Job Scheduling Design: Behind the Scenes of a Distributed Job Scheduler

Job Scheduling Design

Good job scheduling design is essential for orchestrating tasks and workflows efficiently. When designing a distributed job scheduler, requirements, scalability, and fault tolerance should be carefully considered. Job scheduling also happens to be a very common system design interview question.

So whether you’re preparing to actually design a distributed job scheduler or just ace an upcoming interview, this article covers tips and best practices for doing both.

How to Design a Distributed Job Scheduler

Deep dive into high-level design, the importance of system design review.

  • RunMyJobs by Redwood Task Scheduler 
  • Best Practices for Passing a System Design Interview 
  • Three Common Job Scheduling Problems 
  • Advantages & Disadvantages of Time-Based Scheduling Strategies

A distributed job scheduler involves multiple nodes working together to manage and schedule jobs across a cluster. When designing a distributed job scheduler, factors like fault tolerance, scalability, and efficient job execution should be taken into consideration.

The architecture should be designed to handle the scale and complexity that comes with job scheduling. Technologies like Kafka and message queues provide reliable communication between nodes within the distributed system.

Mechanisms for handling failures to ensure job execution will make the system fault-tolerant. These can include retry logic, job monitoring, and fault recovery methods. Job loads should be distributed evening across notes for optimal resource allocation through load balancing. Load balancing algorithms can be used to mitigate CPU issues and memory availability.

Sharding techniques can be used to partition job metadata and leverage horizontal staling in a system designed to handle a growing number of nodes and jobs. To help identify bottlenecks and avoid performance problems, teams can incorporate notifications and monitoring to track job status, job execution time, and latency.

A deep dive into high-level design of a job scheduling system includes the architecture and components involved. Some key considerations include the desired job scheduling workflow, job metadata management, how to implement a task scheduler, and defining job execution.

The workflow and steps involved for everything from job submission to execution must be defined. APIs can be used to allow job submissions from multiple sources. When designing the database, the schema is extremely important. Database management systems built on SQL and NoSQL components offer better scalability, durability, and include ACID properties.

Storing job metadata like job ID, timestamp, execution time, and dependencies will make the system more efficient and allow for more detailed tracking. The task scheduler that is implemented into the system should be able to manage resource allocation, consider load balancing, and prioritize jobs.

As part of the high-level design of the job scheduling system, mechanisms for executing jobs, including launching processes, containerization, and interacting with external systems must be defined.

Performing a system design review is crucial for scalability, efficiency, and maintainability. These reviews are essential for finding flaws, ensuring scalability and load testing, maintaining data integrity, and encouraging collaboration.

System design reviews uncover design flows, bottlenecks, and performance issues. This creates optimization of system architecture and algorithms. These reviews also make sure the system can handle failures, maintains data integrity, and provides fault-tolerant mechanisms.

Finally, this activity encourages collaboration among the team members working across the system and creates an opportunity to collect valuable feedback to improve overall quality and functionality.

RunMyJobs by Redwood Task Scheduler

Rather than designing a new job scheduling system from scratch, teams can get up and running with workload automation immediately with RunMyJobs by Redwood. Through an enterprise platform designed for scaling and growth, this task scheduler offers a variety of scheduling options. Teams can choose from recurring schedules, custom calendars, and event-driven triggers for running jobs.

Notifications and alerts can be set-up for job status updates and failures so tasks can be easily monitored. Redwood’s SaaS-based architecture makes it possible to set flexible load balancers and process priorities across applications. Features include the ability to control servers and run scripts with self-updating agents for Windows, Linux, macOS, and more.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are some best practices for passing a system design interview at amazon.

To excel in a system design interview at Amazon/AWS, LinkedIn or any other company, consider the following best practices:

  • Understand the problem requirements and constraints. 
  • Break down the system into components while considering scalability, fault tolerance, and data management. 
  • Consider tradeoffs and justify design decisions based on system needs. 
  • Study distributed systems, databases, caching, and networking concepts. 
  • Prioritize non-functional requirements like performance, latency, and durability.

These best practices will help prepare for any system design interview question that comes up. 

Redwood’s resource library has hundreds of resources from videos to whitepapers that can help prepare for design system interviews .

What are the three job scheduling problems?

When it comes to job scheduling, there are a number of complications that can arise based on factors like dependencies, resources, workflow requirements, and more. Three of the most common scheduling problems are outlined below.

