential to ensure no contractual terms prohibit you from transferring a benefit to a third party. Doing say may lead to breaching the contract, and you will be liable for damages. 

With novations, you must obtain consent from every party to a contract before transferring your contractual obligations and rights. This is because you are transferring your duties to perform obligations to a third party. In addition, as the other businesses involved in a contract rely on the performance of these obligations, they have a right to be notified of the novation arrangements. They must also provide their consent to these arrangements. Therefore, a novation deed must be signed and approved by every party to that original agreement, including the party exiting the contract.

2. Novations Require Consideration

Consideration is an essential element of contract law. It is a legal term for payment of value in exchange for a promise. To have a legally binding contract, you must have some form of consideration passing between parties. For example, in a delivery contract, one party must pay another party for shipping a set of goods. Without that consideration passing between parties, you cannot have a legally binding contract, and you can take action against your business partner for breach of contract. 

Novation deeds require you to exchange consideration before terminating the original contract. They also require consideration when making the new novation contract. On the other hand, as assignments do not involve the termination of a contract, you do not have to show that parties to the contract exchanged consideration.

Assignments and novations differ in three important ways. For instance, assignments transfer rights to contractual benefits to third parties, while novations transfer rights and obligations under a contract to a third party. Additionally, novations require the consent of all parties to the contract. On the other hand, you can make assignments without the consent of all parties. Finally, novations require consideration. 

If you need help transferring your rights, our experienced contract lawyers can assist as part of our LegalVision membership. For a low monthly fee, you will have unlimited access to lawyers to answer your questions and draft and review your documents.  Call us today on 0808 196 8584 or visit our membership page .

Assignments are where business owners can transfer a right or benefit given to them under a contractual arrangement to a third party. 

A novation transfers both a business owner’s rights and obligations under a contract to a third party. 

We appreciate your feedback – your submission has been successfully received.

Register for our free webinars

Preparing your business for success in 2024, spam, cookies and content: legal considerations when leveraging digital marketing, contact us now.

Fill out the form and we will contact you within one business day

Related articles

' decoding=

How Do I Assign a Commercial Lease in the UK?

' decoding=

Sale of Goods Act in England?">Can I Contract Out of the Sale of Goods Act in England?

' decoding=

4 Steps to Take Before Signing a Contract in England

' decoding=

Benefits of Working With a Lawyer to Review Your Company Contract in England and Wales

We’re an award-winning law firm

Award

2023 Economic Innovator of the Year Finalist - The Spectator

Award

2023 Law Company of the Year Finalist - The Lawyer Awards

Award

2023 Future of Legal Services Innovation - Legal Innovation Awards

Award

2021 Fastest Growing Law Firm in APAC - Financial Times

Assignment and Assumption Agreement and Optional Novation (NY) | Practical Law

lease assignment novation

Assignment and Assumption Agreement and Optional Novation (NY)

Practical law standard document w-002-7123  (approx. 24 pages).

Industrial Spaces for Rent & Sale in Singapore

Welcome to IndustrialGuru.sg

Difference Between Assignment & Novation

Difference Between Assignment & Novation

We sometimes hear of certain rental cases where leases are transferred due to a sale with tenancy or in cases where a new incoming tenant intends to take over the existing lease. Let us find out what are the options available for the transfer of lease from one party to another.

Assignment of Lease

An assignment of lease is an agreement which transfers rights of the tenancy from one landlord to another landlord. For example, if a warehouse or factory is sold with tenancy to a new owner who is also the new landlord of the industrial unit. In simple terms, in a transaction where a property owned by owner 1 is sold with tenancy to owner 2, the lease will be assigned to owner 2 upon completion of the sale. In this case, the lease is taken over by owner 2 or assigned to owner 2.

