assignment of lease corporation tax

This site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; others help us improve the user experience. By using the site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Read our  privacy policy  to learn more.

Leasing property to a corporation

• C Corporation Income Taxation

Shareholders of closely held C corporations commonly lease real estate, equipment, and other property to the corporate entity, either directly or through a separate partnership, a limited liability company, or an S corporation. Advantages that can motivate these rental arrangements include the following:

• Avoiding payroll taxes: Rental income from real estate is not subject to the self-employment (SE) tax; a lease of real estate to a closely held corporation represents the ability to withdraw funds from the corporation without incurring Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA) taxes (i.e., Social Security and Medicare) or SE tax.
• Avoiding corporate-level gain: Retaining ownership of real estate and other valuable tangible or intangible assets outside the corporation avoids the potential for triggering a gain within the corporation upon a distribution or liquidation of the assets. Conversely, if appreciated assets (i.e., those with a fair market value (FMV) in excess of adjusted tax basis) are distributed from a corporation, whether in liquidation or other form of distribution, gain must be recognized (Secs. 311(b)(1) and 336(a)).
• Retirement cash flow: Retaining valuable assets outside a controlled corporation allows the shareholder-lessor to continue to receive a cash flow stream from the corporation in the form of rents or royalties, even though the shareholder is not employed by the corporation. This can allow a portion of the corporate income to flow to a retired shareholder or a shareholder who is uninvolved in the business operations.
• Business transition: Retaining assets outside the corporation allows the ownership of the business operation and the ownership of business assets to be segregated. For example, a controlling shareholder-lessor may want to divest ownership and control of the business operations by disposing of some or all of the corporate stock but retain a significant portion of the business assets for lease to the entity. This can help transfer ownership and control to the successor generation by minimizing the value of the corporation (e.g., where the corporation contains only operating assets such as receivables and inventory, with fixed assets retained by the founder).

Example 1. Leasing land to a corporation to minimize payroll taxes and avoid double taxation: A recently formed W Inc. with a capital contribution of $1,000. A is the only shareholder. He intends to transfer the assets of AJ' s Car Wash ( AJ ), a sole proprietorship, to the new corporation. AJ' s profits are A' s only income and are required to meet his personal expenses.

The car wash is located on two acres of prime real estate. A originally paid $30,000 for this land, which now has an appraised value of $75,000. A believes that the land will continue to appreciate in value. AJ also has equipment with an adjusted basis and FMV of $20,000.

If A leases the land and real property improvements to W , A receives rent that would otherwise be withdrawn from the corporation in the form of compensation or dividends. By renting the land instead of transferring it to the corporation, A avoids payroll taxes (i.e., if the payments were compensation) and double taxation (i.e., if the payments were dividends) on the rent amounts. Also, by not transferring the land to the corporation, A avoids double taxation later.

Transferring the property to the corporation would result in A' s tax basis in the land of $30,000 carrying over to the corporation (Sec. 362(a)). When the appreciated land or the proceeds from the sale of the land are extracted from the corporation, both A and W would recognize gain. The equipment would not appreciate in value and would probably depreciate and need to be replaced from time to time. Thus, there is less risk of double taxation arising from placing the equipment directly into the corporation.

Renting property to a closely held C corporation is an effective way to extract wealth from the business in a form other than wages (subject to FICA taxes) or dividends (nondeductible). However, rental payments that are too high in relation to the property's fair rental value face possible reclassification as constructive dividends or compensation (Sec. 482; Maschmeyer's Nursery, Inc. , T.C. Memo. 1996 - 78 ). On the other hand, taxpayers who receive too little or no rent for the use of property by their closely held corporation may find that the IRS, upon examination, determines that there has been constructive receipt of rental income.

Example 2. Establishing a fair rental value for property leased to a corporation: Assume the same facts as in Example 1. A and W are related parties, since A owns more than 50% of AJ' s stock (Sec. 267(b)). A should set the rent payments at fair rental value. Also, W should pay a reasonable salary to A for the services he performs. Otherwise, the IRS can reallocate income and expenses to clearly reflect income. Such a reallocation could result in a recharacterization of the rent income as a constructive dividend.