  • Precedence constraints and dependencies : Some jobs are depending on other jobs and must be executed in a specific order. In this use case, if one job fails, it puts the entire workflow to a halt.
  • Resource allocation : Jobs require specific resources like CPU, memory, networking availability, and more. Performance issues and workflow disruptions can happen when resources aren’t allocated appropriately among jobs.
  • Scheduling optimization : Optimal scheduling minimizes job completion time, helps spread resource utilizations as needed, and reduces latency. Achieving this balance requires complex algorithms and heuristics.

See how RunMyJobs by Redwood helps teams avoid common job scheduling problems .

What are some of the advantages and disadvantages of a time-based scheduling strategy?

Some advantages of a time-based scheduling strategy include simplicity and predictability. It’s straightforward to implement and understand, and because jobs are scheduled on fixed-time intervals, it’s easier to predict execution.

Disadvantages of a time-based scheduling strategy is the potential for a lack of flexibility and efficiency. Time-based schedules often don't account for variations in workload or priorities, and jobs that are idle during periods of low activity can needlessly use resources.

Learn about another scheduling strategy, cron jobs, and how it compares with using RunMyJobs by Redwood .

  • Business Process Automation
  • Managed File Transfer
  • Report Distribution
  • DevOps Automation
  • Data Warehouse Management
  • Security Management
  • Application Management
  • Incident Management
  • Infrastructure Management
  • Record To Report
  • Asset Accounting
  • Procure To Pay Software
  • Order to Cash

Automate Any Process, Anywhere.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved

  • Terms of Service

database design for task scheduler

Your Privacy

Strictly necessary cookies, performance cookies, targeting cookies.

More Information

Cookie Preference Center

Always Active

Google Tag Manager

Redwood Form Autofill

Google Analytics

Google / DoubleClick

SOLUTION LOGIN

(WORKLOAD AUTOMATION)

ON-PREMISE SUPPORT LOGIN

Cloud support login.

A new Portal account can be requested by a colleague with access to the Support Portal. Please ask him/her to create a Portal Account Request. If you have questions or if assistance is needed, please contact support .

Or already have an account:

A Deep Dive into Job Scheduling Design & System Design

Take a deep dive into job scheduling design and learn about API and database design. Job scheduling is one of the most common system design interview questions.

database design for task scheduler

System design is a critical process that encompasses decision-making regarding many aspects of how the system operates and functions. Within the realm of system design, job scheduling plays a vital role in efficiently managing and executing tasks.

This article explores the intricacies of system and job scheduling design, including high-level design elements like database design, API design, and system architecture.

What is system design?

System design is the process of defining the architecture, components, interfaces, and behavior of a system to meet specific requirements. This process involves making decisions about the organization and structure of the system, including hardware, software, networks, databases, and user interfaces.

The goal of system design is to create a blueprint to guide the development and implementation of the system and ensure it meets desired functionality and performance objectives. Scalability, reliability, security, performance, and maintainability are all important aspects that drive the design process. Designing a job scheduling tool is a common system design interview question.

Designing a Distributed Job Scheduler

When designing a distributed job scheduler, the system requirements are related to the creation, scheduling, and execution of jobs. As a baseline, a series of both functional and non-functional requirements should guide the design process.

Functional Requirements

  • Jobs can be created to run at specific times or intervals. 
  • Jobs can be updated and deleted. 
  • The priority of a job can be specified to resolve conflicts for jobs with the same start time. 
  • Jobs can run asynchronously. 

Non-functional Requirements  

  • Durability: Jobs and related status information will not get lost due to system failures. 
  • Reliability: Jobs should be completed or status information updated with appropriate details. Jobs should run at their specific times or intervals.   
  • Availability: It is always possible to create new jobs, update existing jobs, and query job status. 
  • Scalability: Jobs can be added without compromising the reliability or availability of the job scheduling system.  

Other design system requirements that are neither functional or non-funtional include those related to traffic, CPU, memory, and throughput. These requirements define the number of jobs that can be created per day, number of jobs that can run at the same time, length of job, and size requirements. For example, if a job can run at a max of five minutes, the distributed system is highly CPU bound. 

High-Level Design of a Task Scheduler

In addition to defining the requirements of the system, the design of other foundational elements should be thought through. The high-level design of a job scheduling system involves database design, API design, task scheduler and task runner design, and system architecture. 

Database Design  

In the database design of a distributed task scheduler, the access pattern of the application will determine the schema. This will involve requests that hit the database related read and write operations.

Examples of a read operation request can include retrieving all jobs associated with a given user ID; retrieving job execution history for a job ID;  and finding all running jobs at a given point in time. Examples of write operation requests can include creating or deleting new jobs; adding job execution history to the database; and updating the execution time of a job in the system after the job is complete.