Novation of Lease

A novation of lease usually involves three parties and is a tripartite agreement. For example, in a case where tenant 1 of a warehouse or factory unit intends to allow tenant 2 to take over the existing lease and the landlord is also supportive of the arrangements. In this case, a novation of lease between tenants can be done. The novation agreement is in such a way where the contract between landlord and tenant 1 is rescinded and is replaced by a new contract between landlord and tenant 2 who is taking over the lease based on the same terms and conditions. However, do note that for novation, all 3 parties must be in agreement before the novation can take place.

Why it is Important to Know the Difference

As contracts are legally binding, it is important to use the right type of agreement whether assignment or novation agreement for different scenarios so that the rights or obligations or both are transferred correctly between parties of the contract.

Sale with tenancy and takeover of lease sometimes happen and it will be good to understand the difference so that we are well equipped with the right knowledge when it happens.

IMAGES

  1. Assignment of Lease Form

    lease assignment novation

  2. Assignment of Lease Form Free Download

    lease assignment novation

  3. Standard Form Novation Agreement free to print in doc and pdf

    lease assignment novation

  4. FREE 9+ Sample Novation Agreement Templates in PDF

    lease assignment novation

  5. Novation Agreement Template Australia

    lease assignment novation

  6. Assignment of Lease by Landlord

    lease assignment novation

VIDEO

  1. Real estate contracts: Assignment of a lease, void, voidable

  2. Large 1 bedroom apartment in prime Noho location for $4495

  3. Bank of Scotland Plc

  4. Contract 101: Novation V. Assignment -Consumer Obligor, Mortgage, Promissory Note (Preview)

  5. Handling Requests for Commission Discounts in Business Sale Transaction

  6. The difference between roommates, subletting and assignment

COMMENTS

  1. Assignment vs Novation: Everything You Need to Know

    Novation is a mechanism where one party transfers all its obligations and rights under a contract to a third party, with the consent of the original counterparty. Assignment The transfer of a benefit or interest from one party to another is referred to as an assignment.

  2. Assignment and novation

    Assignment and novation 19 Aug 2011, 4:40 pm Follow Projects Assignment Assignment involves the transfer of an interest or benefit from one person to another. However the 'burden', or obligations, under a contract cannot be transferred. Assignment in construction contracts

  3. Novation: Definition in Contract Law, Types, Uses, and Example

    Novation is the replacement of one of the parties in an agreement between two parties, with the consent of all three parties involved. To novate is to replace an old obligation with a new one....

  4. Novation vs Assignment: Which One Is The Correct One?

    Novation is the act of replacing one party in a contract with another party, while assignment is the act of transferring rights or obligations from one party to another. Novation is the proper term when a new party is being substituted for an existing party in a contract.

  5. Novation Agreement: Everything You Need to Know

    Novation vs. Assignment While novation and assignment are similar, there are important differences between them. A novation involves three parties, and all involved parties must consent to the new contract. A novation is able to transfer obligations as well as rights. An assignment doesn't transfer obligations.

  6. Assignment vs. Novation: What is the Difference?

    Here, the new party (the "novatee") steps into the shoes of the original party (the "novator") and assumes both the rights and obligations. A novation agreement essentially terminates the contract with the original party and creates a new contract with the new party.

  7. Novation And Assignment: What Is The Difference?

    Novation and assignment are ways for someone to transfer their interest in a contract to someone else. Whilst the difference between assignment and novation is relatively small, it is an essential one.

  8. Novation Agreement: What is a novation agreement (2023)?

    Novation vs Assignment: Novation in contract and business law is different from assignment . Assignment is generally valid as long as the party is provided notice whereas a novation requires agreement of all parties. An assignment only passes along benefits. whereas a novation transfers both benefits and obligations.

  9. Assignment and Novation: Spot the Difference

    Novation. Whereas assignment only transfers a party's rights under a contract, novation transfers both a party's rights and its obligations. Strictly speaking, the original contract is extinguished and a new one formed between the incoming party and the remaining party to the original contract. This new contract has the same terms as the ...