Fair rental value can be determined by calculating the rate of return A would expect if he were to sell the real estate and invest the proceeds. A rate of return of 15% (taking the various risks involved into consideration) will be used to make this determination. Based on these factors, a fair rental rate of $1,750 per month is calculated. A also decides that he will set his salary at $4,000 per month, which he believes is a fair amount for the services that will be performed. A should document these decisions in the corporate minutes and have a valid real estate lease prepared by his attorney.

Example 3. Avoiding constructive receipt of unpaid rent from a corporation: D and J are the sole shareholders and directors of P , a cash - method C corporation. During the current tax year, they lease a warehouse to the corporation at a fair rental value of $2,000 per month. The corporation pays rent to the shareholder - lessors for the period of January to May, but in June the rental payments are discontinued. The corporation has sufficient cash on hand to make the rental payments, but D and J decide to waive the collection of the rental payments because of the discrepancy between the lower corporate rates and their high individual return rates.

In a similar fact pattern, the Tax Court held that controlling shareholders may be in constructive receipt of unpaid rent when the corporation has both the obligation to pay the rent and the necessary funds on hand ( Hooper , T.C. Memo. 1995 - 108 ; Regs. Sec. 1. 451 - 2 ). The corporation would be entitled to claim a deduction on its books for the additional rent, and this would be treated as additional rental income to D and J . In addition, because the rent was not actually paid, D and J make a constructive contribution of capital to P ; this is nondeductible by them and a nontaxable receipt of capital by P .

Observation : In the Hooper case, the shareholder was required to report rental income but received no cash from the corporation with which to pay the tax on the income. Furthermore, since the rent income was considered to be constructively received by the shareholder and then contributed to the corporation's capital, actual payment of the rental amount to the shareholder would be a distribution subject to dividend treatment. In other words, the shareholder could not withdraw the cash in the future without paying tax once again.

Given the maximum tax on dividends of 20%, it is possible that reducing rental payments and paying dividends might produce an overall lower combined tax burden if the shareholder is in a high tax bracket and the corporation is in a lower tax bracket. Care should be taken if restructuring an existing lease agreement, as the IRS may challenge the original rent level as being a partial dividend taxable at the higher rates in effect in prior years.

Caution : Shareholders may be subject to the additional 3.8% net investment income tax on rent received from leasing tangible property to the company. The net investment income tax applies to rent (among other categories of income) less properly allocable deductions (Regs. Sec. 1. 1411 - 4 (a)(1)(i)). However, rent is excluded from the net investment income tax if it is derived in the ordinary course of a trade or business that is not a passive activity (Regs. Sec. 1. 1411 - 4 (b)). According to the preamble to the final Sec. 1411 regulations, due to the differing factual combinations that can exist in determining whether a rental activity rises to the level of a Sec. 162 trade or business, bright - line definitions are impractical. Instead the preamble lists factors to consider, including the type of property (commercial real property, residential condominium, etc.), the day - to - day involvement of the owner or an agent, the type of rental (net lease versus traditional lease, short - term versus long - term lease), and the number of properties rented.

An individual who rents real estate to a corporation receives income that is exempt from self - employment (SE) income (Sec. 1402(a)(1)). The exemption also applies to personal property that is leased with real estate. However, there is no exemption from SE income if personal property alone (i.e., without real estate) is leased to a corporation. Thus, when an individual leases equipment to a controlled corporation, whether an S corporation or a C corporation, and this equipment is not leased in conjunction with real estate, any net rental income on the equipment faces exposure to SE tax. This assumes that the leasing activity is conducted with regularity and continuity, so as to rise to the level of a trade or business ( Stevenson , T.C. Memo. 1989 - 357 ).

Example 4. Leasing equipment to a corporation may generate SE income: D recently formed T Inc. with a capital contribution of $1,000. D is the only shareholder. D intends to operate his sole proprietorship, DK Cleaners, in the new corporation. The profits from DK are D' s sole source of income and are required to meet his personal expenses. D intends to lease the cleaning machinery to T . Under audit, the IRS could assert that D is in the business of equipment rental or leasing. In that case, D' s rental income would be subject to SE tax.