As part of the database design, schema can be used to define a job table to keep track of job metadata like owners, execution time intervals, and retry policies. In this use case, User ID can be used as the partition key, and the Job ID can be used as the sort key. 

If complex queries are not in use, shards of both SQL and NoSQL (Cassandra) databases will suffice to handle system requirements. In the case of using a distributed queue and MySQL, whenever a job is submitted, it can be pushed to a Kafka queue. MySQL is beneficial because it has ACID properties that allow transactions and row-based locking. 

For API design of a distributed system, a single machine is not advised because it creates a single point of failure. Setting up multiple replicas of an API server requires a load balancer. The load balancer uses a round-robin algorithm to intelligently distribute requests. 

Task Scheduler and Task Runner Design 

Optimal system design of a job scheduler breaks up the task runner and scheduler into separate components to allow for better functionality and scalability.

The task scheduler should be set to run a query into the database for all jobs due at a specific timestamp. Then, all due jobs should be enqueued to a distributed message queue in a first-in-first-out manner. 

The task runner should be set to fetch messages from the message queue. Each message contains the job ID and URL used for updating the job status on the database. 

System Architecture

If the foundation for the job scheduler has been set with database design schema and API calls, there are some service-related design system review items to keep in mind. These include web service, scheduling service, and execution service design.

For further design system optimization, a caching layer can be added by using in-memory cache or Redis. Using a daemon to populate the cache consistently will reduce the load on the database. 

ActiveBatch Job Scheduling Tool 

Instead of designing a disturbing job scheduling tool from scratch, teams can use ActiveBatch’s cross-platform software to automate and orchestrate diverse systems and processes. Minimize manual efforts with event triggers to handle daily tasks like file transfer, data modifications, and sending email notifications. ActiveBatch supports countless integrations with cloud vendors like Amazon (AWS) EC2, Microsoft Azure, and more. Workflow orchestration and optimization capabilities enable teams to automate, integrate, and monitor multiple technologies from a single point of control.

Frequently Asked Questions

In job scheduling, it’s common to use an algorithm to determine the order in which jobs are executed based on inputted criteria. The three most common methods for job scheduling are:  1. First-Come, First-Served (FCFS) : Jobs are scheduled and executed in the order they arrive. The job scheduler maintains a queue of incoming jobs, and the first job in the queue is executed first. FCFS is a non-preemptive scheduling algorithm, meaning once a job starts executing, it continues until completion, even if a higher priority job becomes available. 2. Shortest Job First (SJF) : Jobs are scheduled based on estimated execution time. The scheduler prioritizes jobs with the shortest expected execution time and executes them first. SJF can be either non-preemptive or preemptive. Non-preemptive SJF scheduling completes a job once it starts, while preemptive SJF scheduling can interrupt an ongoing job if a shorter job becomes available. 3. Priority : In this job scheduling method, priorities are assigned to each job and then jobs are scheduled based on those priority levels. Priority scheduling can be either non-preemptive or preemptive. Compare ActiveBatch with other job scheduling methods, like Cron job, and see why teams prefer our modern task scheduling tools .

Batch processing focuses on executing a collection of jobs in a non-interactive manner, while interactive processing emphasizes real-time or near real-time user interaction with the job scheduling system to initiate and execute tasks on demand. With batch processing, jobs are usually submitted in advance and processed in a sequential or parallel manner without user interaction. The input and output data is predefined and stored in files or databases. Batch processing can be particularly useful for large-scale data processing, running overnight backups, generating reports, and performing complex calculations. With interactive processing, users provide input and receive immediate feedback from the job scheduling system, and jobs are initiated and executed on demand based on real-time user input or requests. The output data is displayed directly to the user during the session. Interactive processing can be a good method for interactive applications, user interfaces, and other online solutions that require immediate user interaction and feedback, like a chat bot or messaging platform. See how teams manage critical business and IT jobs with ActiveBatch’s batch scheduler .

'  data-srcset=

Editorial Staff

Let us know what you thought about this post., automate with confidence.

Orchestrate everything from day-to-day operations to innovative use cases with reliable, extensible automation

Request a Demo

LinkedIn

System Design: The Distributed Task Scheduler

Learn about the basics of designing a distributed task scheduler.

When to use a task scheduler

Distributed task scheduling, how will we design a task scheduling system.

A task is a piece of computational work that requires resources (CPU time, memory, storage, network bandwidth, and so on) for some specified time. For example, uploading a photo or a video on Facebook or Instagram consists of the following background tasks:

  • Encode the photo or video in multiple resolutions.
  • Validate the photo or video to check for content monetization Content monetization is a way of leveraging content so that a service can profit from it as users consume it. copyrights, and many more.