  10. PDF AWG Novation Project Guiding Principles

    AWG TEMPLATE DOCUMENTS ON LEASE NOVATION/ ASSIGNMENT & ASSUMPTION AGREEMENTS - GUIDING PRINCIPLES ENGLISH LAW & NEW YORK LAW VERSIONS Novation Agreement, Assignment & Assumption Agreement and Notice & Acknowledgement Templates Release Date: October 2017 Purpose of template documents

  11. Assignment and Assumption of Lease and Novation Agreement

    Assignment and Assumption of Lease and Novation Agreement - Pitney Bowes Inc. and Pitney Bowes Office Systems Inc.: Learn more about this contract and other key contractual terms and issues by viewing the many sample contracts FindLaw has to offer in our Corporate Counsel Center.

  12. Assignment And Novation Agreement: Definition & Sample

    An assignment and novation agreement is a contract between two parties where one gives up their rights and responsibilities under an original contract. An assignment cancels the original contract and transfers the rights and responsibilities of one of the parties to another, third party. In novation, one of the parties surrenders their rights ...

  13. 10 Tips for Understanding the Difference Between Novation and Assignment

    Transferring a lease contract may involve either novation or assignment depending on its circumstances. These two methods can help transfer it. Here is more on this subject: This process includes three steps. All parties involved (landlord, current tenant (assignor), and new tenant (assignee)) must agree upon a novation arrangement.

  14. Legal briefing

    Table 1: Differences between novation and assignment. Novation. A novation is the mechanism by which a contract is terminated and a new contract is made between different or additional parties. 2 The new contract is generally on the same terms as the original contract. A novation has the effect of substituting one party for another party without necessarily changing the rights and obligations ...

  15. FAR 42.1204 Novation Clause vs Assignment of Contract

    All should be aware that the contracting officer does not have to approve every assignment of contract transactions under the FAR 42.1204 contract novation clause. Avoid the costly mistake of assuming that the government must approve all novations. If done improperly, contractors can be found in breach of contract terms and can even face ...

  16. Novation

    Novation refers to the process of substituting an existing contract with a replacement contract, where the contracting parties reach a consensus. One of the contracting parties in the original contract is replaced by an entirely new party that assumes the rights and obligations of the original party.

  17. Assignment and Assumption of Lease and Novation Agreement

    Following the Effective Date: (i) the term Tenant, as used in the Lease, shall refer to Assignee; (ii) Landlord accepts the liability of Assignee in lieu of the liability of Assignor; and (iii) Landlord shall be bound by the terms of the Lease in every way as if Assignee were named in the Lease in place of Assignor as a party thereto.

  18. Assignment and Novation

    Assignment and Novation What are assignment and novation clauses? The two main legal tools for the transfer of the rights and/or obligations under a contract to another party are: assignment, for the transfer of benefits; and novation, for the transfer of rights/benefits and obligations.

  19. Differences Between Assignment and Novation

    An assignment or a novation can help you do this. However, they act in very different ways and have differing requirements. This article will explain the main differences between an assignment and a novation and the circumstances where you may wish to use them. What is an Assignment?

  20. Assignment and Assumption Agreement and Optional Novation (NY ...

    This form contains provisions to incorporate an assumption of the delegated obligations and an optional novation into the assignment agreement. It also includes common representations and warranties, indemnification provisions, and refund of escrow deposits found in assignment and assumption agreements.

  21. PDF Master Aircraft Lease Novation Agreement and Assignment, Assumption and

    The amendments to the Existing Lease and Lease that will take effect as of the Effective Time and a form of Effective Time Acknowledgement are each attached to the Novation Agreement and the Assignment Agreement as Appendix A and Appendix B, respectively.

  22. Assignment and Novation: Transferring Contracts in Singapore

    Assignment and Novation: Transferring Contracts in Singapore Last updated on January 14, 2024 There are 2 methods of transferring a contract in Singapore. If you want to transfer just the rights under the contract, you can perform an assignment of the contract.

  23. Difference Between Assignment & Novation

    An assignment of lease is an agreement which transfers rights of the tenancy from one landlord to another landlord. For example, if a warehouse or factory is sold with tenancy to a new owner who is also the new landlord of the industrial unit.