Example 5. Conducting an equipment leasing trade or business: R is the sole shareholder of RI Inc., a corporation that does printing and binding of publications and advertising brochures. Since forming the corporation over 10 years ago, R has retained all equipment personally for lease to the corporation. R buys or trades all annual replacement equipment for the business and likes the flexibility of adjusting his personal income through the use of the Sec. 179 deduction and the timing of asset purchases. On average, R owns 20 to 30 pieces of equipment that are leased to his corporation. Under the lease, the corporation is responsible for maintenance and repair, but R insures the equipment.

Because of the duration of this arrangement and the number of items of equipment involved, it is likely that R is really conducting a leasing trade or business, which would be subject to SE tax. The reporting of this activity within R' s Form 1040, U.S. Individual Income Tax Return , should be on Schedule C, Profit or Loss From Business , rather than Schedule E, Supplemental Income and Loss .

Normally, rental income arrangements, such as leasing real estate to a corporation, produce passive income to the extent of any net rental income received by the lessor (Sec. 469(c)(2)). Passive rental income can be very valuable to an individual lessor, since it can serve to absorb passive losses from other activities. However, the IRS has issued self - rental property regulations that prohibit using net income from the rental of property to offset other passive losses if the property is rented to a business in which the taxpayer materially participates (Regs. Sec. 1. 469 - 2 (f)(6)).

These rules, converting what would otherwise be passive income into nonpassive income, apply only if the rental activity produces net income. If the rental activity produces a loss, the loss continues to retain its passive character. The Tax Court upheld the validity of the passive income recharacterization regulations in a 1998 decision ( Schwalbach , 111 T.C. 215 (1998)).

In Carlos , 123 T.C. 275 (2004), the taxpayer owned two separate buildings. Each of the buildings was leased to one of two S corporations solely owned by the taxpayer. One of the properties incurred a loss, and the other incurred income. The taxpayer netted income and loss from the two properties, which he had grouped as a single activity for Sec. 469 purposes. The result was that the taxpayer reported nonpassive net rental income and no passive activity loss. In doing so, the taxpayer contended that the passive activity loss computation requires the netting of income and loss from all items of rental property grouped within the passive activity, and only after that computation is passive income recharacterized as nonpassive. The Tax Court disagreed, holding that under Regs. Sec. 1. 469 - 2 (f)(6), self - rental income should be removed from the computation of the passive activity loss. After this was done, the taxpayer was left with no passive income to offset against the passive loss from the other property.

Example 6. Leasing property to a business in which the lessor materially participates: B owns all the stock of N Inc., a C corporation in which he materially participates. B leases a building to N netting $30,000 of rental income annually. Since B will materially participate in the operation, the $30,000 of income from leasing the building is nonpassive.

In addition to self - rental arrangements, net income from rental property will also be recharacterized as nonpassive if less than 30% of the unadjusted basis of the property is depreciable (Temp. Regs. Sec. 1. 469 - 2T (f)(3)). The net income is recharacterized as portfolio income. Again, as with self - rented property, the rule only applies to net income; if the activity produces a loss, it retains its passive character.

Example 7. Characterizing net income from partially depreciable rental property: T Corp. recently purchased undeveloped land for a future project. Since the planned relocation is several years away, T rented the land to a farmer. Less than 30% of T' s basis in the property is depreciable. Although rental income is normally passive, T must treat the rental income as nonpassive because less than 30% of the unadjusted basis of the property is depreciable. T will not be able to offset its passive activity losses against the net income from this rental property. On the other hand, if the rental activity results in a loss, the loss will be characterized as a passive activity loss.

Sec. 280A(c)(6) disallows any deduction attributable to the rental of the taxpayer's residence to his or her employer during any period in which the individual uses the residence in performing services as an employee of the employer. Despite this constraint on deducting expenses, shareholders may still wish to consider the strategy of leasing an office, or perhaps a storage area, in their home to their corporation. The obvious advantage of extracting cash from the corporation this way is that the rental payments are exempt from payroll taxes. However, practitioners must consider the effect this may have on the exclusion of gain from the sale of the residence.