The successful execution of all the above tasks makes the photo or video visible. However, a photo and video uploader does not need to stop the above tasks to complete.

Another example is when we post a comment on Facebook. We don’t hold the comment poster until that comment is delivered to all the followers. That delivery is delegated to an asynchronous task scheduler to do offline.

In a system, many tasks contend for limited computational resources. A system that mediates between tasks and resources by intelligently allocating resources to tasks so that task-level and system-level goals are met is called a task scheduler .

A task scheduler is a critical component of a system for getting work done efficiently. It allows us to complete a large number of tasks using limited resources. It also aids in fully utilizing the system’s resources, provides users with an uninterrupted execution experience Running periodic tasks without user intervention to initiate the task execution again and again. , and so on. The following are some of the use cases of task scheduling:

Single-OS-based node: It has many processes or tasks that contend for the node’s limited computational resources. So, we could use a local OS task scheduler that efficiently allocates resources to the tasks. It uses multi-feedback queues to pick some tasks and runs them on some processor.

Cloud computing services: Where there are many distributed resources and various tasks from multiple tenants, there is a strong need for a task scheduler to utilize cloud computing resources efficiently and meet tenants’ demands. A local OS task scheduler isn’t sufficient for this purpose because the tasks are in the billions, the source of the tasks is not single, and the resources to manage are not in a single machine. We have to go for a distributed solution.

Large distributed systems: In this system, many tasks run in the background against a single request by a user. Consider that there are millions to billions of users of a popular system like Facebook, WhatsApp, or Instagram. These systems require a task scheduler to handle billions of tasks. Facebook schedules its tasks against billions of parallel asynchronous requests Asynchronous requests are those that are not on a client’s critical path and often have some delay tolerance. Users request these tasks, and the system completes the tasks while the requester does not need to wait for the completion of the work. Notifications about the final state of the task are communicated to the requester some time in the future. by its users using Async.

Note: Async is Facebook’s own distributed task scheduler that schedules all its tasks. Some tasks are more time-sensitive, like the tasks that should run to notify the users that the livestream of an event has started. It would be pointless if the users received a notification about the livestream after it had finished. Some tasks can be delayed, like tasks that make friend suggestions to users. Async schedules tasks based on appropriate priorities.

The process of deciding and assigning resources to the tasks in a timely manner is called task scheduling . The visual difference between an OS-level task scheduler and a data center-level task scheduler is shown in the following illustration:

The OS task scheduler schedules a node’s local tasks or processes on that node’s computational resources. At the same time, the data center’s task scheduler schedules billions of tasks coming from multiple tenants that use the data center’s resources.

Our goal is to design a task scheduler similar to the data center-level task scheduler where the following is considered:

  • Tasks will come from many different sources, tenants, and sub-systems.
  • Many resources will be dispersed in a data center (or maybe across many data centers).

The above two requirements make the task scheduling problem challenging. We’ll design a distributed task scheduler that can handle all these tasks by making it scalable, reliable, and fault-tolerant.

We have divided the design of the task scheduler into four lessons:

  • Requirements: We’ll identify the functional and non-functional requirements of a task scheduling system in this lesson.
  • Design: This lesson will discuss the system design of our task scheduling system and explores the components of the system and database schema.
  • Design considerations: In this lesson, we’ll highlight some design factors, such as task prioritization, resource optimization, and so on.
  • Evaluation: We’ll evaluate our design of task scheduler based on our requirements.

Let’s start by understanding the requirements of a task scheduling system.

database design for task scheduler

Building a Distributed Task Scheduler in Go

System design & implementation.

database design for task scheduler

Introduction

In this issue, we’ll discuss how we can design a distributed task scheduler, the motivation behind designing such a system, and then implement the same using Go.

You can find the complete code that we’ll be working towards on my github .

The system we talk about here is inspired by Reliable Cron Across the Planet , which is a research article by folks at Google, as well as the insights I picked up in Arpit Bhayani’s System Design Masterclass (which I highly recommend.)

Task Scheduling

Task scheduling is a common and widely needed use case, and every unix machine has a system utility to aid with it. This utility is called Cron and it’s used to run user and system-defined tasks at scheduled times (and intervals).

crond is a singular component that enables cron to do its job - this is a daemon that loads the list of scheduled cron jobs, sorted based on their next execution time. The daemon waits until the first item is scheduled to be executed - which is when it launches the given job, calculates the next time to launch them, and waits until the next scheduled time.