Example 8. Tax savings from home ­office space rental: A and her daughter, K , are the shareholders of a successful retail chain that is organized as a C corporation. A has been making annual gifts of the corporation's stock to K in an attempt to reduce her estate and also to shift more of the dividend income from the corporation to her daughter.

The corporation enters into a lease with K for both an office and a storage area within her residence. These are used by the corporation for its business activities and by K in the performance of her duties as an employee of the corporation. The reasonable rental value of this space is $12,000 per year. Accordingly, the corporation will pay $12,000 of deductible rent to K , and K will report $12,000 of rental income on Schedule E of her Form 1040. Because K is an employee of the corporation, Sec. 280A(c)(6) prohibits any offsetting deductions on K' s Schedule E. However, as real property rental income, the payments are not subject to SE tax or payroll taxes.    

This case study has been adapted from PPC's Tax Planning Guide — Closely Held Corporations , 31st Edition, by Albert L. Grasso, R. Barry Johnson, and Lewis A. Siegel. Published by Thomson Reuters/Tax & Accounting, Carrollton, Texas, 2018 (800-431-9025; tax.thomsonreuters.com) .

IRS signals it will challenge IDGT basis step-up at death

Impact of the oecd global anti–base erosion model rules on gilti, integrating transfer pricing and esg: practical considerations, proposed pfic regulations could complicate elections and reporting, lookback period fix should apply to all disaster relief.

This article discusses the history of the deduction of business meal expenses and the new rules under the TCJA and the regulations and provides a framework for documenting and substantiating the deduction.

PRACTICE MANAGEMENT

CPAs assess how their return preparation products performed.

Assignment of Lease

Jump to section, need help with an assignment of lease, what is an assignment of lease.

The assignment of lease is a title document that transfers all rights possessed by a lessee or tenant to a property to another party. The assignee takes the assignor’s place in the landlord-tenant relationship.

You can view an example of a lease assignment here .

How Lease Assignment Works

In cases where a tenant wants to or needs to get out of their lease before it expires, lease assignment provides a legal option to assign or transfer rights of the lease to someone else. For instance, if in a commercial lease a business leases a place for 12 months but the business moves or shuts down after 10 months, the person can transfer the lease to someone else through an assignment of the lease. In this case, they will not have to pay rent for the last two months as the new assigned tenant will be responsible for that.

However, before the original tenant can be released of any responsibilities associated with the lease, other requirements need to be satisfied. The landlord needs to consent to the lease transfer through a “License to Assign” document. It is crucial to complete this document before moving on to the assignment of lease as the landlord may refuse to approve the assignment.

Difference Between Assignment of Lease and Subletting

A transfer of the remaining interest in a lease, also known as assignment, is possible when implied rights to assign exist. Some leases do not allow assignment or sharing of possessions or property under a lease. An assignment ensures the complete transfer of the rights to the property from one tenant to another.

The assignor is no longer responsible for rent or utilities and other costs that they might have had under the lease. Here, the assignee becomes the tenant and takes over all responsibilities such as rent. However, unless the assignee is released of all liabilities by the landlord, they remain responsible if the new tenant defaults.

A sublease is a new lease agreement between the tenant (or the sublessor) and a third-party (or the sublessee) for a portion of the lease. The original lease agreement between the landlord and the sublessor (or original tenant) still remains in place. The original tenant still remains responsible for all duties set under the lease.

Here are some key differences between subletting and assigning a lease:

• Under a sublease, the original lease agreement still remains in place.
• The original tenant retains all responsibilities under a sublease agreement.
• A sublease can be for less than all of the property, such as for a room, general area, portion of the leased premises, etc.
• Subleasing can be for a portion of the lease term. For instance, a tenant can sublease the property for a month and then retain it after the third-party completes their month-long sublet.
• Since the sublease agreement is between the tenant and the third-party, rent is often negotiable, based on the term of the sublease and other circumstances.
• The third-party in a sublease agreement does not have a direct relationship with the landlord.
• The subtenant will need to seek consent of both the tenant and the landlord to make any repairs or changes to the property during their sublease.