Why are we complicating cron?

Reliability.

It’s easy to see the reliability issues with cron -  its operation is confined to a single machine responsible for running the scheduler. Consequently, if the machine is offline, the scheduler is inactive, leading to a halt in the execution of scheduled tasks.

Failure Modes

Diving deeper into the failure modes, let us see the kinds of tasks for which one might want to use a scheduler. Some of these tasks can be idempotent, which means in the event of a malfunction it is safe to execute them multiple times.

For example, repeatedly running a job to retrieve the current weather poses no significant issue. On the other hand, certain tasks, like dispatching bulk notifications or processing employee payroll, are sensitive to duplication and should ideally be executed only once.

Similarly, it’s probably okay to skip launching certain jobs in the event of failures - such as updating a weather widget on your laptop every 15 minutes, however, it’s not acceptable to skip the job to process employee payroll that is scheduled to run once every month.

We're immediately confronted with the first trade-off we need to make: should we risk skipping a job or risk executing the same job multiple times ? For a lot of use cases, it may make more sense to favor skipping launches over risking duplicate executions. The reasoning behind this choice is straightforward. Setting up monitoring systems to detect skipped or failed launches is typically simpler and more effective than rectifying the consequences of a job that runs multiple times. For instance, reversing the effects of disbursing employee salaries twice or sending a newsletter email multiple times can be complex, if not impossible, in some cases.

For the sake of simplicity, we’ll try to strike a balance between the two options . We will launch any tasks that may have been scheduled to run at a given time or in the past, while also attempting to ensure that the same tasks are not dispatched multiple times during an execution run. Such systems can have extremely sophisticated edge cases and we won’t attempt to handle every single one.

Distributed Cron

To tackle the reliability issues with running cron on a single machine, let’s discuss how we may want to make the application distributed.

A core component of cron is the cron table - which manages the state of the system. The scheduler references this table to decide which task needs to be executed at a given moment. This state is one of the critical aspects of the system that needs to persist across system restarts and failovers. You can go one of two ways to store this state:

Store the state externally in externally distributed storage (eg. HDFS)

Distributed, and therefore reliable.

Optimized for large files (while cron needs to store very small files, which are expensive to write and have high latency).

Introduces an external dependency to a system that may need to be highly available. In case the cron service is a core part of the infra, one should prioritize minimal external dependencies.

Store the state within the cron nodes itself

Need to manage state consensus.

The core system state is not stored in an external dependency.

Storage can be highly optimized for the use case.

More complicated to implement.

While option 2 may make more sense at Google’s scale and SLAs, option 1 is simpler to implement. We’ll be following an approach similar to option 1, by using Postgres to manage the state for our scheduler.

Designing a Distributed Task Scheduler

We'll start from the user's initial interaction and build out the components incrementally. Here's how the system can be structured:

For this design, let’s assume that a task that a user submits has the following information:

A string representing the command or script the worker node should execute.

The time at which the task is supposed to be executed.

Optionally, the user can set up recurring tasks, but let’s not care about that at this stage - since recurring tasks are nothing but regular tasks scheduled multiple times.

When a user submits a task to the system, we need to store it in whatever storage system our scheduler is using for state management. We’ll be using Postgres, however, the exact database you use does not matter, as long as it provides certain levels of guarantees that we expect from the system (which we will soon discuss).

Database Schema Design

Any task that the user submits should be stored inside our Tasks table. The table stores the following information: uniquely identifies a scheduled task in the system.

Command (string) : command that needs to be run to execute the task, this is submitted by the user.

scheduled_at (unix timestamp) : When the command should be executed.

Further, you may be tempted to store the Status of the task in this table, which would tell us whether the task is queued , in-progress , completed , or failed . However, that introduces a problem. What if the machine that is executing our task (and is supposed to inform us of the task completion) crashes? The status in the table would become inconsistent.

Instead, we’ll adopt a more detailed tracking approach.

Execution Phases Timestamps

For each task, we'll store timestamps for different execution phases (e.g., picked_at (when the task is picked up for execution), started_at (when the worker node started executing the task), completed_at (when the task is completed), failed_at (when the task failed). This approach offers several benefits:

Status Derivation : The current status of each task can be derived from these timestamps. For example, if a task has a 'started_at' but no 'completed_at' timestamp, it's in progress.

System Health and Load Insights : By analyzing the timestamps, we can gauge system performance and load, understanding how long tasks are in the queue, execution times, and if there are any unusual delays.