Here is more on an assignment of lease here .

Nicholas M.

Parties Involved in Lease Assignment

There are three parties involved in a lease assignment – the landlord or owner of the property, the assignor and the assignee. The original lease agreement is between the landlord and the tenant, or the assignor. The lease agreement outlines the duties and responsibilities of both parties when it comes to renting the property. Now, when the tenant decides to assign the lease to a third-party, the third-party is known as the assignee. The assignee takes on the responsibilities laid under the original lease agreement between the assignor and the landlord. The landlord must consent to the assignment of the lease prior to the assignment.

For example, Jake is renting a commercial property for his business from Paul for two years beginning January 2013 up until January 2015. In January 2014, Jake suffers a financial crisis and has to close down his business to move to a different city. Jake doesn’t want to continue paying rent on the property as he will not be using it for a year left of the lease. Jake’s friend, John would soon be turning his digital business into a brick-and-mortar store. John has been looking for a space to kick start his venture. Jake can assign his space for the rest of the lease term to John through an assignment of lease. Jake will need to seek the approval of his landlord and then begin the assignment process. Here, Jake will be the assignor who transfers all his lease related duties and responsibilities to John, who will be the assignee.

You can read more on lease agreements here .

Image via Pexels by RODNAE

Assignment of Lease From Seller to Buyer

In case of a residential property, a landlord can assign his leases to the new buyer of the building. The landlord will assign the right to collect rent to the buyer. This will allow the buyer to collect any and all rent from existing tenants in that property. This assignment can also include the assignment of security deposits, if the parties agree to it. This type of assignment provides protection to the buyer so they can collect rent on the property.

The assignment of a lease from the seller to a buyer also requires that all tenants are made aware of the sale of the property. The buyer-seller should give proper notice to the tenants along with a notice of assignment of lease signed by both the buyer and the seller. Tenants should also be informed about the contact information of the new landlord and the payment methods to be used to pay rent to the new landlord.

You can read more on buyer-seller lease assignments here .

Get Help with an Assignment of Lease

Do you have any questions about a lease assignment and want to speak to an expert? Post a project today on ContractsCounsel and receive bids from real estate lawyers who specialize in lease assignment.

Meet some of our Assignment of Lease Lawyers

Emmanuel K.

I am a corporate Attorney licensed in the state of Georgia and Ghana. My professional career started in 2016 as a litigator in a private law firm in Ghana. Subsequently in 2018, I moved in house to work for the University of Ghana and this is where my corporate transactional work experience began. Since coming to the US in 2019, I have gained significant transactional experience through internships at Verizon and Tricentis (a software testing company) during law school at UGA. Since graduating from UGA law school, I have worked as a corporate transactional attorney of an AmLaw 200 firm. In that role, I helped foreign companies entering the US market to establish a presence and comply with applicable corporate laws while doing business. I also assisted customers and service providers in the software and technology industry by reviewing SaaS and similar contracts. Also, I helped energy utilities in the renewable energy space navigate regulatory and policy issues and establish contractual business relationships through contract reviews.

Merry Kogut is a licensed attorney based in Washington State who has been a legal expert on JustAnswer since 2008 specializing in employment law, consumer protection and discrimination issues. She has been an attorney handling WA State phone consultations for Arag Legal Insurance since April, 2023. She has also been an attorney in private practice since 1986, and was in-house legal counsel for multiple WA State government agencies. She brings nearly 50 years combined legal and professional writing experience. Earlier in her career, Merry served as a law clerk for the Washington State Court of Appeals, and as a discrimination specialist, investigator and legislative liaison. She also helped establish the “Legal Writing Institute,” a national association of legal writing instructors and administrators. Merry earned her law degree from the Seattle University (formerly University of Puget Sound) School of Law.