Recovery and Redundancy : In case of crashes, this detailed historical record allows the system to determine what was happening at the time of failure and take appropriate recovery actions, such as rescheduling tasks or alerting administrators.

database design for task scheduler

With this, we have built the scheduling components of our system.

database design for task scheduler

Task Picking

In a distributed task scheduler, effectively managing task execution is crucial. We face a significant challenge: How to handle potentially thousands of tasks scheduled at the same time without overwhelming the database with requests or causing execution conflicts.

Challenges and Considerations

Independent Worker Fetching Drawback : Initially, one might consider allowing workers to independently fetch tasks from the database. However, this approach is prone to causing excessive concurrent connections and overwhelming the database in a large-scale environment.

Need for a Coordinated Approach : To address the limitations of independent fetching, we introduce a coordinator. This component is responsible for picking tasks currently scheduled for execution and delegating them to workers.

Implementing Coordinator-Led Task Assignment

The coordinator will fire queries on the database every few seconds to pick the tasks currently scheduled for execution. Let’s see what such a database query may look like. The coordinator will start a transaction, and fire the following SELECT query.

The above SQL query fetches all the tasks that are scheduled to be executed before the next 30 seconds and have not yet been executed.

For this query to work, every time the coordinator picks a task for execution, it must update the picked_at field. We can fire the following UPDATE query as a part of the overall transaction for each task that we pick:

Remember, the coordinator should be a distributed service, so that it can scale up based on the load on the system. This would mean if multiple coordinators fire this query on the database at the same time, they will end up picking the same tasks - causing multiple executions. To deal with this, each coordinator needs to lock the rows that it is working on.

We can make use of the FOR UPDATE clause to take an exclusive lock on the rows that each coordinator is working on. This means, that the transactions started by the other coordinators won’t be able to select these rows while the current coordinator is operating on them.

There is still one problem with this query. Say 10 different coordinators fire the select query at the same time, each of them will try to pick up the top 10 tasks that are scheduled for execution. However, only one of them will be able to acquire a lock on these 10 rows. This means the rest of the 9 coordinators will end up blocking in contention over the same 10 rows that the first coordinator is already processing.

The SKIP LOCKED clause is introduced to prevent coordinators from blocking each other over the same tasks. This allows each coordinator to bypass tasks already locked by others, ensuring smooth and efficient task distribution.

Once a coordinator has selected a bunch of tasks, it can start delegating them to the workers in its worker pool.

The execution phase is straightforward. Workers remain on standby, awaiting tasks from the coordinator. The workers maintain an internal pool of threads to execute the tasks they receive. Any tasks sent to the workers get added into a thread-safe channel from where the threads can pick up these tasks.

The moment a task is assigned, they begin execution. They promptly notify the coordinator upon starting a task, enabling it to update the task's status in the database accordingly. Likewise, upon task completion or failure, the workers communicate the outcome back to the coordinator for a further update.

Therefore, our system ends up as follows

database design for task scheduler

Implementation

It’s hard to discuss code in a newsletter, so I decided to go over the implementation on my YouTube channel. You can check it out here:

Subscribe to the YouTube Channel

In this article we discussed the design of a distributed task scheduler, offering a way to overcome the limitations of regular cron. We explored key concepts like task scheduling with detailed timestamps, and task picking with efficient locking strategies. Finally, we went over the code to understand how you can build such a system in Go.

database design for task scheduler

Ready for more?

Database design for Daily, Weekly, Monthly and adhoc tasks

#EDIT - Sorry about the formatting not sure how to create a neat table in the post…

I am struggling to come up with an efficient database design to hold information about schedules of tasks to be performed. Note: these are not CRON tasks but I will produce automated reminders for users to complete tasks.

Examples of What I need to store:

  • Task1 to be completed every Day by 18:00
  • Task2 to be completed every Monday by 15:00
  • Task3 to be completed on the 1st of Each Month by 20:00
  • Task4 ad hoc one off task to be completed on the 18th Feb 2013 by 23:00
  • Task5 Weekly Task to be completed every Saturday by 12:00
  • Task6 Monthly Task to be completed on the 20th of each month by 11:00

My Idea which I am sure is not the best so any thoughts would be appreciated:

Logic would be: Frequency = Daily, Week, Month day_no = weekly - 1-7 or monthly 1-31 (probably limit to 28 so that tasks can not recur on days that don’t exist in a month.) interval = so that we can do every 2 days adhoc = to schedule a one off task

Days of the week = Mon=1, Tue=2, Wed=3 etc adhoc date would be in mysql format

I just feel a little uneasy about the design and i am sure there must be a better way.

I started by storing a number of seconds between occurrences, but then Months were thrown into the mix which blew that idea, otherwise it would be simple Start_TimeStamp | Interval_seconds where we would then have no need for complete by etc

Any thoughts would be gratefully accepted

Matt Houldsworth

This is an interesting idea. Quick google brought up this guy who had the same idea:

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/12089431/database-table-design-for-scheduling-tasks

His checked answer is how I started to think through it… Multiple tables, 1 for each type of schedule. I find the metaData schema posted in there insteresting though, and I’m looking through it a bit more: http://static.springsource.org/spring-batch/reference/html/metaDataSchema.html

Thanks, I have seen both of those, although I thought that started to get messy with the multiple tables but perhaps more manageable?

I am also monitoring this thread http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14412527/design-option-for-recurring-tasks

which seems a nice solution although his query is MsSQL rather than MySQL so I would have to see if I could do a similar query in MySQL

I don’t think its messy at all as long as you have the proper handling on the application layer for it.

Creating the database for schedulers

Each scheduler requires a database in which to store its persistent information. Schedulers use this database for storing tasks and then running them. The choice of database and location should be determined by the application developer and server administrator.

Before you begin

Scheduler performance is ultimately limited by database performance. If you need more tasks per second, you can run the scheduler daemons on larger systems, use clusters for the session beans used by the tasks or partition the tasks by using multiple schedulers. Eventually, however, the scheduler database becomes saturated, and a larger or better-tuned database system is needed. For detailed information on scheduler topologies refer to the WebSphere® Enterprise Scheduler planning and administration guide technical paper.

Multiple schedulers can share a database when you specify unique table prefix values in each scheduler configuration. This sharing can reduce the cost of administering scheduler databases. However, do not configure schedulers with non-unique table prefixes such that two separate servers share the same database table. A lease occurs between a specific database table and a scheduler running on a server. This lease allows one server at a time to own the lease to a specific database table. This process exists to ensure that one server runs schedule events, such as Enterprise JavaBeans (EJB) timers, in a cluster environment. If the server with this lease is unavailable, another server in the cluster obtains the lease.

About this task

  • Create a database. To create the database for a scheduler or to determine if an existing database is adequate for a scheduler, review the Create scheduler databases topic.
  • Create tables for schedulers using the administrative console. Use the administrative console to add, delete and verify database tables through your Web browser. This method is ideal for developers and simple scheduler topologies.

Use JMX to add, delete and verify database tables programmatically with Java™ or scripting. This method is ideal for automating scheduler configurations for simple scheduler topologies.

  • Create tables for schedulers using DDL files. Manually edit the DDL files using your favorite text editor, and verify that mapping between the table names and the scheduler resources and data sources is correct.

IMAGES

  1. Design a Job Scheduler

    database design for task scheduler

  2. 7+ Free Task Scheduler Template

    database design for task scheduler

  3. database design for task scheduler

    database design for task scheduler

  4. Understanding the Task Scheduler Architecture

    database design for task scheduler

  5. Enhanced Task Management Database Template

    database design for task scheduler

  6. How to create an automated Task using Task Scheduler in Windows 11/10

    database design for task scheduler

VIDEO

  1. فانتسي القبس مع مساعد الفوزان الحلقة 11

  2. How to automate and schedule the maintenance task in MSSQL server with out any coding & Script

  3. Atlassian Interview Question

  4. Sql DBA Day to Day Tasks Videos Available || Contact 9902590140

  5. DATABASE FINAL PROJECT

  6. Database Design and Optimization with SQL: Analytics Corper Workshop Day

COMMENTS

  1. Database table design for scheduling tasks

    In Java there are for example Quartz or a library I wrote myself, db-scheduler. db-scheduler is easily embeddable, and has out-of-the-box support for tasks on a recurring schedule (fixed duration, daily, etc).

  2. Design a Distributed Job Scheduler for Millions of Tasks in Daily

    diagram-5: db-schema-design-4: task-schedule-table-optimized We converted next_execution_time to a UNIX timestamp with minute-level granularity and marked it as a partition key .job_id field also ...

  3. How do I design a database for a resource scheduling and allocation

    I have two entities: Resource and Project.A Project runs for a certain amount of time (in calendar days), and I need to allocate several Resources to it (allocation interval - 1 work day, not an hourly basis).. Now if I create two tables (resource and project), how do I achieve this?How should the tables be designed? Do I create a new entry for every day and resource?