Mr. McElvenny has extensive experience handling and developing strategy for complex commercial and real estate cases. He’s drafted hundreds of complaints ranging from simple breaches of contract to complex commercial claims including breach of fiduciary duty, constructive trusts and misappropriation of trade secrets. He has an excellent record in trial, arbitration and mediation. He also has significant experience in motion practice in both state and federal court. Through his work in corporate law, Mr. McElvenny has developed considerable experience with Limited Liability Company member disputes and general corporate governance. He’s drafted a number of industry-specific documents such as Operating Agreements (for Limited Liability Companies), commercial leases, settlement agreements and employment contracts. Mr. McElvenny has also represented criminal defendants in felony matters and assisted in the defense of civil matters arising from alleged SEC violations. He has represented individuals appearing before the Illinois Department of Professional Regulation as a result of SEC proceedings. After graduating with a B.A. in Philosophy, Mr. McElvenny proceeded from Loyola University-Chicago to DePaul University College of Law, receiving his JD from that institution in 2002. In 2010, he earned his Master’s of Science in Accounting from Loyola University-Chicago’s Graduate School of Business. Mr. McElvenny was selected to Illinois’ Super Lawyers Rising Stars in 2010, 2012 and 2013.

Marykaren R.

I provide legal advice and guidance on complex privacy laws and regulations including: Privacy Policies, incident response & state data breach notification laws, privacy risk and risk assessments, PIAs/DPIAs, contracts, and policies and procedures to help build consumer trust and ensure compliance. I am successful by encouraging collaboration with stakeholders to ensure a successful and sustainable program.

Led by Tamla N. Lloyd, Esquire, our firm prioritizes a client-centered approach and aim to provide comprehensive, personalized services to help clients achieve their legal goals.

Born and raised in St. Louis, MO. Bachelors Degree from the University of Iowa. Masters Degree from the University of Melbourne. J.D. from the University of Kansas. Licensed to practice law in Missouri and Kansas. Tennessee currently pending.

I graduated from Wayne State University in 1992 and was admitted to practice in Michigan the same year. I've been practicing in Traverse City since 1993. My goal is for clients to feel that I am accessible and prompt, while providing quality and affordable legal services.

Find the best lawyer for your project

Real estate lawyers by top cities.

• Austin Real Estate Lawyers
• Boston Real Estate Lawyers
• Chicago Real Estate Lawyers
• Dallas Real Estate Lawyers
• Denver Real Estate Lawyers
• Houston Real Estate Lawyers
• Los Angeles Real Estate Lawyers
• New York Real Estate Lawyers
• Phoenix Real Estate Lawyers
• San Diego Real Estate Lawyers
• Tampa Real Estate Lawyers

Assignment of Lease lawyers by city

• Austin Assignment of Lease Lawyers
• Boston Assignment of Lease Lawyers
• Chicago Assignment of Lease Lawyers
• Dallas Assignment of Lease Lawyers
• Denver Assignment of Lease Lawyers
• Houston Assignment of Lease Lawyers
• Los Angeles Assignment of Lease Lawyers
• New York Assignment of Lease Lawyers
• Phoenix Assignment of Lease Lawyers
• San Diego Assignment of Lease Lawyers
• Tampa Assignment of Lease Lawyers

related contracts

• Addendum to Lease
• ALTA Statement
• Apartment Lease
• Apartment Rental Agreement
• Boundary Line Agreement
• Brokerage Agreement
• Building Contract
• Building Lease
• Buyer Agency Agreement
• Buyer Broker Agreement

other helpful articles

• How much does it cost to draft a contract?
• Do Contract Lawyers Use Templates?
• How do Contract Lawyers charge?
• Business Contract Lawyers: How Can They Help?
• What to look for when hiring a lawyer

Quick, user friendly and one of the better ways I've come across to get ahold of lawyers willing to take new clients.

Contracts Counsel was incredibly helpful and easy to use. I submitted a project for a lawyer's help within a day I had received over 6 proposals from qualified lawyers. I submitted a bid that works best for my business and we went forward with the project.

I never knew how difficult it was to obtain representation or a lawyer, and ContractsCounsel was EXACTLY the type of service I was hoping for when I was in a pinch. Working with their service was efficient, effective and made me feel in control. Thank you so much and should I ever need attorney services down the road, I'll certainly be a repeat customer.