  4. Job Scheduling Design: Behind the Scenes of a Distributed Job Scheduler

    A distributed job scheduler involves multiple nodes working together to manage and schedule jobs across a cluster. When designing a distributed job scheduler, factors like fault tolerance, scalability, and efficient job execution should be taken into consideration. The architecture should be designed to handle the scale and complexity that ...

  5. Ace the System Design Interview: Job Scheduling System

    Jan 15, 2022 23 1. Introduction When a limit-sell order or some code is scheduled to run in the future, you need a piece of software like Apache Airflow that runs tasks when certain conditions are met. Because of its wide popularity in the industry, job scheduler has been among the top topics of system design interviews.

  6. sql server

    First, I would use the following schema: EmailTaskSchedule: ID EmailTemplateID Enabled RecurranceSpecification [JSON] EmailTaskEvents ID EmailTaskScheduleID

  7. A Deep Dive into Job Scheduling Design & System Design

    The high-level design of a job scheduling system involves database design, API design, task scheduler and task runner design, and system architecture. Database Design In the database design of a distributed task scheduler, the access pattern of the application will determine the schema.

  8. System Design: The Distributed Task Scheduler

    A system that mediates between tasks and resources by intelligently allocating resources to tasks so that task-level and system-level goals are met is called a task scheduler. When to use a task scheduler A task scheduler is a critical component of a system for getting work done efficiently.

  9. Design a distributed job scheduler (KISS Interview series)

    The purpose of this post is to design a simple yet scalable job scheduling system. Problem Statement. Design a job scheduler that runs jobs at a scheduled interval. Requirement. Functional requirement

  10. Building a Distributed Task Scheduler in Go

    Database Schema Design. Any task that the user submits should be stored inside our Tasks table. The table stores the following information: uniquely identifies a scheduled task in the system. ... In this article we discussed the design of a distributed task scheduler, offering a way to overcome the limitations of regular cron. We explored key ...

  11. Cloud Massive Task Scheduling System Database Design

    Massive Task Scheduling Database Design. Cloud task scheduling has the following features: There is no relation between users' tasks. During scheduling, there may be a dependency on a single user's task. It has massive data. Tasks are in a final stable state. After the tasks are stable, their records stay unchanged.

  12. Database design for Daily, Weekly, Monthly and adhoc tasks

    All I am struggling to come up with an efficient database design to hold information about schedules of tasks to be performed. Note: these are not CRON tasks but I will produce automated reminders ...

  13. Creating the database for schedulers

    Complete the following steps to create scheduler databases. Procedure Create a database. To create the database for a scheduler or to determine if an existing database is adequate for a scheduler, review the Create scheduler databases topic. Create the scheduler tables. There are three methods for creating the tables for a scheduler:

  14. PDF Database Design for Scheduling System using Normalization and SQL

    scheduler tasks are the first level of the system flow. Scheduler tasks query the database for listing of the shift requests that are made by workers and it will make a schedule according to the requests and according to staffing policies. For exam-ple, scheduling one Head Nurse and Two Licensed Practical Nurses in each shift.

  15. Is this an alright way to design a DB schema for a task scheduling

    IntervalSchedule: eg. Run everyday, or every 3 days, or every 4 hours, etc. Monthly/Yearly-Schedule: Set of days to run every month/year MonthlyRelativeSchedule: I stole this from the sysschedules thing. Holds a set of days that conform to things like every second (Frequency) Saturday (DayType), or the last weekday of the month, etc.

  16. Distributed Task Scheduler. Introduction

    Fig 1.0: Task scheduler. The process of deciding and assigning resources to the tasks in a timely manner is called task scheduling.. Example is when we post a comment on Facebook.

  17. System Design: Designing a distributed Job Scheduler

    System Design: Designing a distributed Job Scheduler | Many interesting concepts to learn - LeetCode Discuss Level up your coding skills and quickly land a job. This is the best place to expand your knowledge and get prepared for your next interview.

  18. database design

    What data structure or database design would be the best for this? I was thinking about storing strings (max of 31 characters -> 1 char , 1 day) similar to -> "MMAANNOOOAAMMNNAAOO..." for each user; Month table would contain such strings for each employee. What would you suggest? database-design data-structures scheduling Share

  19. scheduled tasks

    scheduled tasks - Designing a database with complex dependencies? (Related to scheduling) - Stack Overflow Designing a database with complex dependencies? (Related to scheduling) Asked 5 years, 7 months ago Modified 5 years, 6 months ago Viewed 407 times 2

  20. c#

    How to schedule a database task? Ask Question Asked 12 years, 7 months ago Modified 12 years, 3 months ago Viewed 3k times 2 Background: I created an application that measures a weight from a scale and saves the information in MS SQL server database.