I got 5 bids within 24h of posting my project. I choose the person who provided the most detailed and relevant intro letter, highlighting their experience relevant to my project. I am very satisfied with the outcome and quality of the two agreements that were produced, they actually far exceed my expectations.

How It Works

Post Your Project

Get Free Bids to Compare

Hire Your Lawyer

Want to speak to someone?

Get in touch below and we will schedule a time to connect!

Find lawyers and attorneys by city

The global body for professional accountants

• Search jobs
• Find an accountant
• Technical activities
• Help & support

Can't find your location/region listed? Please visit our global website instead

• Middle East
• Cayman Islands
• Trinidad & Tobago
• Virgin Islands (British)
• United Kingdom
• Czech Republic
• United Arab Emirates
• Saudi Arabia
• State of Palestine
• Syrian Arab Republic
• South Africa
• Africa (other)
• Hong Kong SAR of China
• New Zealand
• Apply to become an ACCA student
• Why choose to study ACCA?
• ACCA accountancy qualifications
• Getting started with ACCA
• Careers in accountancy
• ACCA Learning
• Register your interest in ACCA
• Learn why you should hire ACCA members
• Why train with ACCA?
• Recruit finance staff
• Train and develop finance talent
• Approved Employer programme
• Employer support
• Support for Approved Learning Partners
• Becoming an ACCA Approved Learning Partner
• Tutor support
• Computer-Based Exam (CBE) centres
• Content providers
• Registered Learning Partner
• Exemption accreditation
• University partnerships
• Find tuition
• Virtual classroom support for learning partners
• Find CPD resources
• Your membership
• Member networks
• AB magazine
• Sectors and industries
• Regulation and standards
• Advocacy and mentoring
• Council, elections and AGM
• Tuition and study options
• Your study options
• Study support resources
• Practical experience
• Ethics and professional skills
• Student Accountant
• Regulation and standards for students
• Completing your PER
• Finding a great supervisor
• Choosing the right objectives for you
• Regularly recording your PER
• Completing your EPSM
• Your future once qualified
• Advance e-magazine
• An introduction to professional insights
• Meet the team
• Global economics
• Professional accountants - the future
• Supporting the global profession
• Download the insights app

Can't find your location listed? Please visit our global website instead

• Capital gains tax on property leases
• Technical activities and advice

Assignment of a lease

Assignment of a long lease, assignment of a short lease, grant of a lease, grant of a long lease, grant of a short lease, acca guide to... getting out of a lease.

A property lease is basically a right to use an asset. A lease is a contract by which one party (lessor) gives the use and possession of land and building to another party (lessee) for a specific period of time, usually in return for a specific rent.

This contrasts with a licence, which entitles a person (licensee) to the use of the property, but which is subject to termination at the will of the owner of the property (licensor).

Leases usually run for many years, while licences cover a relatively short period of time (up to two years).

The key point in determining the tax treatment of a lease transaction is to establish whether there is an assignment of a lease or a grant of a lease.

An assignment of a lease is the legal term used for the sale of a lease. On assignment, the owner relinquishes rights over the property.

A grant of a lease is the creation of a new asset. The person who owns the property grants a lease to a tenant for a specific period of time; however, the rights in the property will eventually revert back to the freehold landlord.

The tax treatment on the assignment of a lease depends on whether the taxpayer is selling a long or  short lease.

A long lease is a lease that has more than 50 years to run at the date it was sold; a lease with less than 50 years to run is a short lease.

The capital gains tax (CGT) computation on the assignment of a long lease is quite straightforward; the original cost is deducted from the proceeds and the resulting gain is then subject to CGT (after the annual exemption).

The CGT computation on the assignment of a short lease is slightly more complex.

A lease with a useful life of less than 50 years is called a ‘wasting asset’. As wasting assets depreciate over time, the allowable base cost for CGT purposes is calculated using the lease depreciation tables (Schedule 8 Paragraph 1, TCGA 1992).

The allowable base cost is the original acquisition cost multiplied by the fraction S/P, where: 

• ‘S’ is the percentage from the lease depreciation table for the years of the lease remaining at the date of assignment
• ‘P’ is the percentage from the lease depreciation table for years of the lease remaining at the date of purchase. 

For example:

Sarah purchased a 42-year lease for £100,000 in January 2000. In January 2012, she sells the lease for £150,000.

As 12 years have passed since original acquisition, Sarah is selling a lease with 30 years left to run.

From the proceeds of £150,000, we deduct the allowable base cost (which is the original acquisition cost multiplied by the fraction S/P).

From the lease depreciation table, the relevant percentage for a 42-year lease is 96.593 and for a 30-year lease the relevant percentage is 87.33.

The capital gain is therefore:

Proceeds: £150,000

Allowable cost:

100,000 x 87.33/96.593 (90,410)

Gain: £59,590

A long lease will become a short lease once less than 50 years are remaining.

Louise bought a 60-year lease on 1 January 1990 for £90,000. She sells the lease on 1 January 2010 for £120,000.

As 20 years have passed since original acquisition, Louise is selling a lease with 40 years left to run.

Accordingly, Louise is selling a short lease and we need to refer to the lease depreciation tables.

The percentage for 50 years or more is always 100, and the percentage for a 40-year lease is 95.457.

Proceeds: £120,000

90,000 x 95.457/100 (85,911)

Gain: £34,089

As with the assignment of a lease the tax implication on the grant of a lease depends on the length of the lease granted.

Where a freeholder grants a long lease to a tenant, CGT is calculated by using the part-disposal formula:

The allowable cost is the acquisition cost multiplied by the fraction A/(A+B), where:

• ‘A’ is the gross amount of the premium paid
• ‘B’ is the value of the remainder or the reversionary interest. 

Rose grants a 55-year lease on a freehold property which she purchased in 2000 for £100,000.

She receives a premium of £150,000 from the leaseholder. The value of the freehold reversion is £200,000.

Premium: £150,000 

100,000 x 150,000/(150,000+200,000) (42,857)

Gain: £107,143

The premium received from the grant of a short lease must be split between the amount chargeable to income tax (under property income rule ITTOIA 2005 S 277 (4)) and the amount chargeable to CGT.

The capital element chargeable to CGT is 2 per cent x (N-1) x P, where:

• ‘N’ is the number of years of the lease
• ‘P’ is the premium received. 

The grant of a lease out of a freehold is treated as a part-disposal; accordingly, allowable cost is calculated as the acquisition cost multiplied by the fraction a/(A+B), where:

• ‘A’ is the gross premium paid
• ‘B’ is the reversionary interest
• ‘a’ is the part of the premium that is chargeable to CGT. 

Elizabeth bought a freehold property 20 years ago for £50,000. In 2010, she granted a 40-year lease for a premium of £100,000, the reversionary interest being £200,000.

We first need to split the premium of £100,000 into the amount subject to income tax and the amount subject to CGT:

The capital element is 2% x (40-1) x £100,000 = £78,000.

The amount chargeable to income tax (as property income) is the difference between the premium received and the amount charged to CGT (£100,000-£78,000 = £22,000).

The capital gain is as follows:

Capital element of the premium: £78,000

Less allowable cost:

50,000 x 78,000/(100,000+200,000) (13,000)

Gain: £65,000

The above only looks at tax implications on assigning or granting of a lease; however, there might be legal implications if the taxpayer wishes to get out of a lease agreement before the end of the term.

This guide can be downloaded from the 'Related documents' section on this page.

Related documents

Related links.

TCGA 1992: Schedule 8, Paragraph 1

Advertisement

• ACCA Careers
• ACCA Career Navigator
• ACCA Learning Community
• Your Future

Useful links

• Make a payment
• ACCA-X online courses
• ACCA Rulebook
• Work for us

Most popular

• Professional insights
• ACCA Qualification
• Member events and CPD
• Supporting Ukraine
• Past exam papers

Connect with us

Planned system updates.

• Accessibility
• Legal policies
• Data protection & cookies
• Advertising